Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Bone of Different Densities Using Different Implant Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

A key factor for the success or failure of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. This depends on the type of loading, bone–implant interface, the shape and characteristics of the implant surface and the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2013-12, Vol.13 (4), p.555-559
Hauptverfasser: Premnath, K., Sridevi, J., Kalavathy, N., Nagaranjani, Prakash, Sharmila, M. Ranganath
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 559
container_issue 4
container_start_page 555
container_title The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
container_volume 13
creator Premnath, K.
Sridevi, J.
Kalavathy, N.
Nagaranjani, Prakash
Sharmila, M. Ranganath
description A key factor for the success or failure of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. This depends on the type of loading, bone–implant interface, the shape and characteristics of the implant surface and the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. This study was done to evaluate the pattern of stress distribution with two different implant designs in four different densities of bone using 3D finite element analysis. Graphic pre-processing software Ansys version 10 was used for creating the geometric configuration of a section of the mandible with a missing first molar. Eight 3D models of this section restored with implant-supported all ceramic crowns were created. Four of these models were created to simulate a single threaded implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4). The other four models were created to simulate a single cylindrical implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3, and D4). The Poisson’s ratio (μ) and Young’s modulus ( E ) of elasticity of the material were incorporated into the model. An average vertical load of 400 N was applied on the occlusal surface of the first molar between the buccal cusp, central fossa and the marginal ridge. Maximum Von Mises stresses in all the eight models were observed at the crestal region or neck of the implant. The stresses observed were more for the threaded implants in all the four densities of bone when compared to that of the cylindrical implants. The study concluded that the cylindrical implant design was more favorable in softer bone than the threaded implant design.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13191-012-0189-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3792329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3092243681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-44bf5f997be7ad6ea2cbb655660cca2c16b0b128535bd85568a17db6becbf4e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQthCILoUH4IIsceGSYid2HHNA2na3pVIlDrRny85Otq4Se_EklfoQvDNOt1QLEgfL9nw_nvFHyHvOTjhj6jPyimteMF7m1ehCvSALrnVTCCbVS7JgWpXzuTwibxDvGJMNa8RrclQKUXGlywX5tb63_WRHHwONHf0xJkCkK49j8m56LPtAT2OAGV75roMEYaQrCOhHD0hv0IftAXI57Hr7yEC_DfiFLun1bQIoVn6YRTHYnp774Eeg6x6GWbPMtQf0-Ja86myP8O5pPyY35-vrs2_F1feLy7PlVdFWjVSFEK6TndbKgbKbGmzZOldLWdesbfOF1445Xjaykm7T5Hpjudq42kHrOgFNdUy-7n13kxtg0-Yeku3NLvnBpgcTrTd_I8Hfmm28N1X-tKrU2eDTk0GKPyfA0QweW-jz5BAnNFxoprjkdZ2pH_-h3sUp5YFnlmA5uIrPLL5ntSkiJuiem-HMzGGbfdgmh23msI3Kmg-HUzwr_qSbCeWegBkKW0gHT__X9Tf-1LeY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1440018316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Bone of Different Densities Using Different Implant Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Premnath, K. ; Sridevi, J. ; Kalavathy, N. ; Nagaranjani, Prakash ; Sharmila, M. Ranganath</creator><creatorcontrib>Premnath, K. ; Sridevi, J. ; Kalavathy, N. ; Nagaranjani, Prakash ; Sharmila, M. Ranganath</creatorcontrib><description>A key factor for the success or failure of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. This depends on the type of loading, bone–implant interface, the shape and characteristics of the implant surface and the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. This study was done to evaluate the pattern of stress distribution with two different implant designs in four different densities of bone using 3D finite element analysis. Graphic pre-processing software Ansys version 10 was used for creating the geometric configuration of a section of the mandible with a missing first molar. Eight 3D models of this section restored with implant-supported all ceramic crowns were created. Four of these models were created to simulate a single threaded implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4). The other four models were created to simulate a single cylindrical implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3, and D4). The Poisson’s ratio (μ) and Young’s modulus ( E ) of elasticity of the material were incorporated into the model. An average vertical load of 400 N was applied on the occlusal surface of the first molar between the buccal cusp, central fossa and the marginal ridge. Maximum Von Mises stresses in all the eight models were observed at the crestal region or neck of the implant. The stresses observed were more for the threaded implants in all the four densities of bone when compared to that of the cylindrical implants. The study concluded that the cylindrical implant design was more favorable in softer bone than the threaded implant design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-4052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0189-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24431792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer India</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Finite element analysis ; Medicine ; Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2013-12, Vol.13 (4), p.555-559</ispartof><rights>Indian Prosthodontic Society 2012</rights><rights>Indian Prosthodontic Society 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-44bf5f997be7ad6ea2cbb655660cca2c16b0b128535bd85568a17db6becbf4e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-44bf5f997be7ad6ea2cbb655660cca2c16b0b128535bd85568a17db6becbf4e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792329/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792329/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431792$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Premnath, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridevi, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalavathy, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagaranjani, Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharmila, M. Ranganath</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Bone of Different Densities Using Different Implant Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis</title><title>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><description>A key factor for the success or failure of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. This depends on the type of loading, bone–implant interface, the shape and characteristics of the implant surface and the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. This study was done to evaluate the pattern of stress distribution with two different implant designs in four different densities of bone using 3D finite element analysis. Graphic pre-processing software Ansys version 10 was used for creating the geometric configuration of a section of the mandible with a missing first molar. Eight 3D models of this section restored with implant-supported all ceramic crowns were created. Four of these models were created to simulate a single threaded implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4). The other four models were created to simulate a single cylindrical implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3, and D4). The Poisson’s ratio (μ) and Young’s modulus ( E ) of elasticity of the material were incorporated into the model. An average vertical load of 400 N was applied on the occlusal surface of the first molar between the buccal cusp, central fossa and the marginal ridge. Maximum Von Mises stresses in all the eight models were observed at the crestal region or neck of the implant. The stresses observed were more for the threaded implants in all the four densities of bone when compared to that of the cylindrical implants. The study concluded that the cylindrical implant design was more favorable in softer bone than the threaded implant design.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>0972-4052</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQthCILoUH4IIsceGSYid2HHNA2na3pVIlDrRny85Otq4Se_EklfoQvDNOt1QLEgfL9nw_nvFHyHvOTjhj6jPyimteMF7m1ehCvSALrnVTCCbVS7JgWpXzuTwibxDvGJMNa8RrclQKUXGlywX5tb63_WRHHwONHf0xJkCkK49j8m56LPtAT2OAGV75roMEYaQrCOhHD0hv0IftAXI57Hr7yEC_DfiFLun1bQIoVn6YRTHYnp774Eeg6x6GWbPMtQf0-Ja86myP8O5pPyY35-vrs2_F1feLy7PlVdFWjVSFEK6TndbKgbKbGmzZOldLWdesbfOF1445Xjaykm7T5Hpjudq42kHrOgFNdUy-7n13kxtg0-Yeku3NLvnBpgcTrTd_I8Hfmm28N1X-tKrU2eDTk0GKPyfA0QweW-jz5BAnNFxoprjkdZ2pH_-h3sUp5YFnlmA5uIrPLL5ntSkiJuiem-HMzGGbfdgmh23msI3Kmg-HUzwr_qSbCeWegBkKW0gHT__X9Tf-1LeY</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Premnath, K.</creator><creator>Sridevi, J.</creator><creator>Kalavathy, N.</creator><creator>Nagaranjani, Prakash</creator><creator>Sharmila, M. Ranganath</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Bone of Different Densities Using Different Implant Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis</title><author>Premnath, K. ; Sridevi, J. ; Kalavathy, N. ; Nagaranjani, Prakash ; Sharmila, M. Ranganath</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-44bf5f997be7ad6ea2cbb655660cca2c16b0b128535bd85568a17db6becbf4e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Premnath, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridevi, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalavathy, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagaranjani, Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharmila, M. Ranganath</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Premnath, K.</au><au>Sridevi, J.</au><au>Kalavathy, N.</au><au>Nagaranjani, Prakash</au><au>Sharmila, M. Ranganath</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Bone of Different Densities Using Different Implant Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle><stitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</stitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>555-559</pages><issn>0972-4052</issn><eissn>1998-4057</eissn><abstract>A key factor for the success or failure of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. This depends on the type of loading, bone–implant interface, the shape and characteristics of the implant surface and the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. This study was done to evaluate the pattern of stress distribution with two different implant designs in four different densities of bone using 3D finite element analysis. Graphic pre-processing software Ansys version 10 was used for creating the geometric configuration of a section of the mandible with a missing first molar. Eight 3D models of this section restored with implant-supported all ceramic crowns were created. Four of these models were created to simulate a single threaded implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4). The other four models were created to simulate a single cylindrical implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3, and D4). The Poisson’s ratio (μ) and Young’s modulus ( E ) of elasticity of the material were incorporated into the model. An average vertical load of 400 N was applied on the occlusal surface of the first molar between the buccal cusp, central fossa and the marginal ridge. Maximum Von Mises stresses in all the eight models were observed at the crestal region or neck of the implant. The stresses observed were more for the threaded implants in all the four densities of bone when compared to that of the cylindrical implants. The study concluded that the cylindrical implant design was more favorable in softer bone than the threaded implant design.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>24431792</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13191-012-0189-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-4052
ispartof The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2013-12, Vol.13 (4), p.555-559
issn 0972-4052
1998-4057
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3792329
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Dentistry
Finite element analysis
Medicine
Original
Original Article
title Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Bone of Different Densities Using Different Implant Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Stress%20Distribution%20in%20Bone%20of%20Different%20Densities%20Using%20Different%20Implant%20Designs:%20A%20Three-Dimensional%20Finite%20Element%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20Indian%20Prosthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Premnath,%20K.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=555-559&rft.issn=0972-4052&rft.eissn=1998-4057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13191-012-0189-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3092243681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1440018316&rft_id=info:pmid/24431792&rfr_iscdi=true