Quantitative analysis of organizational culture in occupational health research: a theory-based validation in 30 workplaces of the organizational culture profile instrument
This study advances a measurement approach for the study of organizational culture in population-based occupational health research, and tests how different organizational culture types are associated with psychological distress, depression, emotional exhaustion, and well-being. Data were collected...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC public health 2013-05, Vol.13 (1), p.443-443, Article 443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 443 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 443 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Marchand, Alain Haines, 3rd, Victor Y Dextras-Gauthier, Julie |
description | This study advances a measurement approach for the study of organizational culture in population-based occupational health research, and tests how different organizational culture types are associated with psychological distress, depression, emotional exhaustion, and well-being.
Data were collected over a sample of 1,164 employees nested in 30 workplaces. Employees completed the 26-item OCP instrument. Psychological distress was measured with the General Health Questionnaire (12-item); depression with the Beck Depression Inventory (21-item); and emotional exhaustion with five items from the Maslach Burnout Inventory general survey. Exploratory factor analysis evaluated the dimensionality of the OCP scale. Multilevel regression models estimated workplace-level variations, and the contribution of organizational culture factors to mental health and well-being after controlling for gender, age, and living with a partner.
Exploratory factor analysis of OCP items revealed four factors explaining about 75% of the variance, and supported the structure of the Competing Values Framework. Factors were labeled Group, Hierarchical, Rational and Developmental. Cronbach's alphas were high (0.82-0.89). Multilevel regression analysis suggested that the four culture types varied significantly between workplaces, and correlated with mental health and well-being outcomes. The Group culture type best distinguished between workplaces and had the strongest associations with the outcomes.
This study provides strong support for the use of the OCP scale for measuring organizational culture in population-based occupational health research in a way that is consistent with the Competing Values Framework. The Group organizational culture needs to be considered as a relevant factor in occupational health studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-443 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3653730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534624583</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534624583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f42b09fdbacd6de9be9441f145498fd3816ab4f3cfd779a98b1d488a60c3f0ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uktv1DAQjhCIlsKdE7LEhUuKHTsvDkjVipdUCSHB2Zo4442LEwc72Wr5TfxInN126aJWlmxr5nt4ZpwkLxk9Z6wq3jJRsjQTeZUyngrBHyWnh9DjO_eT5FkIV5Syssqzp8lJxguRZRk_Tf58m2GYzAST2SCBAew2mECcJs6vYTC_Y8LFKFGznWaPxAzEKTWPt_EOwU4d8RgQvOreESBTh85v0wYCtmQD1rQ78ELllFw7_3O0oHDnErEPOY3eaWMXxzD5ucdhep480WADvrg5z5IfHz98X31OL79--rK6uEybvBJTqkXW0Fq3Dai2aLFusBaCaSZyUVe65RUroBGaK92WZQ111bBWVBUUVHFNUfGz5P1ed5ybHlsVrT1YOXrTg99KB0YeZwbTybXbSF7kvOQ0Cqz2Ao1xDwgcZ5Tr5TItuUxLMi7jMKPKm5tnePdrxjDJ3gSF1sKAbg4Rlhc1z-Ieoa__g1652cdu7lCcsrxk7B9qDRalGbSL5moRlRc5F8Vivtie34OKq8XeKDfgMpVjAt0TlHcheNSHQhmVyz-9r7RXdzt8INx-TP4XVHboRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353015711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative analysis of organizational culture in occupational health research: a theory-based validation in 30 workplaces of the organizational culture profile instrument</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Marchand, Alain ; Haines, 3rd, Victor Y ; Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Marchand, Alain ; Haines, 3rd, Victor Y ; Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>This study advances a measurement approach for the study of organizational culture in population-based occupational health research, and tests how different organizational culture types are associated with psychological distress, depression, emotional exhaustion, and well-being.
Data were collected over a sample of 1,164 employees nested in 30 workplaces. Employees completed the 26-item OCP instrument. Psychological distress was measured with the General Health Questionnaire (12-item); depression with the Beck Depression Inventory (21-item); and emotional exhaustion with five items from the Maslach Burnout Inventory general survey. Exploratory factor analysis evaluated the dimensionality of the OCP scale. Multilevel regression models estimated workplace-level variations, and the contribution of organizational culture factors to mental health and well-being after controlling for gender, age, and living with a partner.
Exploratory factor analysis of OCP items revealed four factors explaining about 75% of the variance, and supported the structure of the Competing Values Framework. Factors were labeled Group, Hierarchical, Rational and Developmental. Cronbach's alphas were high (0.82-0.89). Multilevel regression analysis suggested that the four culture types varied significantly between workplaces, and correlated with mental health and well-being outcomes. The Group culture type best distinguished between workplaces and had the strongest associations with the outcomes.
This study provides strong support for the use of the OCP scale for measuring organizational culture in population-based occupational health research in a way that is consistent with the Competing Values Framework. The Group organizational culture needs to be considered as a relevant factor in occupational health studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23642223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Burnout, Professional - epidemiology ; Burnout, Professional - psychology ; Canada - epidemiology ; Corporate culture ; Depression - psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Male ; Medical research ; Mental illness ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data ; Occupational health and safety ; Organizational Culture ; Personality Inventory - standards ; Psychological aspects ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk factors ; Social Values ; Stress ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Theory ; Workplace - classification ; Workplace - psychology</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2013-05, Vol.13 (1), p.443-443, Article 443</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Marchand et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Marchand et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Marchand et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f42b09fdbacd6de9be9441f145498fd3816ab4f3cfd779a98b1d488a60c3f0ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f42b09fdbacd6de9be9441f145498fd3816ab4f3cfd779a98b1d488a60c3f0ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653730/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653730/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642223$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marchand, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, 3rd, Victor Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative analysis of organizational culture in occupational health research: a theory-based validation in 30 workplaces of the organizational culture profile instrument</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>This study advances a measurement approach for the study of organizational culture in population-based occupational health research, and tests how different organizational culture types are associated with psychological distress, depression, emotional exhaustion, and well-being.
Data were collected over a sample of 1,164 employees nested in 30 workplaces. Employees completed the 26-item OCP instrument. Psychological distress was measured with the General Health Questionnaire (12-item); depression with the Beck Depression Inventory (21-item); and emotional exhaustion with five items from the Maslach Burnout Inventory general survey. Exploratory factor analysis evaluated the dimensionality of the OCP scale. Multilevel regression models estimated workplace-level variations, and the contribution of organizational culture factors to mental health and well-being after controlling for gender, age, and living with a partner.
Exploratory factor analysis of OCP items revealed four factors explaining about 75% of the variance, and supported the structure of the Competing Values Framework. Factors were labeled Group, Hierarchical, Rational and Developmental. Cronbach's alphas were high (0.82-0.89). Multilevel regression analysis suggested that the four culture types varied significantly between workplaces, and correlated with mental health and well-being outcomes. The Group culture type best distinguished between workplaces and had the strongest associations with the outcomes.
This study provides strong support for the use of the OCP scale for measuring organizational culture in population-based occupational health research in a way that is consistent with the Competing Values Framework. The Group organizational culture needs to be considered as a relevant factor in occupational health studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - psychology</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Occupational health and safety</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - standards</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Workplace - classification</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uktv1DAQjhCIlsKdE7LEhUuKHTsvDkjVipdUCSHB2Zo4442LEwc72Wr5TfxInN126aJWlmxr5nt4ZpwkLxk9Z6wq3jJRsjQTeZUyngrBHyWnh9DjO_eT5FkIV5Syssqzp8lJxguRZRk_Tf58m2GYzAST2SCBAew2mECcJs6vYTC_Y8LFKFGznWaPxAzEKTWPt_EOwU4d8RgQvOreESBTh85v0wYCtmQD1rQ78ELllFw7_3O0oHDnErEPOY3eaWMXxzD5ucdhep480WADvrg5z5IfHz98X31OL79--rK6uEybvBJTqkXW0Fq3Dai2aLFusBaCaSZyUVe65RUroBGaK92WZQ111bBWVBUUVHFNUfGz5P1ed5ybHlsVrT1YOXrTg99KB0YeZwbTybXbSF7kvOQ0Cqz2Ao1xDwgcZ5Tr5TItuUxLMi7jMKPKm5tnePdrxjDJ3gSF1sKAbg4Rlhc1z-Ieoa__g1652cdu7lCcsrxk7B9qDRalGbSL5moRlRc5F8Vivtie34OKq8XeKDfgMpVjAt0TlHcheNSHQhmVyz-9r7RXdzt8INx-TP4XVHboRQ</recordid><startdate>20130504</startdate><enddate>20130504</enddate><creator>Marchand, Alain</creator><creator>Haines, 3rd, Victor Y</creator><creator>Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130504</creationdate><title>Quantitative analysis of organizational culture in occupational health research: a theory-based validation in 30 workplaces of the organizational culture profile instrument</title><author>Marchand, Alain ; Haines, 3rd, Victor Y ; Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f42b09fdbacd6de9be9441f145498fd3816ab4f3cfd779a98b1d488a60c3f0ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - psychology</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Occupational health and safety</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - standards</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Workplace - classification</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marchand, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, 3rd, Victor Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marchand, Alain</au><au>Haines, 3rd, Victor Y</au><au>Dextras-Gauthier, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative analysis of organizational culture in occupational health research: a theory-based validation in 30 workplaces of the organizational culture profile instrument</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2013-05-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>443-443</pages><artnum>443</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>This study advances a measurement approach for the study of organizational culture in population-based occupational health research, and tests how different organizational culture types are associated with psychological distress, depression, emotional exhaustion, and well-being.
Data were collected over a sample of 1,164 employees nested in 30 workplaces. Employees completed the 26-item OCP instrument. Psychological distress was measured with the General Health Questionnaire (12-item); depression with the Beck Depression Inventory (21-item); and emotional exhaustion with five items from the Maslach Burnout Inventory general survey. Exploratory factor analysis evaluated the dimensionality of the OCP scale. Multilevel regression models estimated workplace-level variations, and the contribution of organizational culture factors to mental health and well-being after controlling for gender, age, and living with a partner.
Exploratory factor analysis of OCP items revealed four factors explaining about 75% of the variance, and supported the structure of the Competing Values Framework. Factors were labeled Group, Hierarchical, Rational and Developmental. Cronbach's alphas were high (0.82-0.89). Multilevel regression analysis suggested that the four culture types varied significantly between workplaces, and correlated with mental health and well-being outcomes. The Group culture type best distinguished between workplaces and had the strongest associations with the outcomes.
This study provides strong support for the use of the OCP scale for measuring organizational culture in population-based occupational health research in a way that is consistent with the Competing Values Framework. The Group organizational culture needs to be considered as a relevant factor in occupational health studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23642223</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2458-13-443</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2013-05, Vol.13 (1), p.443-443, Article 443 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3653730 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Burnout, Professional - epidemiology Burnout, Professional - psychology Canada - epidemiology Corporate culture Depression - psychology Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Humans Interprofessional Relations Male Medical research Mental illness Middle Aged Models, Theoretical Occupational Health - statistics & numerical data Occupational health and safety Organizational Culture Personality Inventory - standards Psychological aspects Psychometrics - instrumentation Reproducibility of Results Risk factors Social Values Stress Surveys and Questionnaires Theory Workplace - classification Workplace - psychology |
title | Quantitative analysis of organizational culture in occupational health research: a theory-based validation in 30 workplaces of the organizational culture profile instrument |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20analysis%20of%20organizational%20culture%20in%20occupational%20health%20research:%20a%20theory-based%20validation%20in%2030%20workplaces%20of%20the%20organizational%20culture%20profile%20instrument&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Marchand,%20Alain&rft.date=2013-05-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=443-443&rft.artnum=443&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2458-13-443&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534624583%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353015711&rft_id=info:pmid/23642223&rft_galeid=A534624583&rfr_iscdi=true |