Geographically linking population and facility surveys: methodological considerations
The relationship between health services and population outcomes is an important area of public health research that requires bringing together data on outcomes and the relevant service environment. Linking independent, existing datasets geographically is potentially an efficient approach; however,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Population health metrics 2013-08, Vol.11 (1), p.14-14, Article 14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | Population health metrics |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Skiles, Martha Priedeman Burgert, Clara R Curtis, Siân L Spencer, John |
description | The relationship between health services and population outcomes is an important area of public health research that requires bringing together data on outcomes and the relevant service environment. Linking independent, existing datasets geographically is potentially an efficient approach; however, it raises a number of methodological issues which have not been extensively explored. This sensitivity analysis explores the potential misclassification error introduced when a sample rather than a census of health facilities is used and when household survey clusters are geographically displaced for confidentiality.
Using the 2007 Rwanda Service Provision Assessment (RSPA) of all public health facilities and the 2007-2008 Rwanda Interim Demographic and Health Survey (RIDHS), five health facility samples and five household cluster displacements were created to simulate typical SPA samples and household cluster datasets. Facility datasets were matched with cluster datasets to create 36 paired datasets. Four geographic techniques were employed to link clusters with facilities in each paired dataset. The links between clusters and facilities were operationalized by creating health service variables from the RSPA and attaching them to linked RIDHS clusters. Comparisons between the original facility census and undisplaced clusters dataset with the multiple samples and displaced clusters datasets enabled measurement of error due to sampling and displacement.
Facility sampling produced larger misclassification errors than cluster displacement, underestimating access to services. Distance to the nearest facility was misclassified for over 50% of the clusters when directly linked, while linking to all facilities within an administrative boundary produced the lowest misclassification error. Measuring relative service environment produced equally poor results with over half of the clusters assigned to the incorrect quintile when linked with a sample of facilities and more than one-third misclassified due to displacement.
At low levels of geographic disaggregation, linking independent facility samples and household clusters is not recommended. Linking facility census data with population data at the cluster level is possible, but misclassification errors associated with geographic displacement of clusters will bias estimates of relationships between service environment and health outcomes. The potential need to link facility and population-based data requires consideration |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1478-7954-11-14 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3765268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534669121</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534669121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b614t-e61307fa861314e59e7cca7ba8ed9f6493dc38580cd693bba0fa3e9f94ba7e253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5oYicaGHtHbsODYHpFJBqVQJCejZcpxJ1sWxt3ZSsf8ep1uWBhUJ-TD2zDOvRq8ny15hdIwxZyeY1ryoRUULjAtMn2T7u8zTB_e97CDGa4TKMqWeZ3slESUTqN7Prs7B90GtV0Yraze5Ne6HcX2-9uvJqtF4lyvX5p3Sxppxk8cp3MImvssHGFe-9db3c2euvYumhXDXEl9kzzplI7y8j4fZ1aeP388-F5dfzi_OTi-LhmE6FsAwQXWneIqYQiWg1lrVjeLQio5RQVpNeMWRbpkgTaNQpwiITtBG1VBW5DB7v9VdT80ArQY3BmXlOphBhY30yshlxZmV7P2tJDWrSsaTwIetQGP8PwSWFe0HOdsqZ1slxumRRN7eTxH8zQRxlIOJGqxVDvwUZ4Qm6zli_4GWvMIVqubR3vyFXvspuGTnHcUpTdgfqlcWpHGdT2PqWVSeVoQyJnCJE3X8CJVOC4NJXwedSflFw9GiITEj_Bx7NcUoL759XbInW1YHH2OAbmcfRnLe0kcMe_3w23b877UkvwCE8-J6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1428844505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geographically linking population and facility surveys: methodological considerations</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Skiles, Martha Priedeman ; Burgert, Clara R ; Curtis, Siân L ; Spencer, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Skiles, Martha Priedeman ; Burgert, Clara R ; Curtis, Siân L ; Spencer, John</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between health services and population outcomes is an important area of public health research that requires bringing together data on outcomes and the relevant service environment. Linking independent, existing datasets geographically is potentially an efficient approach; however, it raises a number of methodological issues which have not been extensively explored. This sensitivity analysis explores the potential misclassification error introduced when a sample rather than a census of health facilities is used and when household survey clusters are geographically displaced for confidentiality.
Using the 2007 Rwanda Service Provision Assessment (RSPA) of all public health facilities and the 2007-2008 Rwanda Interim Demographic and Health Survey (RIDHS), five health facility samples and five household cluster displacements were created to simulate typical SPA samples and household cluster datasets. Facility datasets were matched with cluster datasets to create 36 paired datasets. Four geographic techniques were employed to link clusters with facilities in each paired dataset. The links between clusters and facilities were operationalized by creating health service variables from the RSPA and attaching them to linked RIDHS clusters. Comparisons between the original facility census and undisplaced clusters dataset with the multiple samples and displaced clusters datasets enabled measurement of error due to sampling and displacement.
Facility sampling produced larger misclassification errors than cluster displacement, underestimating access to services. Distance to the nearest facility was misclassified for over 50% of the clusters when directly linked, while linking to all facilities within an administrative boundary produced the lowest misclassification error. Measuring relative service environment produced equally poor results with over half of the clusters assigned to the incorrect quintile when linked with a sample of facilities and more than one-third misclassified due to displacement.
At low levels of geographic disaggregation, linking independent facility samples and household clusters is not recommended. Linking facility census data with population data at the cluster level is possible, but misclassification errors associated with geographic displacement of clusters will bias estimates of relationships between service environment and health outcomes. The potential need to link facility and population-based data requires consideration when designing a facility survey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-7954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1478-7954-11-14</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23926907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; AIDS ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Health facilities ; Health surveys ; Medical care ; Public health ; Rwanda ; Studies ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Population health metrics, 2013-08, Vol.11 (1), p.14-14, Article 14</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Skiles et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Skiles et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Skiles et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b614t-e61307fa861314e59e7cca7ba8ed9f6493dc38580cd693bba0fa3e9f94ba7e253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b614t-e61307fa861314e59e7cca7ba8ed9f6493dc38580cd693bba0fa3e9f94ba7e253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765268/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765268/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23926907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skiles, Martha Priedeman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgert, Clara R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Siân L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, John</creatorcontrib><title>Geographically linking population and facility surveys: methodological considerations</title><title>Population health metrics</title><addtitle>Popul Health Metr</addtitle><description>The relationship between health services and population outcomes is an important area of public health research that requires bringing together data on outcomes and the relevant service environment. Linking independent, existing datasets geographically is potentially an efficient approach; however, it raises a number of methodological issues which have not been extensively explored. This sensitivity analysis explores the potential misclassification error introduced when a sample rather than a census of health facilities is used and when household survey clusters are geographically displaced for confidentiality.
Using the 2007 Rwanda Service Provision Assessment (RSPA) of all public health facilities and the 2007-2008 Rwanda Interim Demographic and Health Survey (RIDHS), five health facility samples and five household cluster displacements were created to simulate typical SPA samples and household cluster datasets. Facility datasets were matched with cluster datasets to create 36 paired datasets. Four geographic techniques were employed to link clusters with facilities in each paired dataset. The links between clusters and facilities were operationalized by creating health service variables from the RSPA and attaching them to linked RIDHS clusters. Comparisons between the original facility census and undisplaced clusters dataset with the multiple samples and displaced clusters datasets enabled measurement of error due to sampling and displacement.
Facility sampling produced larger misclassification errors than cluster displacement, underestimating access to services. Distance to the nearest facility was misclassified for over 50% of the clusters when directly linked, while linking to all facilities within an administrative boundary produced the lowest misclassification error. Measuring relative service environment produced equally poor results with over half of the clusters assigned to the incorrect quintile when linked with a sample of facilities and more than one-third misclassified due to displacement.
At low levels of geographic disaggregation, linking independent facility samples and household clusters is not recommended. Linking facility census data with population data at the cluster level is possible, but misclassification errors associated with geographic displacement of clusters will bias estimates of relationships between service environment and health outcomes. The potential need to link facility and population-based data requires consideration when designing a facility survey.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rwanda</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1478-7954</issn><issn>1478-7954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5oYicaGHtHbsODYHpFJBqVQJCejZcpxJ1sWxt3ZSsf8ep1uWBhUJ-TD2zDOvRq8ny15hdIwxZyeY1ryoRUULjAtMn2T7u8zTB_e97CDGa4TKMqWeZ3slESUTqN7Prs7B90GtV0Yraze5Ne6HcX2-9uvJqtF4lyvX5p3Sxppxk8cp3MImvssHGFe-9db3c2euvYumhXDXEl9kzzplI7y8j4fZ1aeP388-F5dfzi_OTi-LhmE6FsAwQXWneIqYQiWg1lrVjeLQio5RQVpNeMWRbpkgTaNQpwiITtBG1VBW5DB7v9VdT80ArQY3BmXlOphBhY30yshlxZmV7P2tJDWrSsaTwIetQGP8PwSWFe0HOdsqZ1slxumRRN7eTxH8zQRxlIOJGqxVDvwUZ4Qm6zli_4GWvMIVqubR3vyFXvspuGTnHcUpTdgfqlcWpHGdT2PqWVSeVoQyJnCJE3X8CJVOC4NJXwedSflFw9GiITEj_Bx7NcUoL759XbInW1YHH2OAbmcfRnLe0kcMe_3w23b877UkvwCE8-J6</recordid><startdate>20130808</startdate><enddate>20130808</enddate><creator>Skiles, Martha Priedeman</creator><creator>Burgert, Clara R</creator><creator>Curtis, Siân L</creator><creator>Spencer, John</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130808</creationdate><title>Geographically linking population and facility surveys: methodological considerations</title><author>Skiles, Martha Priedeman ; Burgert, Clara R ; Curtis, Siân L ; Spencer, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b614t-e61307fa861314e59e7cca7ba8ed9f6493dc38580cd693bba0fa3e9f94ba7e253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rwanda</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skiles, Martha Priedeman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgert, Clara R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Siân L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, John</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Population health metrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skiles, Martha Priedeman</au><au>Burgert, Clara R</au><au>Curtis, Siân L</au><au>Spencer, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geographically linking population and facility surveys: methodological considerations</atitle><jtitle>Population health metrics</jtitle><addtitle>Popul Health Metr</addtitle><date>2013-08-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>14-14</pages><artnum>14</artnum><issn>1478-7954</issn><eissn>1478-7954</eissn><abstract>The relationship between health services and population outcomes is an important area of public health research that requires bringing together data on outcomes and the relevant service environment. Linking independent, existing datasets geographically is potentially an efficient approach; however, it raises a number of methodological issues which have not been extensively explored. This sensitivity analysis explores the potential misclassification error introduced when a sample rather than a census of health facilities is used and when household survey clusters are geographically displaced for confidentiality.
Using the 2007 Rwanda Service Provision Assessment (RSPA) of all public health facilities and the 2007-2008 Rwanda Interim Demographic and Health Survey (RIDHS), five health facility samples and five household cluster displacements were created to simulate typical SPA samples and household cluster datasets. Facility datasets were matched with cluster datasets to create 36 paired datasets. Four geographic techniques were employed to link clusters with facilities in each paired dataset. The links between clusters and facilities were operationalized by creating health service variables from the RSPA and attaching them to linked RIDHS clusters. Comparisons between the original facility census and undisplaced clusters dataset with the multiple samples and displaced clusters datasets enabled measurement of error due to sampling and displacement.
Facility sampling produced larger misclassification errors than cluster displacement, underestimating access to services. Distance to the nearest facility was misclassified for over 50% of the clusters when directly linked, while linking to all facilities within an administrative boundary produced the lowest misclassification error. Measuring relative service environment produced equally poor results with over half of the clusters assigned to the incorrect quintile when linked with a sample of facilities and more than one-third misclassified due to displacement.
At low levels of geographic disaggregation, linking independent facility samples and household clusters is not recommended. Linking facility census data with population data at the cluster level is possible, but misclassification errors associated with geographic displacement of clusters will bias estimates of relationships between service environment and health outcomes. The potential need to link facility and population-based data requires consideration when designing a facility survey.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23926907</pmid><doi>10.1186/1478-7954-11-14</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-7954 |
ispartof | Population health metrics, 2013-08, Vol.11 (1), p.14-14, Article 14 |
issn | 1478-7954 1478-7954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3765268 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome AIDS Global positioning systems GPS Health facilities Health surveys Medical care Public health Rwanda Studies Surveys |
title | Geographically linking population and facility surveys: methodological considerations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A15%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geographically%20linking%20population%20and%20facility%20surveys:%20methodological%20considerations&rft.jtitle=Population%20health%20metrics&rft.au=Skiles,%20Martha%20Priedeman&rft.date=2013-08-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=14-14&rft.artnum=14&rft.issn=1478-7954&rft.eissn=1478-7954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1478-7954-11-14&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534669121%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1428844505&rft_id=info:pmid/23926907&rft_galeid=A534669121&rfr_iscdi=true |