Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation
Aims: One of the reason for Latarjet procedure failure may be coracoid graft osteolysis. In this study, we aimed to understand if a better compression between the coracoid process and the glenoid, using a mini-plate fixation during the Latarjet procedure, could reduce the amount of coracoid graft os...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of shoulder surgery 2013-01, Vol.7 (1), p.1-6 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | International journal of shoulder surgery |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Giacomo, Giovanni Costantini, Alberto de Gasperis, Nicola De Vita, Andrea Lin, Bernard Francone, Marco Beccaglia, Mario Mastantuono, Marco |
| description | Aims: One of the reason for Latarjet procedure failure may be coracoid graft osteolysis. In this study, we aimed to understand if a better compression between the coracoid process and the glenoid, using a mini-plate fixation during the Latarjet procedure, could reduce the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis.
Materials and Methods: A computed tomography scan analysis of 26 prospectively followed-up patients was conducted after modified Latarjet procedure using mini-plate fixation technique to determine both the location and the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis in them. We then compared our current results with results from that of our previous study without using mini-plate fixation to determine if there is any statistical significant difference in terms of corcacoid bone graft osteolysis between the two surgical techniques.
Results: The most relevant osteolysis was represented by the superficial part of the proximal coracoid, whereas the deep part of the proximal coracoid graft is least involved in osteolysis and has best bone healing. The current study showed a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid with our previous study (P < 0.01).
Discussion: To our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that show the causes of coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that there is a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid in terms of osteolysis. At clinical examination, this difference did not correspond with any clinical findings.
Level of Evidence: Level 4.
Clinical Relevance: Prospective case series, Treatment study. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0973-6042.109877 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3707330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A327389464</galeid><sourcerecordid>A327389464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579d-51930983af75e1dac1f98338a009537dae674d13dc21c6a4eceb913380aed9bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks-PEyEUxydG466rd0-GxMR4mQrDzDB42Ng0_ko28aJnQuFNS5eBCsyO_Q_8s6Xpbm2N4QDv8Xlf8h7fonhJ8KwmmL7DnNGyxXU1I5h3jD0qLo-pxyfni-JZjBuMG0468rS4qGjXdFXXXRa_Fz5I5Y1GS-8ArYLsE_Ixgbe7aCLKIQR0I5MMG0hoG7wCPQZ4j-ZI-WErg4neoZhGvUNLSBOAQ2nyKKoAU8wX0mkZNEqg1s78HAHdRTQYZ8qtlQlQb37JZLx7XjzppY3w4n6_Kn58-vh98aW8-fb562J-U6qGcV02hNPcKpU9a4BoqUifI9pJjHlDmZbQsloTqlVFVCtrULDkJANYgubLnl4V1wfd7bgcQCtwKUgrtsEMMuyEl0ac3zizFit_JyjDjFKcBd7eCwSf24lJDCYqsFY68GMUpMa4raqm5Rl9_Q-68WNwuT1BaM0aXtUt_UutpAVhXO_zu2ovKua0YrTjdVtnavYfKi8Ng1H573qT82cFb04K1iBtWkdvx_2w4zmID6AKPsYA_XEYBIu9zcTeR2LvI3GwWS55dTrEY8GDrzLw4QBM3mYDxVs7ThBEZm-dn86EyxNhQcSDH-kfBKDjNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347592463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>CLOCKSS</source><source>Portico (Triggered Content) Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Giacomo, Giovanni ; Costantini, Alberto ; de Gasperis, Nicola ; De Vita, Andrea ; Lin, Bernard ; Francone, Marco ; Beccaglia, Mario ; Mastantuono, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Giacomo, Giovanni ; Costantini, Alberto ; de Gasperis, Nicola ; De Vita, Andrea ; Lin, Bernard ; Francone, Marco ; Beccaglia, Mario ; Mastantuono, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: One of the reason for Latarjet procedure failure may be coracoid graft osteolysis. In this study, we aimed to understand if a better compression between the coracoid process and the glenoid, using a mini-plate fixation during the Latarjet procedure, could reduce the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis.
Materials and Methods: A computed tomography scan analysis of 26 prospectively followed-up patients was conducted after modified Latarjet procedure using mini-plate fixation technique to determine both the location and the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis in them. We then compared our current results with results from that of our previous study without using mini-plate fixation to determine if there is any statistical significant difference in terms of corcacoid bone graft osteolysis between the two surgical techniques.
Results: The most relevant osteolysis was represented by the superficial part of the proximal coracoid, whereas the deep part of the proximal coracoid graft is least involved in osteolysis and has best bone healing. The current study showed a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid with our previous study (P < 0.01).
Discussion: To our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that show the causes of coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that there is a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid in terms of osteolysis. At clinical examination, this difference did not correspond with any clinical findings.
Level of Evidence: Level 4.
Clinical Relevance: Prospective case series, Treatment study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-6042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-6042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.109877</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23858288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>South Africa: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Defects ; Medical imaging ; Original ; Patients ; Sports injuries ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques</subject><ispartof>International journal of shoulder surgery, 2013-01, Vol.7 (1), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Jan 2013</rights><rights>Copyright: © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579d-51930983af75e1dac1f98338a009537dae674d13dc21c6a4eceb913380aed9bf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707330/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707330/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23858288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giacomo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gasperis, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vita, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francone, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beccaglia, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastantuono, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation</title><title>International journal of shoulder surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Shoulder Surg</addtitle><description>Aims: One of the reason for Latarjet procedure failure may be coracoid graft osteolysis. In this study, we aimed to understand if a better compression between the coracoid process and the glenoid, using a mini-plate fixation during the Latarjet procedure, could reduce the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis.
Materials and Methods: A computed tomography scan analysis of 26 prospectively followed-up patients was conducted after modified Latarjet procedure using mini-plate fixation technique to determine both the location and the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis in them. We then compared our current results with results from that of our previous study without using mini-plate fixation to determine if there is any statistical significant difference in terms of corcacoid bone graft osteolysis between the two surgical techniques.
Results: The most relevant osteolysis was represented by the superficial part of the proximal coracoid, whereas the deep part of the proximal coracoid graft is least involved in osteolysis and has best bone healing. The current study showed a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid with our previous study (P < 0.01).
Discussion: To our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that show the causes of coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that there is a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid in terms of osteolysis. At clinical examination, this difference did not correspond with any clinical findings.
Level of Evidence: Level 4.
Clinical Relevance: Prospective case series, Treatment study.</description><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><issn>0973-6042</issn><issn>0973-6042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptks-PEyEUxydG466rd0-GxMR4mQrDzDB42Ng0_ko28aJnQuFNS5eBCsyO_Q_8s6Xpbm2N4QDv8Xlf8h7fonhJ8KwmmL7DnNGyxXU1I5h3jD0qLo-pxyfni-JZjBuMG0468rS4qGjXdFXXXRa_Fz5I5Y1GS-8ArYLsE_Ixgbe7aCLKIQR0I5MMG0hoG7wCPQZ4j-ZI-WErg4neoZhGvUNLSBOAQ2nyKKoAU8wX0mkZNEqg1s78HAHdRTQYZ8qtlQlQb37JZLx7XjzppY3w4n6_Kn58-vh98aW8-fb562J-U6qGcV02hNPcKpU9a4BoqUifI9pJjHlDmZbQsloTqlVFVCtrULDkJANYgubLnl4V1wfd7bgcQCtwKUgrtsEMMuyEl0ac3zizFit_JyjDjFKcBd7eCwSf24lJDCYqsFY68GMUpMa4raqm5Rl9_Q-68WNwuT1BaM0aXtUt_UutpAVhXO_zu2ovKua0YrTjdVtnavYfKi8Ng1H573qT82cFb04K1iBtWkdvx_2w4zmID6AKPsYA_XEYBIu9zcTeR2LvI3GwWS55dTrEY8GDrzLw4QBM3mYDxVs7ThBEZm-dn86EyxNhQcSDH-kfBKDjNA</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Giacomo, Giovanni</creator><creator>Costantini, Alberto</creator><creator>de Gasperis, Nicola</creator><creator>De Vita, Andrea</creator><creator>Lin, Bernard</creator><creator>Francone, Marco</creator><creator>Beccaglia, Mario</creator><creator>Mastantuono, Marco</creator><general>Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation</title><author>Giacomo, Giovanni ; Costantini, Alberto ; de Gasperis, Nicola ; De Vita, Andrea ; Lin, Bernard ; Francone, Marco ; Beccaglia, Mario ; Mastantuono, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579d-51930983af75e1dac1f98338a009537dae674d13dc21c6a4eceb913380aed9bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giacomo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gasperis, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vita, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francone, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beccaglia, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastantuono, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of shoulder surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giacomo, Giovanni</au><au>Costantini, Alberto</au><au>de Gasperis, Nicola</au><au>De Vita, Andrea</au><au>Lin, Bernard</au><au>Francone, Marco</au><au>Beccaglia, Mario</au><au>Mastantuono, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of shoulder surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Shoulder Surg</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0973-6042</issn><eissn>0973-6042</eissn><abstract>Aims: One of the reason for Latarjet procedure failure may be coracoid graft osteolysis. In this study, we aimed to understand if a better compression between the coracoid process and the glenoid, using a mini-plate fixation during the Latarjet procedure, could reduce the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis.
Materials and Methods: A computed tomography scan analysis of 26 prospectively followed-up patients was conducted after modified Latarjet procedure using mini-plate fixation technique to determine both the location and the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis in them. We then compared our current results with results from that of our previous study without using mini-plate fixation to determine if there is any statistical significant difference in terms of corcacoid bone graft osteolysis between the two surgical techniques.
Results: The most relevant osteolysis was represented by the superficial part of the proximal coracoid, whereas the deep part of the proximal coracoid graft is least involved in osteolysis and has best bone healing. The current study showed a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid with our previous study (P < 0.01).
Discussion: To our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that show the causes of coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that there is a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid in terms of osteolysis. At clinical examination, this difference did not correspond with any clinical findings.
Level of Evidence: Level 4.
Clinical Relevance: Prospective case series, Treatment study.</abstract><cop>South Africa</cop><pub>Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd</pub><pmid>23858288</pmid><doi>10.4103/0973-6042.109877</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0973-6042 |
| ispartof | International journal of shoulder surgery, 2013-01, Vol.7 (1), p.1-6 |
| issn | 0973-6042 0973-6042 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3707330 |
| source | PubMed Central Open Access; CLOCKSS; Portico (Triggered Content) Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Defects Medical imaging Original Patients Sports injuries Studies Surgery Surgical techniques |
| title | Coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure: A comparison study between two screws standard technique vs mini-plate fixation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A07%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coracoid%20bone%20graft%20osteolysis%20after%20Latarjet%20procedure:%20A%20comparison%20study%20between%20two%20screws%20standard%20technique%20vs%20mini-plate%20fixation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20shoulder%20surgery&rft.au=Giacomo,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0973-6042&rft.eissn=0973-6042&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0973-6042.109877&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA327389464%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347592463&rft_id=info:pmid/23858288&rft_galeid=A327389464&rfr_iscdi=true |