Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2013-11, Vol.111 (5), p.711-720
Hauptverfasser: Andreae, M.H., Andreae, D.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 720
container_issue 5
container_start_page 711
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 111
creator Andreae, M.H.
Andreae, D.A.
description Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions. We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely. Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aet213
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3793661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091217320147</els_id><sourcerecordid>1443404184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdFqFDEUhoModlu98QEklyKMzUkymRkvBFm0CgWh1OtwJnNmN8vMZE2ylX17I1uLhV7l4nz5kvP_jL0B8QFEpy77HV4iZQnqGVuBbqAyTQPP2UoI0VSiA3nGzlPaCQGN7OqX7EyqFkBLs2K7G9r4sODEcUFKeUvJI8-B7yPd0ZK528aweMf36BeOY6bI0yFuKB4_cuTrUOa4EE_HlGnGXMhy0dPv4hv4TBmrIp6OyadX7MWIU6LX9-cF-_n1y-36W3X94-r7-vN15bRUueqGttake1m3epS9lqMZanCEoiVom1GP3ShUJ6VQNZmmNsrgIFqse-1MD0pdsE8n7_7QzzS4skXEye6jnzEebUBvH08Wv7WbcGdV0yljoAje3Qti-HUoodjZJ0fTVBYNh2RBa6WFhlYX9P0JdTGkFGl8eAaE_VuOLeXYUzkFfvv_xx7Qf20UQJ8AKvGUEKNNztPiaPCRXLZD8E95_wAK2qAP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443404184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Andreae, M.H. ; Andreae, D.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andreae, M.H. ; Andreae, D.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions. We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely. Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet213</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23811426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia, Conduction - methods ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; chronic pain ; Chronic Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; meta-analysis ; Nerve Block ; Odds Ratio ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; prevention ; Publication Bias ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; regional anaesthesia ; Review ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; systematic review ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2013-11, Vol.111 (5), p.711-720</ispartof><rights>2013 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23811426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andreae, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreae, D.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions. We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely. Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.</description><subject>Anesthesia, Conduction - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural</subject><subject>chronic pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>Publication Bias</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>regional anaesthesia</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdFqFDEUhoModlu98QEklyKMzUkymRkvBFm0CgWh1OtwJnNmN8vMZE2ylX17I1uLhV7l4nz5kvP_jL0B8QFEpy77HV4iZQnqGVuBbqAyTQPP2UoI0VSiA3nGzlPaCQGN7OqX7EyqFkBLs2K7G9r4sODEcUFKeUvJI8-B7yPd0ZK528aweMf36BeOY6bI0yFuKB4_cuTrUOa4EE_HlGnGXMhy0dPv4hv4TBmrIp6OyadX7MWIU6LX9-cF-_n1y-36W3X94-r7-vN15bRUueqGttake1m3epS9lqMZanCEoiVom1GP3ShUJ6VQNZmmNsrgIFqse-1MD0pdsE8n7_7QzzS4skXEye6jnzEebUBvH08Wv7WbcGdV0yljoAje3Qti-HUoodjZJ0fTVBYNh2RBa6WFhlYX9P0JdTGkFGl8eAaE_VuOLeXYUzkFfvv_xx7Qf20UQJ8AKvGUEKNNztPiaPCRXLZD8E95_wAK2qAP</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Andreae, M.H.</creator><creator>Andreae, D.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Andreae, M.H. ; Andreae, D.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia, Conduction - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural</topic><topic>chronic pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>Publication Bias</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>regional anaesthesia</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andreae, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreae, D.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andreae, M.H.</au><au>Andreae, D.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>711-720</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions. We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely. Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23811426</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aet213</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2013-11, Vol.111 (5), p.711-720
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3793661
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anesthesia, Conduction - methods
Anesthesia, Epidural
chronic pain
Chronic Pain - prevention & control
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
meta-analysis
Nerve Block
Odds Ratio
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
prevention
Publication Bias
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
regional anaesthesia
Review
Surgical Procedures, Operative
systematic review
Treatment Outcome
title Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20anaesthesia%20to%20prevent%20chronic%20pain%20after%20surgery:%20a%20Cochrane%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Andreae,%20M.H.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=711-720&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aet213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1443404184%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443404184&rft_id=info:pmid/23811426&rft_els_id=S0007091217320147&rfr_iscdi=true