Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein neuropathy

OBJECTIVE:To determine whether rituximab 375 mg/m was efficacious in patients with immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy (IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy). METHODS:Fifty-four patients with IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy were enrolle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2013-06, Vol.80 (24), p.2217-2225
Hauptverfasser: Léger, Jean-Marc, Viala, Karine, Nicolas, Guillaume, Créange, Alain, Vallat, Jean-Michel, Pouget, Jean, Clavelou, Pierre, Vial, Christophe, Steck, Andreas, Musset, Lucile, Marin, Benoit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:To determine whether rituximab 375 mg/m was efficacious in patients with immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-myelin–associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy (IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy). METHODS:Fifty-four patients with IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The inclusion criteria were inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) sensory score (ISS) ≥4 and visual analog pain scale >4 or ataxia score ≥2. The primary outcome was mean change in ISS at 12 months. RESULTS:Twenty-six patients were randomized to a group receiving 4 weekly infusions of 375 mg/m rituximab, and 28 patients to placebo. Intention-to-treat analysis, with imputation of missing ISS values by the last observation carried forward method, showed a lack of mean change in ISS at 12 months, 1.0 ± 2.7 in the rituximab group, and 1.0 ± 2.8 in the placebo group. However, changes were observed, in per protocol analysis at 12 months, for the number of patients with an improvement of at least 2 points in the INCAT disability scale (p = 0.027), the self-evaluation scale (p = 0.016), and 2 subscores of the Short Form–36 questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS:Although primary outcome measures provide no evidence to support the use of rituximab in IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy, there were improvements in several secondary outcomes in per protocol analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class I evidence that rituximab is ineffective in improving ISS in patients with IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy.
ISSN:0028-3878
1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318296e92b