Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change

Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013-05, Vol.133 (5), p.2867-2875
Hauptverfasser: Maloff, Erin S, Grantham, D Wesley, Ashmead, Daniel H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2875
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2867
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 133
creator Maloff, Erin S
Grantham, D Wesley
Ashmead, Daniel H
description Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4796102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3663864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1350153144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ccbd9d1b9f4c2848614d7d6e5956a7256a7b46dd504c02b8e09632dc0e53706e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gHJUQ9b8727F0GKX1DwoueQTWbbyH7UJFvov7eltehlhmEe3hkehK4pmVLK6D2dirxUlLATNKaSkayQTJyiMSGEZqJUaoQuYvzajrLg5TkaMa6k4CUbo9nr0JoOR-iiT37t0wanHjtf1xCgsxCx73BaAg4mAe5rbAbnUx822A6A7dJ0C7hEZ7VpIlwd-gR9Pj99zF6z-fvL2-xxnlnOZcqsrVzpaFXWwrJCFIoKlzsFspTK5GxXKqGck0RYwqoCSKk4c5aA5DlRwCfoYZ-7GqoWnIUuBdPoVfCtCRvdG6__bzq_1It-rblSvFBiG3B7CAj99wAx6dZHC01jOuiHqCmXhEpOxQ6926M29DEGqI9nKNE76Zrqg_Qte_P3ryP5a5n_APxdfEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350153144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Maloff, Erin S ; Grantham, D Wesley ; Ashmead, Daniel H</creator><creatorcontrib>Maloff, Erin S ; Grantham, D Wesley ; Ashmead, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><description>Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4796102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23654392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Audiometry ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Threshold ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Motion ; Psychoacoustics ; Psychological Acoustics ; Sound Localization ; Space Perception ; Time Factors ; Time Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-05, Vol.133 (5), p.2867-2875</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Acoustical Society of America 2013 Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ccbd9d1b9f4c2848614d7d6e5956a7256a7b46dd504c02b8e09632dc0e53706e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,230,314,776,780,881,27902,27903</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23654392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maloff, Erin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, D Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashmead, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><title>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Psychological Acoustics</subject><subject>Sound Localization</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gHJUQ9b8727F0GKX1DwoueQTWbbyH7UJFvov7eltehlhmEe3hkehK4pmVLK6D2dirxUlLATNKaSkayQTJyiMSGEZqJUaoQuYvzajrLg5TkaMa6k4CUbo9nr0JoOR-iiT37t0wanHjtf1xCgsxCx73BaAg4mAe5rbAbnUx822A6A7dJ0C7hEZ7VpIlwd-gR9Pj99zF6z-fvL2-xxnlnOZcqsrVzpaFXWwrJCFIoKlzsFspTK5GxXKqGck0RYwqoCSKk4c5aA5DlRwCfoYZ-7GqoWnIUuBdPoVfCtCRvdG6__bzq_1It-rblSvFBiG3B7CAj99wAx6dZHC01jOuiHqCmXhEpOxQ6926M29DEGqI9nKNE76Zrqg_Qte_P3ryP5a5n_APxdfEg</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Maloff, Erin S</creator><creator>Grantham, D Wesley</creator><creator>Ashmead, Daniel H</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</title><author>Maloff, Erin S ; Grantham, D Wesley ; Ashmead, Daniel H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ccbd9d1b9f4c2848614d7d6e5956a7256a7b46dd504c02b8e09632dc0e53706e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Psychological Acoustics</topic><topic>Sound Localization</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maloff, Erin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, D Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashmead, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maloff, Erin S</au><au>Grantham, D Wesley</au><au>Ashmead, Daniel H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2867</spage><epage>2875</epage><pages>2867-2875</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>23654392</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4796102</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-05, Vol.133 (5), p.2867-2875
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3663864
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Audiometry
Auditory Perception
Auditory Threshold
Cues
Discrimination (Psychology)
Female
Humans
Male
Motion
Psychoacoustics
Psychological Acoustics
Sound Localization
Space Perception
Time Factors
Time Perception
Young Adult
title Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A07%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20sensitivity%20to%20differences%20in%20the%20rate%20of%20auditory%20cue%20change&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Maloff,%20Erin%20S&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2867&rft.epage=2875&rft.pages=2867-2875&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4796102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1350153144%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350153144&rft_id=info:pmid/23654392&rfr_iscdi=true