Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates
Background The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is increasingly used in studies with bariatric surgery patients although little is known about psychometric properties of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The current study evaluated the factor structure and construct v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.657-662 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 662 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 657 |
container_title | Obesity surgery |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Grilo, Carlos M. Henderson, Kathryn E. Bell, Robert L. Crosby, Ross D. |
description | Background
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is increasingly used in studies with bariatric surgery patients although little is known about psychometric properties of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The current study evaluated the factor structure and construct validity of the EDE-Q in bariatric surgery candidates.
Methods
Participants were a consecutive series of 174 obese bariatric surgery candidates who completed the EDE-Q and a battery of behavioral and psychological measures.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed an inadequate fit for the original EDE-Q structure but revealed a good fit for an alternative structure suggested by recent research with obese samples. CFA supported a seven-item, three-factor structure; the three factors were interpreted as dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction. The three factors converged with other relevant collateral measures.
Conclusions
These factor analytic findings, which replicate recent findings from studies with diverse obese samples, demonstrated convergent validity. Implications of these findings for clinical assessment and research with bariatric surgery patients are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3610788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1326725398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e4c3523ca9de2322e0be232d7f350d44ffc6ad5745853848b928dd2317cadfc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkNpqav2B3hTAr3xZmw-JjOZm0Ldrh8giGh7G84mmTUym2iSke6_N-NasYVeJbznyZtzzovQASVHlJD2a6K06URFKKuIrEkl36EZbYmsSM3kezQjXVPEjvEdtJvSHSGMNox9RDuMM9Z1gs7QwwKy8yv8w6UQjY148RvWzhcx-OpqtGm6eHDR4hPQOUR8neOo81gE8AbPg0_PAv4FgzMub7Dz-BiigxydxtdjXNm4wfMCOwPZpn30oYch2U8v5x76ebK4mZ9VF5en5_PvF5UWvMmVrTUXjGvojJ3atWQ5nabtuSCmrvteN2BEWwspuKzlsmPSGMZpq8H0mvI99G3rez8u19Zo63OEQd1Ht4a4UQGc-rvi3a1ahUfFG0paKYvB4YtBDA_TJtTaJW2HAbwNY1KUs6ZlgncT-uUf9C6M0ZfxninORNuIQtEtpWNIKdr-tRlK1BSo2gaqSqBqClRNzp_fTvH64k-CBWBbIJWSL7t-8_V_XZ8AADCt9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326325765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Grilo, Carlos M. ; Henderson, Kathryn E. ; Bell, Robert L. ; Crosby, Ross D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grilo, Carlos M. ; Henderson, Kathryn E. ; Bell, Robert L. ; Crosby, Ross D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is increasingly used in studies with bariatric surgery patients although little is known about psychometric properties of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The current study evaluated the factor structure and construct validity of the EDE-Q in bariatric surgery candidates.
Methods
Participants were a consecutive series of 174 obese bariatric surgery candidates who completed the EDE-Q and a battery of behavioral and psychological measures.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed an inadequate fit for the original EDE-Q structure but revealed a good fit for an alternative structure suggested by recent research with obese samples. CFA supported a seven-item, three-factor structure; the three factors were interpreted as dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction. The three factors converged with other relevant collateral measures.
Conclusions
These factor analytic findings, which replicate recent findings from studies with diverse obese samples, demonstrated convergent validity. Implications of these findings for clinical assessment and research with bariatric surgery patients are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23229951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Image - psychology ; Body Mass Index ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - psychology ; Eating disorders ; Feeding and Eating Disorders - diagnosis ; Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - psychology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Original Contributions ; Patient Selection ; Psychometrics ; Psychopathology ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Concept ; Self image ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.657-662</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e4c3523ca9de2322e0be232d7f350d44ffc6ad5745853848b928dd2317cadfc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e4c3523ca9de2322e0be232d7f350d44ffc6ad5745853848b928dd2317cadfc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23229951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grilo, Carlos M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosby, Ross D.</creatorcontrib><title>Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is increasingly used in studies with bariatric surgery patients although little is known about psychometric properties of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The current study evaluated the factor structure and construct validity of the EDE-Q in bariatric surgery candidates.
Methods
Participants were a consecutive series of 174 obese bariatric surgery candidates who completed the EDE-Q and a battery of behavioral and psychological measures.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed an inadequate fit for the original EDE-Q structure but revealed a good fit for an alternative structure suggested by recent research with obese samples. CFA supported a seven-item, three-factor structure; the three factors were interpreted as dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction. The three factors converged with other relevant collateral measures.
Conclusions
These factor analytic findings, which replicate recent findings from studies with diverse obese samples, demonstrated convergent validity. Implications of these findings for clinical assessment and research with bariatric surgery patients are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image - psychology</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkNpqav2B3hTAr3xZmw-JjOZm0Ldrh8giGh7G84mmTUym2iSke6_N-NasYVeJbznyZtzzovQASVHlJD2a6K06URFKKuIrEkl36EZbYmsSM3kezQjXVPEjvEdtJvSHSGMNox9RDuMM9Z1gs7QwwKy8yv8w6UQjY148RvWzhcx-OpqtGm6eHDR4hPQOUR8neOo81gE8AbPg0_PAv4FgzMub7Dz-BiigxydxtdjXNm4wfMCOwPZpn30oYch2U8v5x76ebK4mZ9VF5en5_PvF5UWvMmVrTUXjGvojJ3atWQ5nabtuSCmrvteN2BEWwspuKzlsmPSGMZpq8H0mvI99G3rez8u19Zo63OEQd1Ht4a4UQGc-rvi3a1ahUfFG0paKYvB4YtBDA_TJtTaJW2HAbwNY1KUs6ZlgncT-uUf9C6M0ZfxninORNuIQtEtpWNIKdr-tRlK1BSo2gaqSqBqClRNzp_fTvH64k-CBWBbIJWSL7t-8_V_XZ8AADCt9Q</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Grilo, Carlos M.</creator><creator>Henderson, Kathryn E.</creator><creator>Bell, Robert L.</creator><creator>Crosby, Ross D.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates</title><author>Grilo, Carlos M. ; Henderson, Kathryn E. ; Bell, Robert L. ; Crosby, Ross D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e4c3523ca9de2322e0be232d7f350d44ffc6ad5745853848b928dd2317cadfc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image - psychology</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grilo, Carlos M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosby, Ross D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grilo, Carlos M.</au><au>Henderson, Kathryn E.</au><au>Bell, Robert L.</au><au>Crosby, Ross D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>662</epage><pages>657-662</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is increasingly used in studies with bariatric surgery patients although little is known about psychometric properties of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The current study evaluated the factor structure and construct validity of the EDE-Q in bariatric surgery candidates.
Methods
Participants were a consecutive series of 174 obese bariatric surgery candidates who completed the EDE-Q and a battery of behavioral and psychological measures.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed an inadequate fit for the original EDE-Q structure but revealed a good fit for an alternative structure suggested by recent research with obese samples. CFA supported a seven-item, three-factor structure; the three factors were interpreted as dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction. The three factors converged with other relevant collateral measures.
Conclusions
These factor analytic findings, which replicate recent findings from studies with diverse obese samples, demonstrated convergent validity. Implications of these findings for clinical assessment and research with bariatric surgery patients are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23229951</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8923 |
ispartof | Obesity surgery, 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.657-662 |
issn | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3610788 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adult Body Image - psychology Body Mass Index Cross-Sectional Studies Depression - diagnosis Depression - psychology Eating disorders Feeding and Eating Disorders - diagnosis Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology Female Gastrointestinal surgery Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Obesity Obesity, Morbid - psychology Obesity, Morbid - surgery Original Contributions Patient Selection Psychometrics Psychopathology Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Self Concept Self image Severity of Illness Index Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T22%3A34%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eating%20Disorder%20Examination-Questionnaire%20Factor%20Structure%20and%20Construct%20Validity%20in%20Bariatric%20Surgery%20Candidates&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Grilo,%20Carlos%20M.&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=662&rft.pages=657-662&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1326725398%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326325765&rft_id=info:pmid/23229951&rfr_iscdi=true |