Drift load in populations of small size and low density
According to theory, drift load in randomly mating populations is determined by past population size, because enhanced genetic drift in small populations causes accumulation and fixation of recessive deleterious mutations of small effect. In contrast, segregating load due to mutations of low frequen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heredity 2013-03, Vol.110 (3), p.296-302 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 302 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 296 |
container_title | Heredity |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Willi, Y Griffin, P Van Buskirk, J |
description | According to theory, drift load in randomly mating populations is determined by past population size, because enhanced genetic drift in small populations causes accumulation and fixation of recessive deleterious mutations of small effect. In contrast, segregating load due to mutations of low frequency should decline in smaller populations, at least when mutations are highly recessive and strongly deleterious. Strong local selection generally reduces both types of load. We tested these predictions in 13 isolated, outcrossing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata that varied in population size and plant density. Long-term size was estimated by expected heterozygosity at 20 microsatellite loci. Segregating load was assessed by comparing performance of offspring from selfings versus within-population crosses. Drift load was the heterosis effect created by interpopulation outbreeding. Results showed that segregating load was unrelated to long-term size. However, drift load was significantly higher in populations of small effective size and low density. Drift load was mostly expressed late in development, but started as early as germination and accumulated thereafter. The study largely confirms predictions of theory and illustrates that mutation accumulation can be a threat to natural populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/hdy.2012.86 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3668656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2890531501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e8b05c5b0ec46346a1f78a51b20b6b08a28819e2ff9028017a70cb502c408363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evEvAiyCpM7vZzfYiSP2EghcFb8sm2dgtaTZmE6X-ehNai3ryNId5eHhnXkKOEcYITF7Ms9WYAtKxFDtkiEzwkPIIdskQAGUIIn4ZkAPvFwDAYjrZJwPKKGIs-ZDE17XNm6BwOgtsGVSuagvdWFf6wOWBX-qiCLz9NIEus476CDJTetusDslergtvjjZzRJ5vb56m9-Hs8e5hejUL0yiiTciNTICnPAGTRoJFQmMeS80xoZCIBKSmUuLE0DyfAJWAsY4hTTjQNALJBBuRy7W3apOlyVJTNrUuVFXbpa5Xymmrfm9KO1ev7l0xIaTgveBsI6jdW2t8o5bWp6YodGlc6xXSCQrsPkX_gUrJUADlHXr6B124ti67T_RUDBEg74Xnayqtnfe1ybe5EVTfneq6U313SvZJT36eumW_y2JfF6yStw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287040152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drift load in populations of small size and low density</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Willi, Y ; Griffin, P ; Van Buskirk, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Willi, Y ; Griffin, P ; Van Buskirk, J</creatorcontrib><description>According to theory, drift load in randomly mating populations is determined by past population size, because enhanced genetic drift in small populations causes accumulation and fixation of recessive deleterious mutations of small effect. In contrast, segregating load due to mutations of low frequency should decline in smaller populations, at least when mutations are highly recessive and strongly deleterious. Strong local selection generally reduces both types of load. We tested these predictions in 13 isolated, outcrossing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata that varied in population size and plant density. Long-term size was estimated by expected heterozygosity at 20 microsatellite loci. Segregating load was assessed by comparing performance of offspring from selfings versus within-population crosses. Drift load was the heterosis effect created by interpopulation outbreeding. Results showed that segregating load was unrelated to long-term size. However, drift load was significantly higher in populations of small effective size and low density. Drift load was mostly expressed late in development, but started as early as germination and accumulated thereafter. The study largely confirms predictions of theory and illustrates that mutation accumulation can be a threat to natural populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-067X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.86</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23211785</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HDTYAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Arabidopsis ; Arabidopsis - genetics ; Flowers & plants ; Genetic Drift ; Genetic Loci ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics ; Heterozygote ; Hybrid Vigor ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Mutation ; Natural populations ; North America ; Offspring ; Original ; Phylogeography ; Plant populations ; Planting density ; Population Density ; Population number ; Reproduction - genetics ; Selection, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Heredity, 2013-03, Vol.110 (3), p.296-302</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 The Genetics Society 2013 The Genetics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e8b05c5b0ec46346a1f78a51b20b6b08a28819e2ff9028017a70cb502c408363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e8b05c5b0ec46346a1f78a51b20b6b08a28819e2ff9028017a70cb502c408363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668656/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668656/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23211785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willi, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Buskirk, J</creatorcontrib><title>Drift load in populations of small size and low density</title><title>Heredity</title><addtitle>Heredity (Edinb)</addtitle><description>According to theory, drift load in randomly mating populations is determined by past population size, because enhanced genetic drift in small populations causes accumulation and fixation of recessive deleterious mutations of small effect. In contrast, segregating load due to mutations of low frequency should decline in smaller populations, at least when mutations are highly recessive and strongly deleterious. Strong local selection generally reduces both types of load. We tested these predictions in 13 isolated, outcrossing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata that varied in population size and plant density. Long-term size was estimated by expected heterozygosity at 20 microsatellite loci. Segregating load was assessed by comparing performance of offspring from selfings versus within-population crosses. Drift load was the heterosis effect created by interpopulation outbreeding. Results showed that segregating load was unrelated to long-term size. However, drift load was significantly higher in populations of small effective size and low density. Drift load was mostly expressed late in development, but started as early as germination and accumulated thereafter. The study largely confirms predictions of theory and illustrates that mutation accumulation can be a threat to natural populations.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Arabidopsis</subject><subject>Arabidopsis - genetics</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Genetic Drift</subject><subject>Genetic Loci</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Heterozygote</subject><subject>Hybrid Vigor</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Natural populations</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Phylogeography</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Reproduction - genetics</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><issn>0018-067X</issn><issn>1365-2540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evEvAiyCpM7vZzfYiSP2EghcFb8sm2dgtaTZmE6X-ehNai3ryNId5eHhnXkKOEcYITF7Ms9WYAtKxFDtkiEzwkPIIdskQAGUIIn4ZkAPvFwDAYjrZJwPKKGIs-ZDE17XNm6BwOgtsGVSuagvdWFf6wOWBX-qiCLz9NIEus476CDJTetusDslergtvjjZzRJ5vb56m9-Hs8e5hejUL0yiiTciNTICnPAGTRoJFQmMeS80xoZCIBKSmUuLE0DyfAJWAsY4hTTjQNALJBBuRy7W3apOlyVJTNrUuVFXbpa5Xymmrfm9KO1ev7l0xIaTgveBsI6jdW2t8o5bWp6YodGlc6xXSCQrsPkX_gUrJUADlHXr6B124ti67T_RUDBEg74Xnayqtnfe1ybe5EVTfneq6U313SvZJT36eumW_y2JfF6yStw</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Willi, Y</creator><creator>Griffin, P</creator><creator>Van Buskirk, J</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Drift load in populations of small size and low density</title><author>Willi, Y ; Griffin, P ; Van Buskirk, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e8b05c5b0ec46346a1f78a51b20b6b08a28819e2ff9028017a70cb502c408363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Arabidopsis</topic><topic>Arabidopsis - genetics</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Genetic Drift</topic><topic>Genetic Loci</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Heterozygote</topic><topic>Hybrid Vigor</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Natural populations</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Phylogeography</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Reproduction - genetics</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willi, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Buskirk, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Heredity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willi, Y</au><au>Griffin, P</au><au>Van Buskirk, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drift load in populations of small size and low density</atitle><jtitle>Heredity</jtitle><addtitle>Heredity (Edinb)</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>296</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>296-302</pages><issn>0018-067X</issn><eissn>1365-2540</eissn><coden>HDTYAT</coden><abstract>According to theory, drift load in randomly mating populations is determined by past population size, because enhanced genetic drift in small populations causes accumulation and fixation of recessive deleterious mutations of small effect. In contrast, segregating load due to mutations of low frequency should decline in smaller populations, at least when mutations are highly recessive and strongly deleterious. Strong local selection generally reduces both types of load. We tested these predictions in 13 isolated, outcrossing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata that varied in population size and plant density. Long-term size was estimated by expected heterozygosity at 20 microsatellite loci. Segregating load was assessed by comparing performance of offspring from selfings versus within-population crosses. Drift load was the heterosis effect created by interpopulation outbreeding. Results showed that segregating load was unrelated to long-term size. However, drift load was significantly higher in populations of small effective size and low density. Drift load was mostly expressed late in development, but started as early as germination and accumulated thereafter. The study largely confirms predictions of theory and illustrates that mutation accumulation can be a threat to natural populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>23211785</pmid><doi>10.1038/hdy.2012.86</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-067X |
ispartof | Heredity, 2013-03, Vol.110 (3), p.296-302 |
issn | 0018-067X 1365-2540 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3668656 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accumulation Arabidopsis Arabidopsis - genetics Flowers & plants Genetic Drift Genetic Loci Genetic Variation Genetics Heterozygote Hybrid Vigor Microsatellite Repeats Mutation Natural populations North America Offspring Original Phylogeography Plant populations Planting density Population Density Population number Reproduction - genetics Selection, Genetic |
title | Drift load in populations of small size and low density |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drift%20load%20in%20populations%20of%20small%20size%20and%20low%20density&rft.jtitle=Heredity&rft.au=Willi,%20Y&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=296-302&rft.issn=0018-067X&rft.eissn=1365-2540&rft.coden=HDTYAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/hdy.2012.86&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2890531501%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287040152&rft_id=info:pmid/23211785&rfr_iscdi=true |