Using VIPT‑Jump to Distinguish Between Different Folding Mechanisms: Application to BBL and a Trpzip

Protein folding involves a large number of sequential molecular steps or conformational substates. Thus, experimental characterization of the underlying folding energy landscape for any given protein is difficult. Herein, we present a new method that can be used to determine the major characteristics of the folding energy landscape in question, e.g., to distinguish between activated and barrierless downhill folding scenarios. This method is based on the idea that the conformational relaxation kinetics of different folding mechanisms at a given final condition will show different dependences on the initial condition. We show, using both simulation and experiment, that it is possible to differentiate between disparate kinetic folding models by comparing temperature jump (T-jump) relaxation traces obtained with a fixed final temperature and varied initial temperatures, which effectively varies the initial potential (VIP) of the system of interest. We apply this method (hereafter refer to as VIPT-jump) to two model systems, tryptophan zipper (Trpzip)-2c and BBL, and our results show that BBL exhibits characteristics of barrierless downhill folding, whereas Trpzip-2c folding encounters a free energy barrier. In addition, using the T-jump data of BBL we are able to provide, via Langevin dynamics simulations, a realistic estimate of its conformational diffusion coefficient.