Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change
Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013-05, Vol.133 (5), p.2867-2875 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2875 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2867 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | Maloff, Erin S Grantham, D Wesley Ashmead, Daniel H |
description | Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.4796102 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3663864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1350153144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ccbd9d1b9f4c2848614d7d6e5956a7256a7b46dd504c02b8e09632dc0e53706e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gHJUQ9b8727F0GKX1DwoueQTWbbyH7UJFvov7eltehlhmEe3hkehK4pmVLK6D2dirxUlLATNKaSkayQTJyiMSGEZqJUaoQuYvzajrLg5TkaMa6k4CUbo9nr0JoOR-iiT37t0wanHjtf1xCgsxCx73BaAg4mAe5rbAbnUx822A6A7dJ0C7hEZ7VpIlwd-gR9Pj99zF6z-fvL2-xxnlnOZcqsrVzpaFXWwrJCFIoKlzsFspTK5GxXKqGck0RYwqoCSKk4c5aA5DlRwCfoYZ-7GqoWnIUuBdPoVfCtCRvdG6__bzq_1It-rblSvFBiG3B7CAj99wAx6dZHC01jOuiHqCmXhEpOxQ6926M29DEGqI9nKNE76Zrqg_Qte_P3ryP5a5n_APxdfEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350153144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Maloff, Erin S ; Grantham, D Wesley ; Ashmead, Daniel H</creator><creatorcontrib>Maloff, Erin S ; Grantham, D Wesley ; Ashmead, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><description>Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4796102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23654392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Audiometry ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Threshold ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Motion ; Psychoacoustics ; Psychological Acoustics ; Sound Localization ; Space Perception ; Time Factors ; Time Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-05, Vol.133 (5), p.2867-2875</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Acoustical Society of America 2013 Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ccbd9d1b9f4c2848614d7d6e5956a7256a7b46dd504c02b8e09632dc0e53706e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,230,314,776,780,881,27902,27903</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23654392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maloff, Erin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, D Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashmead, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><title>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Psychological Acoustics</subject><subject>Sound Localization</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gHJUQ9b8727F0GKX1DwoueQTWbbyH7UJFvov7eltehlhmEe3hkehK4pmVLK6D2dirxUlLATNKaSkayQTJyiMSGEZqJUaoQuYvzajrLg5TkaMa6k4CUbo9nr0JoOR-iiT37t0wanHjtf1xCgsxCx73BaAg4mAe5rbAbnUx822A6A7dJ0C7hEZ7VpIlwd-gR9Pj99zF6z-fvL2-xxnlnOZcqsrVzpaFXWwrJCFIoKlzsFspTK5GxXKqGck0RYwqoCSKk4c5aA5DlRwCfoYZ-7GqoWnIUuBdPoVfCtCRvdG6__bzq_1It-rblSvFBiG3B7CAj99wAx6dZHC01jOuiHqCmXhEpOxQ6926M29DEGqI9nKNE76Zrqg_Qte_P3ryP5a5n_APxdfEg</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Maloff, Erin S</creator><creator>Grantham, D Wesley</creator><creator>Ashmead, Daniel H</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</title><author>Maloff, Erin S ; Grantham, D Wesley ; Ashmead, Daniel H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ccbd9d1b9f4c2848614d7d6e5956a7256a7b46dd504c02b8e09632dc0e53706e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Psychological Acoustics</topic><topic>Sound Localization</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maloff, Erin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, D Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashmead, Daniel H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maloff, Erin S</au><au>Grantham, D Wesley</au><au>Ashmead, Daniel H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2867</spage><epage>2875</epage><pages>2867-2875</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>23654392</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4796102</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-05, Vol.133 (5), p.2867-2875 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3663864 |
source | MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adult Audiometry Auditory Perception Auditory Threshold Cues Discrimination (Psychology) Female Humans Male Motion Psychoacoustics Psychological Acoustics Sound Localization Space Perception Time Factors Time Perception Young Adult |
title | Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A07%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20sensitivity%20to%20differences%20in%20the%20rate%20of%20auditory%20cue%20change&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Maloff,%20Erin%20S&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2867&rft.epage=2875&rft.pages=2867-2875&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4796102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1350153144%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350153144&rft_id=info:pmid/23654392&rfr_iscdi=true |