Comparison of Rigid and Semirigid Fixation for Advancement Genioplasty
To compare the skeletal stability of rigid versus semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty by the assessment of vertical and horizontal measurements pre-operatively and post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. The study comprised of patients who underwent standard advancement gen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery 2013-09, Vol.12 (3), p.260-265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 265 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 260 |
container_title | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Shaik, Mahaboob Koteswar Rao, N. Kiran Kumar, N. Prasanthi, G. |
description | To compare the skeletal stability of rigid versus semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty by the assessment of vertical and horizontal measurements pre-operatively and post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. The study comprised of patients who underwent standard advancement genioplasty by inferior osteotomy of the chin with broadest musculoperiosteal pedicle with either rigid fixation or wire fixation. The displacements of vertical and horizontal measurements resulting following surgery was derived by calculating the difference between preoperative, immediate post-operative and 1 year post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Preoperative measurements were marked as T1, immediate post-operative as T2, 1 year follow up post-operative as T3. In the semirigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 5.97 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 1.623 mm during a period of minimum 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.7 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.325 mm during a period of 1 year. In the rigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 4.815 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 0.2 mm during a period of 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.975 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.1 mm during a period of 1 year. This study confirms the findings of several previous studies that contribute data specific towards the use of rigid fixation in advancement genioplasty. In our study we also observed that, in cases where large advancements are necessary, wire fixation may offer insufficient means of fixation particularly if the movement is complex and asymmetrical, in which case rigid fixation devices are more helpful. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12663-012-0430-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3777031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1490718061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-76c312a0d471277a668e9c57914b2d54b44ecd4ec24347473082acd2168ac3583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKtUf4EYG3LgZTW4yk8lGkGKrIAg-wF1IM2lNmUlqMi3235tarQ8wEJJwv3tyDwehI4LPCMb8PBIoS5pjAjlmFOewhfax4CwXDJ63P-6QV8DFHjqMcYrTooQKSnbRHjBGSVXAPhr0fTtTwUbvMj_O7u3E1plydfZgWhs-XgP7pjqb6mMfsst6oZw2rXFdNjTO-lmjYrc8QDtj1URz-Hn20NPg6rF_nd_eDW_6l7e5Zhx3OS81JaBwzTgBzlVZVkboggvCRlAXbMSY0XXawCjjjFNcgdI1kLJSmhYV7aGLte5sPmpNrdMYQTVyFmyrwlJ6ZeXvirMvcuIXknLOV_576PRTIPjXuYmdbG3UpmmUM34eJWECc1LhcoWe_EGnfh5csidBEFFgKgqRKLKmdPAxBjPeDEOwXAUl10HJFJRcBSUh9Rz_dLHp-IolAbAGYiq5iQnfX_-v-g5h85yz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919503959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Rigid and Semirigid Fixation for Advancement Genioplasty</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Shaik, Mahaboob ; Koteswar Rao, N. ; Kiran Kumar, N. ; Prasanthi, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaik, Mahaboob ; Koteswar Rao, N. ; Kiran Kumar, N. ; Prasanthi, G.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the skeletal stability of rigid versus semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty by the assessment of vertical and horizontal measurements pre-operatively and post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. The study comprised of patients who underwent standard advancement genioplasty by inferior osteotomy of the chin with broadest musculoperiosteal pedicle with either rigid fixation or wire fixation. The displacements of vertical and horizontal measurements resulting following surgery was derived by calculating the difference between preoperative, immediate post-operative and 1 year post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Preoperative measurements were marked as T1, immediate post-operative as T2, 1 year follow up post-operative as T3. In the semirigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 5.97 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 1.623 mm during a period of minimum 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.7 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.325 mm during a period of 1 year. In the rigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 4.815 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 0.2 mm during a period of 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.975 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.1 mm during a period of 1 year. This study confirms the findings of several previous studies that contribute data specific towards the use of rigid fixation in advancement genioplasty. In our study we also observed that, in cases where large advancements are necessary, wire fixation may offer insufficient means of fixation particularly if the movement is complex and asymmetrical, in which case rigid fixation devices are more helpful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-8279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-942X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12663-012-0430-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24431852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer India</publisher><subject>Cellulose acetate ; Comparative Study ; Dentistry ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patients ; Plastic Surgery ; Stainless steel ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Wire</subject><ispartof>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2013-09, Vol.12 (3), p.260-265</ispartof><rights>Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2012</rights><rights>Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2012.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-76c312a0d471277a668e9c57914b2d54b44ecd4ec24347473082acd2168ac3583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-76c312a0d471277a668e9c57914b2d54b44ecd4ec24347473082acd2168ac3583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3777031/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919503959?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21387,21388,27923,27924,33529,33530,33743,33744,41487,42556,43658,43804,51318,53790,53792,64384,64386,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaik, Mahaboob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koteswar Rao, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiran Kumar, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasanthi, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Rigid and Semirigid Fixation for Advancement Genioplasty</title><title>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</title><addtitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><description>To compare the skeletal stability of rigid versus semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty by the assessment of vertical and horizontal measurements pre-operatively and post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. The study comprised of patients who underwent standard advancement genioplasty by inferior osteotomy of the chin with broadest musculoperiosteal pedicle with either rigid fixation or wire fixation. The displacements of vertical and horizontal measurements resulting following surgery was derived by calculating the difference between preoperative, immediate post-operative and 1 year post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Preoperative measurements were marked as T1, immediate post-operative as T2, 1 year follow up post-operative as T3. In the semirigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 5.97 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 1.623 mm during a period of minimum 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.7 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.325 mm during a period of 1 year. In the rigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 4.815 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 0.2 mm during a period of 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.975 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.1 mm during a period of 1 year. This study confirms the findings of several previous studies that contribute data specific towards the use of rigid fixation in advancement genioplasty. In our study we also observed that, in cases where large advancements are necessary, wire fixation may offer insufficient means of fixation particularly if the movement is complex and asymmetrical, in which case rigid fixation devices are more helpful.</description><subject>Cellulose acetate</subject><subject>Comparative Study</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Wire</subject><issn>0972-8279</issn><issn>0974-942X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKtUf4EYG3LgZTW4yk8lGkGKrIAg-wF1IM2lNmUlqMi3235tarQ8wEJJwv3tyDwehI4LPCMb8PBIoS5pjAjlmFOewhfax4CwXDJ63P-6QV8DFHjqMcYrTooQKSnbRHjBGSVXAPhr0fTtTwUbvMj_O7u3E1plydfZgWhs-XgP7pjqb6mMfsst6oZw2rXFdNjTO-lmjYrc8QDtj1URz-Hn20NPg6rF_nd_eDW_6l7e5Zhx3OS81JaBwzTgBzlVZVkboggvCRlAXbMSY0XXawCjjjFNcgdI1kLJSmhYV7aGLte5sPmpNrdMYQTVyFmyrwlJ6ZeXvirMvcuIXknLOV_576PRTIPjXuYmdbG3UpmmUM34eJWECc1LhcoWe_EGnfh5csidBEFFgKgqRKLKmdPAxBjPeDEOwXAUl10HJFJRcBSUh9Rz_dLHp-IolAbAGYiq5iQnfX_-v-g5h85yz</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Shaik, Mahaboob</creator><creator>Koteswar Rao, N.</creator><creator>Kiran Kumar, N.</creator><creator>Prasanthi, G.</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Rigid and Semirigid Fixation for Advancement Genioplasty</title><author>Shaik, Mahaboob ; Koteswar Rao, N. ; Kiran Kumar, N. ; Prasanthi, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-76c312a0d471277a668e9c57914b2d54b44ecd4ec24347473082acd2168ac3583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cellulose acetate</topic><topic>Comparative Study</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Wire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaik, Mahaboob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koteswar Rao, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiran Kumar, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasanthi, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaik, Mahaboob</au><au>Koteswar Rao, N.</au><au>Kiran Kumar, N.</au><au>Prasanthi, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Rigid and Semirigid Fixation for Advancement Genioplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle><stitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>260-265</pages><issn>0972-8279</issn><eissn>0974-942X</eissn><abstract>To compare the skeletal stability of rigid versus semirigid fixation for advancement genioplasty by the assessment of vertical and horizontal measurements pre-operatively and post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. The study comprised of patients who underwent standard advancement genioplasty by inferior osteotomy of the chin with broadest musculoperiosteal pedicle with either rigid fixation or wire fixation. The displacements of vertical and horizontal measurements resulting following surgery was derived by calculating the difference between preoperative, immediate post-operative and 1 year post-operatively on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Preoperative measurements were marked as T1, immediate post-operative as T2, 1 year follow up post-operative as T3. In the semirigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 5.97 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 1.623 mm during a period of minimum 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.7 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.325 mm during a period of 1 year. In the rigid group a mean horizontal advancement of 4.815 mm was accompanied by a relapse of 0.2 mm during a period of 1 year. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.975 mm. This was accompanied by a relapse of 0.1 mm during a period of 1 year. This study confirms the findings of several previous studies that contribute data specific towards the use of rigid fixation in advancement genioplasty. In our study we also observed that, in cases where large advancements are necessary, wire fixation may offer insufficient means of fixation particularly if the movement is complex and asymmetrical, in which case rigid fixation devices are more helpful.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>24431852</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12663-012-0430-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0972-8279 |
ispartof | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2013-09, Vol.12 (3), p.260-265 |
issn | 0972-8279 0974-942X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3777031 |
source | ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Cellulose acetate Comparative Study Dentistry Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Otorhinolaryngology Patients Plastic Surgery Stainless steel Statistical analysis Surgery Wire |
title | Comparison of Rigid and Semirigid Fixation for Advancement Genioplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Rigid%20and%20Semirigid%20Fixation%20for%20Advancement%20Genioplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20maxillofacial%20and%20oral%20surgery&rft.au=Shaik,%20Mahaboob&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=260-265&rft.issn=0972-8279&rft.eissn=0974-942X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12663-012-0430-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1490718061%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919503959&rft_id=info:pmid/24431852&rfr_iscdi=true |