A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing

The flash-drag (FDE) effect refers to the phenomenon in which the position of a stationary flashed object in one location appears shifted in the direction of nearby motion. Over the past decade, it has been debated how bottom-up and top-down processes contribute to this illusion. In this study, we d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2011-11, Vol.11 (13), p.12-12
Hauptverfasser: Fukiage, Taiki, Whitney, David, Murakami, Ikuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 13
container_start_page 12
container_title Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 11
creator Fukiage, Taiki
Whitney, David
Murakami, Ikuya
description The flash-drag (FDE) effect refers to the phenomenon in which the position of a stationary flashed object in one location appears shifted in the direction of nearby motion. Over the past decade, it has been debated how bottom-up and top-down processes contribute to this illusion. In this study, we demonstrate that randomly phase-shifting gratings can produce the FDE. In the random motion sequence we used, the FDE inducer (a sinusoidal grating) jumped to a random phase every 125 ms and stood still until the next jump. Because this random sequence could not be tracked attentively, it was impossible for the observer to discern the jump direction at the time of the flash. By sorting the data based on the flash's onset time relative to each jump time in the random motion sequence, we found that a large FDE with a broad temporal tuning occurred around 50 to 150 ms before the jump and that this effect was not correlated with any other jumps in the past or future. These results suggest that as few as two frames of unpredictable apparent motion can preattentively cause the FDE with a broad temporal tuning.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/11.13.12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3627737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>904007642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-70e5594faf9f06e959bc3892fd772f188235f87f30bc4226e808c9bb2eff1bb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhoMo7roK_gLpTS9d89WmvQiy-AULXvTiJaTpZDfSNmvSLfjvzbIfrJfJDPPMm5cZhK4JnhKSi3tCpoRNCT1BY5IxngqW09OjfIQuQvjGmOIMk3M0ohQXmPNijL4eE9OosExrrxYJGAO6T2yXeNXVrk1a11sXKxhANSE2BtcM0ELXJ84kKw-q72NhB9ijK-80hGC7xSU6M3EIrnbvBH0-P33MXtP5-8vb7HGeas5EnwoMWVZyo0xpcA5lVlaaFSU1tRDUkKKgLDOFMAxXmlOaQ4ELXVYVjWZJVZVsgh62uqt11UKtox-vGrnytlX-Vzpl5f9OZ5dy4QYZFyMEE1Hgdifg3c8aQi9bGzQ0jerArYMsMcdY5JxG8m5Lau9C8GAOvxAsN5eIQRImyQa9OXZ1APerZ3_ItYVV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904007642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Fukiage, Taiki ; Whitney, David ; Murakami, Ikuya</creator><creatorcontrib>Fukiage, Taiki ; Whitney, David ; Murakami, Ikuya</creatorcontrib><description>The flash-drag (FDE) effect refers to the phenomenon in which the position of a stationary flashed object in one location appears shifted in the direction of nearby motion. Over the past decade, it has been debated how bottom-up and top-down processes contribute to this illusion. In this study, we demonstrate that randomly phase-shifting gratings can produce the FDE. In the random motion sequence we used, the FDE inducer (a sinusoidal grating) jumped to a random phase every 125 ms and stood still until the next jump. Because this random sequence could not be tracked attentively, it was impossible for the observer to discern the jump direction at the time of the flash. By sorting the data based on the flash's onset time relative to each jump time in the random motion sequence, we found that a large FDE with a broad temporal tuning occurred around 50 to 150 ms before the jump and that this effect was not correlated with any other jumps in the past or future. These results suggest that as few as two frames of unpredictable apparent motion can preattentively cause the FDE with a broad temporal tuning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/11.13.12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22080448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Attention - physiology ; Awareness - physiology ; Humans ; Judgment - physiology ; Models, Neurological ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Optical Illusions - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Space Perception - physiology ; Unconscious (Psychology) ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2011-11, Vol.11 (13), p.12-12</ispartof><rights>ARVO</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-70e5594faf9f06e959bc3892fd772f188235f87f30bc4226e808c9bb2eff1bb93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627737/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627737/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22080448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fukiage, Taiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Ikuya</creatorcontrib><title>A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>The flash-drag (FDE) effect refers to the phenomenon in which the position of a stationary flashed object in one location appears shifted in the direction of nearby motion. Over the past decade, it has been debated how bottom-up and top-down processes contribute to this illusion. In this study, we demonstrate that randomly phase-shifting gratings can produce the FDE. In the random motion sequence we used, the FDE inducer (a sinusoidal grating) jumped to a random phase every 125 ms and stood still until the next jump. Because this random sequence could not be tracked attentively, it was impossible for the observer to discern the jump direction at the time of the flash. By sorting the data based on the flash's onset time relative to each jump time in the random motion sequence, we found that a large FDE with a broad temporal tuning occurred around 50 to 150 ms before the jump and that this effect was not correlated with any other jumps in the past or future. These results suggest that as few as two frames of unpredictable apparent motion can preattentively cause the FDE with a broad temporal tuning.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Awareness - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Optical Illusions - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhoMo7roK_gLpTS9d89WmvQiy-AULXvTiJaTpZDfSNmvSLfjvzbIfrJfJDPPMm5cZhK4JnhKSi3tCpoRNCT1BY5IxngqW09OjfIQuQvjGmOIMk3M0ohQXmPNijL4eE9OosExrrxYJGAO6T2yXeNXVrk1a11sXKxhANSE2BtcM0ELXJ84kKw-q72NhB9ijK-80hGC7xSU6M3EIrnbvBH0-P33MXtP5-8vb7HGeas5EnwoMWVZyo0xpcA5lVlaaFSU1tRDUkKKgLDOFMAxXmlOaQ4ELXVYVjWZJVZVsgh62uqt11UKtox-vGrnytlX-Vzpl5f9OZ5dy4QYZFyMEE1Hgdifg3c8aQi9bGzQ0jerArYMsMcdY5JxG8m5Lau9C8GAOvxAsN5eIQRImyQa9OXZ1APerZ3_ItYVV</recordid><startdate>20111111</startdate><enddate>20111111</enddate><creator>Fukiage, Taiki</creator><creator>Whitney, David</creator><creator>Murakami, Ikuya</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111111</creationdate><title>A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing</title><author>Fukiage, Taiki ; Whitney, David ; Murakami, Ikuya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-70e5594faf9f06e959bc3892fd772f188235f87f30bc4226e808c9bb2eff1bb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Awareness - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Optical Illusions - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Unconscious (Psychology)</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fukiage, Taiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitney, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Ikuya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fukiage, Taiki</au><au>Whitney, David</au><au>Murakami, Ikuya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2011-11-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>12-12</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>The flash-drag (FDE) effect refers to the phenomenon in which the position of a stationary flashed object in one location appears shifted in the direction of nearby motion. Over the past decade, it has been debated how bottom-up and top-down processes contribute to this illusion. In this study, we demonstrate that randomly phase-shifting gratings can produce the FDE. In the random motion sequence we used, the FDE inducer (a sinusoidal grating) jumped to a random phase every 125 ms and stood still until the next jump. Because this random sequence could not be tracked attentively, it was impossible for the observer to discern the jump direction at the time of the flash. By sorting the data based on the flash's onset time relative to each jump time in the random motion sequence, we found that a large FDE with a broad temporal tuning occurred around 50 to 150 ms before the jump and that this effect was not correlated with any other jumps in the past or future. These results suggest that as few as two frames of unpredictable apparent motion can preattentively cause the FDE with a broad temporal tuning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22080448</pmid><doi>10.1167/11.13.12</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-7362
ispartof Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2011-11, Vol.11 (13), p.12-12
issn 1534-7362
1534-7362
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3627737
source PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adolescent
Attention - physiology
Awareness - physiology
Humans
Judgment - physiology
Models, Neurological
Motion Perception - physiology
Optical Illusions - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Space Perception - physiology
Unconscious (Psychology)
Young Adult
title A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A31%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20flash-drag%20effect%20in%20random%20motion%20reveals%20involvement%20of%20preattentive%20motion%20processing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Fukiage,%20Taiki&rft.date=2011-11-11&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=12-12&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/11.13.12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E904007642%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904007642&rft_id=info:pmid/22080448&rfr_iscdi=true