Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2013-11, Vol.111 (5), p.711-720 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 720 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 711 |
container_title | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Andreae, M.H. Andreae, D.A. |
description | Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions.
We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely.
Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bja/aet213 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3793661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091217320147</els_id><sourcerecordid>1443404184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdFqFDEUhoModlu98QEklyKMzUkymRkvBFm0CgWh1OtwJnNmN8vMZE2ylX17I1uLhV7l4nz5kvP_jL0B8QFEpy77HV4iZQnqGVuBbqAyTQPP2UoI0VSiA3nGzlPaCQGN7OqX7EyqFkBLs2K7G9r4sODEcUFKeUvJI8-B7yPd0ZK528aweMf36BeOY6bI0yFuKB4_cuTrUOa4EE_HlGnGXMhy0dPv4hv4TBmrIp6OyadX7MWIU6LX9-cF-_n1y-36W3X94-r7-vN15bRUueqGttake1m3epS9lqMZanCEoiVom1GP3ShUJ6VQNZmmNsrgIFqse-1MD0pdsE8n7_7QzzS4skXEye6jnzEebUBvH08Wv7WbcGdV0yljoAje3Qti-HUoodjZJ0fTVBYNh2RBa6WFhlYX9P0JdTGkFGl8eAaE_VuOLeXYUzkFfvv_xx7Qf20UQJ8AKvGUEKNNztPiaPCRXLZD8E95_wAK2qAP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443404184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Andreae, M.H. ; Andreae, D.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andreae, M.H. ; Andreae, D.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions.
We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely.
Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet213</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23811426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia, Conduction - methods ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; chronic pain ; Chronic Pain - prevention & control ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; meta-analysis ; Nerve Block ; Odds Ratio ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; prevention ; Publication Bias ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; regional anaesthesia ; Review ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; systematic review ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2013-11, Vol.111 (5), p.711-720</ispartof><rights>2013 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23811426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andreae, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreae, D.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions.
We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely.
Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.</description><subject>Anesthesia, Conduction - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural</subject><subject>chronic pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>Publication Bias</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>regional anaesthesia</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdFqFDEUhoModlu98QEklyKMzUkymRkvBFm0CgWh1OtwJnNmN8vMZE2ylX17I1uLhV7l4nz5kvP_jL0B8QFEpy77HV4iZQnqGVuBbqAyTQPP2UoI0VSiA3nGzlPaCQGN7OqX7EyqFkBLs2K7G9r4sODEcUFKeUvJI8-B7yPd0ZK528aweMf36BeOY6bI0yFuKB4_cuTrUOa4EE_HlGnGXMhy0dPv4hv4TBmrIp6OyadX7MWIU6LX9-cF-_n1y-36W3X94-r7-vN15bRUueqGttake1m3epS9lqMZanCEoiVom1GP3ShUJ6VQNZmmNsrgIFqse-1MD0pdsE8n7_7QzzS4skXEye6jnzEebUBvH08Wv7WbcGdV0yljoAje3Qti-HUoodjZJ0fTVBYNh2RBa6WFhlYX9P0JdTGkFGl8eAaE_VuOLeXYUzkFfvv_xx7Qf20UQJ8AKvGUEKNNztPiaPCRXLZD8E95_wAK2qAP</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Andreae, M.H.</creator><creator>Andreae, D.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Andreae, M.H. ; Andreae, D.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9d854e4b2584f2b42f6d51cea08e187f4f9f03922035e675636ad08a5b4c6b133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia, Conduction - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural</topic><topic>chronic pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>Publication Bias</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>regional anaesthesia</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andreae, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreae, D.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andreae, M.H.</au><au>Andreae, D.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>711-720</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>Regional anaesthesia may reduce the risk of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition. We compared regional anaesthesia vs conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain (PPP).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception to May 2012, limiting the results to randomized, controlled, clinical trials (RCTs), supplemented by a hand search in conference proceedings. We included RCTs comparing regional vs conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at 6 or 12 months. The two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as our summary statistic based on random-effects models. We grouped studies according to surgical interventions.
We identified 23 RCTs. We pooled data from 250 participants in three trials after thoracotomy with outcomes at 6 months. Data favoured epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of PPP with an OR of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20–0.56). We pooled two studies investigating paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery; pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes ∼6 months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.14–0.94). Adverse effects were reported sparsely.
Epidural anaesthesia and paravertebral block, respectively, may prevent PPP after thoracotomy and breast cancer surgery in about one out of every four to five patients treated. Small numbers, performance bias, attrition, and incomplete outcome data especially at 12 months weaken our conclusions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23811426</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aet213</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0912 |
ispartof | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2013-11, Vol.111 (5), p.711-720 |
issn | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3793661 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anesthesia, Conduction - methods Anesthesia, Epidural chronic pain Chronic Pain - prevention & control Data Interpretation, Statistical Follow-Up Studies Humans meta-analysis Nerve Block Odds Ratio Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control prevention Publication Bias Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic regional anaesthesia Review Surgical Procedures, Operative systematic review Treatment Outcome |
title | Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20anaesthesia%20to%20prevent%20chronic%20pain%20after%20surgery:%20a%20Cochrane%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Andreae,%20M.H.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=711-720&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aet213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1443404184%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443404184&rft_id=info:pmid/23811426&rft_els_id=S0007091217320147&rfr_iscdi=true |