Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors

Failures to perceive visual stimuli lead to errors in decision making. Different theoretical accounts implicate either medial frontal (MF) cognitive control processes or prestimulus occipital (OC) cortical oscillatory dynamics in errors during perceptual tasks. Here, we show that these 2 previously...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) N.Y. 1991), 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1061-1072
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Michael X, van Gaal, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1072
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1061
container_title Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)
container_volume 23
creator Cohen, Michael X
van Gaal, Simon
description Failures to perceive visual stimuli lead to errors in decision making. Different theoretical accounts implicate either medial frontal (MF) cognitive control processes or prestimulus occipital (OC) cortical oscillatory dynamics in errors during perceptual tasks. Here, we show that these 2 previously unconnected theoretical accounts can be reconciled, and the brain regions described by the 2 theories have complimentary and interactive roles in supporting error adaptation. Using a perceptual discrimination task and time-frequency network-based analyses of electroencephalography data, we show that perceptual anticipation and posterror top-down control mechanisms recruit distinct but interacting brain networks. MF sites were a hub for theta-band networks and theta-alpha coupling elicited after errors, whereas occipital sites were a network hub during stimulus anticipation and alpha-gamma coupling. Granger causality analyses revealed that these networks communicate in their preferred direction and frequency band: response-related MF → OC interactions occurred in the theta band, whereas stimulus anticipation-related OC → MF interactions occurred in the alpha band. Subjects with stronger network interactions were more likely to improve performance after errors. These findings demonstrate that multiple large-scale brain networks interact dynamically and in a directionally specific manner in different frequency bands to support flexible behavior adaptation during perceptual decision making.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cercor/bhs069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3615344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1324385129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2b30e7f3e1804c8bf8b1b39b5628fa17fa3293da23a76215cfa50587cb95399e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LHTEUhkOxqL112a1k6WZqPiYzk40g2g9BcNOuw0nuGW_amWRMchX_vZGroqsceB-evPAS8o2z75xpeeowuZhO7SazTn8ih7ztWCO41nv1Zm3fSMH5AfmS8z_GeC-U2CcHQijeCsUOyXz5GGD2jvpQMIErPoZMLZYHxEAnSLfYZAcTUpvABxpqEtP_TJeEa-9KRTdw72OCicIalgLPBgpjtdGldsOlbGuGKcWUv5LPI0wZj17eFfn788efi9_N9c2vq4vz68a1SpZGWMmwHyXygbVusONguZXaqk4MI_B-BCm0XIOQ0HeCKzeCYmrondVKao1yRc523mVrZ1w7DKUWNEvyM6RHE8Gbj0nwG3Mb743suJJtWwUnL4IU77aYi5l9djhNEDBus-FStHJQvNZYkWaHuhRzTji-fcOZeZ7I7CYyu4kqf_y-2xv9uol8AjjiksU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324385129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cohen, Michael X ; van Gaal, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Michael X ; van Gaal, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>Failures to perceive visual stimuli lead to errors in decision making. Different theoretical accounts implicate either medial frontal (MF) cognitive control processes or prestimulus occipital (OC) cortical oscillatory dynamics in errors during perceptual tasks. Here, we show that these 2 previously unconnected theoretical accounts can be reconciled, and the brain regions described by the 2 theories have complimentary and interactive roles in supporting error adaptation. Using a perceptual discrimination task and time-frequency network-based analyses of electroencephalography data, we show that perceptual anticipation and posterror top-down control mechanisms recruit distinct but interacting brain networks. MF sites were a hub for theta-band networks and theta-alpha coupling elicited after errors, whereas occipital sites were a network hub during stimulus anticipation and alpha-gamma coupling. Granger causality analyses revealed that these networks communicate in their preferred direction and frequency band: response-related MF → OC interactions occurred in the theta band, whereas stimulus anticipation-related OC → MF interactions occurred in the alpha band. Subjects with stronger network interactions were more likely to improve performance after errors. These findings demonstrate that multiple large-scale brain networks interact dynamically and in a directionally specific manner in different frequency bands to support flexible behavior adaptation during perceptual decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-3211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22514250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Anticipation, Psychological - physiology ; Decision Making - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1061-1072</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press 2012. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2b30e7f3e1804c8bf8b1b39b5628fa17fa3293da23a76215cfa50587cb95399e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2b30e7f3e1804c8bf8b1b39b5628fa17fa3293da23a76215cfa50587cb95399e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22514250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Michael X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gaal, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors</title><title>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</title><addtitle>Cereb Cortex</addtitle><description>Failures to perceive visual stimuli lead to errors in decision making. Different theoretical accounts implicate either medial frontal (MF) cognitive control processes or prestimulus occipital (OC) cortical oscillatory dynamics in errors during perceptual tasks. Here, we show that these 2 previously unconnected theoretical accounts can be reconciled, and the brain regions described by the 2 theories have complimentary and interactive roles in supporting error adaptation. Using a perceptual discrimination task and time-frequency network-based analyses of electroencephalography data, we show that perceptual anticipation and posterror top-down control mechanisms recruit distinct but interacting brain networks. MF sites were a hub for theta-band networks and theta-alpha coupling elicited after errors, whereas occipital sites were a network hub during stimulus anticipation and alpha-gamma coupling. Granger causality analyses revealed that these networks communicate in their preferred direction and frequency band: response-related MF → OC interactions occurred in the theta band, whereas stimulus anticipation-related OC → MF interactions occurred in the alpha band. Subjects with stronger network interactions were more likely to improve performance after errors. These findings demonstrate that multiple large-scale brain networks interact dynamically and in a directionally specific manner in different frequency bands to support flexible behavior adaptation during perceptual decision making.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticipation, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LHTEUhkOxqL112a1k6WZqPiYzk40g2g9BcNOuw0nuGW_amWRMchX_vZGroqsceB-evPAS8o2z75xpeeowuZhO7SazTn8ih7ztWCO41nv1Zm3fSMH5AfmS8z_GeC-U2CcHQijeCsUOyXz5GGD2jvpQMIErPoZMLZYHxEAnSLfYZAcTUpvABxpqEtP_TJeEa-9KRTdw72OCicIalgLPBgpjtdGldsOlbGuGKcWUv5LPI0wZj17eFfn788efi9_N9c2vq4vz68a1SpZGWMmwHyXygbVusONguZXaqk4MI_B-BCm0XIOQ0HeCKzeCYmrondVKao1yRc523mVrZ1w7DKUWNEvyM6RHE8Gbj0nwG3Mb743suJJtWwUnL4IU77aYi5l9djhNEDBus-FStHJQvNZYkWaHuhRzTji-fcOZeZ7I7CYyu4kqf_y-2xv9uol8AjjiksU</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Cohen, Michael X</creator><creator>van Gaal, Simon</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors</title><author>Cohen, Michael X ; van Gaal, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2b30e7f3e1804c8bf8b1b39b5628fa17fa3293da23a76215cfa50587cb95399e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticipation, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Michael X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gaal, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Michael X</au><au>van Gaal, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors</atitle><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle><addtitle>Cereb Cortex</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1072</epage><pages>1061-1072</pages><issn>1047-3211</issn><eissn>1460-2199</eissn><abstract>Failures to perceive visual stimuli lead to errors in decision making. Different theoretical accounts implicate either medial frontal (MF) cognitive control processes or prestimulus occipital (OC) cortical oscillatory dynamics in errors during perceptual tasks. Here, we show that these 2 previously unconnected theoretical accounts can be reconciled, and the brain regions described by the 2 theories have complimentary and interactive roles in supporting error adaptation. Using a perceptual discrimination task and time-frequency network-based analyses of electroencephalography data, we show that perceptual anticipation and posterror top-down control mechanisms recruit distinct but interacting brain networks. MF sites were a hub for theta-band networks and theta-alpha coupling elicited after errors, whereas occipital sites were a network hub during stimulus anticipation and alpha-gamma coupling. Granger causality analyses revealed that these networks communicate in their preferred direction and frequency band: response-related MF → OC interactions occurred in the theta band, whereas stimulus anticipation-related OC → MF interactions occurred in the alpha band. Subjects with stronger network interactions were more likely to improve performance after errors. These findings demonstrate that multiple large-scale brain networks interact dynamically and in a directionally specific manner in different frequency bands to support flexible behavior adaptation during perceptual decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>22514250</pmid><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhs069</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-3211
ispartof Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1061-1072
issn 1047-3211
1460-2199
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3615344
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adaptation, Physiological - physiology
Adolescent
Adult
Anticipation, Psychological - physiology
Decision Making - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Nerve Net - physiology
Neural Pathways - physiology
Neuronal Plasticity - physiology
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Young Adult
title Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A19%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20interactions%20between%20large-scale%20brain%20networks%20predict%20behavioral%20adaptation%20after%20perceptual%20errors&rft.jtitle=Cerebral%20cortex%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201991)&rft.au=Cohen,%20Michael%20X&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1072&rft.pages=1061-1072&rft.issn=1047-3211&rft.eissn=1460-2199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cercor/bhs069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1324385129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324385129&rft_id=info:pmid/22514250&rfr_iscdi=true