Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans

The accuracy of the two dose calculation engines available for RapidArc planning (both released for clinical use) is investigated in comparison to the COMPASS data. Two dose calculation algorithms (Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA)) were used to calculate RA plans and compared to ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2013-06, Vol.8 (1), p.140-140, Article 140
Hauptverfasser: Kathirvel, Murugesan, Subramanian, Shanmuga, Clivio, Alessandro, Arun, Gandhi, Fogliata, Antonella, Nicolini, Giorgia, Subramani, Vellaiyan, Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai, Vanetti, Eugenio, Cozzi, Luca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 1
container_start_page 140
container_title Radiation oncology (London, England)
container_volume 8
creator Kathirvel, Murugesan
Subramanian, Shanmuga
Clivio, Alessandro
Arun, Gandhi
Fogliata, Antonella
Nicolini, Giorgia
Subramani, Vellaiyan
Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai
Vanetti, Eugenio
Cozzi, Luca
description The accuracy of the two dose calculation engines available for RapidArc planning (both released for clinical use) is investigated in comparison to the COMPASS data. Two dose calculation algorithms (Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA)) were used to calculate RA plans and compared to calculations with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm (CC) from the COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry). CC calculations, performed on patient data, are based on experimental fluence measurements with a 2D array of ion chambers mounted on the linac head. The study was conducted on clinical cases treated with RA. Five cases for each of the following groups were included: Brain, Head and Neck, Thorax, Pelvis and stereotactic body radiation therapy for hypo-fractionated treatments with small fields. COMPASS measurements were performed with the iMatrixx-2D array. RapidArc plans were optimized for delivery using 6MV photons from a Clinac-iX (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). For almost all parameters, the better agreement was between Acuros-XB and COMPASS independently from the anatomical site and fractionation. The same result was obtained from the mean dose difference per organ with Acuros-CC average differences below 0.5% while for AAA-CC data, average deviations exceeded 0.5% and in the case of the pelvis 1%. Relevance of observed differences determined with the 3D gamma analysis resulted in a pass rate exceeding 99.5% for Acuros-CC and exceeding 97.5% for AAA-CC. This study demonstrated that i) a good agreement exists between COMPASS-CC calculations based on measured fluences with respect to dose distributions obtained with both Acuros-XB and AAA algorithms; ii) 3D dose distributions reconstructed from actual delivery coincide very precisely with the planned data; iii) a slight preference in favor of Acuros-XB was observed suggesting the preference for this algorithm in clinical applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1748-717X-8-140
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3702450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534715431</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534715431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-b7ef1dcc07f86c3a4760469fed6d80c1bb3deea77fea09b2f0c33fd7d2607e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk1v1DAQjRCIfsCZG7LEOa0dJ3FyQUpXUJAqISGQerMm9njXVRIHO2m1_46fhjdblq5U5IPHM2_ejOdNkrxj9IKxqrxkIq9SwcRtWqUspy-S04Pn5RP7JDkL4Y7SvOC0fp2cZFwUlciq0-T3ytvJKugIjKMHG6LlDJk2SECp2YPa7t5NNF1Ib68IDJo0gw1u8m60KtrQbfcMTbd2kW3TE-X6ETxqMjnSI4TZY4_DtCRHpJo7mKwbAnmI8KXYkhECCdswYU_ssHg1dvYe_dLCdxitbrwiqrPDUm_sYAhvklcGuoBvH-_z5OfnTz9WX9Kbb9dfV81N2ha5mNJWoGFaKSpMVSoOuShpXtYGdakrqljbco0IQhgEWreZoYpzo4XOSiqwAn6efNzzjnPbo1bxOx46OXrbg99KB1YeRwa7kWt3L7mgWV7QSHC1J2it-w_BcSSORO4UlDsFZSWjvpHkw2MX3v2aMUzyzs0-ShAk43XNKlFw8Q-1hg6lHUwUC1Rvg5JNwXPBipyziLp4BhWPxt4qN6Cx0X-UcLlPUHEXgkdzaJ5RuVvHZ9p9_3RoB_zf_eN_AM-Q4Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399187537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kathirvel, Murugesan ; Subramanian, Shanmuga ; Clivio, Alessandro ; Arun, Gandhi ; Fogliata, Antonella ; Nicolini, Giorgia ; Subramani, Vellaiyan ; Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai ; Vanetti, Eugenio ; Cozzi, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Kathirvel, Murugesan ; Subramanian, Shanmuga ; Clivio, Alessandro ; Arun, Gandhi ; Fogliata, Antonella ; Nicolini, Giorgia ; Subramani, Vellaiyan ; Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai ; Vanetti, Eugenio ; Cozzi, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>The accuracy of the two dose calculation engines available for RapidArc planning (both released for clinical use) is investigated in comparison to the COMPASS data. Two dose calculation algorithms (Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA)) were used to calculate RA plans and compared to calculations with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm (CC) from the COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry). CC calculations, performed on patient data, are based on experimental fluence measurements with a 2D array of ion chambers mounted on the linac head. The study was conducted on clinical cases treated with RA. Five cases for each of the following groups were included: Brain, Head and Neck, Thorax, Pelvis and stereotactic body radiation therapy for hypo-fractionated treatments with small fields. COMPASS measurements were performed with the iMatrixx-2D array. RapidArc plans were optimized for delivery using 6MV photons from a Clinac-iX (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). For almost all parameters, the better agreement was between Acuros-XB and COMPASS independently from the anatomical site and fractionation. The same result was obtained from the mean dose difference per organ with Acuros-CC average differences below 0.5% while for AAA-CC data, average deviations exceeded 0.5% and in the case of the pelvis 1%. Relevance of observed differences determined with the 3D gamma analysis resulted in a pass rate exceeding 99.5% for Acuros-CC and exceeding 97.5% for AAA-CC. This study demonstrated that i) a good agreement exists between COMPASS-CC calculations based on measured fluences with respect to dose distributions obtained with both Acuros-XB and AAA algorithms; ii) 3D dose distributions reconstructed from actual delivery coincide very precisely with the planned data; iii) a slight preference in favor of Acuros-XB was observed suggesting the preference for this algorithm in clinical applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23758728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Internet/Web search services ; Medical equipment and supplies industry ; Medical test kit industry ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Technology application</subject><ispartof>Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013-06, Vol.8 (1), p.140-140, Article 140</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Kathirvel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Kathirvel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Kathirvel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-b7ef1dcc07f86c3a4760469fed6d80c1bb3deea77fea09b2f0c33fd7d2607e8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-b7ef1dcc07f86c3a4760469fed6d80c1bb3deea77fea09b2f0c33fd7d2607e8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702450/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702450/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kathirvel, Murugesan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, Shanmuga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clivio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arun, Gandhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogliata, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramani, Vellaiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanetti, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans</title><title>Radiation oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>The accuracy of the two dose calculation engines available for RapidArc planning (both released for clinical use) is investigated in comparison to the COMPASS data. Two dose calculation algorithms (Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA)) were used to calculate RA plans and compared to calculations with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm (CC) from the COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry). CC calculations, performed on patient data, are based on experimental fluence measurements with a 2D array of ion chambers mounted on the linac head. The study was conducted on clinical cases treated with RA. Five cases for each of the following groups were included: Brain, Head and Neck, Thorax, Pelvis and stereotactic body radiation therapy for hypo-fractionated treatments with small fields. COMPASS measurements were performed with the iMatrixx-2D array. RapidArc plans were optimized for delivery using 6MV photons from a Clinac-iX (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). For almost all parameters, the better agreement was between Acuros-XB and COMPASS independently from the anatomical site and fractionation. The same result was obtained from the mean dose difference per organ with Acuros-CC average differences below 0.5% while for AAA-CC data, average deviations exceeded 0.5% and in the case of the pelvis 1%. Relevance of observed differences determined with the 3D gamma analysis resulted in a pass rate exceeding 99.5% for Acuros-CC and exceeding 97.5% for AAA-CC. This study demonstrated that i) a good agreement exists between COMPASS-CC calculations based on measured fluences with respect to dose distributions obtained with both Acuros-XB and AAA algorithms; ii) 3D dose distributions reconstructed from actual delivery coincide very precisely with the planned data; iii) a slight preference in favor of Acuros-XB was observed suggesting the preference for this algorithm in clinical applications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet/Web search services</subject><subject>Medical equipment and supplies industry</subject><subject>Medical test kit industry</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><issn>1748-717X</issn><issn>1748-717X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk1v1DAQjRCIfsCZG7LEOa0dJ3FyQUpXUJAqISGQerMm9njXVRIHO2m1_46fhjdblq5U5IPHM2_ejOdNkrxj9IKxqrxkIq9SwcRtWqUspy-S04Pn5RP7JDkL4Y7SvOC0fp2cZFwUlciq0-T3ytvJKugIjKMHG6LlDJk2SECp2YPa7t5NNF1Ib68IDJo0gw1u8m60KtrQbfcMTbd2kW3TE-X6ETxqMjnSI4TZY4_DtCRHpJo7mKwbAnmI8KXYkhECCdswYU_ssHg1dvYe_dLCdxitbrwiqrPDUm_sYAhvklcGuoBvH-_z5OfnTz9WX9Kbb9dfV81N2ha5mNJWoGFaKSpMVSoOuShpXtYGdakrqljbco0IQhgEWreZoYpzo4XOSiqwAn6efNzzjnPbo1bxOx46OXrbg99KB1YeRwa7kWt3L7mgWV7QSHC1J2it-w_BcSSORO4UlDsFZSWjvpHkw2MX3v2aMUzyzs0-ShAk43XNKlFw8Q-1hg6lHUwUC1Rvg5JNwXPBipyziLp4BhWPxt4qN6Cx0X-UcLlPUHEXgkdzaJ5RuVvHZ9p9_3RoB_zf_eN_AM-Q4Rw</recordid><startdate>20130611</startdate><enddate>20130611</enddate><creator>Kathirvel, Murugesan</creator><creator>Subramanian, Shanmuga</creator><creator>Clivio, Alessandro</creator><creator>Arun, Gandhi</creator><creator>Fogliata, Antonella</creator><creator>Nicolini, Giorgia</creator><creator>Subramani, Vellaiyan</creator><creator>Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai</creator><creator>Vanetti, Eugenio</creator><creator>Cozzi, Luca</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130611</creationdate><title>Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans</title><author>Kathirvel, Murugesan ; Subramanian, Shanmuga ; Clivio, Alessandro ; Arun, Gandhi ; Fogliata, Antonella ; Nicolini, Giorgia ; Subramani, Vellaiyan ; Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai ; Vanetti, Eugenio ; Cozzi, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-b7ef1dcc07f86c3a4760469fed6d80c1bb3deea77fea09b2f0c33fd7d2607e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet/Web search services</topic><topic>Medical equipment and supplies industry</topic><topic>Medical test kit industry</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kathirvel, Murugesan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, Shanmuga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clivio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arun, Gandhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogliata, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subramani, Vellaiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanetti, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kathirvel, Murugesan</au><au>Subramanian, Shanmuga</au><au>Clivio, Alessandro</au><au>Arun, Gandhi</au><au>Fogliata, Antonella</au><au>Nicolini, Giorgia</au><au>Subramani, Vellaiyan</au><au>Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai</au><au>Vanetti, Eugenio</au><au>Cozzi, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans</atitle><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2013-06-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>140-140</pages><artnum>140</artnum><issn>1748-717X</issn><eissn>1748-717X</eissn><abstract>The accuracy of the two dose calculation engines available for RapidArc planning (both released for clinical use) is investigated in comparison to the COMPASS data. Two dose calculation algorithms (Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA)) were used to calculate RA plans and compared to calculations with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm (CC) from the COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry). CC calculations, performed on patient data, are based on experimental fluence measurements with a 2D array of ion chambers mounted on the linac head. The study was conducted on clinical cases treated with RA. Five cases for each of the following groups were included: Brain, Head and Neck, Thorax, Pelvis and stereotactic body radiation therapy for hypo-fractionated treatments with small fields. COMPASS measurements were performed with the iMatrixx-2D array. RapidArc plans were optimized for delivery using 6MV photons from a Clinac-iX (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). For almost all parameters, the better agreement was between Acuros-XB and COMPASS independently from the anatomical site and fractionation. The same result was obtained from the mean dose difference per organ with Acuros-CC average differences below 0.5% while for AAA-CC data, average deviations exceeded 0.5% and in the case of the pelvis 1%. Relevance of observed differences determined with the 3D gamma analysis resulted in a pass rate exceeding 99.5% for Acuros-CC and exceeding 97.5% for AAA-CC. This study demonstrated that i) a good agreement exists between COMPASS-CC calculations based on measured fluences with respect to dose distributions obtained with both Acuros-XB and AAA algorithms; ii) 3D dose distributions reconstructed from actual delivery coincide very precisely with the planned data; iii) a slight preference in favor of Acuros-XB was observed suggesting the preference for this algorithm in clinical applications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23758728</pmid><doi>10.1186/1748-717X-8-140</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-717X
ispartof Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013-06, Vol.8 (1), p.140-140, Article 140
issn 1748-717X
1748-717X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3702450
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
Health aspects
Humans
Internet/Web search services
Medical equipment and supplies industry
Medical test kit industry
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Technology application
title Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20appraisal%20of%20the%20accuracy%20of%20Acuros-XB%20and%20Anisotropic%20Analytical%20Algorithm%20compared%20to%20measurement%20and%20calculations%20with%20the%20compass%20system%20in%20the%20delivery%20of%20RapidArc%20clinical%20plans&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Kathirvel,%20Murugesan&rft.date=2013-06-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=140-140&rft.artnum=140&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1748-717X-8-140&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534715431%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399187537&rft_id=info:pmid/23758728&rft_galeid=A534715431&rfr_iscdi=true