Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children
Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of pediatrics 2011-09, Vol.159 (3), p.437-441.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 441.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 437 |
container_title | The Journal of pediatrics |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Lane, Mariella M., PhD Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH Shulman, Robert J., MD |
description | Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with >78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with >80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3741451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347611002411</els_id><sourcerecordid>1663650593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgC0EoiXwC5BgLwguCTP2PryHVoKIAlIQEqFcLa892zo462BvKuXf45BQHgeQJT92vxmP_ZmxxwgzBKxfrmarDdk044A4AzED4HfYKULbTGspxF12mr_wqSib-oQ9SGkFAG0JcJ-dcCxlW1XNKVt8Iu9057wbd4UebPFFe2f3i9AXuvgQrOsd2eJ1dGkMvliOIfcXIa6LpdGeij7EYn7tvI00PGT3eu0TPTqOE3Z58ebz_N108fHt-_mrxdTUAOO0Q6g6yWWHhqpagLBCNy3opsOO12hAdwJ4Z3lL0FuNXS0qI0sjhc2R1IkJOz_k3Wy7NVlDwxi1V5vo1jruVNBO_flncNfqKtwo0ZRYVpgTPD8miOHbltKo1i4Z8l4PFLZJSVnyBoXkmXzxTxLrWtQVVK3IqDigJoaUIvW3BSGovTG1Uj-Mqb0xBUJlPznqye9nuY35qSgDz46ATvnG-6gH49IvriylaHObsKcHrtdB6avsS10u805V1i6bfMuZODsQlN3cOIoqGUeDIesimVHZ4P5T6vlf8ca7weWivtKO0ips45C1K1SJK1DL_fPbvz7EPCsRxXc_W9KK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663650593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lane, Mariella M., PhD ; Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD ; Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH ; Shulman, Robert J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Lane, Mariella M., PhD ; Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD ; Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH ; Shulman, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with >78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with >80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21489557</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOPDAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; correlation ; Feces ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterology - methods ; General aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; methods ; Pediatrics ; Photography ; Reinforcement, Verbal ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2011-09, Vol.159 (3), p.437-441.e1</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347611002411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24483939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21489557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shulman, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with >78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with >80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology - methods</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Verbal</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgC0EoiXwC5BgLwguCTP2PryHVoKIAlIQEqFcLa892zo462BvKuXf45BQHgeQJT92vxmP_ZmxxwgzBKxfrmarDdk044A4AzED4HfYKULbTGspxF12mr_wqSib-oQ9SGkFAG0JcJ-dcCxlW1XNKVt8Iu9057wbd4UebPFFe2f3i9AXuvgQrOsd2eJ1dGkMvliOIfcXIa6LpdGeij7EYn7tvI00PGT3eu0TPTqOE3Z58ebz_N108fHt-_mrxdTUAOO0Q6g6yWWHhqpagLBCNy3opsOO12hAdwJ4Z3lL0FuNXS0qI0sjhc2R1IkJOz_k3Wy7NVlDwxi1V5vo1jruVNBO_flncNfqKtwo0ZRYVpgTPD8miOHbltKo1i4Z8l4PFLZJSVnyBoXkmXzxTxLrWtQVVK3IqDigJoaUIvW3BSGovTG1Uj-Mqb0xBUJlPznqye9nuY35qSgDz46ATvnG-6gH49IvriylaHObsKcHrtdB6avsS10u805V1i6bfMuZODsQlN3cOIoqGUeDIesimVHZ4P5T6vlf8ca7weWivtKO0ips45C1K1SJK1DL_fPbvz7EPCsRxXc_W9KK</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</creator><creator>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</creator><creator>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Shulman, Robert J., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</title><author>Lane, Mariella M., PhD ; Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD ; Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH ; Shulman, Robert J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology - methods</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Verbal</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shulman, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</au><au>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</au><au>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</au><au>Shulman, Robert J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>441.e1</epage><pages>437-441.e1</pages><issn>0022-3476</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><coden>JOPDAB</coden><abstract>Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with >78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with >80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.</abstract><cop>Maryland Heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21489557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3476 |
ispartof | The Journal of pediatrics, 2011-09, Vol.159 (3), p.437-441.e1 |
issn | 0022-3476 1097-6833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3741451 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Age Factors Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool children correlation Feces Female Gastroenterology Gastroenterology - methods General aspects Humans Male Medical sciences methods Pediatrics Photography Reinforcement, Verbal Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Validity%20of%20a%20Modified%20Bristol%20Stool%20Form%20Scale%20for%20Children&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Lane,%20Mariella%20M.,%20PhD&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=441.e1&rft.pages=437-441.e1&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft.coden=JOPDAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1663650593%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663650593&rft_id=info:pmid/21489557&rft_els_id=S0022347611002411&rfr_iscdi=true |