Right, But Not Left, Bundle Branch Block Is Associated With Large Anteroseptal Scar

Objectives This study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger scar size than left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients do. Background A proximal septal perforating branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013-09, Vol.62 (11), p.959-967
Hauptverfasser: Strauss, David G., MD, PhD, Loring, Zak, MD, Selvester, Ronald H., MD, Gerstenblith, Gary, MD, Tomaselli, Gordon, MD, Weiss, Robert G., MD, Wagner, Galen S., MD, Wu, Katherine C., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 967
container_issue 11
container_start_page 959
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 62
creator Strauss, David G., MD, PhD
Loring, Zak, MD
Selvester, Ronald H., MD
Gerstenblith, Gary, MD
Tomaselli, Gordon, MD
Weiss, Robert G., MD
Wagner, Galen S., MD
Wu, Katherine C., MD
description Objectives This study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger scar size than left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients do. Background A proximal septal perforating branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not the left posterior fascicle. Thus, proximal LAD occlusions should cause RBBB, not LBBB. Methods We performed electrocardiograms and magnetic resonance imaging for scar quantification in 233 patients with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35% who were receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD cohort). Scar size and location were compared among patients with RBBB, LBBB, nonspecific LV conduction delay, and QRS 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3785987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0735109713019852</els_id><sourcerecordid>1430847223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-ef46136d167971fcb15e18395d14da9f0c713db46752462c4c06316f1c4596743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt9rE0EQxw9RbFr9B3yQBRF88M6d2193IIWk-KMQFIzi47LZm0s2vdzF3U2h_333TGy1Dz4tw3xmdub7nSx7AbQACvLdptgYa4uSAisoL6ikj7IJCFHlTNTqcTahiokcaK1OstMQNpRSWUH9NDspmUo5YJNs8c2t1vEtme0j-TJEMsf2d9Q3HZKZN71dk1k32CtyGcg0hME6E7EhP11ck7nxKyTTPqIfAu6i6cjCGv8se9KaLuDz43uW_fj44fvF53z-9dPlxXSeWyGrmGPLJTDZgFS1gtYuQSBUrBYN8MbULbUKWLPkUomSy9JySyUD2YLlopaKs7Ps_NB3t19usbHYR286vfNua_yNHozT_2Z6t9ar4VozVYm6UqnBm2MDP_zaY4h664LFrjM9DvuggTNacVWWLKGvHqCbYe_7tJ4GyQVL2nKaqPJA2SRI8NjeDQNUj57pjR4906NnmnKdPEtFL_9e467kj0kJeH0ETLCma0dXXLjnlCqp4DJx7w8cJtGvHXodrMPeYuM82qibwf1_jvMH5bZzvUs_XuENhvt9dSg11YvxusbjAkahrkTJbgFOdca-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645300040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right, But Not Left, Bundle Branch Block Is Associated With Large Anteroseptal Scar</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD ; Loring, Zak, MD ; Selvester, Ronald H., MD ; Gerstenblith, Gary, MD ; Tomaselli, Gordon, MD ; Weiss, Robert G., MD ; Wagner, Galen S., MD ; Wu, Katherine C., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD ; Loring, Zak, MD ; Selvester, Ronald H., MD ; Gerstenblith, Gary, MD ; Tomaselli, Gordon, MD ; Weiss, Robert G., MD ; Wagner, Galen S., MD ; Wu, Katherine C., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger scar size than left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients do. Background A proximal septal perforating branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not the left posterior fascicle. Thus, proximal LAD occlusions should cause RBBB, not LBBB. Methods We performed electrocardiograms and magnetic resonance imaging for scar quantification in 233 patients with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35% who were receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD cohort). Scar size and location were compared among patients with RBBB, LBBB, nonspecific LV conduction delay, and QRS &lt;120 ms. A second cohort of 20 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation was studied to determine whether controlled infarction in a proximal LAD septal perforator caused RBBB or LBBB. Results In the ICD cohort, LV ejection fraction was similar between RBBB and LBBB patients (24.9% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.98); however, RBBB patients had significantly larger scar size (24.0% vs. 6.5%; p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with nonspecific LV conduction delay or QRS &lt;120 ms had intermediate scar size (12.9% and 14.4%, respectively). Those with RBBB (compared with LBBB) were more likely to have ischemic heart disease (79% vs. 29%; p &lt; 0.0001). In the alcohol septal ablation cohort, 15 of 20 patients (75%) developed RBBB, but no patients developed LBBB. Conclusions In patients with LV ejection fraction ≤35%, RBBB is associated with significantly larger scar size than LBBB is, and occlusion of a proximal LAD septal perforator causes RBBB. In contrast, LBBB is most commonly caused by nonischemic pathologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23707313</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACCDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation Techniques ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bundle-Branch Block - etiology ; Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiomyopathies - complications ; Cardiomyopathies - prevention &amp; control ; Cardiomyopathy ; Cardiovascular ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Cohort Studies ; Coronary Occlusion - complications ; Coronary Occlusion - prevention &amp; control ; Coronary vessels ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Heart ; Heart attacks ; Heart Septum - pathology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; ischemic heart disease ; left bundle branch block ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; myocardial infarction ; nonischemic cardiomyopathy ; Prospective Studies ; Review boards ; right bundle branch block ; Stroke Volume ; Veins &amp; arteries ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013-09, Vol.62 (11), p.959-967</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 10, 2013</rights><rights>2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-ef46136d167971fcb15e18395d14da9f0c713db46752462c4c06316f1c4596743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-ef46136d167971fcb15e18395d14da9f0c713db46752462c4c06316f1c4596743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109713019852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27720546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23707313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loring, Zak, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvester, Ronald H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenblith, Gary, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaselli, Gordon, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Robert G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Galen S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Katherine C., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Right, But Not Left, Bundle Branch Block Is Associated With Large Anteroseptal Scar</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objectives This study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger scar size than left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients do. Background A proximal septal perforating branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not the left posterior fascicle. Thus, proximal LAD occlusions should cause RBBB, not LBBB. Methods We performed electrocardiograms and magnetic resonance imaging for scar quantification in 233 patients with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35% who were receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD cohort). Scar size and location were compared among patients with RBBB, LBBB, nonspecific LV conduction delay, and QRS &lt;120 ms. A second cohort of 20 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation was studied to determine whether controlled infarction in a proximal LAD septal perforator caused RBBB or LBBB. Results In the ICD cohort, LV ejection fraction was similar between RBBB and LBBB patients (24.9% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.98); however, RBBB patients had significantly larger scar size (24.0% vs. 6.5%; p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with nonspecific LV conduction delay or QRS &lt;120 ms had intermediate scar size (12.9% and 14.4%, respectively). Those with RBBB (compared with LBBB) were more likely to have ischemic heart disease (79% vs. 29%; p &lt; 0.0001). In the alcohol septal ablation cohort, 15 of 20 patients (75%) developed RBBB, but no patients developed LBBB. Conclusions In patients with LV ejection fraction ≤35%, RBBB is associated with significantly larger scar size than LBBB is, and occlusion of a proximal LAD septal perforator causes RBBB. In contrast, LBBB is most commonly caused by nonischemic pathologies.</description><subject>Ablation Techniques</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - etiology</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - complications</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Coronary Occlusion - complications</subject><subject>Coronary Occlusion - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart Septum - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>ischemic heart disease</subject><subject>left bundle branch block</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>myocardial infarction</subject><subject>nonischemic cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>right bundle branch block</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt9rE0EQxw9RbFr9B3yQBRF88M6d2193IIWk-KMQFIzi47LZm0s2vdzF3U2h_333TGy1Dz4tw3xmdub7nSx7AbQACvLdptgYa4uSAisoL6ikj7IJCFHlTNTqcTahiokcaK1OstMQNpRSWUH9NDspmUo5YJNs8c2t1vEtme0j-TJEMsf2d9Q3HZKZN71dk1k32CtyGcg0hME6E7EhP11ck7nxKyTTPqIfAu6i6cjCGv8se9KaLuDz43uW_fj44fvF53z-9dPlxXSeWyGrmGPLJTDZgFS1gtYuQSBUrBYN8MbULbUKWLPkUomSy9JySyUD2YLlopaKs7Ps_NB3t19usbHYR286vfNua_yNHozT_2Z6t9ar4VozVYm6UqnBm2MDP_zaY4h664LFrjM9DvuggTNacVWWLKGvHqCbYe_7tJ4GyQVL2nKaqPJA2SRI8NjeDQNUj57pjR4906NnmnKdPEtFL_9e467kj0kJeH0ETLCma0dXXLjnlCqp4DJx7w8cJtGvHXodrMPeYuM82qibwf1_jvMH5bZzvUs_XuENhvt9dSg11YvxusbjAkahrkTJbgFOdca-</recordid><startdate>20130910</startdate><enddate>20130910</enddate><creator>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Loring, Zak, MD</creator><creator>Selvester, Ronald H., MD</creator><creator>Gerstenblith, Gary, MD</creator><creator>Tomaselli, Gordon, MD</creator><creator>Weiss, Robert G., MD</creator><creator>Wagner, Galen S., MD</creator><creator>Wu, Katherine C., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130910</creationdate><title>Right, But Not Left, Bundle Branch Block Is Associated With Large Anteroseptal Scar</title><author>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD ; Loring, Zak, MD ; Selvester, Ronald H., MD ; Gerstenblith, Gary, MD ; Tomaselli, Gordon, MD ; Weiss, Robert G., MD ; Wagner, Galen S., MD ; Wu, Katherine C., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-ef46136d167971fcb15e18395d14da9f0c713db46752462c4c06316f1c4596743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Ablation Techniques</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - etiology</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - complications</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Coronary Occlusion - complications</topic><topic>Coronary Occlusion - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart Septum - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>ischemic heart disease</topic><topic>left bundle branch block</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>myocardial infarction</topic><topic>nonischemic cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>right bundle branch block</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loring, Zak, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvester, Ronald H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenblith, Gary, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaselli, Gordon, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Robert G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Galen S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Katherine C., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strauss, David G., MD, PhD</au><au>Loring, Zak, MD</au><au>Selvester, Ronald H., MD</au><au>Gerstenblith, Gary, MD</au><au>Tomaselli, Gordon, MD</au><au>Weiss, Robert G., MD</au><au>Wagner, Galen S., MD</au><au>Wu, Katherine C., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right, But Not Left, Bundle Branch Block Is Associated With Large Anteroseptal Scar</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2013-09-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>959-967</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><coden>JACCDI</coden><abstract>Objectives This study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger scar size than left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients do. Background A proximal septal perforating branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not the left posterior fascicle. Thus, proximal LAD occlusions should cause RBBB, not LBBB. Methods We performed electrocardiograms and magnetic resonance imaging for scar quantification in 233 patients with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35% who were receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD cohort). Scar size and location were compared among patients with RBBB, LBBB, nonspecific LV conduction delay, and QRS &lt;120 ms. A second cohort of 20 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation was studied to determine whether controlled infarction in a proximal LAD septal perforator caused RBBB or LBBB. Results In the ICD cohort, LV ejection fraction was similar between RBBB and LBBB patients (24.9% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.98); however, RBBB patients had significantly larger scar size (24.0% vs. 6.5%; p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with nonspecific LV conduction delay or QRS &lt;120 ms had intermediate scar size (12.9% and 14.4%, respectively). Those with RBBB (compared with LBBB) were more likely to have ischemic heart disease (79% vs. 29%; p &lt; 0.0001). In the alcohol septal ablation cohort, 15 of 20 patients (75%) developed RBBB, but no patients developed LBBB. Conclusions In patients with LV ejection fraction ≤35%, RBBB is associated with significantly larger scar size than LBBB is, and occlusion of a proximal LAD septal perforator causes RBBB. In contrast, LBBB is most commonly caused by nonischemic pathologies.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23707313</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.060</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013-09, Vol.62 (11), p.959-967
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3785987
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Ablation Techniques
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bundle-Branch Block - etiology
Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Cardiology
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiomyopathies - complications
Cardiomyopathies - prevention & control
Cardiomyopathy
Cardiovascular
Cicatrix - etiology
Cicatrix - pathology
Cohort Studies
Coronary Occlusion - complications
Coronary Occlusion - prevention & control
Coronary vessels
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electrocardiography
Female
Heart
Heart attacks
Heart Septum - pathology
Humans
Internal Medicine
ischemic heart disease
left bundle branch block
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
myocardial infarction
nonischemic cardiomyopathy
Prospective Studies
Review boards
right bundle branch block
Stroke Volume
Veins & arteries
Ventricular Function, Left
title Right, But Not Left, Bundle Branch Block Is Associated With Large Anteroseptal Scar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right,%20But%20Not%20Left,%20Bundle%20Branch%20Block%20Is%20Associated%20With%20Large%20Anteroseptal%20Scar&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Strauss,%20David%20G.,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-09-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=959-967&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft.coden=JACCDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1430847223%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645300040&rft_id=info:pmid/23707313&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0735109713019852&rfr_iscdi=true