Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries
Diethylene glycol (DEG), a chemical that has been implicated in multiple medication-associated mass poisonings, can result in renal and neurological toxicity if ingested. Three previous such mass poisonings implicated Chinese manufacturers as the origin of contaminated ingredients. No literature exi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical toxicology 2011-03, Vol.7 (1), p.33-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Journal of medical toxicology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Schier, Joshua G. Barr, Dana B. Li, Zheng Wolkin, Amy F. Baker, Samuel E. Lewis, Lauren S. McGeehin, Michael A. |
description | Diethylene glycol (DEG), a chemical that has been implicated in multiple medication-associated mass poisonings, can result in renal and neurological toxicity if ingested. Three previous such mass poisonings implicated Chinese manufacturers as the origin of contaminated ingredients. No literature exists on potential DEG or triethylene glycol (TEG), a related compound, contamination of health products imported from Asian countries to the USA. Our primary objective was to quantitatively assess the amount of DEG present in a convenience sampling of these health products. The study’s secondary objectives were to: (1) evaluate for, and quantify TEG levels in these samples; (2) compare DEG and TEG levels in these products directly to levels in medications implicated in previous similar mass poisonings; and (3) to estimate DEG dose (in mg/kg) based on the manufacturer’s instructions and compare these values to toxic doses from past mass poisonings and the literature. A quantitative assessment of DEG and TEG was performed in a convenience sampling of over-the-counter health products imported from Asian countries. Results were converted to volume to volume (
v
/
v
) % and compared with DEG levels in medications implicated in previous mass poisonings. Estimated doses (based on the manufacturer’s instructions) of each product with detectable levels of DEG for a 70 kg adult were compared to toxic doses of DEG reported in the literature. Seventeen of 85 (20%) samples were not able to be analyzed for DEG or TEG due to technical reasons. Fifteen of 68 (22%) samples successfully tested had detectable levels of DEG (mean, 18.8 μg/ml; range, 0.791–110.1 μg/ml; and volume to volume (
v
/
v
) range, 0.00007–0.01%). Two of 68 (3%) samples had TEG levels of 12.8 and 20.2 μg/ml or 0.0012% and 0.0018% TEG
v
/
v
. The product with the highest DEG% by
v
/
v
was 810 times less than the product involved in the Panama DEG mass poisoning (8.1%). The lowest reported toxic dose from a past DEG mass poisoning (14 mg/kg) was more than 150 times higher than the highest daily dose estimated in our study (0.09 mg/kg). Sixty-eight of 85 (80%) samples were able to be successfully analyzed for DEG and TEG. DEG and TEG were detectable in 15/68 (22%) and 2/68 (3%) samples, respectively. Based on current standards, these levels probably do not represent an acute public health threat. Additional research focusing on why DEG is found in these products and on the minimum amount of DEG needed to result |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13181-010-0111-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3614107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290151641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-ad22dc88008e4fe0eaba4c4ef118ecaad96bc12714aea0cafa6a71a8b5905d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVFLHDEUhUOxqLX-gL6U4Hva3JlMJnkRZG1VECxU3wrhbnLHHZmdrMmMsP--sWtt-9CHkIRz7jkXPsY-gPwEUrafM9RgQEiQ5QAI-4Ydgq1boa1t9sq7abSwsrYH7F3OD1KWf6X22UElbdVqMIfsx3lP02o70Ej8Ytj6OPB-5JeEw7Ti31IMs58y_x6HwG-eKIlpRWIR53GixHEM_Gq9iWmiwLsU1_ws9zjyX3rqKb9nbzscMh2_3Efs7uuX28WluL65uFqcXQvf1GoSGKoqeGOkNKQ6koRLVF5RB2DIIwarlx6qFhQSSo8damwBzbKxsgla10fsdJe7mZdrCp5KPQ5uk_o1pq2L2Lt_lbFfufv45GoNCmRbAk5eAlJ8nClP7iHOaSw7O9NorZQ2UEywM_kUc07UvRaAdM883I6HKzzcMw9ny8zHvzd7nfgNoBiqnSEXabyn9Kf5_6k_AWY1mCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856644681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schier, Joshua G. ; Barr, Dana B. ; Li, Zheng ; Wolkin, Amy F. ; Baker, Samuel E. ; Lewis, Lauren S. ; McGeehin, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schier, Joshua G. ; Barr, Dana B. ; Li, Zheng ; Wolkin, Amy F. ; Baker, Samuel E. ; Lewis, Lauren S. ; McGeehin, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>Diethylene glycol (DEG), a chemical that has been implicated in multiple medication-associated mass poisonings, can result in renal and neurological toxicity if ingested. Three previous such mass poisonings implicated Chinese manufacturers as the origin of contaminated ingredients. No literature exists on potential DEG or triethylene glycol (TEG), a related compound, contamination of health products imported from Asian countries to the USA. Our primary objective was to quantitatively assess the amount of DEG present in a convenience sampling of these health products. The study’s secondary objectives were to: (1) evaluate for, and quantify TEG levels in these samples; (2) compare DEG and TEG levels in these products directly to levels in medications implicated in previous similar mass poisonings; and (3) to estimate DEG dose (in mg/kg) based on the manufacturer’s instructions and compare these values to toxic doses from past mass poisonings and the literature. A quantitative assessment of DEG and TEG was performed in a convenience sampling of over-the-counter health products imported from Asian countries. Results were converted to volume to volume (
v
/
v
) % and compared with DEG levels in medications implicated in previous mass poisonings. Estimated doses (based on the manufacturer’s instructions) of each product with detectable levels of DEG for a 70 kg adult were compared to toxic doses of DEG reported in the literature. Seventeen of 85 (20%) samples were not able to be analyzed for DEG or TEG due to technical reasons. Fifteen of 68 (22%) samples successfully tested had detectable levels of DEG (mean, 18.8 μg/ml; range, 0.791–110.1 μg/ml; and volume to volume (
v
/
v
) range, 0.00007–0.01%). Two of 68 (3%) samples had TEG levels of 12.8 and 20.2 μg/ml or 0.0012% and 0.0018% TEG
v
/
v
. The product with the highest DEG% by
v
/
v
was 810 times less than the product involved in the Panama DEG mass poisoning (8.1%). The lowest reported toxic dose from a past DEG mass poisoning (14 mg/kg) was more than 150 times higher than the highest daily dose estimated in our study (0.09 mg/kg). Sixty-eight of 85 (80%) samples were able to be successfully analyzed for DEG and TEG. DEG and TEG were detectable in 15/68 (22%) and 2/68 (3%) samples, respectively. Based on current standards, these levels probably do not represent an acute public health threat. Additional research focusing on why DEG is found in these products and on the minimum amount of DEG needed to result in toxicity is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-9039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-6995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13181-010-0111-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20927618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Antifreeze solutions ; Asia ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Contamination ; Dietary supplements ; Dietary Supplements - analysis ; Dietary Supplements - economics ; Diethylene glycol ; Drug Contamination - economics ; Drug Labeling ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - administration & dosage ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - chemistry ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - economics ; Ethylene Glycols - administration & dosage ; Ethylene Glycols - analysis ; Ethylene Glycols - toxicity ; Health risks ; Humans ; Internationality ; Neurotoxicity ; Nonprescription Drugs - administration & dosage ; Nonprescription Drugs - chemistry ; Nonprescription Drugs - economics ; Original Study ; Pharmaceutical Vehicles - administration & dosage ; Pharmaceutical Vehicles - analysis ; Pharmaceutical Vehicles - toxicity ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Poisoning ; Poisoning - prevention & control ; Polyethylene Glycols - analysis ; Polyethylene Glycols - toxicity ; Public health ; Sampling ; Solvents - administration & dosage ; Solvents - analysis ; Solvents - toxicity ; Toxicity ; Triethylene glycol ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of medical toxicology, 2011-03, Vol.7 (1), p.33-38</ispartof><rights>American College of Medical Toxicology 2010</rights><rights>American College of Medical Toxicology 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-ad22dc88008e4fe0eaba4c4ef118ecaad96bc12714aea0cafa6a71a8b5905d663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-ad22dc88008e4fe0eaba4c4ef118ecaad96bc12714aea0cafa6a71a8b5905d663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614107/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614107/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927618$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schier, Joshua G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Dana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolkin, Amy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Samuel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Lauren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGeehin, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries</title><title>Journal of medical toxicology</title><addtitle>J. Med. Toxicol</addtitle><addtitle>J Med Toxicol</addtitle><description>Diethylene glycol (DEG), a chemical that has been implicated in multiple medication-associated mass poisonings, can result in renal and neurological toxicity if ingested. Three previous such mass poisonings implicated Chinese manufacturers as the origin of contaminated ingredients. No literature exists on potential DEG or triethylene glycol (TEG), a related compound, contamination of health products imported from Asian countries to the USA. Our primary objective was to quantitatively assess the amount of DEG present in a convenience sampling of these health products. The study’s secondary objectives were to: (1) evaluate for, and quantify TEG levels in these samples; (2) compare DEG and TEG levels in these products directly to levels in medications implicated in previous similar mass poisonings; and (3) to estimate DEG dose (in mg/kg) based on the manufacturer’s instructions and compare these values to toxic doses from past mass poisonings and the literature. A quantitative assessment of DEG and TEG was performed in a convenience sampling of over-the-counter health products imported from Asian countries. Results were converted to volume to volume (
v
/
v
) % and compared with DEG levels in medications implicated in previous mass poisonings. Estimated doses (based on the manufacturer’s instructions) of each product with detectable levels of DEG for a 70 kg adult were compared to toxic doses of DEG reported in the literature. Seventeen of 85 (20%) samples were not able to be analyzed for DEG or TEG due to technical reasons. Fifteen of 68 (22%) samples successfully tested had detectable levels of DEG (mean, 18.8 μg/ml; range, 0.791–110.1 μg/ml; and volume to volume (
v
/
v
) range, 0.00007–0.01%). Two of 68 (3%) samples had TEG levels of 12.8 and 20.2 μg/ml or 0.0012% and 0.0018% TEG
v
/
v
. The product with the highest DEG% by
v
/
v
was 810 times less than the product involved in the Panama DEG mass poisoning (8.1%). The lowest reported toxic dose from a past DEG mass poisoning (14 mg/kg) was more than 150 times higher than the highest daily dose estimated in our study (0.09 mg/kg). Sixty-eight of 85 (80%) samples were able to be successfully analyzed for DEG and TEG. DEG and TEG were detectable in 15/68 (22%) and 2/68 (3%) samples, respectively. Based on current standards, these levels probably do not represent an acute public health threat. Additional research focusing on why DEG is found in these products and on the minimum amount of DEG needed to result in toxicity is needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antifreeze solutions</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements - economics</subject><subject>Diethylene glycol</subject><subject>Drug Contamination - economics</subject><subject>Drug Labeling</subject><subject>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - chemistry</subject><subject>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - economics</subject><subject>Ethylene Glycols - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ethylene Glycols - analysis</subject><subject>Ethylene Glycols - toxicity</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Neurotoxicity</subject><subject>Nonprescription Drugs - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nonprescription Drugs - chemistry</subject><subject>Nonprescription Drugs - economics</subject><subject>Original Study</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Vehicles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Vehicles - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Vehicles - toxicity</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Poisoning - prevention & control</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - analysis</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - toxicity</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Solvents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Solvents - analysis</subject><subject>Solvents - toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Triethylene glycol</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1556-9039</issn><issn>1937-6995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVFLHDEUhUOxqLX-gL6U4Hva3JlMJnkRZG1VECxU3wrhbnLHHZmdrMmMsP--sWtt-9CHkIRz7jkXPsY-gPwEUrafM9RgQEiQ5QAI-4Ydgq1boa1t9sq7abSwsrYH7F3OD1KWf6X22UElbdVqMIfsx3lP02o70Ej8Ytj6OPB-5JeEw7Ti31IMs58y_x6HwG-eKIlpRWIR53GixHEM_Gq9iWmiwLsU1_ws9zjyX3rqKb9nbzscMh2_3Efs7uuX28WluL65uFqcXQvf1GoSGKoqeGOkNKQ6koRLVF5RB2DIIwarlx6qFhQSSo8damwBzbKxsgla10fsdJe7mZdrCp5KPQ5uk_o1pq2L2Lt_lbFfufv45GoNCmRbAk5eAlJ8nClP7iHOaSw7O9NorZQ2UEywM_kUc07UvRaAdM883I6HKzzcMw9ny8zHvzd7nfgNoBiqnSEXabyn9Kf5_6k_AWY1mCE</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Schier, Joshua G.</creator><creator>Barr, Dana B.</creator><creator>Li, Zheng</creator><creator>Wolkin, Amy F.</creator><creator>Baker, Samuel E.</creator><creator>Lewis, Lauren S.</creator><creator>McGeehin, Michael A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries</title><author>Schier, Joshua G. ; Barr, Dana B. ; Li, Zheng ; Wolkin, Amy F. ; Baker, Samuel E. ; Lewis, Lauren S. ; McGeehin, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-ad22dc88008e4fe0eaba4c4ef118ecaad96bc12714aea0cafa6a71a8b5905d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antifreeze solutions</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements - economics</topic><topic>Diethylene glycol</topic><topic>Drug Contamination - economics</topic><topic>Drug Labeling</topic><topic>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - chemistry</topic><topic>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - economics</topic><topic>Ethylene Glycols - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ethylene Glycols - analysis</topic><topic>Ethylene Glycols - toxicity</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Neurotoxicity</topic><topic>Nonprescription Drugs - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nonprescription Drugs - chemistry</topic><topic>Nonprescription Drugs - economics</topic><topic>Original Study</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Vehicles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Vehicles - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Vehicles - toxicity</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Poisoning - prevention & control</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - analysis</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - toxicity</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Solvents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Solvents - analysis</topic><topic>Solvents - toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Triethylene glycol</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schier, Joshua G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Dana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolkin, Amy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Samuel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Lauren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGeehin, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schier, Joshua G.</au><au>Barr, Dana B.</au><au>Li, Zheng</au><au>Wolkin, Amy F.</au><au>Baker, Samuel E.</au><au>Lewis, Lauren S.</au><au>McGeehin, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical toxicology</jtitle><stitle>J. Med. Toxicol</stitle><addtitle>J Med Toxicol</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>33-38</pages><issn>1556-9039</issn><eissn>1937-6995</eissn><abstract>Diethylene glycol (DEG), a chemical that has been implicated in multiple medication-associated mass poisonings, can result in renal and neurological toxicity if ingested. Three previous such mass poisonings implicated Chinese manufacturers as the origin of contaminated ingredients. No literature exists on potential DEG or triethylene glycol (TEG), a related compound, contamination of health products imported from Asian countries to the USA. Our primary objective was to quantitatively assess the amount of DEG present in a convenience sampling of these health products. The study’s secondary objectives were to: (1) evaluate for, and quantify TEG levels in these samples; (2) compare DEG and TEG levels in these products directly to levels in medications implicated in previous similar mass poisonings; and (3) to estimate DEG dose (in mg/kg) based on the manufacturer’s instructions and compare these values to toxic doses from past mass poisonings and the literature. A quantitative assessment of DEG and TEG was performed in a convenience sampling of over-the-counter health products imported from Asian countries. Results were converted to volume to volume (
v
/
v
) % and compared with DEG levels in medications implicated in previous mass poisonings. Estimated doses (based on the manufacturer’s instructions) of each product with detectable levels of DEG for a 70 kg adult were compared to toxic doses of DEG reported in the literature. Seventeen of 85 (20%) samples were not able to be analyzed for DEG or TEG due to technical reasons. Fifteen of 68 (22%) samples successfully tested had detectable levels of DEG (mean, 18.8 μg/ml; range, 0.791–110.1 μg/ml; and volume to volume (
v
/
v
) range, 0.00007–0.01%). Two of 68 (3%) samples had TEG levels of 12.8 and 20.2 μg/ml or 0.0012% and 0.0018% TEG
v
/
v
. The product with the highest DEG% by
v
/
v
was 810 times less than the product involved in the Panama DEG mass poisoning (8.1%). The lowest reported toxic dose from a past DEG mass poisoning (14 mg/kg) was more than 150 times higher than the highest daily dose estimated in our study (0.09 mg/kg). Sixty-eight of 85 (80%) samples were able to be successfully analyzed for DEG and TEG. DEG and TEG were detectable in 15/68 (22%) and 2/68 (3%) samples, respectively. Based on current standards, these levels probably do not represent an acute public health threat. Additional research focusing on why DEG is found in these products and on the minimum amount of DEG needed to result in toxicity is needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20927618</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13181-010-0111-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-9039 |
ispartof | Journal of medical toxicology, 2011-03, Vol.7 (1), p.33-38 |
issn | 1556-9039 1937-6995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3614107 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Antifreeze solutions Asia Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Contamination Dietary supplements Dietary Supplements - analysis Dietary Supplements - economics Diethylene glycol Drug Contamination - economics Drug Labeling Drugs, Chinese Herbal - administration & dosage Drugs, Chinese Herbal - chemistry Drugs, Chinese Herbal - economics Ethylene Glycols - administration & dosage Ethylene Glycols - analysis Ethylene Glycols - toxicity Health risks Humans Internationality Neurotoxicity Nonprescription Drugs - administration & dosage Nonprescription Drugs - chemistry Nonprescription Drugs - economics Original Study Pharmaceutical Vehicles - administration & dosage Pharmaceutical Vehicles - analysis Pharmaceutical Vehicles - toxicity Pharmacology/Toxicology Poisoning Poisoning - prevention & control Polyethylene Glycols - analysis Polyethylene Glycols - toxicity Public health Sampling Solvents - administration & dosage Solvents - analysis Solvents - toxicity Toxicity Triethylene glycol United States |
title | Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A24%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diethylene%20Glycol%20in%20Health%20Products%20Sold%20Over-the-Counter%20and%20Imported%20from%20Asian%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20toxicology&rft.au=Schier,%20Joshua%20G.&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=33-38&rft.issn=1556-9039&rft.eissn=1937-6995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13181-010-0111-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290151641%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856644681&rft_id=info:pmid/20927618&rfr_iscdi=true |