Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of urban health 2013-10, Vol.90 (Suppl 1), p.129-141
Hauptverfasser: Barton, Hugh, Grant, Marcus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page 129
container_title Journal of urban health
container_volume 90
creator Barton, Hugh
Grant, Marcus
description The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3764272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073634411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b156744f56cbc980c8d6c49aa4d61e1ddb538201b948643111d01a79a3cd7c203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMotlZ_gBdZ8byaSbLJ5iJIUSsU9GDPIZvNtlu22Zpshf57U7aWevA0w8yb94YPoWvA94CxeAgAGWEpBkglZzKlJ2gIjOcpybk8jT2Wccg4HqCLEJYYA2eCnKMBIQKYwHSIbme-0C75aLRztZsnVeuTidVNt9gm47qrbbhEZ5Vugr3a1xGavTx_jifp9P31bfw0TQ0VsksLyLhgrMq4KYzMsclLbpjUmpUcLJRlkdGcYCgkyzmjAFBi0EJqakphCKYj9Nj7rjfFypbGus7rRq19vdJ-q1pdq78bVy_UvP1WVHBGBIkGd3sD335tbOjUst14F39WwCjFnEouowp6lfFtCN5WhwTAakdV9VRVpKp2VBWNNzfHrx0ufjFGAekFIa7c3Pqj6H9dfwD7sIDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433063969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barton, Hugh ; Grant, Marcus</creator><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh ; Grant, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-3460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22714703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aging ; Cities ; City Planning - organization &amp; administration ; City Planning - standards ; Community-Institutional Relations ; Environmental Health ; Epidemiology ; Europe ; Health behavior ; Health care policy ; Health Informatics ; Health Planning - organization &amp; administration ; Health Planning - standards ; Health promotion ; Health Services Accessibility ; Healthy People Programs - organization &amp; administration ; Healthy People Programs - standards ; Humans ; Life Style ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Program Evaluation ; Public Health ; Residence Characteristics ; Social Determinants of Health ; Social Support ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urban Health ; Urban planning ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban health, 2013-10, Vol.90 (Suppl 1), p.129-141</ispartof><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2011</rights><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b156744f56cbc980c8d6c49aa4d61e1ddb538201b948643111d01a79a3cd7c203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22714703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme</title><title>Journal of urban health</title><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><description>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>City Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>City Planning - standards</subject><subject>Community-Institutional Relations</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health Planning - standards</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Healthy People Programs - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Healthy People Programs - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Social Determinants of Health</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urban Health</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>1099-3460</issn><issn>1468-2869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMotlZ_gBdZ8byaSbLJ5iJIUSsU9GDPIZvNtlu22Zpshf57U7aWevA0w8yb94YPoWvA94CxeAgAGWEpBkglZzKlJ2gIjOcpybk8jT2Wccg4HqCLEJYYA2eCnKMBIQKYwHSIbme-0C75aLRztZsnVeuTidVNt9gm47qrbbhEZ5Vugr3a1xGavTx_jifp9P31bfw0TQ0VsksLyLhgrMq4KYzMsclLbpjUmpUcLJRlkdGcYCgkyzmjAFBi0EJqakphCKYj9Nj7rjfFypbGus7rRq19vdJ-q1pdq78bVy_UvP1WVHBGBIkGd3sD335tbOjUst14F39WwCjFnEouowp6lfFtCN5WhwTAakdV9VRVpKp2VBWNNzfHrx0ufjFGAekFIa7c3Pqj6H9dfwD7sIDA</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Barton, Hugh</creator><creator>Grant, Marcus</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities</title><author>Barton, Hugh ; Grant, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b156744f56cbc980c8d6c49aa4d61e1ddb538201b948643111d01a79a3cd7c203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>City Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>City Planning - standards</topic><topic>Community-Institutional Relations</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health Planning - standards</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Healthy People Programs - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Healthy People Programs - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Social Determinants of Health</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urban Health</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barton, Hugh</au><au>Grant, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle><stitle>J Urban Health</stitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>129-141</pages><issn>1099-3460</issn><eissn>1468-2869</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made by European cities in relation to Healthy Urban Planning (HUP) during Phase IV of the World Health Organization's Healthy Cities programme (2003–2008). The introduction sets out the general principle of HUP, identifying three levels or phases of health and planning integration. This leads on to a more specific analysis of the processes and substance of HUP, which provide criteria for assessment of progress. The assessment itself relies on two sources of data provided by the municipalities: the Annual Review Templates (ARTs) 2008 and the response to the Phase IV General Evaluation Questionnaire. The findings indicate that the evidence from different sources and questions in different sections are encouragingly consistent. The number of cities achieving a good level of understanding and activity in HUP has risen very substantially over the period. In particular, those achieving effective strategic integration of health and planning have increased. A key challenge for the future will be to develop planning frameworks which advance public health concerns in a spatial policy context driven often by market forces. A health in all policies approach could be valuable.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>22714703</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-3460
ispartof Journal of urban health, 2013-10, Vol.90 (Suppl 1), p.129-141
issn 1099-3460
1468-2869
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3764272
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aging
Cities
City Planning - organization & administration
City Planning - standards
Community-Institutional Relations
Environmental Health
Epidemiology
Europe
Health behavior
Health care policy
Health Informatics
Health Planning - organization & administration
Health Planning - standards
Health promotion
Health Services Accessibility
Healthy People Programs - organization & administration
Healthy People Programs - standards
Humans
Life Style
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Program Evaluation
Public Health
Residence Characteristics
Social Determinants of Health
Social Support
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urban Health
Urban planning
World Health Organization
title Urban Planning for Healthy Cities: A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20Planning%20for%20Healthy%20Cities:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Progress%20of%20the%20European%20Healthy%20Cities%20Programme&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20health&rft.au=Barton,%20Hugh&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=129-141&rft.issn=1099-3460&rft.eissn=1468-2869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3073634411%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433063969&rft_id=info:pmid/22714703&rfr_iscdi=true