Characteristics and quality of life of patients presenting to cancer support centres: patient rated outcomes and use of complementary therapies

In order to effectively target and provide individualised patient support strategies it is crucial to have a comprehensive picture of those presenting for services. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and patient rated outcomes of individuals presenting to SolarisCare canc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC complementary and alternative medicine 2013-07, Vol.13 (1), p.169-169, Article 169
Hauptverfasser: Furzer, Bonnie J, Wright, Kemi E, Petterson, Anna S, Wallman, Karen E, Ackland, Timothy R, Joske, David J L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 169
container_issue 1
container_start_page 169
container_title BMC complementary and alternative medicine
container_volume 13
creator Furzer, Bonnie J
Wright, Kemi E
Petterson, Anna S
Wallman, Karen E
Ackland, Timothy R
Joske, David J L
description In order to effectively target and provide individualised patient support strategies it is crucial to have a comprehensive picture of those presenting for services. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and patient rated outcomes of individuals presenting to SolarisCare cancer support centres and their choices regarding complementary and integrated therapies (CIT). A cohort with a current or previous cancer diagnosis aged 18 - 87 years presenting to a SolarisCare centre during a 5-day period completed a questionnaire. Four SolarisCare centres participated in the trial including regional and metropolitan locations. Outcomes included medical and demographic characteristics, CIT variables and patient rated outcomes (PROs) including quality of life (QoL). Of the 95 participants (70.3%) who completed the survey, the mean age was 60.5 years with 62% currently receiving treatment. Eighty percent of the sample had at least one other comorbid condition, with the most popular CIT being relaxation massage. Of the PROs, QoL was significantly lower than norms for the Australian population and other mixed cancer populations. No notable differences were seen between genders, however significantly poorer outcomes were found for the younger age group. Fifty percent of the population did not meet physical activity recommendations, and musculoskeletal symptoms explained between 25-27% of variance in QoL. A greater understanding of the health profiles of patients presenting to supportive care centres and their use of CIT, provides Western Australian health professionals with key information to ensure the safety of supportive care practices, as well as fosters optimal patient outcomes and enhances the integration of supportive care strategies within mainstream medical care.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1472-6882-13-169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3717092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534635162</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534635162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-4938ff37b5e078c51fb390fb63a64c562f786b58372ed6e38dd057aeeb4bf0c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk-L1DAYh4so7rp69yQBQbxUk6ZNUg_CMvgPFrzoOaTpm2mWtOkmqbCfwq9sOrM7zojiKSG_Jw_vmzdF8ZzgN4QI9pbUvCqZEFVJaElY-6A4Pxw9PNqfFU9ivMaYcEHqx8VZRUWdM3pe_NwMKiidINiYrI5ITT26WZSz6RZ5g5w1sK6zShamFNEcIOaNnbYoeaTVpCGguMyzDwnpnOT83T2OgkrQI78k7UfYy5e4E-aD2cGYIRVuURogqNlCfFo8MspFeHa3XhTfP374tvlcXn399GVzeVV2DWeprFsqjKG8awBzoRtiOtpi0zGqWK0bVhkuWNcIyivoGVDR97jhCqCrO4N1Sy-K93vvvHQj9LvClZNzsGOuR3pl5Wky2UFu_Q9JOeG4rbJgsxd01v9DcJrkhuU6ELkORBIq87yy5fVdGcHfLBCTHG3U4JyawC9RVkIIjHFNxH9RUhPCKtbiOqMv_0Cv_RKm_J47qq0wxc1vaqscSDsZn-vUq1ReNrRmtMm-TL06ogZQLg3RuyVZP8VTEO9BHXyMAczhLQiW62_9W_cvjodwuHD_PekvWd_nIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1411920305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics and quality of life of patients presenting to cancer support centres: patient rated outcomes and use of complementary therapies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Furzer, Bonnie J ; Wright, Kemi E ; Petterson, Anna S ; Wallman, Karen E ; Ackland, Timothy R ; Joske, David J L</creator><creatorcontrib>Furzer, Bonnie J ; Wright, Kemi E ; Petterson, Anna S ; Wallman, Karen E ; Ackland, Timothy R ; Joske, David J L</creatorcontrib><description>In order to effectively target and provide individualised patient support strategies it is crucial to have a comprehensive picture of those presenting for services. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and patient rated outcomes of individuals presenting to SolarisCare cancer support centres and their choices regarding complementary and integrated therapies (CIT). A cohort with a current or previous cancer diagnosis aged 18 - 87 years presenting to a SolarisCare centre during a 5-day period completed a questionnaire. Four SolarisCare centres participated in the trial including regional and metropolitan locations. Outcomes included medical and demographic characteristics, CIT variables and patient rated outcomes (PROs) including quality of life (QoL). Of the 95 participants (70.3%) who completed the survey, the mean age was 60.5 years with 62% currently receiving treatment. Eighty percent of the sample had at least one other comorbid condition, with the most popular CIT being relaxation massage. Of the PROs, QoL was significantly lower than norms for the Australian population and other mixed cancer populations. No notable differences were seen between genders, however significantly poorer outcomes were found for the younger age group. Fifty percent of the population did not meet physical activity recommendations, and musculoskeletal symptoms explained between 25-27% of variance in QoL. A greater understanding of the health profiles of patients presenting to supportive care centres and their use of CIT, provides Western Australian health professionals with key information to ensure the safety of supportive care practices, as well as fosters optimal patient outcomes and enhances the integration of supportive care strategies within mainstream medical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6882</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23844723</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alternative medicine ; Australia ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Cohort Studies ; complement ; Complementary Therapies - psychology ; Ethics ; Exercise ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; massage ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; musculoskeletal system ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patient Satisfaction ; patients ; physical activity ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Studies ; surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; variance ; Western Australia ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2013-07, Vol.13 (1), p.169-169, Article 169</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Furzer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Furzer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Furzer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-4938ff37b5e078c51fb390fb63a64c562f786b58372ed6e38dd057aeeb4bf0c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-4938ff37b5e078c51fb390fb63a64c562f786b58372ed6e38dd057aeeb4bf0c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717092/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717092/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23844723$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furzer, Bonnie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Kemi E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petterson, Anna S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallman, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackland, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joske, David J L</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics and quality of life of patients presenting to cancer support centres: patient rated outcomes and use of complementary therapies</title><title>BMC complementary and alternative medicine</title><addtitle>BMC Complement Altern Med</addtitle><description>In order to effectively target and provide individualised patient support strategies it is crucial to have a comprehensive picture of those presenting for services. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and patient rated outcomes of individuals presenting to SolarisCare cancer support centres and their choices regarding complementary and integrated therapies (CIT). A cohort with a current or previous cancer diagnosis aged 18 - 87 years presenting to a SolarisCare centre during a 5-day period completed a questionnaire. Four SolarisCare centres participated in the trial including regional and metropolitan locations. Outcomes included medical and demographic characteristics, CIT variables and patient rated outcomes (PROs) including quality of life (QoL). Of the 95 participants (70.3%) who completed the survey, the mean age was 60.5 years with 62% currently receiving treatment. Eighty percent of the sample had at least one other comorbid condition, with the most popular CIT being relaxation massage. Of the PROs, QoL was significantly lower than norms for the Australian population and other mixed cancer populations. No notable differences were seen between genders, however significantly poorer outcomes were found for the younger age group. Fifty percent of the population did not meet physical activity recommendations, and musculoskeletal symptoms explained between 25-27% of variance in QoL. A greater understanding of the health profiles of patients presenting to supportive care centres and their use of CIT, provides Western Australian health professionals with key information to ensure the safety of supportive care practices, as well as fosters optimal patient outcomes and enhances the integration of supportive care strategies within mainstream medical care.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alternative medicine</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>complement</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - psychology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>massage</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>musculoskeletal system</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Western Australia</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1472-6882</issn><issn>1472-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk-L1DAYh4so7rp69yQBQbxUk6ZNUg_CMvgPFrzoOaTpm2mWtOkmqbCfwq9sOrM7zojiKSG_Jw_vmzdF8ZzgN4QI9pbUvCqZEFVJaElY-6A4Pxw9PNqfFU9ivMaYcEHqx8VZRUWdM3pe_NwMKiidINiYrI5ITT26WZSz6RZ5g5w1sK6zShamFNEcIOaNnbYoeaTVpCGguMyzDwnpnOT83T2OgkrQI78k7UfYy5e4E-aD2cGYIRVuURogqNlCfFo8MspFeHa3XhTfP374tvlcXn399GVzeVV2DWeprFsqjKG8awBzoRtiOtpi0zGqWK0bVhkuWNcIyivoGVDR97jhCqCrO4N1Sy-K93vvvHQj9LvClZNzsGOuR3pl5Wky2UFu_Q9JOeG4rbJgsxd01v9DcJrkhuU6ELkORBIq87yy5fVdGcHfLBCTHG3U4JyawC9RVkIIjHFNxH9RUhPCKtbiOqMv_0Cv_RKm_J47qq0wxc1vaqscSDsZn-vUq1ReNrRmtMm-TL06ogZQLg3RuyVZP8VTEO9BHXyMAczhLQiW62_9W_cvjodwuHD_PekvWd_nIg</recordid><startdate>20130711</startdate><enddate>20130711</enddate><creator>Furzer, Bonnie J</creator><creator>Wright, Kemi E</creator><creator>Petterson, Anna S</creator><creator>Wallman, Karen E</creator><creator>Ackland, Timothy R</creator><creator>Joske, David J L</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130711</creationdate><title>Characteristics and quality of life of patients presenting to cancer support centres: patient rated outcomes and use of complementary therapies</title><author>Furzer, Bonnie J ; Wright, Kemi E ; Petterson, Anna S ; Wallman, Karen E ; Ackland, Timothy R ; Joske, David J L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-4938ff37b5e078c51fb390fb63a64c562f786b58372ed6e38dd057aeeb4bf0c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alternative medicine</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>complement</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - psychology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>massage</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>musculoskeletal system</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Western Australia</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furzer, Bonnie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Kemi E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petterson, Anna S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallman, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackland, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joske, David J L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC complementary and alternative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furzer, Bonnie J</au><au>Wright, Kemi E</au><au>Petterson, Anna S</au><au>Wallman, Karen E</au><au>Ackland, Timothy R</au><au>Joske, David J L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics and quality of life of patients presenting to cancer support centres: patient rated outcomes and use of complementary therapies</atitle><jtitle>BMC complementary and alternative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Complement Altern Med</addtitle><date>2013-07-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>169-169</pages><artnum>169</artnum><issn>1472-6882</issn><eissn>1472-6882</eissn><abstract>In order to effectively target and provide individualised patient support strategies it is crucial to have a comprehensive picture of those presenting for services. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and patient rated outcomes of individuals presenting to SolarisCare cancer support centres and their choices regarding complementary and integrated therapies (CIT). A cohort with a current or previous cancer diagnosis aged 18 - 87 years presenting to a SolarisCare centre during a 5-day period completed a questionnaire. Four SolarisCare centres participated in the trial including regional and metropolitan locations. Outcomes included medical and demographic characteristics, CIT variables and patient rated outcomes (PROs) including quality of life (QoL). Of the 95 participants (70.3%) who completed the survey, the mean age was 60.5 years with 62% currently receiving treatment. Eighty percent of the sample had at least one other comorbid condition, with the most popular CIT being relaxation massage. Of the PROs, QoL was significantly lower than norms for the Australian population and other mixed cancer populations. No notable differences were seen between genders, however significantly poorer outcomes were found for the younger age group. Fifty percent of the population did not meet physical activity recommendations, and musculoskeletal symptoms explained between 25-27% of variance in QoL. A greater understanding of the health profiles of patients presenting to supportive care centres and their use of CIT, provides Western Australian health professionals with key information to ensure the safety of supportive care practices, as well as fosters optimal patient outcomes and enhances the integration of supportive care strategies within mainstream medical care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23844723</pmid><doi>10.1186/1472-6882-13-169</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6882
ispartof BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2013-07, Vol.13 (1), p.169-169, Article 169
issn 1472-6882
1472-6882
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3717092
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Access to information
Adult
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alternative medicine
Australia
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Cohort Studies
complement
Complementary Therapies - psychology
Ethics
Exercise
Female
Health aspects
Hospitals
Humans
Male
massage
Medical research
Middle Aged
Mortality
musculoskeletal system
Neoplasms - psychology
Neoplasms - therapy
Oncology, Experimental
Patient Satisfaction
patients
physical activity
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Studies
surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
variance
Western Australia
Young Adult
title Characteristics and quality of life of patients presenting to cancer support centres: patient rated outcomes and use of complementary therapies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20of%20patients%20presenting%20to%20cancer%20support%20centres:%20patient%20rated%20outcomes%20and%20use%20of%20complementary%20therapies&rft.jtitle=BMC%20complementary%20and%20alternative%20medicine&rft.au=Furzer,%20Bonnie%20J&rft.date=2013-07-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=169-169&rft.artnum=169&rft.issn=1472-6882&rft.eissn=1472-6882&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1472-6882-13-169&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534635162%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1411920305&rft_id=info:pmid/23844723&rft_galeid=A534635162&rfr_iscdi=true