Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors
BACKGROUND: Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors. METHODS: The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the Natio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2013-03, Vol.119 (5), p.1050-1057 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1057 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1050 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Weaver, Kathryn E. Geiger, Ann M. Lu, Lingyi Case, L. Douglas |
description | BACKGROUND:
Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors.
METHODS:
The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics.
RESULTS:
Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P < .001), to have less education (P < .001), and to lack health insurance (P < .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03).
CONCLUSIONS:
The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.27840 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3679645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1291601967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9KJDEQxsOyouOfiw8gfVkQoTWVpNOdi7CM6x8QBV1hb6EmnXYiPd2zSfcsc9tH2Gf0Scw4o6sXPRVF_fjqq_oI2QV6CJSyI9MYf8jyQtAvZABU5SkFwb6SAaW0SDPBf22QzRAeYpuzjK-TDcapkkzyATm56T3Wj3__9X6ETVK6MEXvOmdD4ppkbLHuxknosOtDgpO2uU_ubhODjbE-Cb2fuVnrwzZZq7AOdmdVt8jd6Y-fw_P08vrsYvj9MjWZUDQtLUomIIMy-quUYhSKDGyFpTDRMJZloYoKABkCR64ya42RVpi8GBkoOd8ix0vdaT-a2NLYpovm9dS7Cfq5btHp95PGjfV9O9Nc5kqKLArsrwR8-7u3odMTF4yta2xs2wcNggsKnOX55yhTICkouUAPlqjxbQjeVq-OgOpFQnqRkH5OKMJ7b294RV8iicC3FYDBYF35-GwX_nNSUVlIFTlYcn9cbecfrNTDq-HNcvkTFOmqUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291601967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weaver, Kathryn E. ; Geiger, Ann M. ; Lu, Lingyi ; Case, L. Douglas</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Kathryn E. ; Geiger, Ann M. ; Lu, Lingyi ; Case, L. Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:
Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors.
METHODS:
The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics.
RESULTS:
Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P < .001), to have less education (P < .001), and to lack health insurance (P < .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03).
CONCLUSIONS:
The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27840</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23096263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; cancer ; comorbidity ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; mental health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - psychology ; rural health ; Rural Population ; survivors ; Survivors - psychology ; Tumors ; unemployment ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2013-03, Vol.119 (5), p.1050-1057</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.27840$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.27840$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26906869$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23096263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Lingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, L. Douglas</creatorcontrib><title>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:
Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors.
METHODS:
The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics.
RESULTS:
Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P < .001), to have less education (P < .001), and to lack health insurance (P < .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03).
CONCLUSIONS:
The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>comorbidity</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>rural health</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>survivors</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>unemployment</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9KJDEQxsOyouOfiw8gfVkQoTWVpNOdi7CM6x8QBV1hb6EmnXYiPd2zSfcsc9tH2Gf0Scw4o6sXPRVF_fjqq_oI2QV6CJSyI9MYf8jyQtAvZABU5SkFwb6SAaW0SDPBf22QzRAeYpuzjK-TDcapkkzyATm56T3Wj3__9X6ETVK6MEXvOmdD4ppkbLHuxknosOtDgpO2uU_ubhODjbE-Cb2fuVnrwzZZq7AOdmdVt8jd6Y-fw_P08vrsYvj9MjWZUDQtLUomIIMy-quUYhSKDGyFpTDRMJZloYoKABkCR64ya42RVpi8GBkoOd8ix0vdaT-a2NLYpovm9dS7Cfq5btHp95PGjfV9O9Nc5kqKLArsrwR8-7u3odMTF4yta2xs2wcNggsKnOX55yhTICkouUAPlqjxbQjeVq-OgOpFQnqRkH5OKMJ7b294RV8iicC3FYDBYF35-GwX_nNSUVlIFTlYcn9cbecfrNTDq-HNcvkTFOmqUA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Weaver, Kathryn E.</creator><creator>Geiger, Ann M.</creator><creator>Lu, Lingyi</creator><creator>Case, L. Douglas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</title><author>Weaver, Kathryn E. ; Geiger, Ann M. ; Lu, Lingyi ; Case, L. Douglas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>comorbidity</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>rural health</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>survivors</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>unemployment</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Lingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, L. Douglas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Kathryn E.</au><au>Geiger, Ann M.</au><au>Lu, Lingyi</au><au>Case, L. Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1050</spage><epage>1057</epage><pages>1050-1057</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:
Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors.
METHODS:
The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics.
RESULTS:
Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P < .001), to have less education (P < .001), and to lack health insurance (P < .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03).
CONCLUSIONS:
The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>23096263</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.27840</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2013-03, Vol.119 (5), p.1050-1057 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3679645 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences cancer comorbidity Epidemiology Female Health Status Health Status Disparities Humans Male Medical sciences mental health Middle Aged Neoplasms - psychology rural health Rural Population survivors Survivors - psychology Tumors unemployment United States - epidemiology |
title | Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A15%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%E2%80%90urban%20disparities%20in%20health%20status%20among%20US%20cancer%20survivors&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Weaver,%20Kathryn%20E.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1050&rft.epage=1057&rft.pages=1050-1057&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.27840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1291601967%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291601967&rft_id=info:pmid/23096263&rfr_iscdi=true |