Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of urban health 2013-10, Vol.90 (Suppl 1), p.129-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | 129 |
container_title | Journal of urban health |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Barton, Hugh Grant, Marcus |
description | The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3764272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073634411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b156744f56cbc980c8d6c49aa4d61e1ddb538201b948643111d01a79a3cd7c203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMotlZ_gBdZ8byaSbLJ5iJIUSsU9GDPIZvNtlu22Zpshf57U7aWevA0w8yb94YPoWvA94CxeAgAGWEpBkglZzKlJ2gIjOcpybk8jT2Wccg4HqCLEJYYA2eCnKMBIQKYwHSIbme-0C75aLRztZsnVeuTidVNt9gm47qrbbhEZ5Vugr3a1xGavTx_jifp9P31bfw0TQ0VsksLyLhgrMq4KYzMsclLbpjUmpUcLJRlkdGcYCgkyzmjAFBi0EJqakphCKYj9Nj7rjfFypbGus7rRq19vdJ-q1pdq78bVy_UvP1WVHBGBIkGd3sD335tbOjUst14F39WwCjFnEouowp6lfFtCN5WhwTAakdV9VRVpKp2VBWNNzfHrx0ufjFGAekFIa7c3Pqj6H9dfwD7sIDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433063969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barton, Hugh ; Grant, Marcus</creator><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh ; Grant, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-3460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22714703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aging ; Cities ; City Planning - organization & administration ; City Planning - standards ; Community-Institutional Relations ; Environmental Health ; Epidemiology ; Europe ; Health behavior ; Health care policy ; Health Informatics ; Health Planning - organization & administration ; Health Planning - standards ; Health promotion ; Health Services Accessibility ; Healthy People Programs - organization & administration ; Healthy People Programs - standards ; Humans ; Life Style ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Program Evaluation ; Public Health ; Residence Characteristics ; Social Determinants of Health ; Social Support ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urban Health ; Urban planning ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban health, 2013-10, Vol.90 (Suppl 1), p.129-141</ispartof><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2011</rights><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b156744f56cbc980c8d6c49aa4d61e1ddb538201b948643111d01a79a3cd7c203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22714703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme</title><title>Journal of urban health</title><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><description>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>City Planning - organization & administration</subject><subject>City Planning - standards</subject><subject>Community-Institutional Relations</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Health Planning - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health Planning - standards</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Healthy People Programs - organization & administration</subject><subject>Healthy People Programs - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Social Determinants of Health</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urban Health</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>1099-3460</issn><issn>1468-2869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMotlZ_gBdZ8byaSbLJ5iJIUSsU9GDPIZvNtlu22Zpshf57U7aWevA0w8yb94YPoWvA94CxeAgAGWEpBkglZzKlJ2gIjOcpybk8jT2Wccg4HqCLEJYYA2eCnKMBIQKYwHSIbme-0C75aLRztZsnVeuTidVNt9gm47qrbbhEZ5Vugr3a1xGavTx_jifp9P31bfw0TQ0VsksLyLhgrMq4KYzMsclLbpjUmpUcLJRlkdGcYCgkyzmjAFBi0EJqakphCKYj9Nj7rjfFypbGus7rRq19vdJ-q1pdq78bVy_UvP1WVHBGBIkGd3sD335tbOjUst14F39WwCjFnEouowp6lfFtCN5WhwTAakdV9VRVpKp2VBWNNzfHrx0ufjFGAekFIa7c3Pqj6H9dfwD7sIDA</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Barton, Hugh</creator><creator>Grant, Marcus</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities</title><author>Barton, Hugh ; Grant, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b156744f56cbc980c8d6c49aa4d61e1ddb538201b948643111d01a79a3cd7c203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>City Planning - organization & administration</topic><topic>City Planning - standards</topic><topic>Community-Institutional Relations</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Health Planning - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health Planning - standards</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Healthy People Programs - organization & administration</topic><topic>Healthy People Programs - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Social Determinants of Health</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urban Health</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barton, Hugh</au><au>Grant, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle><stitle>J Urban Health</stitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>129-141</pages><issn>1099-3460</issn><eissn>1468-2869</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>22714703</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1099-3460 |
ispartof | Journal of urban health, 2013-10, Vol.90 (Suppl 1), p.129-141 |
issn | 1099-3460 1468-2869 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3764272 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aging Cities City Planning - organization & administration City Planning - standards Community-Institutional Relations Environmental Health Epidemiology Europe Health behavior Health care policy Health Informatics Health Planning - organization & administration Health Planning - standards Health promotion Health Services Accessibility Healthy People Programs - organization & administration Healthy People Programs - standards Humans Life Style Medicine Medicine & Public Health Program Evaluation Public Health Residence Characteristics Social Determinants of Health Social Support Socioeconomic Factors Surveys and Questionnaires Urban Health Urban planning World Health Organization |
title | Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20Planning%20for%20Healthy%20Cities:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Progress%20of%20the%20European%20Healthy%20Cities%20Programme&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20health&rft.au=Barton,%20Hugh&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=129-141&rft.issn=1099-3460&rft.eissn=1468-2869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3073634411%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433063969&rft_id=info:pmid/22714703&rfr_iscdi=true |