Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication in Breast and Cervical Cancer-Related Care: A Qualitative Study of Low-Income English- and Spanish-Speaking Women

To explore patient perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care among low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women, we examined communication barriers and facilitators reported by patients receiving care at safety net clinics. Participants were interview...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of community health 2013-08, Vol.38 (4), p.707-715
Hauptverfasser: Simon, Melissa A., Ragas, Daiva M., Nonzee, Narissa J., Phisuthikul, Ava M., Luu, Thanh Ha, Dong, XinQi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 715
container_issue 4
container_start_page 707
container_title Journal of community health
container_volume 38
creator Simon, Melissa A.
Ragas, Daiva M.
Nonzee, Narissa J.
Phisuthikul, Ava M.
Luu, Thanh Ha
Dong, XinQi
description To explore patient perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care among low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women, we examined communication barriers and facilitators reported by patients receiving care at safety net clinics. Participants were interviewed in English or Spanish after receiving an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test or cancer diagnosis. Following an inductive approach, interviews were coded and analyzed by the language spoken with providers and patientprovider language concordance status. Of 78 participants, 53 % (n = 41) were English-speakers and 47 % (n = 37) were Spanish-speakers. All English-speakers were language-concordant with providers. Of Spanish-speakers, 27 % (n = 10) were Spanish-concordant; 38 % (n = 14) were Spanish-discordant, requiring an interpreter; and 35 % (n = 13) were Spanish mixed-concordant, experiencing both types of communication throughout the care continuum. English-speakers focused on communication barriers, and difficulty understanding jargon arose as a theme. Spanish-speakers emphasized communication facilitators related to Spanish language use. Themes among all Spanish-speaking sub-groups included appreciation for language support resources and preference for Spanish-speaking providers. Mixed-concordant participants accounted for the majority of Spanish-speakers who reported communication barriers. Our data suggest that, although perception of patient-provider communication may depend on the language spoken throughout the care continuum, jargon is lost when health information is communicated in Spanish. Further, the respective consistency of language concordance or interpretation may play a role in patient perception of patient-provider communication.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10900-013-9668-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3706461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48715941</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48715941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-cc1708692769cd92e3875a52691971bfc6f5021fc1fdfdd63cd64d3698af87d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGL1DAYxYMo7uzqH-BBKXjxEv2SNElzEdbiqrDgIAreQjZJ1w5tMibtwPz3pnQdVg96CuT93sv35SH0jMBrAiDfZAIKAANhWAnR4OMDtCFcMswEgYdoA6BqzEnNz9B5zjsAICDFY3RGGedMNGyDvm99sn4_9THkKnbV1ky9DxPepnjonU9VG8dxDr01C1L1oXqXvMlTZYKrWp8ORRmq1gTrE_7iBzP5cm-Sf4IedWbI_undeYG-Xb3_2n7E158_fGovr7HllE_YWiKhEYpKoaxT1LNGcsOpUERJctNZ0XGgpLOkc51zglknaseEakzXSKfYBXq75u7nm9E7W4ZPZtD71I8mHXU0vf5TCf0PfRsPmkkQtSAl4NVdQIo_Z58nPfbZ-mEwwcc5a1JTJThVEv6PMqWAc6gX9OVf6C7OKZSfWKgGmKKqLhRZKZtizsl3p7kJ6KVivVasS8V6qVgfi-fF_YVPjt-dFoCuQC5SuPXp3tP_SH2-mnZ5iukUWjeScFUT9gt4nbtt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1398039294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication in Breast and Cervical Cancer-Related Care: A Qualitative Study of Low-Income English- and Spanish-Speaking Women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Simon, Melissa A. ; Ragas, Daiva M. ; Nonzee, Narissa J. ; Phisuthikul, Ava M. ; Luu, Thanh Ha ; Dong, XinQi</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Melissa A. ; Ragas, Daiva M. ; Nonzee, Narissa J. ; Phisuthikul, Ava M. ; Luu, Thanh Ha ; Dong, XinQi</creatorcontrib><description>To explore patient perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care among low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women, we examined communication barriers and facilitators reported by patients receiving care at safety net clinics. Participants were interviewed in English or Spanish after receiving an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test or cancer diagnosis. Following an inductive approach, interviews were coded and analyzed by the language spoken with providers and patientprovider language concordance status. Of 78 participants, 53 % (n = 41) were English-speakers and 47 % (n = 37) were Spanish-speakers. All English-speakers were language-concordant with providers. Of Spanish-speakers, 27 % (n = 10) were Spanish-concordant; 38 % (n = 14) were Spanish-discordant, requiring an interpreter; and 35 % (n = 13) were Spanish mixed-concordant, experiencing both types of communication throughout the care continuum. English-speakers focused on communication barriers, and difficulty understanding jargon arose as a theme. Spanish-speakers emphasized communication facilitators related to Spanish language use. Themes among all Spanish-speaking sub-groups included appreciation for language support resources and preference for Spanish-speaking providers. Mixed-concordant participants accounted for the majority of Spanish-speakers who reported communication barriers. Our data suggest that, although perception of patient-provider communication may depend on the language spoken throughout the care continuum, jargon is lost when health information is communicated in Spanish. Further, the respective consistency of language concordance or interpretation may play a role in patient perception of patient-provider communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9668-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23553683</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMHBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Cancer ; Cervical cancer ; Chicago ; Clinics ; Communication ; Communication Barriers ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Ethics ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Hispanic Americans - psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Languages ; Low income groups ; Medical service ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; ORIGINAL PAPER ; Patients ; Perceptions ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Poverty - psychology ; Poverty - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of care ; Screening Tests ; Spanish language ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - psychology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy ; Women ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of community health, 2013-08, Vol.38 (4), p.707-715</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-cc1708692769cd92e3875a52691971bfc6f5021fc1fdfdd63cd64d3698af87d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-cc1708692769cd92e3875a52691971bfc6f5021fc1fdfdd63cd64d3698af87d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48715941$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48715941$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27864,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23553683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragas, Daiva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonzee, Narissa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phisuthikul, Ava M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luu, Thanh Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, XinQi</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication in Breast and Cervical Cancer-Related Care: A Qualitative Study of Low-Income English- and Spanish-Speaking Women</title><title>Journal of community health</title><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><description>To explore patient perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care among low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women, we examined communication barriers and facilitators reported by patients receiving care at safety net clinics. Participants were interviewed in English or Spanish after receiving an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test or cancer diagnosis. Following an inductive approach, interviews were coded and analyzed by the language spoken with providers and patientprovider language concordance status. Of 78 participants, 53 % (n = 41) were English-speakers and 47 % (n = 37) were Spanish-speakers. All English-speakers were language-concordant with providers. Of Spanish-speakers, 27 % (n = 10) were Spanish-concordant; 38 % (n = 14) were Spanish-discordant, requiring an interpreter; and 35 % (n = 13) were Spanish mixed-concordant, experiencing both types of communication throughout the care continuum. English-speakers focused on communication barriers, and difficulty understanding jargon arose as a theme. Spanish-speakers emphasized communication facilitators related to Spanish language use. Themes among all Spanish-speaking sub-groups included appreciation for language support resources and preference for Spanish-speaking providers. Mixed-concordant participants accounted for the majority of Spanish-speakers who reported communication barriers. Our data suggest that, although perception of patient-provider communication may depend on the language spoken throughout the care continuum, jargon is lost when health information is communicated in Spanish. Further, the respective consistency of language concordance or interpretation may play a role in patient perception of patient-provider communication.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Chicago</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Barriers</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Medical service</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ORIGINAL PAPER</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Poverty - psychology</subject><subject>Poverty - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Spanish language</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0094-5145</issn><issn>1573-3610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGL1DAYxYMo7uzqH-BBKXjxEv2SNElzEdbiqrDgIAreQjZJ1w5tMibtwPz3pnQdVg96CuT93sv35SH0jMBrAiDfZAIKAANhWAnR4OMDtCFcMswEgYdoA6BqzEnNz9B5zjsAICDFY3RGGedMNGyDvm99sn4_9THkKnbV1ky9DxPepnjonU9VG8dxDr01C1L1oXqXvMlTZYKrWp8ORRmq1gTrE_7iBzP5cm-Sf4IedWbI_undeYG-Xb3_2n7E158_fGovr7HllE_YWiKhEYpKoaxT1LNGcsOpUERJctNZ0XGgpLOkc51zglknaseEakzXSKfYBXq75u7nm9E7W4ZPZtD71I8mHXU0vf5TCf0PfRsPmkkQtSAl4NVdQIo_Z58nPfbZ-mEwwcc5a1JTJThVEv6PMqWAc6gX9OVf6C7OKZSfWKgGmKKqLhRZKZtizsl3p7kJ6KVivVasS8V6qVgfi-fF_YVPjt-dFoCuQC5SuPXp3tP_SH2-mnZ5iukUWjeScFUT9gt4nbtt</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Simon, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Ragas, Daiva M.</creator><creator>Nonzee, Narissa J.</creator><creator>Phisuthikul, Ava M.</creator><creator>Luu, Thanh Ha</creator><creator>Dong, XinQi</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication in Breast and Cervical Cancer-Related Care</title><author>Simon, Melissa A. ; Ragas, Daiva M. ; Nonzee, Narissa J. ; Phisuthikul, Ava M. ; Luu, Thanh Ha ; Dong, XinQi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-cc1708692769cd92e3875a52691971bfc6f5021fc1fdfdd63cd64d3698af87d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Chicago</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Barriers</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Medical service</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ORIGINAL PAPER</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Poverty - psychology</topic><topic>Poverty - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Spanish language</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragas, Daiva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonzee, Narissa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phisuthikul, Ava M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luu, Thanh Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, XinQi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Melissa A.</au><au>Ragas, Daiva M.</au><au>Nonzee, Narissa J.</au><au>Phisuthikul, Ava M.</au><au>Luu, Thanh Ha</au><au>Dong, XinQi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication in Breast and Cervical Cancer-Related Care: A Qualitative Study of Low-Income English- and Spanish-Speaking Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle><stitle>J Community Health</stitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>707-715</pages><issn>0094-5145</issn><eissn>1573-3610</eissn><coden>JCMHBR</coden><abstract>To explore patient perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care among low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women, we examined communication barriers and facilitators reported by patients receiving care at safety net clinics. Participants were interviewed in English or Spanish after receiving an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test or cancer diagnosis. Following an inductive approach, interviews were coded and analyzed by the language spoken with providers and patientprovider language concordance status. Of 78 participants, 53 % (n = 41) were English-speakers and 47 % (n = 37) were Spanish-speakers. All English-speakers were language-concordant with providers. Of Spanish-speakers, 27 % (n = 10) were Spanish-concordant; 38 % (n = 14) were Spanish-discordant, requiring an interpreter; and 35 % (n = 13) were Spanish mixed-concordant, experiencing both types of communication throughout the care continuum. English-speakers focused on communication barriers, and difficulty understanding jargon arose as a theme. Spanish-speakers emphasized communication facilitators related to Spanish language use. Themes among all Spanish-speaking sub-groups included appreciation for language support resources and preference for Spanish-speaking providers. Mixed-concordant participants accounted for the majority of Spanish-speakers who reported communication barriers. Our data suggest that, although perception of patient-provider communication may depend on the language spoken throughout the care continuum, jargon is lost when health information is communicated in Spanish. Further, the respective consistency of language concordance or interpretation may play a role in patient perception of patient-provider communication.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>23553683</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10900-013-9668-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-5145
ispartof Journal of community health, 2013-08, Vol.38 (4), p.707-715
issn 0094-5145
1573-3610
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3706461
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Attitude to Health
Breast Neoplasms - psychology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Cancer
Cervical cancer
Chicago
Clinics
Communication
Communication Barriers
Community and Environmental Psychology
Ethics
Female
Gynecology
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Hispanic Americans - psychology
Humans
Language
Languages
Low income groups
Medical service
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
ORIGINAL PAPER
Patients
Perceptions
Physician-Patient Relations
Poverty - psychology
Poverty - statistics & numerical data
Qualitative Research
Quality of care
Screening Tests
Spanish language
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - psychology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy
Women
Womens health
Young Adult
title Perceptions of Patient-Provider Communication in Breast and Cervical Cancer-Related Care: A Qualitative Study of Low-Income English- and Spanish-Speaking Women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A47%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20Patient-Provider%20Communication%20in%20Breast%20and%20Cervical%20Cancer-Related%20Care:%20A%20Qualitative%20Study%20of%20Low-Income%20English-%20and%20Spanish-Speaking%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20health&rft.au=Simon,%20Melissa%20A.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=707-715&rft.issn=0094-5145&rft.eissn=1573-3610&rft.coden=JCMHBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10900-013-9668-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48715941%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1398039294&rft_id=info:pmid/23553683&rft_jstor_id=48715941&rfr_iscdi=true