Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics
Trial-to-trial variation in word-pronunciation times exhibits 1/f scaling. One explanation is that human performances are consequent on multiplicative interactions among interdependent processes-interaction dominant dynamics. This article describes simulated distributions of pronunciation times in a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological review 2009-04, Vol.116 (2), p.318-342 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 342 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 318 |
| container_title | Psychological review |
| container_volume | 116 |
| creator | Holden, John G Van Orden, Guy C Turvey, Michael T |
| description | Trial-to-trial variation in word-pronunciation times exhibits 1/f scaling. One explanation is that human performances are consequent on multiplicative interactions among interdependent processes-interaction dominant dynamics. This article describes simulated distributions of pronunciation times in a further test for multiplicative interactions and interdependence. Individual participant distributions of ≈1,100 word-pronunciation times were successfully mimicked for each participant in combinations of lognormal and power-law behavior. Successful hazard function simulations generalized these results to establish interaction dominant dynamics, in contrast with component dominant dynamics, as a likely mechanism for cognitive activity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0014849 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3730291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ835048</ericid><sourcerecordid>614495461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a573t-ed72ab0d7d7d70a5e626344ababc11db762cac052628dea8e7943503930619333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V2L1DAUBuAgiju7Cv4AkSKseGE1J0mT5kaQ2fWLBUFW8C6cppk1S9vUpB2Yf2-GGWd1LjS5COU8nDTvIeQJ0NdAuXqDlIKohb5HFqC5LkEouE8WlHJeMl19PyGnKd3SvEDrh-QkI1FXQiyIuvBpdDH5MBRhVXx1aQxDcsW1713Kn2uHXSqW4Wbwk1-74mIzYO9tekQerHLFPd6fZ-Tb-8vr5cfy6suHT8t3VyVWik-laxXDhrZquylWTjLJhcAGGwvQNkoyi5ZWTLK6dVg7pQWvKNecyvyTnJ-Rt7u-49z0rrVumCJ2Zoy-x7gxAb35uzL4H-YmrA1XnDINucGLfYMYfs4uTab3ybquw8GFORmpACqu6v9CroDVWqkMnx_B2zDHIadgJAihKyHhX4iBYFAD0xm93CEbQ0rRrQ7vAmq2gzW_B5vpsz9zuIP7SWZwvgeYLHariIP16eAYcK4qJbN7unMuensoX36uc-xim8KrXRlHNGPaWIyTt51Ldo4xR2yiWxsAaZjhUN_desyP3C9njM46</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614495461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Holden, John G ; Van Orden, Guy C ; Turvey, Michael T</creator><contributor>Rayner, Keith</contributor><creatorcontrib>Holden, John G ; Van Orden, Guy C ; Turvey, Michael T ; Rayner, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>Trial-to-trial variation in word-pronunciation times exhibits 1/f scaling. One explanation is that human performances are consequent on multiplicative interactions among interdependent processes-interaction dominant dynamics. This article describes simulated distributions of pronunciation times in a further test for multiplicative interactions and interdependence. Individual participant distributions of ≈1,100 word-pronunciation times were successfully mimicked for each participant in combinations of lognormal and power-law behavior. Successful hazard function simulations generalized these results to establish interaction dominant dynamics, in contrast with component dominant dynamics, as a likely mechanism for cognitive activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0014849</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19348544</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSRVAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Cognition ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; English ; Evaluation Methods ; Feedback (Response) ; Fractals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Hypothesis Testing ; Interaction ; Language ; Naming ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Probability ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Pronunciation ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Response time ; Simulation ; Speech ; Statistical Distributions ; Validity ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2009-04, Vol.116 (2), p.318-342</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a573t-ed72ab0d7d7d70a5e626344ababc11db762cac052628dea8e7943503930619333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ835048$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21337576$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19348544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rayner, Keith</contributor><creatorcontrib>Holden, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Orden, Guy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turvey, Michael T</creatorcontrib><title>Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Trial-to-trial variation in word-pronunciation times exhibits 1/f scaling. One explanation is that human performances are consequent on multiplicative interactions among interdependent processes-interaction dominant dynamics. This article describes simulated distributions of pronunciation times in a further test for multiplicative interactions and interdependence. Individual participant distributions of ≈1,100 word-pronunciation times were successfully mimicked for each participant in combinations of lognormal and power-law behavior. Successful hazard function simulations generalized these results to establish interaction dominant dynamics, in contrast with component dominant dynamics, as a likely mechanism for cognitive activity.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Statistical Distributions</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V2L1DAUBuAgiju7Cv4AkSKseGE1J0mT5kaQ2fWLBUFW8C6cppk1S9vUpB2Yf2-GGWd1LjS5COU8nDTvIeQJ0NdAuXqDlIKohb5HFqC5LkEouE8WlHJeMl19PyGnKd3SvEDrh-QkI1FXQiyIuvBpdDH5MBRhVXx1aQxDcsW1713Kn2uHXSqW4Wbwk1-74mIzYO9tekQerHLFPd6fZ-Tb-8vr5cfy6suHT8t3VyVWik-laxXDhrZquylWTjLJhcAGGwvQNkoyi5ZWTLK6dVg7pQWvKNecyvyTnJ-Rt7u-49z0rrVumCJ2Zoy-x7gxAb35uzL4H-YmrA1XnDINucGLfYMYfs4uTab3ybquw8GFORmpACqu6v9CroDVWqkMnx_B2zDHIadgJAihKyHhX4iBYFAD0xm93CEbQ0rRrQ7vAmq2gzW_B5vpsz9zuIP7SWZwvgeYLHariIP16eAYcK4qJbN7unMuensoX36uc-xim8KrXRlHNGPaWIyTt51Ldo4xR2yiWxsAaZjhUN_desyP3C9njM46</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Holden, John G</creator><creator>Van Orden, Guy C</creator><creator>Turvey, Michael T</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics</title><author>Holden, John G ; Van Orden, Guy C ; Turvey, Michael T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a573t-ed72ab0d7d7d70a5e626344ababc11db762cac052628dea8e7943503930619333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Statistical Distributions</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Orden, Guy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turvey, Michael T</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, John G</au><au>Van Orden, Guy C</au><au>Turvey, Michael T</au><au>Rayner, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ835048</ericid><atitle>Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>318-342</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><coden>PSRVAX</coden><abstract>Trial-to-trial variation in word-pronunciation times exhibits 1/f scaling. One explanation is that human performances are consequent on multiplicative interactions among interdependent processes-interaction dominant dynamics. This article describes simulated distributions of pronunciation times in a further test for multiplicative interactions and interdependence. Individual participant distributions of ≈1,100 word-pronunciation times were successfully mimicked for each participant in combinations of lognormal and power-law behavior. Successful hazard function simulations generalized these results to establish interaction dominant dynamics, in contrast with component dominant dynamics, as a likely mechanism for cognitive activity.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19348544</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0014849</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-295X |
| ispartof | Psychological review, 2009-04, Vol.116 (2), p.318-342 |
| issn | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3730291 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences California Cognition Cognition - physiology Cognitive ability Cognitive Processes College Students English Evaluation Methods Feedback (Response) Fractals Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Hypothesis Testing Interaction Language Naming Nonlinear Dynamics Probability Production and perception of spoken language Pronunciation Proportional Hazards Models Psychological aspects Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Response time Simulation Speech Statistical Distributions Validity Words (Phonetic Units) |
| title | Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dispersion%20of%20Response%20Times%20Reveals%20Cognitive%20Dynamics&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Holden,%20John%20G&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=318-342&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft.coden=PSRVAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0014849&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E614495461%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614495461&rft_id=info:pmid/19348544&rft_ericid=EJ835048&rfr_iscdi=true |