The grading model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine
Purpose To present a new model derived from Ross’s model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis and to present inter- and intravariability study. Methods Two readers blinded to each other and blinded to their first and second reading retrospectively evaluated the magnetic resona...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 2013-04, Vol.22 (4), p.892-897 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 897 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 892 |
| container_title | European spine journal |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan Baranovic, Senka Karlak, Ivan Novacic, Karlo Potocki-Karacic, Tanja Lovrić, Dražen |
| description | Purpose
To present a new model derived from Ross’s model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis and to present inter- and intravariability study.
Methods
Two readers blinded to each other and blinded to their first and second reading retrospectively evaluated the magnetic resonance examinations in 32 postoperative spine surgery patients using this model.
Results
Paired and unpaired two-sided
t
tests showed no significant difference between the first and second reading, and interclass correlation coefficient revealed good interobserver reliability.
Conclusion
The proposed model enables estimation of the amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine and does not require any additional software or hardware. It is designed for multi-centered clinical studies where it is necessary to compare the values of epidural fibrosis between the tested and control group. The use of the proposed model is fast and practical and helps to avoid complications arising from image format, calibration and software, which are often encountered in multi-centered studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-012-2537-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3631047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1338392879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fde2facf0655149d1bc9bfc64a34204d8081c2a9ae60ef38848c61c0a648b0c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFjEUhYMo9rX1B7iRgBs3ozefk2wEKX5BoZt2HTKZ5G3qzGRMZgr215vXqaUKQleBc597cu89CL0i8I4AtO8LgFCyAUIbKljb3D5BO8IZbUAz-hTtQHNoZEv0EXpRyjUAERrkc3REGUiuoN2h7xdXHu-z7eO0x2Pq_YBDynipqi3FlzL6acEp_FaWtNgB2zGtm-bn2K-5SiF2OZVYcJzwnMqSZp_tEm88HtaxsxmXOU7-BD0Ldij-5d17jC4_f7o4_dqcnX_5dvrxrHEC2NKE3tNgXQApBOG6J53TXXCSW8Yp8F6BIo5abb0EH5hSXDlJHNi6UgdOsmP0YfOd1270vasb1CHNnONo80-TbDR_V6Z4ZfbpxjDJCPC2Gry9M8jpx-rLYsZYnB8GO_m0FkOYoFQJxfUjUKaYpqo9oG_-Qa_Tmqd6iQMFSoEQtFJko1y9aMk-3M9NwBxSN1vqpqZuDqmb29rz-uHC9x1_Yq4A3YBSS9Pe5wdf_9f1F09muh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330880552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The grading model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan ; Baranovic, Senka ; Karlak, Ivan ; Novacic, Karlo ; Potocki-Karacic, Tanja ; Lovrić, Dražen</creator><creatorcontrib>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan ; Baranovic, Senka ; Karlak, Ivan ; Novacic, Karlo ; Potocki-Karacic, Tanja ; Lovrić, Dražen</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To present a new model derived from Ross’s model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis and to present inter- and intravariability study.
Methods
Two readers blinded to each other and blinded to their first and second reading retrospectively evaluated the magnetic resonance examinations in 32 postoperative spine surgery patients using this model.
Results
Paired and unpaired two-sided
t
tests showed no significant difference between the first and second reading, and interclass correlation coefficient revealed good interobserver reliability.
Conclusion
The proposed model enables estimation of the amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine and does not require any additional software or hardware. It is designed for multi-centered clinical studies where it is necessary to compare the values of epidural fibrosis between the tested and control group. The use of the proposed model is fast and practical and helps to avoid complications arising from image format, calibration and software, which are often encountered in multi-centered studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2537-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23064807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Double-Blind Method ; Epidural Space - pathology ; Fibrosis ; Humans ; Ideas and Technical Innovations ; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Models, Biological ; Neurosurgery ; Observer Variation ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - pathology ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2013-04, Vol.22 (4), p.892-897</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fde2facf0655149d1bc9bfc64a34204d8081c2a9ae60ef38848c61c0a648b0c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fde2facf0655149d1bc9bfc64a34204d8081c2a9ae60ef38848c61c0a648b0c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631047/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631047/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23064807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranovic, Senka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlak, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novacic, Karlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potocki-Karacic, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovrić, Dražen</creatorcontrib><title>The grading model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose
To present a new model derived from Ross’s model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis and to present inter- and intravariability study.
Methods
Two readers blinded to each other and blinded to their first and second reading retrospectively evaluated the magnetic resonance examinations in 32 postoperative spine surgery patients using this model.
Results
Paired and unpaired two-sided
t
tests showed no significant difference between the first and second reading, and interclass correlation coefficient revealed good interobserver reliability.
Conclusion
The proposed model enables estimation of the amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine and does not require any additional software or hardware. It is designed for multi-centered clinical studies where it is necessary to compare the values of epidural fibrosis between the tested and control group. The use of the proposed model is fast and practical and helps to avoid complications arising from image format, calibration and software, which are often encountered in multi-centered studies.</description><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Epidural Space - pathology</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ideas and Technical Innovations</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFjEUhYMo9rX1B7iRgBs3ozefk2wEKX5BoZt2HTKZ5G3qzGRMZgr215vXqaUKQleBc597cu89CL0i8I4AtO8LgFCyAUIbKljb3D5BO8IZbUAz-hTtQHNoZEv0EXpRyjUAERrkc3REGUiuoN2h7xdXHu-z7eO0x2Pq_YBDynipqi3FlzL6acEp_FaWtNgB2zGtm-bn2K-5SiF2OZVYcJzwnMqSZp_tEm88HtaxsxmXOU7-BD0Ldij-5d17jC4_f7o4_dqcnX_5dvrxrHEC2NKE3tNgXQApBOG6J53TXXCSW8Yp8F6BIo5abb0EH5hSXDlJHNi6UgdOsmP0YfOd1270vasb1CHNnONo80-TbDR_V6Z4ZfbpxjDJCPC2Gry9M8jpx-rLYsZYnB8GO_m0FkOYoFQJxfUjUKaYpqo9oG_-Qa_Tmqd6iQMFSoEQtFJko1y9aMk-3M9NwBxSN1vqpqZuDqmb29rz-uHC9x1_Yq4A3YBSS9Pe5wdf_9f1F09muh0</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan</creator><creator>Baranovic, Senka</creator><creator>Karlak, Ivan</creator><creator>Novacic, Karlo</creator><creator>Potocki-Karacic, Tanja</creator><creator>Lovrić, Dražen</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>The grading model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine</title><author>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan ; Baranovic, Senka ; Karlak, Ivan ; Novacic, Karlo ; Potocki-Karacic, Tanja ; Lovrić, Dražen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fde2facf0655149d1bc9bfc64a34204d8081c2a9ae60ef38848c61c0a648b0c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Epidural Space - pathology</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ideas and Technical Innovations</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranovic, Senka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlak, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novacic, Karlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potocki-Karacic, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovrić, Dražen</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lubina, Zvonimir Ivan</au><au>Baranovic, Senka</au><au>Karlak, Ivan</au><au>Novacic, Karlo</au><au>Potocki-Karacic, Tanja</au><au>Lovrić, Dražen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The grading model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>892</spage><epage>897</epage><pages>892-897</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To present a new model derived from Ross’s model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis and to present inter- and intravariability study.
Methods
Two readers blinded to each other and blinded to their first and second reading retrospectively evaluated the magnetic resonance examinations in 32 postoperative spine surgery patients using this model.
Results
Paired and unpaired two-sided
t
tests showed no significant difference between the first and second reading, and interclass correlation coefficient revealed good interobserver reliability.
Conclusion
The proposed model enables estimation of the amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine and does not require any additional software or hardware. It is designed for multi-centered clinical studies where it is necessary to compare the values of epidural fibrosis between the tested and control group. The use of the proposed model is fast and practical and helps to avoid complications arising from image format, calibration and software, which are often encountered in multi-centered studies.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23064807</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-012-2537-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
| ispartof | European spine journal, 2013-04, Vol.22 (4), p.892-897 |
| issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3631047 |
| source | Open Access: PubMed Central; MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Double-Blind Method Epidural Space - pathology Fibrosis Humans Ideas and Technical Innovations Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Models, Biological Neurosurgery Observer Variation Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - pathology Prevalence Retrospective Studies Surgical Orthopedics |
| title | The grading model for the assessment of the total amount of epidural fibrosis in postoperative lumbar spine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A19%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20grading%20model%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20the%20total%20amount%20of%20epidural%20fibrosis%20in%20postoperative%20lumbar%20spine&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Lubina,%20Zvonimir%20Ivan&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=892&rft.epage=897&rft.pages=892-897&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-012-2537-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1338392879%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330880552&rft_id=info:pmid/23064807&rfr_iscdi=true |