A Standardized Relative Resource Cost Model for Medical Care: Application to Cancer Control Programs
Medicare data represent 75% of aged and permanently disabled Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service (FFS) indemnity option, but the data omit 25% of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Little research has examined how longitudinal pat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs 2013-08, Vol.2013 (46), p.106-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 46 |
container_start_page | 106 |
container_title | Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs |
container_volume | 2013 |
creator | O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C. Hornbrook, Mark C. Fishman, Paul A. Ritzwoller, Debra P. Keast, Erin M. Staab, Jenny Lafata, Jennifer Elston Salloum, Ramzi |
description | Medicare data represent 75% of aged and permanently disabled Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service (FFS) indemnity option, but the data omit 25% of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Little research has examined how longitudinal patterns of utilization differ between HMOs and FFS. The Burden of Cancer Study developed and implemented an algorithm to assign standardized relative costs to HMO and Medicare FFS data consistently across time and place. Medicare uses 15 payment systems to reimburse FFS providers for covered services. The standardized relative resource cost algorithm (SRRCA) adapts these various payment systems to utilization data. We describe the rationale for modifications to the Medicare payment systems and discuss the implications of these modifications. We applied the SRRCA to data from four HMO sites and the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare data. Some modifications to Medicare payment systems were required, because data elements needed to categorize utilization were missing from both data sources. For example, data were not available to create episodes for home health services received, so we assigned costs per visit based on visit type (nurse, therapist, and aide). For inpatient utilization, we modified Medicare’s payment algorithm by changing it from a flat payment per diagnosis-related group to daily rates for diagnosis-related groups to differentiate shorter versus longer stays. The SRRCA can be used in multiple managed care plans and across multiple FFS delivery systems within the United States to create consistent relative cost data for economic analyses. Prior to international use of the SRRCA, data need to be standardized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3748000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1426999148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3672-d1730aafd90b79f8449d71e9c75771333caa67a0ad9f64ba6957a16fd3c234d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9PHCEUxUmjqavtR6jh0ZdRGBhYfGiy2dhqorHpn2dyF5hdNswwhRkT--lls2rqm09c4HfOPclB6Asl55QodrHtje9iH9cJhk2-COuRkPoDmlHJm0oIyg_KTJq6ElKyI3Sc87YApCHqIzqqmRJ1Q_kM2QX-NUJvIVn_z1n80wUY_YMrQ45TMg4vYx7xXbQu4DYmfOesNxDwEpK7xIthCOU6-tjjMZbH3rhUJP2YYsA_0i5elz-hwxZCdp-fzxP059vV7-V1dXv__Wa5uK0ME7KuLJWMALRWkZVU7ZxzZSV1yshGSsoYMwBCAgGrWsFXIFQjgYrWMlMzbik7QV_3vsO06pw1rsSAoIfkO0iPOoLXb396v9Hr-KCZ5HNCSDE4ezZI8e_k8qg7n40LAXoXp6wpr4VSivJ5QZs9alLMObn2dQ0leteQftuQ3jdUdKf_Z3xVvVRSALIH4jS80_MJbXylHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1426999148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Standardized Relative Resource Cost Model for Medical Care: Application to Cancer Control Programs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C. ; Hornbrook, Mark C. ; Fishman, Paul A. ; Ritzwoller, Debra P. ; Keast, Erin M. ; Staab, Jenny ; Lafata, Jennifer Elston ; Salloum, Ramzi</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C. ; Hornbrook, Mark C. ; Fishman, Paul A. ; Ritzwoller, Debra P. ; Keast, Erin M. ; Staab, Jenny ; Lafata, Jennifer Elston ; Salloum, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><description>Medicare data represent 75% of aged and permanently disabled Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service (FFS) indemnity option, but the data omit 25% of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Little research has examined how longitudinal patterns of utilization differ between HMOs and FFS. The Burden of Cancer Study developed and implemented an algorithm to assign standardized relative costs to HMO and Medicare FFS data consistently across time and place. Medicare uses 15 payment systems to reimburse FFS providers for covered services. The standardized relative resource cost algorithm (SRRCA) adapts these various payment systems to utilization data. We describe the rationale for modifications to the Medicare payment systems and discuss the implications of these modifications. We applied the SRRCA to data from four HMO sites and the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare data. Some modifications to Medicare payment systems were required, because data elements needed to categorize utilization were missing from both data sources. For example, data were not available to create episodes for home health services received, so we assigned costs per visit based on visit type (nurse, therapist, and aide). For inpatient utilization, we modified Medicare’s payment algorithm by changing it from a flat payment per diagnosis-related group to daily rates for diagnosis-related groups to differentiate shorter versus longer stays. The SRRCA can be used in multiple managed care plans and across multiple FFS delivery systems within the United States to create consistent relative cost data for economic analyses. Prior to international use of the SRRCA, data need to be standardized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-6773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23962514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Delivery of Health Care ; Fee-for-Service Plans - economics ; Fee-for-Service Plans - standards ; Health Expenditures ; Health Maintenance Organizations - economics ; Health Resources - economics ; Humans ; Medicare - economics ; Medicare - standards ; Medicare Part C - economics ; Neoplasms - economics ; Neoplasms - therapy ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2013-08, Vol.2013 (46), p.106-116</ispartof><rights>The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3672-d1730aafd90b79f8449d71e9c75771333caa67a0ad9f64ba6957a16fd3c234d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3672-d1730aafd90b79f8449d71e9c75771333caa67a0ad9f64ba6957a16fd3c234d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1583,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23962514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornbrook, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritzwoller, Debra P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keast, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staab, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafata, Jennifer Elston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salloum, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><title>A Standardized Relative Resource Cost Model for Medical Care: Application to Cancer Control Programs</title><title>Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs</title><addtitle>JNCMON</addtitle><addtitle>J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr</addtitle><description>Medicare data represent 75% of aged and permanently disabled Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service (FFS) indemnity option, but the data omit 25% of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Little research has examined how longitudinal patterns of utilization differ between HMOs and FFS. The Burden of Cancer Study developed and implemented an algorithm to assign standardized relative costs to HMO and Medicare FFS data consistently across time and place. Medicare uses 15 payment systems to reimburse FFS providers for covered services. The standardized relative resource cost algorithm (SRRCA) adapts these various payment systems to utilization data. We describe the rationale for modifications to the Medicare payment systems and discuss the implications of these modifications. We applied the SRRCA to data from four HMO sites and the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare data. Some modifications to Medicare payment systems were required, because data elements needed to categorize utilization were missing from both data sources. For example, data were not available to create episodes for home health services received, so we assigned costs per visit based on visit type (nurse, therapist, and aide). For inpatient utilization, we modified Medicare’s payment algorithm by changing it from a flat payment per diagnosis-related group to daily rates for diagnosis-related groups to differentiate shorter versus longer stays. The SRRCA can be used in multiple managed care plans and across multiple FFS delivery systems within the United States to create consistent relative cost data for economic analyses. Prior to international use of the SRRCA, data need to be standardized.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - standards</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - economics</subject><subject>Health Resources - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Medicare - standards</subject><subject>Medicare Part C - economics</subject><subject>Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1052-6773</issn><issn>1745-6614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9PHCEUxUmjqavtR6jh0ZdRGBhYfGiy2dhqorHpn2dyF5hdNswwhRkT--lls2rqm09c4HfOPclB6Asl55QodrHtje9iH9cJhk2-COuRkPoDmlHJm0oIyg_KTJq6ElKyI3Sc87YApCHqIzqqmRJ1Q_kM2QX-NUJvIVn_z1n80wUY_YMrQ45TMg4vYx7xXbQu4DYmfOesNxDwEpK7xIthCOU6-tjjMZbH3rhUJP2YYsA_0i5elz-hwxZCdp-fzxP059vV7-V1dXv__Wa5uK0ME7KuLJWMALRWkZVU7ZxzZSV1yshGSsoYMwBCAgGrWsFXIFQjgYrWMlMzbik7QV_3vsO06pw1rsSAoIfkO0iPOoLXb396v9Hr-KCZ5HNCSDE4ezZI8e_k8qg7n40LAXoXp6wpr4VSivJ5QZs9alLMObn2dQ0leteQftuQ3jdUdKf_Z3xVvVRSALIH4jS80_MJbXylHA</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C.</creator><creator>Hornbrook, Mark C.</creator><creator>Fishman, Paul A.</creator><creator>Ritzwoller, Debra P.</creator><creator>Keast, Erin M.</creator><creator>Staab, Jenny</creator><creator>Lafata, Jennifer Elston</creator><creator>Salloum, Ramzi</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>A Standardized Relative Resource Cost Model for Medical Care: Application to Cancer Control Programs</title><author>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C. ; Hornbrook, Mark C. ; Fishman, Paul A. ; Ritzwoller, Debra P. ; Keast, Erin M. ; Staab, Jenny ; Lafata, Jennifer Elston ; Salloum, Ramzi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3672-d1730aafd90b79f8449d71e9c75771333caa67a0ad9f64ba6957a16fd3c234d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - standards</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - economics</topic><topic>Health Resources - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Medicare - standards</topic><topic>Medicare Part C - economics</topic><topic>Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornbrook, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritzwoller, Debra P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keast, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staab, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafata, Jennifer Elston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salloum, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Keeffe-Rosetti, Maureen C.</au><au>Hornbrook, Mark C.</au><au>Fishman, Paul A.</au><au>Ritzwoller, Debra P.</au><au>Keast, Erin M.</au><au>Staab, Jenny</au><au>Lafata, Jennifer Elston</au><au>Salloum, Ramzi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Standardized Relative Resource Cost Model for Medical Care: Application to Cancer Control Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs</jtitle><stitle>JNCMON</stitle><addtitle>J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>2013</volume><issue>46</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>106-116</pages><issn>1052-6773</issn><eissn>1745-6614</eissn><abstract>Medicare data represent 75% of aged and permanently disabled Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service (FFS) indemnity option, but the data omit 25% of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Little research has examined how longitudinal patterns of utilization differ between HMOs and FFS. The Burden of Cancer Study developed and implemented an algorithm to assign standardized relative costs to HMO and Medicare FFS data consistently across time and place. Medicare uses 15 payment systems to reimburse FFS providers for covered services. The standardized relative resource cost algorithm (SRRCA) adapts these various payment systems to utilization data. We describe the rationale for modifications to the Medicare payment systems and discuss the implications of these modifications. We applied the SRRCA to data from four HMO sites and the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare data. Some modifications to Medicare payment systems were required, because data elements needed to categorize utilization were missing from both data sources. For example, data were not available to create episodes for home health services received, so we assigned costs per visit based on visit type (nurse, therapist, and aide). For inpatient utilization, we modified Medicare’s payment algorithm by changing it from a flat payment per diagnosis-related group to daily rates for diagnosis-related groups to differentiate shorter versus longer stays. The SRRCA can be used in multiple managed care plans and across multiple FFS delivery systems within the United States to create consistent relative cost data for economic analyses. Prior to international use of the SRRCA, data need to be standardized.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>23962514</pmid><doi>10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-6773 |
ispartof | Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2013-08, Vol.2013 (46), p.106-116 |
issn | 1052-6773 1745-6614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3748000 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Delivery of Health Care Fee-for-Service Plans - economics Fee-for-Service Plans - standards Health Expenditures Health Maintenance Organizations - economics Health Resources - economics Humans Medicare - economics Medicare - standards Medicare Part C - economics Neoplasms - economics Neoplasms - therapy United States - epidemiology |
title | A Standardized Relative Resource Cost Model for Medical Care: Application to Cancer Control Programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A17%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Standardized%20Relative%20Resource%20Cost%20Model%20for%20Medical%20Care:%20Application%20to%20Cancer%20Control%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Cancer%20Institute.%20Monographs&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Keeffe-Rosetti,%20Maureen%20C.&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=2013&rft.issue=46&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=106-116&rft.issn=1052-6773&rft.eissn=1745-6614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1426999148%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1426999148&rft_id=info:pmid/23962514&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002&rfr_iscdi=true |