Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the curing reaction of five experimental adhesive blends containing different photo-initiating systems. The hypothesis tested was that degree of conversion (DC) of resin blends is affected by resin type, solvent content and photo-initiating sy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental materials 2010-04, Vol.26 (4), p.288-294
Hauptverfasser: Cadenaro, Milena, Antoniolli, Francesca, Codan, Barbara, Agee, Kelli, Tay, Franklin R, Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano, Pashley, David H, Breschi, Lorenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 294
container_issue 4
container_start_page 288
container_title Dental materials
container_volume 26
creator Cadenaro, Milena
Antoniolli, Francesca
Codan, Barbara
Agee, Kelli
Tay, Franklin R
Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano
Pashley, David H
Breschi, Lorenzo
description Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the curing reaction of five experimental adhesive blends containing different photo-initiating systems. The hypothesis tested was that degree of conversion (DC) of resin blends is affected by resin type, solvent content and photo-initiating system. Methods The experimental methacrylate resin blends were ranked from hydrophobic (R2) to hydrophilic (R3 and R4) and tested as neat, or solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol, or 10% ethanol and 10% water. Three different photo-initiators were used: IS-1 = 0.25% CQ (camphorquinone) + 1% EDMAB (ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate); IS-2 = 1.25% TPO (diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide); IS-3 = 0.25% CQ + 0.50% EDMAB + 0.50% TPO. DC of resin blends was measured with a differential scanning calorimeter. Data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA. Results Neat resin type influenced DC, as R4 showed the highest values compared to R2 and R3 ( p < 0.05). Solvent had a significant effect on DC ( p < 0.05): dilution of resin blends with 10% or 20% ethanol or 10% ethanol + 10% water increased the DC of all resins, except for R4. Initiators influenced the polymerization since neat resins and mixtures solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol showed their highest DC values when polymerized with IS-1 or IS-3 ( p > 0.05), while IS-2 or IS-3 increased the DC values of resins diluted with 10% ethanol and 10% water ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Water-compatible photo-initiators such as TPO should be included in the hydrophilic solvated adhesive formulation to ensure an appropriate DC of the adhesive layer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3817491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0109564109004230</els_id><sourcerecordid>733679293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93fd31e48c0268f38baa36bd0fd08a0abd3ca1467cf95d67afedcb4fd24b247e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEotvCGyDkG6cEO87G8QUJVUArVeIAnC3HHjdevPZiOxH7ILwvTreUPxdOlj0z3zfj31TVC4Ibgkn_etdo8Fm6psWYN4Q0mA2Pqg0ZGK_LC3tcbTDBvN72HTmrzlPaYYy7lpOn1VkpIQPt6ab6ce2Nm8ErQMEgbY2BWGSR9TZbmUNMKHiUJ0AabiPcZangF4jJlkC5wfcDRLu_6wVJPUGyC6DRgdepyKAITuY1N4dVx0Y0HXUMh8k6q2w-Iuk1SsEtq22RzuV8Vj0x0iV4fn9eVF_ev_t8eVXffPxwffn2plZbwnLNqdGUQDco3PaDocMoJe1HjY3Gg8Ry1FRJ0vVMGb7VPZMGtBo7o9tubDsG9KJ6c9I9zOO-xIp1lE4cyjwyHkWQVvwd8XYSt2ERdCCs46QIvLoXiOHbDCmLvU0KnJMewpwEo7RnvOW0ZHanTBVDShHMgwvBYgUqduIEVKxABSGiAC1lL__s8KHoF8HfI0D5p8VCFEnZlae2EVQWOtj_OfwroFyhr6T7CkdIuzBHXxgIIlIrsPi0LtW6U5iv60Qx_QnvRM8R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733679293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cadenaro, Milena ; Antoniolli, Francesca ; Codan, Barbara ; Agee, Kelli ; Tay, Franklin R ; Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano ; Pashley, David H ; Breschi, Lorenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadenaro, Milena ; Antoniolli, Francesca ; Codan, Barbara ; Agee, Kelli ; Tay, Franklin R ; Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano ; Pashley, David H ; Breschi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the curing reaction of five experimental adhesive blends containing different photo-initiating systems. The hypothesis tested was that degree of conversion (DC) of resin blends is affected by resin type, solvent content and photo-initiating system. Methods The experimental methacrylate resin blends were ranked from hydrophobic (R2) to hydrophilic (R3 and R4) and tested as neat, or solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol, or 10% ethanol and 10% water. Three different photo-initiators were used: IS-1 = 0.25% CQ (camphorquinone) + 1% EDMAB (ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate); IS-2 = 1.25% TPO (diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide); IS-3 = 0.25% CQ + 0.50% EDMAB + 0.50% TPO. DC of resin blends was measured with a differential scanning calorimeter. Data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA. Results Neat resin type influenced DC, as R4 showed the highest values compared to R2 and R3 ( p &lt; 0.05). Solvent had a significant effect on DC ( p &lt; 0.05): dilution of resin blends with 10% or 20% ethanol or 10% ethanol + 10% water increased the DC of all resins, except for R4. Initiators influenced the polymerization since neat resins and mixtures solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol showed their highest DC values when polymerized with IS-1 or IS-3 ( p &gt; 0.05), while IS-2 or IS-3 increased the DC values of resins diluted with 10% ethanol and 10% water ( p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions Water-compatible photo-initiators such as TPO should be included in the hydrophilic solvated adhesive formulation to ensure an appropriate DC of the adhesive layer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20018363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Basic Science ; Analysis of Variance ; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning ; Degree of conversion ; Dentin-bonding agents ; Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry ; Dentin-Bonding Agents - radiation effects ; Dentistry ; Ethanol ; Hardness ; Hydrophilicity ; Initiators ; Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives ; Materials Testing ; Phase Transition ; Phosphines ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Resin Cements - radiation effects ; Solvent ; Solvents ; Terpenes ; Water ; Wettability</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2010-04, Vol.26 (4), p.288-294</ispartof><rights>Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>2009 Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93fd31e48c0268f38baa36bd0fd08a0abd3ca1467cf95d67afedcb4fd24b247e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93fd31e48c0268f38baa36bd0fd08a0abd3ca1467cf95d67afedcb4fd24b247e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadenaro, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoniolli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codan, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agee, Kelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Franklin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pashley, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breschi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the curing reaction of five experimental adhesive blends containing different photo-initiating systems. The hypothesis tested was that degree of conversion (DC) of resin blends is affected by resin type, solvent content and photo-initiating system. Methods The experimental methacrylate resin blends were ranked from hydrophobic (R2) to hydrophilic (R3 and R4) and tested as neat, or solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol, or 10% ethanol and 10% water. Three different photo-initiators were used: IS-1 = 0.25% CQ (camphorquinone) + 1% EDMAB (ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate); IS-2 = 1.25% TPO (diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide); IS-3 = 0.25% CQ + 0.50% EDMAB + 0.50% TPO. DC of resin blends was measured with a differential scanning calorimeter. Data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA. Results Neat resin type influenced DC, as R4 showed the highest values compared to R2 and R3 ( p &lt; 0.05). Solvent had a significant effect on DC ( p &lt; 0.05): dilution of resin blends with 10% or 20% ethanol or 10% ethanol + 10% water increased the DC of all resins, except for R4. Initiators influenced the polymerization since neat resins and mixtures solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol showed their highest DC values when polymerized with IS-1 or IS-3 ( p &gt; 0.05), while IS-2 or IS-3 increased the DC values of resins diluted with 10% ethanol and 10% water ( p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions Water-compatible photo-initiators such as TPO should be included in the hydrophilic solvated adhesive formulation to ensure an appropriate DC of the adhesive layer.</description><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Calorimetry, Differential Scanning</subject><subject>Degree of conversion</subject><subject>Dentin-bonding agents</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Hydrophilicity</subject><subject>Initiators</subject><subject>Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Phase Transition</subject><subject>Phosphines</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Resin Cements - radiation effects</subject><subject>Solvent</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Wettability</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEotvCGyDkG6cEO87G8QUJVUArVeIAnC3HHjdevPZiOxH7ILwvTreUPxdOlj0z3zfj31TVC4Ibgkn_etdo8Fm6psWYN4Q0mA2Pqg0ZGK_LC3tcbTDBvN72HTmrzlPaYYy7lpOn1VkpIQPt6ab6ce2Nm8ErQMEgbY2BWGSR9TZbmUNMKHiUJ0AabiPcZangF4jJlkC5wfcDRLu_6wVJPUGyC6DRgdepyKAITuY1N4dVx0Y0HXUMh8k6q2w-Iuk1SsEtq22RzuV8Vj0x0iV4fn9eVF_ev_t8eVXffPxwffn2plZbwnLNqdGUQDco3PaDocMoJe1HjY3Gg8Ry1FRJ0vVMGb7VPZMGtBo7o9tubDsG9KJ6c9I9zOO-xIp1lE4cyjwyHkWQVvwd8XYSt2ERdCCs46QIvLoXiOHbDCmLvU0KnJMewpwEo7RnvOW0ZHanTBVDShHMgwvBYgUqduIEVKxABSGiAC1lL__s8KHoF8HfI0D5p8VCFEnZlae2EVQWOtj_OfwroFyhr6T7CkdIuzBHXxgIIlIrsPi0LtW6U5iv60Qx_QnvRM8R</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Cadenaro, Milena</creator><creator>Antoniolli, Francesca</creator><creator>Codan, Barbara</creator><creator>Agee, Kelli</creator><creator>Tay, Franklin R</creator><creator>Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano</creator><creator>Pashley, David H</creator><creator>Breschi, Lorenzo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content</title><author>Cadenaro, Milena ; Antoniolli, Francesca ; Codan, Barbara ; Agee, Kelli ; Tay, Franklin R ; Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano ; Pashley, David H ; Breschi, Lorenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93fd31e48c0268f38baa36bd0fd08a0abd3ca1467cf95d67afedcb4fd24b247e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Calorimetry, Differential Scanning</topic><topic>Degree of conversion</topic><topic>Dentin-bonding agents</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Hydrophilicity</topic><topic>Initiators</topic><topic>Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Phase Transition</topic><topic>Phosphines</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Resin Cements - radiation effects</topic><topic>Solvent</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Wettability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadenaro, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoniolli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codan, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agee, Kelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Franklin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pashley, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breschi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadenaro, Milena</au><au>Antoniolli, Francesca</au><au>Codan, Barbara</au><au>Agee, Kelli</au><au>Tay, Franklin R</au><au>Dorigo, Elettra De Stefano</au><au>Pashley, David H</au><au>Breschi, Lorenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>288-294</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the curing reaction of five experimental adhesive blends containing different photo-initiating systems. The hypothesis tested was that degree of conversion (DC) of resin blends is affected by resin type, solvent content and photo-initiating system. Methods The experimental methacrylate resin blends were ranked from hydrophobic (R2) to hydrophilic (R3 and R4) and tested as neat, or solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol, or 10% ethanol and 10% water. Three different photo-initiators were used: IS-1 = 0.25% CQ (camphorquinone) + 1% EDMAB (ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate); IS-2 = 1.25% TPO (diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide); IS-3 = 0.25% CQ + 0.50% EDMAB + 0.50% TPO. DC of resin blends was measured with a differential scanning calorimeter. Data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA. Results Neat resin type influenced DC, as R4 showed the highest values compared to R2 and R3 ( p &lt; 0.05). Solvent had a significant effect on DC ( p &lt; 0.05): dilution of resin blends with 10% or 20% ethanol or 10% ethanol + 10% water increased the DC of all resins, except for R4. Initiators influenced the polymerization since neat resins and mixtures solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol showed their highest DC values when polymerized with IS-1 or IS-3 ( p &gt; 0.05), while IS-2 or IS-3 increased the DC values of resins diluted with 10% ethanol and 10% water ( p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions Water-compatible photo-initiators such as TPO should be included in the hydrophilic solvated adhesive formulation to ensure an appropriate DC of the adhesive layer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20018363</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0109-5641
ispartof Dental materials, 2010-04, Vol.26 (4), p.288-294
issn 0109-5641
1879-0097
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3817491
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Advanced Basic Science
Analysis of Variance
Calorimetry, Differential Scanning
Degree of conversion
Dentin-bonding agents
Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry
Dentin-Bonding Agents - radiation effects
Dentistry
Ethanol
Hardness
Hydrophilicity
Initiators
Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives
Materials Testing
Phase Transition
Phosphines
Resin Cements - chemistry
Resin Cements - radiation effects
Solvent
Solvents
Terpenes
Water
Wettability
title Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20different%20initiators%20on%20the%20degree%20of%20conversion%20of%20experimental%20adhesive%20blends%20in%20relation%20to%20their%20hydrophilicity%20and%20solvent%20content&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Cadenaro,%20Milena&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=288-294&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733679293%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733679293&rft_id=info:pmid/20018363&rft_els_id=S0109564109004230&rfr_iscdi=true