Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA)

Objectives To investigate whether gravitational valves reduce the risk of overdrainage complications compared with programmable valves in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Background Patients with iNPH may benefit from VP shunting but are pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry neurosurgery and psychiatry, 2013-08, Vol.84 (8), p.850-857
Hauptverfasser: Lemcke, Johannes, Meier, Ullrich, Müller, Cornelia, Fritsch, Michael J, Kehler, Uwe, Langer, Niels, Kiefer, Michael, Eymann, Regina, Schuhmann, Martin U, Speil, Andreas, Weber, Friedrich, Remenez, Victor, Rohde, Veit, Ludwig, Hans-Christoph, Stengel, Dirk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 857
container_issue 8
container_start_page 850
container_title Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
container_volume 84
creator Lemcke, Johannes
Meier, Ullrich
Müller, Cornelia
Fritsch, Michael J
Kehler, Uwe
Langer, Niels
Kiefer, Michael
Eymann, Regina
Schuhmann, Martin U
Speil, Andreas
Weber, Friedrich
Remenez, Victor
Rohde, Veit
Ludwig, Hans-Christoph
Stengel, Dirk
description Objectives To investigate whether gravitational valves reduce the risk of overdrainage complications compared with programmable valves in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Background Patients with iNPH may benefit from VP shunting but are prone to overdrainage complications during posture changes. Gravitational valves with tantalum balls are considered to reduce the risk of overdrainage but their clinical effectiveness is unclear. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial comparing gravitational with non-gravitational programmable valves in patients with iNPH eligible for VP shunting. The primary endpoint was any clinical or radiological sign (headache, nausea, vomiting, subdural effusion or slit ventricle) of overdrainage 6 months after randomisation. We also assessed disease specific instruments (Black and Kiefer Scale) and Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) generic health questionnaire. Results We enrolled 145 patients (mean (SD) age 71.9 (6.9) years), 137 of whom were available for endpoint analysis. After 6 months, 29 patients in the standard and five patients in the gravitational shunt group developed overdrainage (risk difference −36%, 95% CI −49% to −23%; p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303936
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3717598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1399506507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b531t-96930620f8742d86970fc06765f2ce3b098a4d8cf56e4d7fe09fdd6de440ce2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhSMEYoaBPStkic0gGvAjsRMWSFXFSxp1xBRG7Cwnvm5ckjjYSaE_iv-IS4cK2Iw3lny-e-698kmSxwS_IITxl5u-H1KKCU0ZZiXjd5JTkvEiZQx_uZucYkz3So5PkgchbPD-FOX95ISyLBeU0tPk50oZGHdI9RqBMbZW9Q45g9Zebe2oRut61aLQTP2ItqrdQkC2R0MUoB8D-m7HBlltXXxpbI1657vIDx5CmDygZqe9q2FoVDuFV0hFRa27WF3PkI89XWcD6BlyA_SoVRW0M9RNbdSjfawfvY1256vr-epyOX_2MLlnVBvg0c19lnx---bT4n16cfnuw2J-kVY5I2Na8pJhTrEpREZ1wUuBTY254LmhNbAKl4XKdFGbnEOmhQFcGq25hizDNdCKnSWvD77DVHWgfw-jWjl42ym_k05Z-a_S20au3VYyQUReFtHg_MbAu28ThFHGRWtoW9WDm4IkeU44yWjBbkdZWeaY51hE9Ol_6MZNPn5QpERBaFZGNFL4QNXeheDBHOcmWO5jI_exkfvYyENsYsmTv_c9FvzJSQTSA2DDCD-OuvJfJRdM5HJ5vZDLJbsq8BWVHyP__MBX3eb29r8AlfvekA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781249995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Lemcke, Johannes ; Meier, Ullrich ; Müller, Cornelia ; Fritsch, Michael J ; Kehler, Uwe ; Langer, Niels ; Kiefer, Michael ; Eymann, Regina ; Schuhmann, Martin U ; Speil, Andreas ; Weber, Friedrich ; Remenez, Victor ; Rohde, Veit ; Ludwig, Hans-Christoph ; Stengel, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemcke, Johannes ; Meier, Ullrich ; Müller, Cornelia ; Fritsch, Michael J ; Kehler, Uwe ; Langer, Niels ; Kiefer, Michael ; Eymann, Regina ; Schuhmann, Martin U ; Speil, Andreas ; Weber, Friedrich ; Remenez, Victor ; Rohde, Veit ; Ludwig, Hans-Christoph ; Stengel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To investigate whether gravitational valves reduce the risk of overdrainage complications compared with programmable valves in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Background Patients with iNPH may benefit from VP shunting but are prone to overdrainage complications during posture changes. Gravitational valves with tantalum balls are considered to reduce the risk of overdrainage but their clinical effectiveness is unclear. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial comparing gravitational with non-gravitational programmable valves in patients with iNPH eligible for VP shunting. The primary endpoint was any clinical or radiological sign (headache, nausea, vomiting, subdural effusion or slit ventricle) of overdrainage 6 months after randomisation. We also assessed disease specific instruments (Black and Kiefer Scale) and Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) generic health questionnaire. Results We enrolled 145 patients (mean (SD) age 71.9 (6.9) years), 137 of whom were available for endpoint analysis. After 6 months, 29 patients in the standard and five patients in the gravitational shunt group developed overdrainage (risk difference −36%, 95% CI −49% to −23%; p&lt;0.001). This difference exceeded predetermined stopping rules and resulted in premature discontinuation of patient recruitment. Disease specific outcome scales did not differ between the groups although there was a significant advantage of the gravitational device in the SF-12 Mental Component Scores at the 6 and 12 month visits. Conclusions Implanting a gravitational rather than another type of valve will avoid one additional overdrainage complication in about every third patient undergoing VP shunting for iNPH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-330X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23457222</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNNPAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ataxia ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - adverse effects ; Cerebrovascular Disease ; Csf Dynamics ; Dementia ; Endoscopy ; Endpoint Determination ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - surgery ; Gravitation ; Humans ; Hydrocephalus ; Hydrocephalus - complications ; Hydrocephalus - surgery ; Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - psychology ; Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical equipment ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Quality of life ; Randomised Trials ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Valves</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, 2013-08, Vol.84 (8), p.850-857</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b531t-96930620f8742d86970fc06765f2ce3b098a4d8cf56e4d7fe09fdd6de440ce2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b531t-96930620f8742d86970fc06765f2ce3b098a4d8cf56e4d7fe09fdd6de440ce2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jnnp.bmj.com/content/84/8/850.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jnnp.bmj.com/content/84/8/850.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23457222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemcke, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Ullrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiefer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eymann, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuhmann, Martin U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speil, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remenez, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Veit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Hans-Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stengel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA)</title><title>Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry</title><addtitle>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objectives To investigate whether gravitational valves reduce the risk of overdrainage complications compared with programmable valves in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Background Patients with iNPH may benefit from VP shunting but are prone to overdrainage complications during posture changes. Gravitational valves with tantalum balls are considered to reduce the risk of overdrainage but their clinical effectiveness is unclear. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial comparing gravitational with non-gravitational programmable valves in patients with iNPH eligible for VP shunting. The primary endpoint was any clinical or radiological sign (headache, nausea, vomiting, subdural effusion or slit ventricle) of overdrainage 6 months after randomisation. We also assessed disease specific instruments (Black and Kiefer Scale) and Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) generic health questionnaire. Results We enrolled 145 patients (mean (SD) age 71.9 (6.9) years), 137 of whom were available for endpoint analysis. After 6 months, 29 patients in the standard and five patients in the gravitational shunt group developed overdrainage (risk difference −36%, 95% CI −49% to −23%; p&lt;0.001). This difference exceeded predetermined stopping rules and resulted in premature discontinuation of patient recruitment. Disease specific outcome scales did not differ between the groups although there was a significant advantage of the gravitational device in the SF-12 Mental Component Scores at the 6 and 12 month visits. Conclusions Implanting a gravitational rather than another type of valve will avoid one additional overdrainage complication in about every third patient undergoing VP shunting for iNPH.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ataxia</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disease</subject><subject>Csf Dynamics</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - surgery</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus - complications</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus - surgery</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - psychology</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Randomised Trials</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Valves</subject><issn>0022-3050</issn><issn>1468-330X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhSMEYoaBPStkic0gGvAjsRMWSFXFSxp1xBRG7Cwnvm5ckjjYSaE_iv-IS4cK2Iw3lny-e-698kmSxwS_IITxl5u-H1KKCU0ZZiXjd5JTkvEiZQx_uZucYkz3So5PkgchbPD-FOX95ISyLBeU0tPk50oZGHdI9RqBMbZW9Q45g9Zebe2oRut61aLQTP2ItqrdQkC2R0MUoB8D-m7HBlltXXxpbI1657vIDx5CmDygZqe9q2FoVDuFV0hFRa27WF3PkI89XWcD6BlyA_SoVRW0M9RNbdSjfawfvY1256vr-epyOX_2MLlnVBvg0c19lnx---bT4n16cfnuw2J-kVY5I2Na8pJhTrEpREZ1wUuBTY254LmhNbAKl4XKdFGbnEOmhQFcGq25hizDNdCKnSWvD77DVHWgfw-jWjl42ym_k05Z-a_S20au3VYyQUReFtHg_MbAu28ThFHGRWtoW9WDm4IkeU44yWjBbkdZWeaY51hE9Ol_6MZNPn5QpERBaFZGNFL4QNXeheDBHOcmWO5jI_exkfvYyENsYsmTv_c9FvzJSQTSA2DDCD-OuvJfJRdM5HJ5vZDLJbsq8BWVHyP__MBX3eb29r8AlfvekA</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Lemcke, Johannes</creator><creator>Meier, Ullrich</creator><creator>Müller, Cornelia</creator><creator>Fritsch, Michael J</creator><creator>Kehler, Uwe</creator><creator>Langer, Niels</creator><creator>Kiefer, Michael</creator><creator>Eymann, Regina</creator><creator>Schuhmann, Martin U</creator><creator>Speil, Andreas</creator><creator>Weber, Friedrich</creator><creator>Remenez, Victor</creator><creator>Rohde, Veit</creator><creator>Ludwig, Hans-Christoph</creator><creator>Stengel, Dirk</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA)</title><author>Lemcke, Johannes ; Meier, Ullrich ; Müller, Cornelia ; Fritsch, Michael J ; Kehler, Uwe ; Langer, Niels ; Kiefer, Michael ; Eymann, Regina ; Schuhmann, Martin U ; Speil, Andreas ; Weber, Friedrich ; Remenez, Victor ; Rohde, Veit ; Ludwig, Hans-Christoph ; Stengel, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b531t-96930620f8742d86970fc06765f2ce3b098a4d8cf56e4d7fe09fdd6de440ce2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ataxia</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disease</topic><topic>Csf Dynamics</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - surgery</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus - complications</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus - surgery</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - psychology</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Randomised Trials</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Valves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemcke, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Ullrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiefer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eymann, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuhmann, Martin U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speil, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remenez, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Veit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Hans-Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stengel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemcke, Johannes</au><au>Meier, Ullrich</au><au>Müller, Cornelia</au><au>Fritsch, Michael J</au><au>Kehler, Uwe</au><au>Langer, Niels</au><au>Kiefer, Michael</au><au>Eymann, Regina</au><au>Schuhmann, Martin U</au><au>Speil, Andreas</au><au>Weber, Friedrich</au><au>Remenez, Victor</au><au>Rohde, Veit</au><au>Ludwig, Hans-Christoph</au><au>Stengel, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>850</spage><epage>857</epage><pages>850-857</pages><issn>0022-3050</issn><eissn>1468-330X</eissn><coden>JNNPAU</coden><abstract>Objectives To investigate whether gravitational valves reduce the risk of overdrainage complications compared with programmable valves in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Background Patients with iNPH may benefit from VP shunting but are prone to overdrainage complications during posture changes. Gravitational valves with tantalum balls are considered to reduce the risk of overdrainage but their clinical effectiveness is unclear. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial comparing gravitational with non-gravitational programmable valves in patients with iNPH eligible for VP shunting. The primary endpoint was any clinical or radiological sign (headache, nausea, vomiting, subdural effusion or slit ventricle) of overdrainage 6 months after randomisation. We also assessed disease specific instruments (Black and Kiefer Scale) and Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) generic health questionnaire. Results We enrolled 145 patients (mean (SD) age 71.9 (6.9) years), 137 of whom were available for endpoint analysis. After 6 months, 29 patients in the standard and five patients in the gravitational shunt group developed overdrainage (risk difference −36%, 95% CI −49% to −23%; p&lt;0.001). This difference exceeded predetermined stopping rules and resulted in premature discontinuation of patient recruitment. Disease specific outcome scales did not differ between the groups although there was a significant advantage of the gravitational device in the SF-12 Mental Component Scores at the 6 and 12 month visits. Conclusions Implanting a gravitational rather than another type of valve will avoid one additional overdrainage complication in about every third patient undergoing VP shunting for iNPH.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>23457222</pmid><doi>10.1136/jnnp-2012-303936</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3050
ispartof Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, 2013-08, Vol.84 (8), p.850-857
issn 0022-3050
1468-330X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3717598
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ataxia
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - adverse effects
Cerebrovascular Disease
Csf Dynamics
Dementia
Endoscopy
Endpoint Determination
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - surgery
Gravitation
Humans
Hydrocephalus
Hydrocephalus - complications
Hydrocephalus - surgery
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - psychology
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - surgery
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical equipment
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Neurosurgery
Patients
Quality of life
Randomised Trials
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Valves
title Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A15%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20gravitational%20shunt%20valves%20in%20patients%20with%20idiopathic%20normal%20pressure%20hydrocephalus:%20a%20pragmatic,%20randomised,%20open%20label,%20multicentre%20trial%20(SVASONA)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurology,%20neurosurgery%20and%20psychiatry&rft.au=Lemcke,%20Johannes&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=850&rft.epage=857&rft.pages=850-857&rft.issn=0022-3050&rft.eissn=1468-330X&rft.coden=JNNPAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1399506507%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781249995&rft_id=info:pmid/23457222&rfr_iscdi=true