A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators

OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING:University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2011-03, Vol.39 (3), p.527-532
Hauptverfasser: Dickson, Robert P, Hotchkin, David L, Lamm, Wayne J. E, Hinkson, Carl, Pierson, David J, Glenny, Robb W, Rubinson, Lewis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 532
container_issue 3
container_start_page 527
container_title Critical care medicine
container_volume 39
creator Dickson, Robert P
Hotchkin, David L
Lamm, Wayne J. E
Hinkson, Carl
Pierson, David J
Glenny, Robb W
Rubinson, Lewis
description OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING:University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs. INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr). CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3683595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>858290810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUt1rFDEcDGKx1-p_IJIX8WnbfOxukhehHNUKlb7U55DPXjSbnMnuHf73Rnv21EAImczMb2ACwGuMLjAS7HK9_nyBNMLUUcwJGrUQ-hlY4YGiDhFBn4MVQgJ1tBf0FJzV-hUh3A-MvgCnBGPOWM9WYLmC21xMSA5O2boIfS4wpDAHFWFdykPDndmoFEwDdi7NIaq5cVStrtapAVAlC91OxUXNISeYPZz3GcYwhdnZzi_J_MaP4voSnHgVq3t1OM_Blw_X9-ub7vbu46f11W1nek6GzvcjN5axFlwbL5A2mmFq6Ug80Xzg1A9mZKMiBDNiLfFO2NFoS_FgeN8zeg7eP_puFz05a1qCoqLcljCp8kNmFeS_Lyls5EPeSTpyOoihGbw7GJT8fXF1llOoxsWokstLlS0EEYhj1Jj9I9OUXGtx_mkKRvJXYbIVJv8vrMne_J3wSfSnoUZ4eyCo2irwRSUT6pFHucCY0uP8fY6zK_VbXPauyI1Tcd5I1BYl_dgRhFvYduvabn_lJ81AsqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858290810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Dickson, Robert P ; Hotchkin, David L ; Lamm, Wayne J. E ; Hinkson, Carl ; Pierson, David J ; Glenny, Robb W ; Rubinson, Lewis</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Robert P ; Hotchkin, David L ; Lamm, Wayne J. E ; Hinkson, Carl ; Pierson, David J ; Glenny, Robb W ; Rubinson, Lewis</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING:University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs. INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr). CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21187747</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology ; Acute Lung Injury - therapy ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Gas Analysis ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Positive-Pressure Respiration ; Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy ; Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - physiopathology ; Swine Diseases - therapy</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2011-03, Vol.39 (3), p.527-532</ispartof><rights>2011 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23891133$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21187747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Robert P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkin, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Wayne J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkson, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenny, Robb W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinson, Lewis</creatorcontrib><title>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING:University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs. INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr). CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.</description><subject>Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology</subject><subject>Acute Lung Injury - therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Gas Analysis</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - therapy</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUt1rFDEcDGKx1-p_IJIX8WnbfOxukhehHNUKlb7U55DPXjSbnMnuHf73Rnv21EAImczMb2ACwGuMLjAS7HK9_nyBNMLUUcwJGrUQ-hlY4YGiDhFBn4MVQgJ1tBf0FJzV-hUh3A-MvgCnBGPOWM9WYLmC21xMSA5O2boIfS4wpDAHFWFdykPDndmoFEwDdi7NIaq5cVStrtapAVAlC91OxUXNISeYPZz3GcYwhdnZzi_J_MaP4voSnHgVq3t1OM_Blw_X9-ub7vbu46f11W1nek6GzvcjN5axFlwbL5A2mmFq6Ug80Xzg1A9mZKMiBDNiLfFO2NFoS_FgeN8zeg7eP_puFz05a1qCoqLcljCp8kNmFeS_Lyls5EPeSTpyOoihGbw7GJT8fXF1llOoxsWokstLlS0EEYhj1Jj9I9OUXGtx_mkKRvJXYbIVJv8vrMne_J3wSfSnoUZ4eyCo2irwRSUT6pFHucCY0uP8fY6zK_VbXPauyI1Tcd5I1BYl_dgRhFvYduvabn_lJ81AsqU</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Dickson, Robert P</creator><creator>Hotchkin, David L</creator><creator>Lamm, Wayne J. E</creator><creator>Hinkson, Carl</creator><creator>Pierson, David J</creator><creator>Glenny, Robb W</creator><creator>Rubinson, Lewis</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</title><author>Dickson, Robert P ; Hotchkin, David L ; Lamm, Wayne J. E ; Hinkson, Carl ; Pierson, David J ; Glenny, Robb W ; Rubinson, Lewis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-f468cd77001bcf90bcb713d362f2b8583f5c676a22172dd2fe9d6cbd315c84473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology</topic><topic>Acute Lung Injury - therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Gas Analysis</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Robert P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkin, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Wayne J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkson, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenny, Robb W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinson, Lewis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickson, Robert P</au><au>Hotchkin, David L</au><au>Lamm, Wayne J. E</au><au>Hinkson, Carl</au><au>Pierson, David J</au><au>Glenny, Robb W</au><au>Rubinson, Lewis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>527-532</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVES:To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or “surge,” ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN:Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING:University research laboratory. SUBJECTS:Twelve adult pigs. INTERVENTIONS:Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0 ± 11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0 ± 25.6 torr; p = .002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8 ± 169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3 ± 167.7 torr). CONCLUSIONS:We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>21187747</pmid><doi>10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3493
ispartof Critical care medicine, 2011-03, Vol.39 (3), p.527-532
issn 0090-3493
1530-0293
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3683595
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acute Lung Injury - physiopathology
Acute Lung Injury - therapy
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Gas Analysis
Blood Pressure - physiology
Disease Models, Animal
Emergency and intensive respiratory care
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy
Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology
Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy
Swine
Swine Diseases - physiopathology
Swine Diseases - therapy
title A porcine model for initial surge mechanical ventilator assessment and evaluation of two limited-function ventilators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20porcine%20model%20for%20initial%20surge%20mechanical%20ventilator%20assessment%20and%20evaluation%20of%20two%20limited-function%20ventilators&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Dickson,%20Robert%20P&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=527-532&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206b99b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E858290810%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858290810&rft_id=info:pmid/21187747&rfr_iscdi=true