Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?
In the following point‐counterpoint article, internationally‐acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer‐reviewed by both the editorial team a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2013-05, Vol.33 (3), p.355-361 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 361 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 355 |
| container_title | Ophthalmic & physiological optics |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Morgan, Ian G. Ashby, Regan S. Nickla, Debora L. |
| description | In the following point‐counterpoint article, internationally‐acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the
order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer‐reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point‐Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/opo.12059 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3745013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1350894528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-60b600b96905d0810def673c66338fc9811ba69de01a375e2c0a4d00a30be7fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFO3DAQhq2qqCy0h75AlWN7CIzj2E4qFVQQLEgrtgcoR8uxJ8VtEi92lnbfHsPCqhyYi0fyN_-MPkI-Utijqfb9wu_RAnj9hkxoKXlOGWVvyQSK1PMSqm2yE-NvAJBSVu_IdsGEKGohJuTbqQ99ZnER3J0enR8yPdiswyHmbrBLgzbrV37h9NdMB8zGG1xl1rUtBhzGw_dkq9VdxA9P7y65Oj25PD7LZ_Pp-fH3WW5KzupcQCMAmlrUwC1UFCy2QjIjBGNVa-qK0kaL2iJQzSTHwoAuLYBm0KBsDdslB-vcxbLp0Zq0O-hOpaN7HVbKa6de_gzuRv3yd4rJkgNlKeDzU0Dwt0uMo-pdNNh1ekC_jIoyDlVd8qJK6Jc1aoKPMWC7WUNBPehWSbd61J3YT__ftSGf_SZgfw38dR2uXk9S8x_z58h8PeHiiP82Ezr8UUmZ5Or6YqpmR9Of1_SCqjN2Dw8TmPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350894528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Morgan, Ian G. ; Ashby, Regan S. ; Nickla, Debora L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ian G. ; Ashby, Regan S. ; Nickla, Debora L.</creatorcontrib><description>In the following point‐counterpoint article, internationally‐acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the
order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer‐reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point‐Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-1313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/opo.12059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23662966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Chickens ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dopamine - physiology ; Emmetropia - physiology ; Form Perception - physiology ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Sensory Deprivation - physiology</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2013-05, Vol.33 (3), p.355-361</ispartof><rights>Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2013 The College of Optometrists</rights><rights>Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2013 The College of Optometrists.</rights><rights>2013 The College of Optometrists 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-60b600b96905d0810def673c66338fc9811ba69de01a375e2c0a4d00a30be7fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-60b600b96905d0810def673c66338fc9811ba69de01a375e2c0a4d00a30be7fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fopo.12059$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fopo.12059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Regan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickla, Debora L.</creatorcontrib><title>Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?</title><title>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</title><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><description>In the following point‐counterpoint article, internationally‐acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the
order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer‐reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point‐Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dopamine - physiology</subject><subject>Emmetropia - physiology</subject><subject>Form Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sensory Deprivation - physiology</subject><issn>0275-5408</issn><issn>1475-1313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFO3DAQhq2qqCy0h75AlWN7CIzj2E4qFVQQLEgrtgcoR8uxJ8VtEi92lnbfHsPCqhyYi0fyN_-MPkI-Utijqfb9wu_RAnj9hkxoKXlOGWVvyQSK1PMSqm2yE-NvAJBSVu_IdsGEKGohJuTbqQ99ZnER3J0enR8yPdiswyHmbrBLgzbrV37h9NdMB8zGG1xl1rUtBhzGw_dkq9VdxA9P7y65Oj25PD7LZ_Pp-fH3WW5KzupcQCMAmlrUwC1UFCy2QjIjBGNVa-qK0kaL2iJQzSTHwoAuLYBm0KBsDdslB-vcxbLp0Zq0O-hOpaN7HVbKa6de_gzuRv3yd4rJkgNlKeDzU0Dwt0uMo-pdNNh1ekC_jIoyDlVd8qJK6Jc1aoKPMWC7WUNBPehWSbd61J3YT__ftSGf_SZgfw38dR2uXk9S8x_z58h8PeHiiP82Ezr8UUmZ5Or6YqpmR9Of1_SCqjN2Dw8TmPA</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Morgan, Ian G.</creator><creator>Ashby, Regan S.</creator><creator>Nickla, Debora L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?</title><author>Morgan, Ian G. ; Ashby, Regan S. ; Nickla, Debora L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-60b600b96905d0810def673c66338fc9811ba69de01a375e2c0a4d00a30be7fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dopamine - physiology</topic><topic>Emmetropia - physiology</topic><topic>Form Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sensory Deprivation - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Regan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickla, Debora L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Ian G.</au><au>Ashby, Regan S.</au><au>Nickla, Debora L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>355-361</pages><issn>0275-5408</issn><eissn>1475-1313</eissn><abstract>In the following point‐counterpoint article, internationally‐acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the
order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer‐reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point‐Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23662966</pmid><doi>10.1111/opo.12059</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0275-5408 |
| ispartof | Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2013-05, Vol.33 (3), p.355-361 |
| issn | 0275-5408 1475-1313 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3745013 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals |
| subjects | Animals Chickens Disease Models, Animal Dopamine - physiology Emmetropia - physiology Form Perception - physiology Myopia - physiopathology Sensory Deprivation - physiology |
| title | Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A09%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Form%20deprivation%20and%20lens-induced%20myopia:%20are%20they%20different?&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20&%20physiological%20optics&rft.au=Morgan,%20Ian%20G.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=355-361&rft.issn=0275-5408&rft.eissn=1475-1313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/opo.12059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1350894528%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350894528&rft_id=info:pmid/23662966&rfr_iscdi=true |