Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis

No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. However, previous analyses suggest that patients transferred for non-clinical reasons have worse outcomes than those who are not transferred, but these studies were underpowe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2012-10, Vol.16 (5), p.R179-R179, Article R179
Hauptverfasser: Barratt, Helen, Harrison, David A, Rowan, Kathryn M, Raine, Rosalind
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page R179
container_issue 5
container_start_page R179
container_title Critical care (London, England)
container_volume 16
creator Barratt, Helen
Harrison, David A
Rowan, Kathryn M
Raine, Rosalind
description No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. However, previous analyses suggest that patients transferred for non-clinical reasons have worse outcomes than those who are not transferred, but these studies were underpowered and hampered by residual case-mix differences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of transferring adult general critical care patients to other hospitals for non-clinical reasons. We carried out a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing critical care patients who underwent a non-clinical critical care unit to unit transfer to another hospital with those who were not transferred. The primary outcome measure was mortality at ultimate discharge from acute hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at ultimate discharge from critical care, plus length of stay in both critical care and acute hospital. A total of 308,323 patients were admitted to one of 198 adult general critical care units in England and Wales between January 2008 and September 2011. This included 759 patients who underwent a non-clinical transfer within 48 hours of admission to the unit and 1,518 propensity-matched patients who were not transferred. The relative risk of ultimate acute hospital mortality was 1.01 (95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 1.16) for the non-clinical transfer group, compared with patients who were not transferred but had a similar propensity for transfer. There was no statistically significant difference in ultimate critical care unit mortality. Transferred patients received on average three additional days of critical care (P < 0.001) but the difference in length of acute hospital stay was of only borderline significance (P = 0.05). In our analysis the difference in mortality between non-clinical transferred and nontransferred patients was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, non-clinical transfers received, on average, an additional 3 days of critical care. This has potential ramifications in terms of distress, inconvenience and cost for patients, their families, and the National Health Service. We therefore need further evidence, including qualitative data from family members and cost-effective analyses, to better understand the broader effects of non-clinical transfer.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/cc11662
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3682280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534343068</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534343068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-7635f3336516995605fde2d9428fb1e873a644a8f1d0e1fdfdc340bfbdac2d0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt9rFDEQx4MotlbxP5CAD_qyNdlkc9k-CKXUH1DwRcG3kE0mvUg2WZOccP-Cf7U571p6oMzDZGY-882QDEIvKTmnVIp3xlAqRP8InVIuRCfI-P1xOzPBOzmw4QQ9K-UHIXQlBXuKTnpGGKeEnaLf186BqTg5HFPsTPDRGx2wjxVyt05l8bWFJvv6N290BryJvuKaDj7rWBzkncQdFrbYh4AXXT3EWi6wxktOC8Ti67abdTVrsNikdcoV66jDtvjyHD1xOhR4cfBn6NuH669Xn7qbLx8_X13edBOXq9qtBBscY0wMVIzjIMjgLPR25L10EwW5YlpwrqWjlgB11lnDOJncZLXpLdHsDL3f6y6baQZr2oRZB7VkP-u8VUl7dVyJfq1u0y_FhOx7SZrAxV5g8uk_AscVk2Z1-KHW_PZwe04_N1Cqmn0xEIKOkDZF0WGgrJe9GBv6eo_e6gDKR5eamtnh6nJgvBkRslHn_6CaWZi9SRGcb_mjhjf7BpNTKRnc_eSUqN02PZj11cOXuufu1of9AUZhyQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551328269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Barratt, Helen ; Harrison, David A ; Rowan, Kathryn M ; Raine, Rosalind</creator><creatorcontrib>Barratt, Helen ; Harrison, David A ; Rowan, Kathryn M ; Raine, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><description>No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. However, previous analyses suggest that patients transferred for non-clinical reasons have worse outcomes than those who are not transferred, but these studies were underpowered and hampered by residual case-mix differences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of transferring adult general critical care patients to other hospitals for non-clinical reasons. We carried out a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing critical care patients who underwent a non-clinical critical care unit to unit transfer to another hospital with those who were not transferred. The primary outcome measure was mortality at ultimate discharge from acute hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at ultimate discharge from critical care, plus length of stay in both critical care and acute hospital. A total of 308,323 patients were admitted to one of 198 adult general critical care units in England and Wales between January 2008 and September 2011. This included 759 patients who underwent a non-clinical transfer within 48 hours of admission to the unit and 1,518 propensity-matched patients who were not transferred. The relative risk of ultimate acute hospital mortality was 1.01 (95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 1.16) for the non-clinical transfer group, compared with patients who were not transferred but had a similar propensity for transfer. There was no statistically significant difference in ultimate critical care unit mortality. Transferred patients received on average three additional days of critical care (P &lt; 0.001) but the difference in length of acute hospital stay was of only borderline significance (P = 0.05). In our analysis the difference in mortality between non-clinical transferred and nontransferred patients was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, non-clinical transfers received, on average, an additional 3 days of critical care. This has potential ramifications in terms of distress, inconvenience and cost for patients, their families, and the National Health Service. We therefore need further evidence, including qualitative data from family members and cost-effective analyses, to better understand the broader effects of non-clinical transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc11662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23034103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Critical Illness - mortality ; Critical Illness - therapy ; Critically ill ; Female ; Hospitalization - trends ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - trends ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Patient transfer ; Patient Transfer - trends ; Propensity Score ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2012-10, Vol.16 (5), p.R179-R179, Article R179</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2012 Barratt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Barratt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-7635f3336516995605fde2d9428fb1e873a644a8f1d0e1fdfdc340bfbdac2d0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-7635f3336516995605fde2d9428fb1e873a644a8f1d0e1fdfdc340bfbdac2d0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682280/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682280/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barratt, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. However, previous analyses suggest that patients transferred for non-clinical reasons have worse outcomes than those who are not transferred, but these studies were underpowered and hampered by residual case-mix differences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of transferring adult general critical care patients to other hospitals for non-clinical reasons. We carried out a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing critical care patients who underwent a non-clinical critical care unit to unit transfer to another hospital with those who were not transferred. The primary outcome measure was mortality at ultimate discharge from acute hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at ultimate discharge from critical care, plus length of stay in both critical care and acute hospital. A total of 308,323 patients were admitted to one of 198 adult general critical care units in England and Wales between January 2008 and September 2011. This included 759 patients who underwent a non-clinical transfer within 48 hours of admission to the unit and 1,518 propensity-matched patients who were not transferred. The relative risk of ultimate acute hospital mortality was 1.01 (95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 1.16) for the non-clinical transfer group, compared with patients who were not transferred but had a similar propensity for transfer. There was no statistically significant difference in ultimate critical care unit mortality. Transferred patients received on average three additional days of critical care (P &lt; 0.001) but the difference in length of acute hospital stay was of only borderline significance (P = 0.05). In our analysis the difference in mortality between non-clinical transferred and nontransferred patients was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, non-clinical transfers received, on average, an additional 3 days of critical care. This has potential ramifications in terms of distress, inconvenience and cost for patients, their families, and the National Health Service. We therefore need further evidence, including qualitative data from family members and cost-effective analyses, to better understand the broader effects of non-clinical transfer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Critical Illness - mortality</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>Critically ill</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization - trends</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - trends</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patient transfer</subject><subject>Patient Transfer - trends</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt9rFDEQx4MotlbxP5CAD_qyNdlkc9k-CKXUH1DwRcG3kE0mvUg2WZOccP-Cf7U571p6oMzDZGY-882QDEIvKTmnVIp3xlAqRP8InVIuRCfI-P1xOzPBOzmw4QQ9K-UHIXQlBXuKTnpGGKeEnaLf186BqTg5HFPsTPDRGx2wjxVyt05l8bWFJvv6N290BryJvuKaDj7rWBzkncQdFrbYh4AXXT3EWi6wxktOC8Ti67abdTVrsNikdcoV66jDtvjyHD1xOhR4cfBn6NuH669Xn7qbLx8_X13edBOXq9qtBBscY0wMVIzjIMjgLPR25L10EwW5YlpwrqWjlgB11lnDOJncZLXpLdHsDL3f6y6baQZr2oRZB7VkP-u8VUl7dVyJfq1u0y_FhOx7SZrAxV5g8uk_AscVk2Z1-KHW_PZwe04_N1Cqmn0xEIKOkDZF0WGgrJe9GBv6eo_e6gDKR5eamtnh6nJgvBkRslHn_6CaWZi9SRGcb_mjhjf7BpNTKRnc_eSUqN02PZj11cOXuufu1of9AUZhyQE</recordid><startdate>20121003</startdate><enddate>20121003</enddate><creator>Barratt, Helen</creator><creator>Harrison, David A</creator><creator>Rowan, Kathryn M</creator><creator>Raine, Rosalind</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121003</creationdate><title>Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis</title><author>Barratt, Helen ; Harrison, David A ; Rowan, Kathryn M ; Raine, Rosalind</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-7635f3336516995605fde2d9428fb1e873a644a8f1d0e1fdfdc340bfbdac2d0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Critical Illness - mortality</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>Critically ill</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization - trends</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - trends</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patient transfer</topic><topic>Patient Transfer - trends</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barratt, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barratt, Helen</au><au>Harrison, David A</au><au>Rowan, Kathryn M</au><au>Raine, Rosalind</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2012-10-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>R179</spage><epage>R179</epage><pages>R179-R179</pages><artnum>R179</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. However, previous analyses suggest that patients transferred for non-clinical reasons have worse outcomes than those who are not transferred, but these studies were underpowered and hampered by residual case-mix differences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of transferring adult general critical care patients to other hospitals for non-clinical reasons. We carried out a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing critical care patients who underwent a non-clinical critical care unit to unit transfer to another hospital with those who were not transferred. The primary outcome measure was mortality at ultimate discharge from acute hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at ultimate discharge from critical care, plus length of stay in both critical care and acute hospital. A total of 308,323 patients were admitted to one of 198 adult general critical care units in England and Wales between January 2008 and September 2011. This included 759 patients who underwent a non-clinical transfer within 48 hours of admission to the unit and 1,518 propensity-matched patients who were not transferred. The relative risk of ultimate acute hospital mortality was 1.01 (95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 1.16) for the non-clinical transfer group, compared with patients who were not transferred but had a similar propensity for transfer. There was no statistically significant difference in ultimate critical care unit mortality. Transferred patients received on average three additional days of critical care (P &lt; 0.001) but the difference in length of acute hospital stay was of only borderline significance (P = 0.05). In our analysis the difference in mortality between non-clinical transferred and nontransferred patients was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, non-clinical transfers received, on average, an additional 3 days of critical care. This has potential ramifications in terms of distress, inconvenience and cost for patients, their families, and the National Health Service. We therefore need further evidence, including qualitative data from family members and cost-effective analyses, to better understand the broader effects of non-clinical transfer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23034103</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc11662</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-8535
ispartof Critical care (London, England), 2012-10, Vol.16 (5), p.R179-R179, Article R179
issn 1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3682280
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Critical Illness - mortality
Critical Illness - therapy
Critically ill
Female
Hospitalization - trends
Hospitals
Humans
Intensive Care Units - trends
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Patient transfer
Patient Transfer - trends
Propensity Score
Treatment Outcome
title Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A26%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20non-clinical%20inter-hospital%20critical%20care%20unit%20to%20unit%20transfer%20of%20critically%20ill%20patients:%20a%20propensity-matched%20cohort%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Barratt,%20Helen&rft.date=2012-10-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=R179&rft.epage=R179&rft.pages=R179-R179&rft.artnum=R179&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc11662&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534343068%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551328269&rft_id=info:pmid/23034103&rft_galeid=A534343068&rfr_iscdi=true