A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators
OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING:University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care medicine 2011-03, Vol.39 (3), p.527-532 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 532 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 527 |
container_title | Critical care medicine |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Dickson, Robert P Hotchkin, David L Lamm, Wayne J. E Hinkson, Carl Pierson, David J Glenny, Robb W Rubinson, Lewis |
description | OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios.
DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study.
SETTING:University research laboratory.
SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs.
INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr).
CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3683595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>858290810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUt1rFDEcDGKx1-p_IJIX8WnbfOxukhehHNUKlb7U55DPXjSbnMnuHf73Rnv21EAImczMb2ACwGuMLjAS7HK9_nyBNMLUUcwJGrUQ-hlY4YGiDhFBn4MVQgJ1tBf0FJzV-hUh3A-MvgCnBGPOWM9WYLmC21xMSA5O2boIfS4wpDAHFWFdykPDndmoFEwDdi7NIaq5cVStrtapAVAlC91OxUXNISeYPZz3GcYwhdnZzi_J_MaP4voSnHgVq3t1OM_Blw_X9-ub7vbu46f11W1nek6GzvcjN5axFlwbL5A2mmFq6Ug80Xzg1A9mZKMiBDNiLfFO2NFoS_FgeN8zeg7eP_puFz05a1qCoqLcljCp8kNmFeS_Lyls5EPeSTpyOoihGbw7GJT8fXF1llOoxsWokstLlS0EEYhj1Jj9I9OUXGtx_mkKRvJXYbIVJv8vrMne_J3wSfSnoUZ4eyCo2irwRSUT6pFHucCY0uP8fY6zK_VbXPauyI1Tcd5I1BYl_dgRhFvYduvabn_lJ81AsqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858290810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Dickson, Robert P ; Hotchkin, David L ; Lamm, Wayne J. E ; Hinkson, Carl ; Pierson, David J ; Glenny, Robb W ; Rubinson, Lewis</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Robert P ; Hotchkin, David L ; Lamm, Wayne J. E ; Hinkson, Carl ; Pierson, David J ; Glenny, Robb W ; Rubinson, Lewis</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios.
DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study.
SETTING:University research laboratory.
SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs.
INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr).
CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21187747</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology ; Acute Lung Injury - therapy ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Gas Analysis ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Positive-Pressure Respiration ; Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy ; Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - physiopathology ; Swine Diseases - therapy</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2011-03, Vol.39 (3), p.527-532</ispartof><rights>2011 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23891133$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21187747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Robert P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkin, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Wayne J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkson, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenny, Robb W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinson, Lewis</creatorcontrib><title>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios.
DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study.
SETTING:University research laboratory.
SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs.
INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr).
CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.</description><subject>Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology</subject><subject>Acute Lung Injury - therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Gas Analysis</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - therapy</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUt1rFDEcDGKx1-p_IJIX8WnbfOxukhehHNUKlb7U55DPXjSbnMnuHf73Rnv21EAImczMb2ACwGuMLjAS7HK9_nyBNMLUUcwJGrUQ-hlY4YGiDhFBn4MVQgJ1tBf0FJzV-hUh3A-MvgCnBGPOWM9WYLmC21xMSA5O2boIfS4wpDAHFWFdykPDndmoFEwDdi7NIaq5cVStrtapAVAlC91OxUXNISeYPZz3GcYwhdnZzi_J_MaP4voSnHgVq3t1OM_Blw_X9-ub7vbu46f11W1nek6GzvcjN5axFlwbL5A2mmFq6Ug80Xzg1A9mZKMiBDNiLfFO2NFoS_FgeN8zeg7eP_puFz05a1qCoqLcljCp8kNmFeS_Lyls5EPeSTpyOoihGbw7GJT8fXF1llOoxsWokstLlS0EEYhj1Jj9I9OUXGtx_mkKRvJXYbIVJv8vrMne_J3wSfSnoUZ4eyCo2irwRSUT6pFHucCY0uP8fY6zK_VbXPauyI1Tcd5I1BYl_dgRhFvYduvabn_lJ81AsqU</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Dickson, Robert P</creator><creator>Hotchkin, David L</creator><creator>Lamm, Wayne J. E</creator><creator>Hinkson, Carl</creator><creator>Pierson, David J</creator><creator>Glenny, Robb W</creator><creator>Rubinson, Lewis</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</title><author>Dickson, Robert P ; Hotchkin, David L ; Lamm, Wayne J. E ; Hinkson, Carl ; Pierson, David J ; Glenny, Robb W ; Rubinson, Lewis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology</topic><topic>Acute Lung Injury - therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Gas Analysis</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Robert P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkin, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Wayne J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkson, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenny, Robb W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinson, Lewis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickson, Robert P</au><au>Hotchkin, David L</au><au>Lamm, Wayne J. E</au><au>Hinkson, Carl</au><au>Pierson, David J</au><au>Glenny, Robb W</au><au>Rubinson, Lewis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>527-532</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios.
DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study.
SETTING:University research laboratory.
SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs.
INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr).
CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>21187747</pmid><doi>10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-3493 |
ispartof | Critical care medicine, 2011-03, Vol.39 (3), p.527-532 |
issn | 0090-3493 1530-0293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3683595 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology Acute Lung Injury - therapy Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Animals Biological and medical sciences Blood Gas Analysis Blood Pressure - physiology Disease Models, Animal Emergency and intensive respiratory care Intensive care medicine Medical sciences Positive-Pressure Respiration Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy Swine Swine Diseases - physiopathology Swine Diseases - therapy |
title | A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20porcine%20model%20for%20initial%20surge%20mechanical%20ventilator%20assessment%20and%20evaluation%20of%20two%20limited-function%20ventilators&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Dickson,%20Robert%20P&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=527-532&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E858290810%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858290810&rft_id=info:pmid/21187747&rfr_iscdi=true |