Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors

BACKGROUND: Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors. METHODS: The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the Natio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2013-03, Vol.119 (5), p.1050-1057
Hauptverfasser: Weaver, Kathryn E., Geiger, Ann M., Lu, Lingyi, Case, L. Douglas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1057
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1050
container_title Cancer
container_volume 119
creator Weaver, Kathryn E.
Geiger, Ann M.
Lu, Lingyi
Case, L. Douglas
description BACKGROUND: Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors. METHODS: The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P < .001), to have less education (P < .001), and to lack health insurance (P < .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03). CONCLUSIONS: The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.27840
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3679645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1291601967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9KJDEQxsOyouOfiw8gfVkQoTWVpNOdi7CM6x8QBV1hb6EmnXYiPd2zSfcsc9tH2Gf0Scw4o6sXPRVF_fjqq_oI2QV6CJSyI9MYf8jyQtAvZABU5SkFwb6SAaW0SDPBf22QzRAeYpuzjK-TDcapkkzyATm56T3Wj3__9X6ETVK6MEXvOmdD4ppkbLHuxknosOtDgpO2uU_ubhODjbE-Cb2fuVnrwzZZq7AOdmdVt8jd6Y-fw_P08vrsYvj9MjWZUDQtLUomIIMy-quUYhSKDGyFpTDRMJZloYoKABkCR64ya42RVpi8GBkoOd8ix0vdaT-a2NLYpovm9dS7Cfq5btHp95PGjfV9O9Nc5kqKLArsrwR8-7u3odMTF4yta2xs2wcNggsKnOX55yhTICkouUAPlqjxbQjeVq-OgOpFQnqRkH5OKMJ7b294RV8iicC3FYDBYF35-GwX_nNSUVlIFTlYcn9cbecfrNTDq-HNcvkTFOmqUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291601967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weaver, Kathryn E. ; Geiger, Ann M. ; Lu, Lingyi ; Case, L. Douglas</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Kathryn E. ; Geiger, Ann M. ; Lu, Lingyi ; Case, L. Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors. METHODS: The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P &lt; .001), to have less education (P &lt; .001), and to lack health insurance (P &lt; .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03). CONCLUSIONS: The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27840</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23096263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; cancer ; comorbidity ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; mental health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - psychology ; rural health ; Rural Population ; survivors ; Survivors - psychology ; Tumors ; unemployment ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2013-03, Vol.119 (5), p.1050-1057</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.27840$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.27840$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26906869$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23096263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Lingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, L. Douglas</creatorcontrib><title>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors. METHODS: The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P &lt; .001), to have less education (P &lt; .001), and to lack health insurance (P &lt; .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03). CONCLUSIONS: The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>comorbidity</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>rural health</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>survivors</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>unemployment</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9KJDEQxsOyouOfiw8gfVkQoTWVpNOdi7CM6x8QBV1hb6EmnXYiPd2zSfcsc9tH2Gf0Scw4o6sXPRVF_fjqq_oI2QV6CJSyI9MYf8jyQtAvZABU5SkFwb6SAaW0SDPBf22QzRAeYpuzjK-TDcapkkzyATm56T3Wj3__9X6ETVK6MEXvOmdD4ppkbLHuxknosOtDgpO2uU_ubhODjbE-Cb2fuVnrwzZZq7AOdmdVt8jd6Y-fw_P08vrsYvj9MjWZUDQtLUomIIMy-quUYhSKDGyFpTDRMJZloYoKABkCR64ya42RVpi8GBkoOd8ix0vdaT-a2NLYpovm9dS7Cfq5btHp95PGjfV9O9Nc5kqKLArsrwR8-7u3odMTF4yta2xs2wcNggsKnOX55yhTICkouUAPlqjxbQjeVq-OgOpFQnqRkH5OKMJ7b294RV8iicC3FYDBYF35-GwX_nNSUVlIFTlYcn9cbecfrNTDq-HNcvkTFOmqUA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Weaver, Kathryn E.</creator><creator>Geiger, Ann M.</creator><creator>Lu, Lingyi</creator><creator>Case, L. Douglas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</title><author>Weaver, Kathryn E. ; Geiger, Ann M. ; Lu, Lingyi ; Case, L. Douglas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5490-dea624151d014f99201851efad4c142add898f11a2a13a395eecc6e4c78bc1d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>comorbidity</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>rural health</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>survivors</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>unemployment</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Lingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, L. Douglas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Kathryn E.</au><au>Geiger, Ann M.</au><au>Lu, Lingyi</au><au>Case, L. Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1050</spage><epage>1057</epage><pages>1050-1057</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: Although rural residents are more likely to be diagnosed with more advanced cancers and to die of cancer, little is known about rural‐urban disparities in self‐reported health among survivors. METHODS: The authors identified adults who had a self‐reported history of cancer from the National Health Interview Survey (2006‐2010). Rural‐urban residence was defined using US Census definitions. Logistic regression with weighting to account for complex sampling was used to assess rural‐urban differences in health status after accounting for differences in demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 7804 identified cancer survivors, 20.8% were rural residents. This translated to a population of 2.8 million rural cancer survivors in the United States. Rural survivors were more likely than urban survivors to be non‐Hispanic white (P &lt; .001), to have less education (P &lt; .001), and to lack health insurance (P &lt; .001). Rural survivors reported worse health in all domains. After adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, age, marital status, education, insurance, time since diagnosis, and number of cancers, rural survivors were more likely to report fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.20‐1.62), psychological distress (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐1.50), ≥2 noncancer comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.32), and health‐related unemployment (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐2.03). CONCLUSIONS: The current results provide the first estimates of the proportion and number of US adult cancer survivors who reside in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors are at greater risk for a variety of poor health outcomes, even many years after their cancer diagnosis, and should be a target for interventions to improve their health and well being. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. There are an estimated 2.8 million cancer survivors who reside in rural areas of the United States. Relative to urban survivors, rural survivors report poorer health, higher psychological distress, more noncancer comorbidities, and higher rates of health‐related unemployment.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>23096263</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.27840</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2013-03, Vol.119 (5), p.1050-1057
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3679645
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
cancer
comorbidity
Epidemiology
Female
Health Status
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
mental health
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - psychology
rural health
Rural Population
survivors
Survivors - psychology
Tumors
unemployment
United States - epidemiology
title Rural‐urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A15%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%E2%80%90urban%20disparities%20in%20health%20status%20among%20US%20cancer%20survivors&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Weaver,%20Kathryn%20E.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1050&rft.epage=1057&rft.pages=1050-1057&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.27840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1291601967%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291601967&rft_id=info:pmid/23096263&rfr_iscdi=true