The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials

Abstract Background The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2013-02, Vol.9 (1), p.S21-S31
Hauptverfasser: Raghavan, Nandini, Samtani, Mahesh N, Farnum, Michael, Yang, Eric, Novak, Gerald, Grundman, Michael, Narayan, Vaibhav, DiBernardo, Allitia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S31
container_issue 1
container_start_page S21
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 9
creator Raghavan, Nandini
Samtani, Mahesh N
Farnum, Michael
Yang, Eric
Novak, Gerald
Grundman, Michael
Narayan, Vaibhav
DiBernardo, Allitia
description Abstract Background The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. Methods Using Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. Results All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive–functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ1-42 ) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. Conclusion An empirical, data-driven approach with e xisting instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early AD clinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ1-42 pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2187
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3732822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1552526012023850</els_id><sourcerecordid>1288314602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6407-ec5a59715086af2042b6efaf93590f6bc7f90d53a20e206d91ad322ad54d2f753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUstu1DAUjRCIlsIXICEv2ST4EeeBRKVRSqHVAIuWDRvLY1-3Dkk8tTNTha_HYYbhsYGNr3V9zrlHPjdJnhOcEUyKV23Wyu5bRjGhGeYZJVX5IDkmnNOU07J-eLgX-Ch5EkKLcY4rwh8nR5QRWuZFfZzcXd8CWpwtrtLG3SAPWxvsCPo1-ui20CHl-rWbOygo2UFAKxlAIzf84owO2X7tIxyBMVZZGNSE7IA-NBdIDhqB9N0U8Wj0VnbhafLIxALP9vUk-Xz-9rp5ny4_vbtoFstUFTkuU1Bc8rokHFeFNBTndFWAkaZmvMamWKnS1FhzJikGigtdE6kZpVLzXFNTcnaSnO5015tVD1rBMHrZibW3vfSTcNKKP18Geytu3FawktGK0ijwci_g3d0Gwih6GxR0nRzAbYIgtKoYyQs8Q9kOqrwLwYM5jCFYzGGJVsxhiTksgbmYw4qsF787PHB-phMBzQ5wbzuY_kdTLJZfLi_jMTcx3495s1OB-NtbC16EHyGBth7UKLSz_7B5-hdfdXawcR--wgShdRs_xCAFESGSxNW8dfPSRQOUVRyz799WzrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1288314602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Raghavan, Nandini ; Samtani, Mahesh N ; Farnum, Michael ; Yang, Eric ; Novak, Gerald ; Grundman, Michael ; Narayan, Vaibhav ; DiBernardo, Allitia</creator><creatorcontrib>Raghavan, Nandini ; Samtani, Mahesh N ; Farnum, Michael ; Yang, Eric ; Novak, Gerald ; Grundman, Michael ; Narayan, Vaibhav ; DiBernardo, Allitia ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. Methods Using Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. Results All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive–functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ1-42 ) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. Conclusion An empirical, data-driven approach with e xisting instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early AD clinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ1-42 pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2187</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23127469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ADAS-Cog ; Aged ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer Disease - psychology ; Alzheimer's disease ; Ceiling effects ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis ; Composite endpoints ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; MCI ; Mild cognitive impairment ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Novel endpoints ; Power ; Sample size</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2013-02, Vol.9 (1), p.S21-S31</ispartof><rights>The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>2013 The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2013 The Alzheimer’s Association. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6407-ec5a59715086af2042b6efaf93590f6bc7f90d53a20e206d91ad322ad54d2f753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6407-ec5a59715086af2042b6efaf93590f6bc7f90d53a20e206d91ad322ad54d2f753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2012.05.2187$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2012.05.2187$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23127469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raghavan, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samtani, Mahesh N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnum, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grundman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBernardo, Allitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><title>The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. Methods Using Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. Results All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive–functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ1-42 ) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. Conclusion An empirical, data-driven approach with e xisting instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early AD clinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ1-42 pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.</description><subject>ADAS-Cog</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Ceiling effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Composite endpoints</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MCI</subject><subject>Mild cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Novel endpoints</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUstu1DAUjRCIlsIXICEv2ST4EeeBRKVRSqHVAIuWDRvLY1-3Dkk8tTNTha_HYYbhsYGNr3V9zrlHPjdJnhOcEUyKV23Wyu5bRjGhGeYZJVX5IDkmnNOU07J-eLgX-Ch5EkKLcY4rwh8nR5QRWuZFfZzcXd8CWpwtrtLG3SAPWxvsCPo1-ui20CHl-rWbOygo2UFAKxlAIzf84owO2X7tIxyBMVZZGNSE7IA-NBdIDhqB9N0U8Wj0VnbhafLIxALP9vUk-Xz-9rp5ny4_vbtoFstUFTkuU1Bc8rokHFeFNBTndFWAkaZmvMamWKnS1FhzJikGigtdE6kZpVLzXFNTcnaSnO5015tVD1rBMHrZibW3vfSTcNKKP18Geytu3FawktGK0ijwci_g3d0Gwih6GxR0nRzAbYIgtKoYyQs8Q9kOqrwLwYM5jCFYzGGJVsxhiTksgbmYw4qsF787PHB-phMBzQ5wbzuY_kdTLJZfLi_jMTcx3495s1OB-NtbC16EHyGBth7UKLSz_7B5-hdfdXawcR--wgShdRs_xCAFESGSxNW8dfPSRQOUVRyz799WzrQ</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Raghavan, Nandini</creator><creator>Samtani, Mahesh N</creator><creator>Farnum, Michael</creator><creator>Yang, Eric</creator><creator>Novak, Gerald</creator><creator>Grundman, Michael</creator><creator>Narayan, Vaibhav</creator><creator>DiBernardo, Allitia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The Alzheimer's Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials</title><author>Raghavan, Nandini ; Samtani, Mahesh N ; Farnum, Michael ; Yang, Eric ; Novak, Gerald ; Grundman, Michael ; Narayan, Vaibhav ; DiBernardo, Allitia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6407-ec5a59715086af2042b6efaf93590f6bc7f90d53a20e206d91ad322ad54d2f753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ADAS-Cog</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Ceiling effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Composite endpoints</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MCI</topic><topic>Mild cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Novel endpoints</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raghavan, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samtani, Mahesh N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnum, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grundman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBernardo, Allitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raghavan, Nandini</au><au>Samtani, Mahesh N</au><au>Farnum, Michael</au><au>Yang, Eric</au><au>Novak, Gerald</au><au>Grundman, Michael</au><au>Narayan, Vaibhav</au><au>DiBernardo, Allitia</au><aucorp>Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</aucorp><aucorp>Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>S21</spage><epage>S31</epage><pages>S21-S31</pages><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. Methods Using Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. Results All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive–functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ1-42 ) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. Conclusion An empirical, data-driven approach with e xisting instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early AD clinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ1-42 pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23127469</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2187</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2013-02, Vol.9 (1), p.S21-S31
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3732822
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects ADAS-Cog
Aged
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis
Alzheimer Disease - psychology
Alzheimer's disease
Ceiling effects
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic
Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis
Composite endpoints
Early Diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
MCI
Mild cognitive impairment
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests
Novel endpoints
Power
Sample size
title The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ADAS-Cog%20revisited:%20Novel%20composite%20scales%20based%20on%20ADAS-Cog%20to%20improve%20efficiency%20in%20MCI%20and%20early%20AD%20trials&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Raghavan,%20Nandini&rft.aucorp=Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20Disease%20Neuroimaging%20Initiative&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=S21&rft.epage=S31&rft.pages=S21-S31&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1288314602%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1288314602&rft_id=info:pmid/23127469&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1552526012023850&rfr_iscdi=true