Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies
A review of planning studies was undertaken to evaluate estimated risks of radiation induced second primary cancers (RISPC) associated with different prostate radiotherapy techniques for localised prostate cancer. A total of 83 publications were identified which employed a variety of methods to esti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2013-07, Vol.8 (1), p.172-172, Article 172 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 172 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Radiation oncology (London, England) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Murray, Louise Henry, Ann Hoskin, Peter Siebert, Frank-Andre Venselaar, Jack |
description | A review of planning studies was undertaken to evaluate estimated risks of radiation induced second primary cancers (RISPC) associated with different prostate radiotherapy techniques for localised prostate cancer. A total of 83 publications were identified which employed a variety of methods to estimate RISPC risk. Of these, the 16 planning studies which specifically addressed absolute or relative second cancer risk using dose-response models were selected for inclusion within this review. There are uncertainties and limitations related to all the different methods for estimating RISPC risk. Whether or not dose models include the effects of the primary radiation beam, as well as out-of-field regions, influences estimated risks. Regarding the impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT, at equivalent energies, several studies suggest an increase in risk related to increased leakage contributing to out-of-field RISPC risk, although in absolute terms this increase in risk may be very small. IMRT also results in increased low dose normal tissue irradiation, but the extent to which this has been estimated to contribute to RISPC risk is variable, and may also be very small. IMRT is often delivered using 6MV photons while conventional radiotherapy often requires higher energies to achieve adequate tissue penetration, and so comparisons between IMRT and older techniques should not be restricted to equivalent energies. Proton and brachytherapy planning studies suggest very low RISPC risks associated with these techniques. Until there is sufficient clinical evidence regarding RISPC risks associated with modern irradiation techniques, the data produced from planning studies is relevant when considering which patients to irradiate, and which technique to employ. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1748-717X-8-172 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3724744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534715394</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534715394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e67c313dc5f102a8a0b6843a265ba5c2e669c3527af8d76eddbe9fae20cf21be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk1rGzEQFaWhSdOeeyuCnjdZfa12eygkoR-BQA5poTcxK41cBa_kSuuU_vvK2HVjSNFBw8ybx5s3Q8gb1p4x1nfnTMu-0Ux_b_qGaf6MnOwzzx_Fx-RlKfdtK5VohxfkmIteKNaJEzLeoU3R0VUOE-Tf1EK0mAsFP2OmGVyAOaRIfcoVk8oMM-5A7ynQjA8Bf9HkqYMZqM9poqslxBjigpZ57QKWV-TIw7Lg691_Sr59-vj16ktzc_v5-uriphmV1HODnbaCCWeVZy2HHtqx66UA3qkRlOXYdYMVimvwvdMdOjfi4AF5az1nI4pT8mHLu1qPEzqLcc6wNLvJTIJgDisx_DCL9GCE5lJLWQkutwRjSP8hOKzYNJmNx2bjselrzCvJu52KnH6usczmPq1zrIMbJpka2DBo9Q-1gCWaEH2qhHYKxZoLJaRmSgwbQWdPoOpzOIW6NvSh5g8azrcNtq6qZPR78aw1m4N5Qu7bx6bt8X8vRPwB-jW9qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1415919975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murray, Louise ; Henry, Ann ; Hoskin, Peter ; Siebert, Frank-Andre ; Venselaar, Jack</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Louise ; Henry, Ann ; Hoskin, Peter ; Siebert, Frank-Andre ; Venselaar, Jack ; BRAPHYQS/PROBATE group of the GEC ESTRO</creatorcontrib><description>A review of planning studies was undertaken to evaluate estimated risks of radiation induced second primary cancers (RISPC) associated with different prostate radiotherapy techniques for localised prostate cancer. A total of 83 publications were identified which employed a variety of methods to estimate RISPC risk. Of these, the 16 planning studies which specifically addressed absolute or relative second cancer risk using dose-response models were selected for inclusion within this review. There are uncertainties and limitations related to all the different methods for estimating RISPC risk. Whether or not dose models include the effects of the primary radiation beam, as well as out-of-field regions, influences estimated risks. Regarding the impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT, at equivalent energies, several studies suggest an increase in risk related to increased leakage contributing to out-of-field RISPC risk, although in absolute terms this increase in risk may be very small. IMRT also results in increased low dose normal tissue irradiation, but the extent to which this has been estimated to contribute to RISPC risk is variable, and may also be very small. IMRT is often delivered using 6MV photons while conventional radiotherapy often requires higher energies to achieve adequate tissue penetration, and so comparisons between IMRT and older techniques should not be restricted to equivalent energies. Proton and brachytherapy planning studies suggest very low RISPC risks associated with these techniques. Until there is sufficient clinical evidence regarding RISPC risks associated with modern irradiation techniques, the data produced from planning studies is relevant when considering which patients to irradiate, and which technique to employ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23835163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Confidence intervals ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - etiology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy - adverse effects ; Review ; Risk factors ; Second primary cancer ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013-07, Vol.8 (1), p.172-172, Article 172</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Murray et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Murray et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Murray et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e67c313dc5f102a8a0b6843a265ba5c2e669c3527af8d76eddbe9fae20cf21be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e67c313dc5f102a8a0b6843a265ba5c2e669c3527af8d76eddbe9fae20cf21be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3724744/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3724744/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, Frank-Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venselaar, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAPHYQS/PROBATE group of the GEC ESTRO</creatorcontrib><title>Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies</title><title>Radiation oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>A review of planning studies was undertaken to evaluate estimated risks of radiation induced second primary cancers (RISPC) associated with different prostate radiotherapy techniques for localised prostate cancer. A total of 83 publications were identified which employed a variety of methods to estimate RISPC risk. Of these, the 16 planning studies which specifically addressed absolute or relative second cancer risk using dose-response models were selected for inclusion within this review. There are uncertainties and limitations related to all the different methods for estimating RISPC risk. Whether or not dose models include the effects of the primary radiation beam, as well as out-of-field regions, influences estimated risks. Regarding the impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT, at equivalent energies, several studies suggest an increase in risk related to increased leakage contributing to out-of-field RISPC risk, although in absolute terms this increase in risk may be very small. IMRT also results in increased low dose normal tissue irradiation, but the extent to which this has been estimated to contribute to RISPC risk is variable, and may also be very small. IMRT is often delivered using 6MV photons while conventional radiotherapy often requires higher energies to achieve adequate tissue penetration, and so comparisons between IMRT and older techniques should not be restricted to equivalent energies. Proton and brachytherapy planning studies suggest very low RISPC risks associated with these techniques. Until there is sufficient clinical evidence regarding RISPC risks associated with modern irradiation techniques, the data produced from planning studies is relevant when considering which patients to irradiate, and which technique to employ.</description><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - etiology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Second primary cancer</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1748-717X</issn><issn>1748-717X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk1rGzEQFaWhSdOeeyuCnjdZfa12eygkoR-BQA5poTcxK41cBa_kSuuU_vvK2HVjSNFBw8ybx5s3Q8gb1p4x1nfnTMu-0Ux_b_qGaf6MnOwzzx_Fx-RlKfdtK5VohxfkmIteKNaJEzLeoU3R0VUOE-Tf1EK0mAsFP2OmGVyAOaRIfcoVk8oMM-5A7ynQjA8Bf9HkqYMZqM9poqslxBjigpZ57QKWV-TIw7Lg691_Sr59-vj16ktzc_v5-uriphmV1HODnbaCCWeVZy2HHtqx66UA3qkRlOXYdYMVimvwvdMdOjfi4AF5az1nI4pT8mHLu1qPEzqLcc6wNLvJTIJgDisx_DCL9GCE5lJLWQkutwRjSP8hOKzYNJmNx2bjselrzCvJu52KnH6usczmPq1zrIMbJpka2DBo9Q-1gCWaEH2qhHYKxZoLJaRmSgwbQWdPoOpzOIW6NvSh5g8azrcNtq6qZPR78aw1m4N5Qu7bx6bt8X8vRPwB-jW9qw</recordid><startdate>20130708</startdate><enddate>20130708</enddate><creator>Murray, Louise</creator><creator>Henry, Ann</creator><creator>Hoskin, Peter</creator><creator>Siebert, Frank-Andre</creator><creator>Venselaar, Jack</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130708</creationdate><title>Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies</title><author>Murray, Louise ; Henry, Ann ; Hoskin, Peter ; Siebert, Frank-Andre ; Venselaar, Jack</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-e67c313dc5f102a8a0b6843a265ba5c2e669c3527af8d76eddbe9fae20cf21be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - etiology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Second primary cancer</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, Frank-Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venselaar, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAPHYQS/PROBATE group of the GEC ESTRO</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Louise</au><au>Henry, Ann</au><au>Hoskin, Peter</au><au>Siebert, Frank-Andre</au><au>Venselaar, Jack</au><aucorp>BRAPHYQS/PROBATE group of the GEC ESTRO</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies</atitle><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2013-07-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>172-172</pages><artnum>172</artnum><issn>1748-717X</issn><eissn>1748-717X</eissn><abstract>A review of planning studies was undertaken to evaluate estimated risks of radiation induced second primary cancers (RISPC) associated with different prostate radiotherapy techniques for localised prostate cancer. A total of 83 publications were identified which employed a variety of methods to estimate RISPC risk. Of these, the 16 planning studies which specifically addressed absolute or relative second cancer risk using dose-response models were selected for inclusion within this review. There are uncertainties and limitations related to all the different methods for estimating RISPC risk. Whether or not dose models include the effects of the primary radiation beam, as well as out-of-field regions, influences estimated risks. Regarding the impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT, at equivalent energies, several studies suggest an increase in risk related to increased leakage contributing to out-of-field RISPC risk, although in absolute terms this increase in risk may be very small. IMRT also results in increased low dose normal tissue irradiation, but the extent to which this has been estimated to contribute to RISPC risk is variable, and may also be very small. IMRT is often delivered using 6MV photons while conventional radiotherapy often requires higher energies to achieve adequate tissue penetration, and so comparisons between IMRT and older techniques should not be restricted to equivalent energies. Proton and brachytherapy planning studies suggest very low RISPC risks associated with these techniques. Until there is sufficient clinical evidence regarding RISPC risks associated with modern irradiation techniques, the data produced from planning studies is relevant when considering which patients to irradiate, and which technique to employ.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23835163</pmid><doi>10.1186/1748-717X-8-172</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-717X |
ispartof | Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013-07, Vol.8 (1), p.172-172, Article 172 |
issn | 1748-717X 1748-717X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3724744 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cancer therapies Care and treatment Confidence intervals Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Humans Male Medical research Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology Neoplasms, Second Primary - etiology Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiation Dosage Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Radiotherapy - adverse effects Review Risk factors Second primary cancer Studies |
title | Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A41%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Second%20primary%20cancers%20after%20radiation%20for%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20review%20of%20data%20from%20planning%20studies&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Murray,%20Louise&rft.aucorp=BRAPHYQS/PROBATE%20group%20of%20the%20GEC%20ESTRO&rft.date=2013-07-08&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=172-172&rft.artnum=172&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1748-717X-8-172&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534715394%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1415919975&rft_id=info:pmid/23835163&rft_galeid=A534715394&rfr_iscdi=true |