Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection
A previous study demonstrated that alexidine has greater affinity for the major virulence factors of bacteria than chlorhexidine. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activity of 1% alexidine with that of 2% chlorhexidine using Enterococcus faecalis.infected dentin blocks. Sixty bo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral science 2013-03, Vol.5 (1), p.26-31 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 31 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 26 |
| container_title | International journal of oral science |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Kim, Hyun-Shik Woo Chang, Seok Baek, Seung-Ho Han, Seung Hyun Lee, Yoon Zhu, Qiang Kum, Kee-Yeon |
| description | A previous study demonstrated that alexidine has greater affinity for the major virulence factors of bacteria than chlorhexidine. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activity of 1% alexidine with that of 2% chlorhexidine using Enterococcus faecalis.infected dentin blocks. Sixty bovine dentin blocks were prepared and randomly divided into six groups of 10 each. E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 dentin blocks using the Luppens apparatus for 24 h and then the dentin blocks were soaked in 2% chlorhexidine or 1% alexidine solutions for 5 and 10 min, respectively. Sterile saline was used as a control. The antimicrobial efficacy was assessed by counting the number of bacteria adhering to the dentin surface and observing the degradation of bacterial shape or membrane rupture under a scanning electron microscope. Significantly fewer bacteria were observed in the 2% chlorhexidine- or 1% alexidine-soaked groups than in the control group （P~O.05）. However, there was no significant difference in the number of bacteria adhering to the dentinal surface between the two experimental groups or between the two soaking time groups （P＞0.05）. Ruptured or antiseptic-attached bacteria were more frequently observed in the lO-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups than in the 5-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups. In conclusion, lO-min soaking with 1% alexidine or 2% chlorhexidine can be effective against E. faecalis infection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ijos.2013.11 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3632760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>45566665</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>gjkqkxzz_e201301005</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>gjkqkxzz_e201301005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-43b08aabe9285e368d9d47b28f3b230481693bab376f791d1e415b58459319e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstv1DAQhy0EokvhxhkFcUGCLB4_EvtSqarKQ6rEBU4cLMdxst5m7a6dQOlfj6NdooI4MJeRPJ9_80ToOeA1YCreuW1Ia4KBrgEeoBXBTJYUKvkQraCqWUkEiBP0JKUtxpXgBB6jE0KZJBLjFfp27ke3cyaGxumhsF1nzViErtCDvXWt87bQvi3MZghxs7z02vk0Fpd-tDGYYMyUik5boweXCudnDRf8U_So00Oyz47-FH19f_nl4mN59fnDp4vzq9JwxseS0QYLrRsrieCWVqKVLasbIjraEIqZyM3QRje0rrpaQguWAW-4YFxSkFbSU3R20L2Zmp1tjfVj1IO6iW6n408VtFN_RrzbqD58V7SipK5wFnhzEPihfad9r7Zhij6XrPrt9f769u5O2XnCGDDmmX59TBfDfrJpVDuXjB0G7W2YkgIqpQSQIP8DpYBFtln11V_oUgQIjAmhhNeZenug8sJSirZbugSs5nNQ8zmouVgFkPEX9yezwL_3n4HyAKQc8r2N97L-W_DlMf8m-H6fvyyajPMqG6e_AMSnyz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800223257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Kim, Hyun-Shik ; Woo Chang, Seok ; Baek, Seung-Ho ; Han, Seung Hyun ; Lee, Yoon ; Zhu, Qiang ; Kum, Kee-Yeon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun-Shik ; Woo Chang, Seok ; Baek, Seung-Ho ; Han, Seung Hyun ; Lee, Yoon ; Zhu, Qiang ; Kum, Kee-Yeon</creatorcontrib><description>A previous study demonstrated that alexidine has greater affinity for the major virulence factors of bacteria than chlorhexidine. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activity of 1% alexidine with that of 2% chlorhexidine using Enterococcus faecalis.infected dentin blocks. Sixty bovine dentin blocks were prepared and randomly divided into six groups of 10 each. E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 dentin blocks using the Luppens apparatus for 24 h and then the dentin blocks were soaked in 2% chlorhexidine or 1% alexidine solutions for 5 and 10 min, respectively. Sterile saline was used as a control. The antimicrobial efficacy was assessed by counting the number of bacteria adhering to the dentin surface and observing the degradation of bacterial shape or membrane rupture under a scanning electron microscope. Significantly fewer bacteria were observed in the 2% chlorhexidine- or 1% alexidine-soaked groups than in the control group （P~O.05）. However, there was no significant difference in the number of bacteria adhering to the dentinal surface between the two experimental groups or between the two soaking time groups （P＞0.05）. Ruptured or antiseptic-attached bacteria were more frequently observed in the lO-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups than in the 5-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups. In conclusion, lO-min soaking with 1% alexidine or 2% chlorhexidine can be effective against E. faecalis infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-2818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-3169</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2013.11</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23492900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>alexidine ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; antibacterial ; apparatus ; Bacterial Adhesion - drug effects ; Bacterial Load - drug effects ; Biguanides - pharmacology ; canal ; Cattle ; Cell Membrane - drug effects ; chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - pharmacology ; Dentin - microbiology ; Dentistry ; effect ; electron ; Enterococcus ; Enterococcus faecalis ; Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects ; faecalis ; Luppens ; Medicine ; microscope ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original ; original-article ; Orthopedics ; Random Allocation ; root ; scanning ; soaking ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral science, 2013-03, Vol.5 (1), p.26-31</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 West China School of Stomatology 2013 West China School of Stomatology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-43b08aabe9285e368d9d47b28f3b230481693bab376f791d1e415b58459319e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-43b08aabe9285e368d9d47b28f3b230481693bab376f791d1e415b58459319e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/89520X/89520X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632760/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632760/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27929,27930,41125,42194,51581,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23492900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun-Shik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo Chang, Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Seung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kum, Kee-Yeon</creatorcontrib><title>Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection</title><title>International journal of oral science</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Sci</addtitle><addtitle>International Journal of Oral Science</addtitle><description>A previous study demonstrated that alexidine has greater affinity for the major virulence factors of bacteria than chlorhexidine. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activity of 1% alexidine with that of 2% chlorhexidine using Enterococcus faecalis.infected dentin blocks. Sixty bovine dentin blocks were prepared and randomly divided into six groups of 10 each. E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 dentin blocks using the Luppens apparatus for 24 h and then the dentin blocks were soaked in 2% chlorhexidine or 1% alexidine solutions for 5 and 10 min, respectively. Sterile saline was used as a control. The antimicrobial efficacy was assessed by counting the number of bacteria adhering to the dentin surface and observing the degradation of bacterial shape or membrane rupture under a scanning electron microscope. Significantly fewer bacteria were observed in the 2% chlorhexidine- or 1% alexidine-soaked groups than in the control group （P~O.05）. However, there was no significant difference in the number of bacteria adhering to the dentinal surface between the two experimental groups or between the two soaking time groups （P＞0.05）. Ruptured or antiseptic-attached bacteria were more frequently observed in the lO-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups than in the 5-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups. In conclusion, lO-min soaking with 1% alexidine or 2% chlorhexidine can be effective against E. faecalis infection.</description><subject>alexidine</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>antibacterial</subject><subject>apparatus</subject><subject>Bacterial Adhesion - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacterial Load - drug effects</subject><subject>Biguanides - pharmacology</subject><subject>canal</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cell Membrane - drug effects</subject><subject>chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dentin - microbiology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>effect</subject><subject>electron</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects</subject><subject>faecalis</subject><subject>Luppens</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>microscope</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>root</subject><subject>scanning</subject><subject>soaking</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1674-2818</issn><issn>2049-3169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstv1DAQhy0EokvhxhkFcUGCLB4_EvtSqarKQ6rEBU4cLMdxst5m7a6dQOlfj6NdooI4MJeRPJ9_80ToOeA1YCreuW1Ia4KBrgEeoBXBTJYUKvkQraCqWUkEiBP0JKUtxpXgBB6jE0KZJBLjFfp27ke3cyaGxumhsF1nzViErtCDvXWt87bQvi3MZghxs7z02vk0Fpd-tDGYYMyUik5boweXCudnDRf8U_So00Oyz47-FH19f_nl4mN59fnDp4vzq9JwxseS0QYLrRsrieCWVqKVLasbIjraEIqZyM3QRje0rrpaQguWAW-4YFxSkFbSU3R20L2Zmp1tjfVj1IO6iW6n408VtFN_RrzbqD58V7SipK5wFnhzEPihfad9r7Zhij6XrPrt9f769u5O2XnCGDDmmX59TBfDfrJpVDuXjB0G7W2YkgIqpQSQIP8DpYBFtln11V_oUgQIjAmhhNeZenug8sJSirZbugSs5nNQ8zmouVgFkPEX9yezwL_3n4HyAKQc8r2N97L-W_DlMf8m-H6fvyyajPMqG6e_AMSnyz4</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyun-Shik</creator><creator>Woo Chang, Seok</creator><creator>Baek, Seung-Ho</creator><creator>Han, Seung Hyun</creator><creator>Lee, Yoon</creator><creator>Zhu, Qiang</creator><creator>Kum, Kee-Yeon</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute and BK21 Program, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea %Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea%Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Dental Research Institute and BK21 Program, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea%Department of Dentistry Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea%Division of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection</title><author>Kim, Hyun-Shik ; Woo Chang, Seok ; Baek, Seung-Ho ; Han, Seung Hyun ; Lee, Yoon ; Zhu, Qiang ; Kum, Kee-Yeon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-43b08aabe9285e368d9d47b28f3b230481693bab376f791d1e415b58459319e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>alexidine</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>antibacterial</topic><topic>apparatus</topic><topic>Bacterial Adhesion - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacterial Load - drug effects</topic><topic>Biguanides - pharmacology</topic><topic>canal</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cell Membrane - drug effects</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dentin - microbiology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>effect</topic><topic>electron</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects</topic><topic>faecalis</topic><topic>Luppens</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>microscope</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>root</topic><topic>scanning</topic><topic>soaking</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun-Shik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo Chang, Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Seung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kum, Kee-Yeon</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyun-Shik</au><au>Woo Chang, Seok</au><au>Baek, Seung-Ho</au><au>Han, Seung Hyun</au><au>Lee, Yoon</au><au>Zhu, Qiang</au><au>Kum, Kee-Yeon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral science</jtitle><stitle>Int J Oral Sci</stitle><addtitle>International Journal of Oral Science</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>26-31</pages><issn>1674-2818</issn><eissn>2049-3169</eissn><abstract>A previous study demonstrated that alexidine has greater affinity for the major virulence factors of bacteria than chlorhexidine. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activity of 1% alexidine with that of 2% chlorhexidine using Enterococcus faecalis.infected dentin blocks. Sixty bovine dentin blocks were prepared and randomly divided into six groups of 10 each. E. faecalis was inoculated on 60 dentin blocks using the Luppens apparatus for 24 h and then the dentin blocks were soaked in 2% chlorhexidine or 1% alexidine solutions for 5 and 10 min, respectively. Sterile saline was used as a control. The antimicrobial efficacy was assessed by counting the number of bacteria adhering to the dentin surface and observing the degradation of bacterial shape or membrane rupture under a scanning electron microscope. Significantly fewer bacteria were observed in the 2% chlorhexidine- or 1% alexidine-soaked groups than in the control group （P~O.05）. However, there was no significant difference in the number of bacteria adhering to the dentinal surface between the two experimental groups or between the two soaking time groups （P＞0.05）. Ruptured or antiseptic-attached bacteria were more frequently observed in the lO-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups than in the 5-min-soaked chlorhexidine and alexidine groups. In conclusion, lO-min soaking with 1% alexidine or 2% chlorhexidine can be effective against E. faecalis infection.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23492900</pmid><doi>10.1038/ijos.2013.11</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1674-2818 |
| ispartof | International journal of oral science, 2013-03, Vol.5 (1), p.26-31 |
| issn | 1674-2818 2049-3169 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3632760 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
| subjects | alexidine Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology antibacterial apparatus Bacterial Adhesion - drug effects Bacterial Load - drug effects Biguanides - pharmacology canal Cattle Cell Membrane - drug effects chlorhexidine Chlorhexidine - pharmacology Dentin - microbiology Dentistry effect electron Enterococcus Enterococcus faecalis Enterococcus faecalis - drug effects faecalis Luppens Medicine microscope Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original original-article Orthopedics Random Allocation root scanning soaking Surgical Orthopedics Time Factors |
| title | Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T21%3A26%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antimicrobial%20effect%20of%20alexidine%20and%20chlorhexidine%20against%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20infection&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20science&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyun-Shik&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=26-31&rft.issn=1674-2818&rft.eissn=2049-3169&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ijos.2013.11&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_pubme%3Egjkqkxzz_e201301005%3C/wanfang_jour_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800223257&rft_id=info:pmid/23492900&rft_cqvip_id=45566665&rft_wanfj_id=gjkqkxzz_e201301005&rfr_iscdi=true |