Laparoscopic conservative surgery of colovesical fistula: is it the right way?
Enterovesical fistula is a rare disease. The standard treatment of colovesical fistula is removal of the fistula, suture of the bladder wall, and colic resection with or without temporary colostomy. The usual approach is open because the laparoscopic one has high conversion rates and morbidity. We r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne 2013-01, Vol.8 (2), p.162-165 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 165 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 162 |
| container_title | Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Giovanni, Cochetti Emanuele, Cottini Roberto, Cirocchi Alberto, Pansadoro Emanuele, Lepri Alessia, Corsi Francesco, Barillaro Ettore, Mearini |
| description | Enterovesical fistula is a rare disease. The standard treatment of colovesical fistula is removal of the fistula, suture of the bladder wall, and colic resection with or without temporary colostomy. The usual approach is open because the laparoscopic one has high conversion rates and morbidity. We report the first laparoscopic conservative treatment of colovesical fistula in our knowledge and its long-term results. A 69-year-old man was affected by colovesical fistula due to endoscopic exeresis of a 2 cm adenomatous polyp in the sigmoid diverticulum. We performed a laparoscopic conservative treatment of the fistula without colic resection. Operative time was 210 min and estimated blood loss was 300 ml. The catheter was removed after 10 days. Time to first flatus was 2 days and the hospital stay was 8 days. No peri- or post-operative complications occurred. At 48-month follow-up fistula did not recur. Laparoscopic conservative surgery for colovesical fistula is safe and feasible. It could be a therapeutic option in selected cases, especially if diverticular disease and inflammation are slight. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5114/wiitm.2011.32808 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3699766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3017815791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-76c3a684c6a42b11eed867f9fc45ba9bc4852386dca4993d87ccc9dab45607023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIlsedE7LEOcWOHcfmAEIVL6mCC5wtx3FaV2lcbCdV_570QQWnlXZnZkczAFxhNMowprcra-NilCKMRyTliB-BYZoKkSCU0WMwxFxkCc04H4CzEOYIMZFifgoGKeEkxwgPwftELZV3Qbul1VC7JhjfqWg7A0Prp8avoav6fe06E6xWNaxsiG2t7qAN0EYYZwZ6O51FuFLrhwtwUqk6mMv9PAdfz0-f49dk8vHyNn6cJJoIHJOcaaIYp5opmhYYG1Nyllei0jQrlCg05VnvkZVaUSFIyXOttShVQTOGcpSSc3C_0122xcKU2jTRq1ouvV0ov5ZOWfn_0tiZnLpOEiZEzlgvcLMX8O67NSHKuWt903uWmAiRES4w7VFoh9J9RMGb6vABI7lpQG4bkJsG5LaBnnL919mB8Bs5-QG7G4Ss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399538914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic conservative surgery of colovesical fistula: is it the right way?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Giovanni, Cochetti ; Emanuele, Cottini ; Roberto, Cirocchi ; Alberto, Pansadoro ; Emanuele, Lepri ; Alessia, Corsi ; Francesco, Barillaro ; Ettore, Mearini</creator><creatorcontrib>Giovanni, Cochetti ; Emanuele, Cottini ; Roberto, Cirocchi ; Alberto, Pansadoro ; Emanuele, Lepri ; Alessia, Corsi ; Francesco, Barillaro ; Ettore, Mearini</creatorcontrib><description>Enterovesical fistula is a rare disease. The standard treatment of colovesical fistula is removal of the fistula, suture of the bladder wall, and colic resection with or without temporary colostomy. The usual approach is open because the laparoscopic one has high conversion rates and morbidity. We report the first laparoscopic conservative treatment of colovesical fistula in our knowledge and its long-term results. A 69-year-old man was affected by colovesical fistula due to endoscopic exeresis of a 2 cm adenomatous polyp in the sigmoid diverticulum. We performed a laparoscopic conservative treatment of the fistula without colic resection. Operative time was 210 min and estimated blood loss was 300 ml. The catheter was removed after 10 days. Time to first flatus was 2 days and the hospital stay was 8 days. No peri- or post-operative complications occurred. At 48-month follow-up fistula did not recur. Laparoscopic conservative surgery for colovesical fistula is safe and feasible. It could be a therapeutic option in selected cases, especially if diverticular disease and inflammation are slight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1895-4588</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2299-0054</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2299-0054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.32808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23837101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Case Report</subject><ispartof>Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne, 2013-01, Vol.8 (2), p.162-165</ispartof><rights>Copyright Termedia Publishing House 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-76c3a684c6a42b11eed867f9fc45ba9bc4852386dca4993d87ccc9dab45607023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699766/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699766/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23837101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giovanni, Cochetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emanuele, Cottini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, Cirocchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Pansadoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emanuele, Lepri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessia, Corsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francesco, Barillaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettore, Mearini</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic conservative surgery of colovesical fistula: is it the right way?</title><title>Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne</title><addtitle>Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne</addtitle><description>Enterovesical fistula is a rare disease. The standard treatment of colovesical fistula is removal of the fistula, suture of the bladder wall, and colic resection with or without temporary colostomy. The usual approach is open because the laparoscopic one has high conversion rates and morbidity. We report the first laparoscopic conservative treatment of colovesical fistula in our knowledge and its long-term results. A 69-year-old man was affected by colovesical fistula due to endoscopic exeresis of a 2 cm adenomatous polyp in the sigmoid diverticulum. We performed a laparoscopic conservative treatment of the fistula without colic resection. Operative time was 210 min and estimated blood loss was 300 ml. The catheter was removed after 10 days. Time to first flatus was 2 days and the hospital stay was 8 days. No peri- or post-operative complications occurred. At 48-month follow-up fistula did not recur. Laparoscopic conservative surgery for colovesical fistula is safe and feasible. It could be a therapeutic option in selected cases, especially if diverticular disease and inflammation are slight.</description><subject>Case Report</subject><issn>1895-4588</issn><issn>2299-0054</issn><issn>2299-0054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIlsedE7LEOcWOHcfmAEIVL6mCC5wtx3FaV2lcbCdV_570QQWnlXZnZkczAFxhNMowprcra-NilCKMRyTliB-BYZoKkSCU0WMwxFxkCc04H4CzEOYIMZFifgoGKeEkxwgPwftELZV3Qbul1VC7JhjfqWg7A0Prp8avoav6fe06E6xWNaxsiG2t7qAN0EYYZwZ6O51FuFLrhwtwUqk6mMv9PAdfz0-f49dk8vHyNn6cJJoIHJOcaaIYp5opmhYYG1Nyllei0jQrlCg05VnvkZVaUSFIyXOttShVQTOGcpSSc3C_0122xcKU2jTRq1ouvV0ov5ZOWfn_0tiZnLpOEiZEzlgvcLMX8O67NSHKuWt903uWmAiRES4w7VFoh9J9RMGb6vABI7lpQG4bkJsG5LaBnnL919mB8Bs5-QG7G4Ss</recordid><startdate>20130116</startdate><enddate>20130116</enddate><creator>Giovanni, Cochetti</creator><creator>Emanuele, Cottini</creator><creator>Roberto, Cirocchi</creator><creator>Alberto, Pansadoro</creator><creator>Emanuele, Lepri</creator><creator>Alessia, Corsi</creator><creator>Francesco, Barillaro</creator><creator>Ettore, Mearini</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130116</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic conservative surgery of colovesical fistula: is it the right way?</title><author>Giovanni, Cochetti ; Emanuele, Cottini ; Roberto, Cirocchi ; Alberto, Pansadoro ; Emanuele, Lepri ; Alessia, Corsi ; Francesco, Barillaro ; Ettore, Mearini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-76c3a684c6a42b11eed867f9fc45ba9bc4852386dca4993d87ccc9dab45607023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Case Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giovanni, Cochetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emanuele, Cottini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, Cirocchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Pansadoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emanuele, Lepri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessia, Corsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francesco, Barillaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettore, Mearini</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giovanni, Cochetti</au><au>Emanuele, Cottini</au><au>Roberto, Cirocchi</au><au>Alberto, Pansadoro</au><au>Emanuele, Lepri</au><au>Alessia, Corsi</au><au>Francesco, Barillaro</au><au>Ettore, Mearini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic conservative surgery of colovesical fistula: is it the right way?</atitle><jtitle>Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne</jtitle><addtitle>Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne</addtitle><date>2013-01-16</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>162-165</pages><issn>1895-4588</issn><issn>2299-0054</issn><eissn>2299-0054</eissn><abstract>Enterovesical fistula is a rare disease. The standard treatment of colovesical fistula is removal of the fistula, suture of the bladder wall, and colic resection with or without temporary colostomy. The usual approach is open because the laparoscopic one has high conversion rates and morbidity. We report the first laparoscopic conservative treatment of colovesical fistula in our knowledge and its long-term results. A 69-year-old man was affected by colovesical fistula due to endoscopic exeresis of a 2 cm adenomatous polyp in the sigmoid diverticulum. We performed a laparoscopic conservative treatment of the fistula without colic resection. Operative time was 210 min and estimated blood loss was 300 ml. The catheter was removed after 10 days. Time to first flatus was 2 days and the hospital stay was 8 days. No peri- or post-operative complications occurred. At 48-month follow-up fistula did not recur. Laparoscopic conservative surgery for colovesical fistula is safe and feasible. It could be a therapeutic option in selected cases, especially if diverticular disease and inflammation are slight.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>23837101</pmid><doi>10.5114/wiitm.2011.32808</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1895-4588 |
| ispartof | Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne, 2013-01, Vol.8 (2), p.162-165 |
| issn | 1895-4588 2299-0054 2299-0054 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3699766 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Case Report |
| title | Laparoscopic conservative surgery of colovesical fistula: is it the right way? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A21%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20conservative%20surgery%20of%20colovesical%20fistula:%20is%20it%20the%20right%20way?&rft.jtitle=Wideochirurgia%20i%20inne%20techniki%20ma%C5%82o%20inwazyjne&rft.au=Giovanni,%20Cochetti&rft.date=2013-01-16&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=162-165&rft.issn=1895-4588&rft.eissn=2299-0054&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/wiitm.2011.32808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3017815791%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399538914&rft_id=info:pmid/23837101&rfr_iscdi=true |