Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children

Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of pediatrics 2011-09, Vol.159 (3), p.437-441.e1
Hauptverfasser: Lane, Mariella M., PhD, Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD, Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH, Shulman, Robert J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 441.e1
container_issue 3
container_start_page 437
container_title The Journal of pediatrics
container_volume 159
creator Lane, Mariella M., PhD
Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD
Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH
Shulman, Robert J., MD
description Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with >78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with >80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3741451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347611002411</els_id><sourcerecordid>1663650593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgC0EoiXwC5BgLwguCTP2PryHVoKIAlIQEqFcLa892zo462BvKuXf45BQHgeQJT92vxmP_ZmxxwgzBKxfrmarDdk044A4AzED4HfYKULbTGspxF12mr_wqSib-oQ9SGkFAG0JcJ-dcCxlW1XNKVt8Iu9057wbd4UebPFFe2f3i9AXuvgQrOsd2eJ1dGkMvliOIfcXIa6LpdGeij7EYn7tvI00PGT3eu0TPTqOE3Z58ebz_N108fHt-_mrxdTUAOO0Q6g6yWWHhqpagLBCNy3opsOO12hAdwJ4Z3lL0FuNXS0qI0sjhc2R1IkJOz_k3Wy7NVlDwxi1V5vo1jruVNBO_flncNfqKtwo0ZRYVpgTPD8miOHbltKo1i4Z8l4PFLZJSVnyBoXkmXzxTxLrWtQVVK3IqDigJoaUIvW3BSGovTG1Uj-Mqb0xBUJlPznqye9nuY35qSgDz46ATvnG-6gH49IvriylaHObsKcHrtdB6avsS10u805V1i6bfMuZODsQlN3cOIoqGUeDIesimVHZ4P5T6vlf8ca7weWivtKO0ips45C1K1SJK1DL_fPbvz7EPCsRxXc_W9KK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663650593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lane, Mariella M., PhD ; Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD ; Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH ; Shulman, Robert J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Lane, Mariella M., PhD ; Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD ; Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH ; Shulman, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with &gt;78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with &gt;80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21489557</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOPDAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; correlation ; Feces ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterology - methods ; General aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; methods ; Pediatrics ; Photography ; Reinforcement, Verbal ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2011-09, Vol.159 (3), p.437-441.e1</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347611002411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24483939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21489557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shulman, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with &gt;78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with &gt;80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology - methods</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Verbal</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgC0EoiXwC5BgLwguCTP2PryHVoKIAlIQEqFcLa892zo462BvKuXf45BQHgeQJT92vxmP_ZmxxwgzBKxfrmarDdk044A4AzED4HfYKULbTGspxF12mr_wqSib-oQ9SGkFAG0JcJ-dcCxlW1XNKVt8Iu9057wbd4UebPFFe2f3i9AXuvgQrOsd2eJ1dGkMvliOIfcXIa6LpdGeij7EYn7tvI00PGT3eu0TPTqOE3Z58ebz_N108fHt-_mrxdTUAOO0Q6g6yWWHhqpagLBCNy3opsOO12hAdwJ4Z3lL0FuNXS0qI0sjhc2R1IkJOz_k3Wy7NVlDwxi1V5vo1jruVNBO_flncNfqKtwo0ZRYVpgTPD8miOHbltKo1i4Z8l4PFLZJSVnyBoXkmXzxTxLrWtQVVK3IqDigJoaUIvW3BSGovTG1Uj-Mqb0xBUJlPznqye9nuY35qSgDz46ATvnG-6gH49IvriylaHObsKcHrtdB6avsS10u805V1i6bfMuZODsQlN3cOIoqGUeDIesimVHZ4P5T6vlf8ca7weWivtKO0ips45C1K1SJK1DL_fPbvz7EPCsRxXc_W9KK</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</creator><creator>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</creator><creator>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Shulman, Robert J., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</title><author>Lane, Mariella M., PhD ; Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD ; Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH ; Shulman, Robert J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-b105b828b1ce56303d3a790a7b1b261c0ab302bd29e0fda1b635c84c83d105eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology - methods</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Verbal</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shulman, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lane, Mariella M., PhD</au><au>Czyzewski, Danita I., PhD</au><au>Chumpitazi, Bruno P., MD, MPH</au><au>Shulman, Robert J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>441.e1</epage><pages>437-441.e1</pages><issn>0022-3476</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><coden>JOPDAB</coden><abstract>Objectives This study sought to: evaluate the ability of children to reliably use a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children (mBSFS-C), evaluate criterion-related validity of the mBSFS-C, and identify the lower age limit for mBSFS-C use. Study design The mBSFS-C comprises 5 stool form types described and depicted in drawings. Children 3 to 18 years old rated stool form for 10 stool photographs. Because of low reliability when stool form descriptors were not read aloud (n = 119), a subsequent sample of children (n = 191) rated photographs with descriptors read. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for descriptor-unread versus -read samples were 0.62 and 0.79, respectively. Children were increasingly reliable with age. Percentage of correct ratings varied with stool form type, but generally increased with age. With descriptors unread, children 8 years and older demonstrated acceptable interobserver reliability, with &gt;78% of ratings correct. With descriptors read, children 6 years and older demonstrated acceptable reliability, with &gt;80% of ratings correct. Conclusions The mBSFS-C is reliable and valid for use by children, with age 6 years being the lower limit for scale use with descriptors read and age 8 years being the lower limit without descriptors read. We anticipate that the mBSFS-C can be effectively used in pediatric clinical and research settings.</abstract><cop>Maryland Heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21489557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3476
ispartof The Journal of pediatrics, 2011-09, Vol.159 (3), p.437-441.e1
issn 0022-3476
1097-6833
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3741451
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
children
correlation
Feces
Female
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology - methods
General aspects
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
methods
Pediatrics
Photography
Reinforcement, Verbal
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Reliability and Validity of a Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Validity%20of%20a%20Modified%20Bristol%20Stool%20Form%20Scale%20for%20Children&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Lane,%20Mariella%20M.,%20PhD&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=441.e1&rft.pages=437-441.e1&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft.coden=JOPDAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1663650593%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663650593&rft_id=info:pmid/21489557&rft_els_id=S0022347611002411&rfr_iscdi=true