Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X
BACKGROUND: Abdominal obesity predicts a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Over the past several decades, prevalence of abdominal obesity has increased markedly in industrialized countries like the United States No previous analyses, however, have evaluated whether there are birth cohort effect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Obesity 2013-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1129-1134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1129 |
container_title | International Journal of Obesity |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Robinson, W R Utz, R L Keyes, K M Martin, C L Yang, Y |
description | BACKGROUND:
Abdominal obesity predicts a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Over the past several decades, prevalence of abdominal obesity has increased markedly in industrialized countries like the United States No previous analyses, however, have evaluated whether there are birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity. Estimating cohort effects is necessary to forecast future health trends and understand the past population-level trends.
METHODS:
This analysis evaluated whether there were birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity for the Silent Generation (born 1925–1945), children of the Great Depression; Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964); or Generation X (born 1965–1980). Cohort effects for prevalence of abdominal obesity were estimated using the median polish method with data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1988 and 2008. Respondents were aged 20–74 years.
RESULTS:
After taking into account age effects and ubiquitous secular changes, the Silent Generation and Generation X had higher cohort-specific prevalence of abdominal obesity than the Baby Boomers. Effects were more pronounced in women than men.
CONCLUSIONS:
This work presents a novel finding: evidence that the birth cohorts of the post-World War II Baby Boom appeared to have uniquely low cohort effects on abdominal obesity. The growing prosperity of the post-World War II US may have exposed the baby-boom generation to lower levels of psychosocial and socioeconomic stress than the previous or subsequent generations. By identifying factors associated with the Baby Boomers’ low cohort-specific sensitivity to the obesogenic environment, the obesity prevention community can identify early-life factors that can protect future generations from excess weight gain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ijo.2012.198 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3604045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A341935568</galeid><sourcerecordid>A341935568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-51d8b9fc1ab6633a0b29edc93ded731ff69d080e5b82e493a41d3896b30ce2433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9rFDEUxwdRbK3ePEtAFA-dNZn8mIkHoVu0CgUPteAtZDJvdrLMJG2SFfa_N9td210pSA6BvM_75vF936J4TfCMYNp8tEs_qzCpZkQ2T4pjwmpRcibrp8UxprguMRf8qHgR4xJjzDmunhdHFa0qWVN2XKS5DWlAxg8-JAR9DyZF5B3Sbecn6_SIfAvRpjWyDqUB0LWzCTp0lXSC-Onu6cqO4BK6AAdBJ-vdKZrrdo3m3k8QItKu2yuiXy-LZ70eI7za3SfF9dcvP8-_lZc_Lr6fn12WRhCSSk66ppW9IboVglKN20pCZyTtoKsp6XshO9xg4G1TAZNUM9LRRoqWYgMVo_Sk-LzVvVm1U-7MQwY9qptgJx3WymurDivODmrhfysqMMOMZ4EPO4Hgb1cQk5psNDCO2oFfRUUamgcRPC_ivyjLsKgxZRl9-w-69KuQrb6jaskFa_ADtdAjKOt6n0c0G1F1RhmRlHPRZGr2CJVPB5M13kGfd3PY8H6vYQA9piH6cbXZTDwET7egCT7GAP29bwSrTfJUTp7aJE_l5GX8zb7X9_DfqGXg3Q7Q0eixD9oZGx-4mje1qDdC5ZaLueQWEPbceezjP_2_7bA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417956480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Robinson, W R ; Utz, R L ; Keyes, K M ; Martin, C L ; Yang, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Robinson, W R ; Utz, R L ; Keyes, K M ; Martin, C L ; Yang, Y</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:
Abdominal obesity predicts a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Over the past several decades, prevalence of abdominal obesity has increased markedly in industrialized countries like the United States No previous analyses, however, have evaluated whether there are birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity. Estimating cohort effects is necessary to forecast future health trends and understand the past population-level trends.
METHODS:
This analysis evaluated whether there were birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity for the Silent Generation (born 1925–1945), children of the Great Depression; Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964); or Generation X (born 1965–1980). Cohort effects for prevalence of abdominal obesity were estimated using the median polish method with data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1988 and 2008. Respondents were aged 20–74 years.
RESULTS:
After taking into account age effects and ubiquitous secular changes, the Silent Generation and Generation X had higher cohort-specific prevalence of abdominal obesity than the Baby Boomers. Effects were more pronounced in women than men.
CONCLUSIONS:
This work presents a novel finding: evidence that the birth cohorts of the post-World War II Baby Boom appeared to have uniquely low cohort effects on abdominal obesity. The growing prosperity of the post-World War II US may have exposed the baby-boom generation to lower levels of psychosocial and socioeconomic stress than the previous or subsequent generations. By identifying factors associated with the Baby Boomers’ low cohort-specific sensitivity to the obesogenic environment, the obesity prevention community can identify early-life factors that can protect future generations from excess weight gain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-0565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2012.198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23229734</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOBDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>20th century ; 631/443/7 ; 692/699/2743/393 ; 692/700/478/174 ; Abdomen ; Adult ; Age ; Age Distribution ; Age factors in disease ; Aged ; Baby boomers ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control ; Chronic illnesses ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Effect ; Demographic aspects ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control ; Disease ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gender differences ; Generation X ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metabolic Diseases ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Surveys ; Obesity ; Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology ; Obesity, Abdominal - etiology ; Obesity, Abdominal - prevention & control ; original-article ; Population ; Population Growth ; Prevalence ; Prevention ; Public Health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Factors ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomics ; Sociology ; Time Factors ; Trends ; United States - epidemiology ; War ; Womens health ; World War II</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Obesity, 2013-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1129-1134</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-51d8b9fc1ab6633a0b29edc93ded731ff69d080e5b82e493a41d3896b30ce2433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-51d8b9fc1ab6633a0b29edc93ded731ff69d080e5b82e493a41d3896b30ce2433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/ijo.2012.198$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/ijo.2012.198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27587678$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23229734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robinson, W R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utz, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X</title><title>International Journal of Obesity</title><addtitle>Int J Obes</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Obes (Lond)</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:
Abdominal obesity predicts a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Over the past several decades, prevalence of abdominal obesity has increased markedly in industrialized countries like the United States No previous analyses, however, have evaluated whether there are birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity. Estimating cohort effects is necessary to forecast future health trends and understand the past population-level trends.
METHODS:
This analysis evaluated whether there were birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity for the Silent Generation (born 1925–1945), children of the Great Depression; Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964); or Generation X (born 1965–1980). Cohort effects for prevalence of abdominal obesity were estimated using the median polish method with data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1988 and 2008. Respondents were aged 20–74 years.
RESULTS:
After taking into account age effects and ubiquitous secular changes, the Silent Generation and Generation X had higher cohort-specific prevalence of abdominal obesity than the Baby Boomers. Effects were more pronounced in women than men.
CONCLUSIONS:
This work presents a novel finding: evidence that the birth cohorts of the post-World War II Baby Boom appeared to have uniquely low cohort effects on abdominal obesity. The growing prosperity of the post-World War II US may have exposed the baby-boom generation to lower levels of psychosocial and socioeconomic stress than the previous or subsequent generations. By identifying factors associated with the Baby Boomers’ low cohort-specific sensitivity to the obesogenic environment, the obesity prevention community can identify early-life factors that can protect future generations from excess weight gain.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>631/443/7</subject><subject>692/699/2743/393</subject><subject>692/700/478/174</subject><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Age factors in disease</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Baby boomers</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Effect</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Generation X</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Surveys</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity, Abdominal - etiology</subject><subject>Obesity, Abdominal - prevention & control</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Growth</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>World War II</subject><issn>0307-0565</issn><issn>1476-5497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9rFDEUxwdRbK3ePEtAFA-dNZn8mIkHoVu0CgUPteAtZDJvdrLMJG2SFfa_N9td210pSA6BvM_75vF936J4TfCMYNp8tEs_qzCpZkQ2T4pjwmpRcibrp8UxprguMRf8qHgR4xJjzDmunhdHFa0qWVN2XKS5DWlAxg8-JAR9DyZF5B3Sbecn6_SIfAvRpjWyDqUB0LWzCTp0lXSC-Onu6cqO4BK6AAdBJ-vdKZrrdo3m3k8QItKu2yuiXy-LZ70eI7za3SfF9dcvP8-_lZc_Lr6fn12WRhCSSk66ppW9IboVglKN20pCZyTtoKsp6XshO9xg4G1TAZNUM9LRRoqWYgMVo_Sk-LzVvVm1U-7MQwY9qptgJx3WymurDivODmrhfysqMMOMZ4EPO4Hgb1cQk5psNDCO2oFfRUUamgcRPC_ivyjLsKgxZRl9-w-69KuQrb6jaskFa_ADtdAjKOt6n0c0G1F1RhmRlHPRZGr2CJVPB5M13kGfd3PY8H6vYQA9piH6cbXZTDwET7egCT7GAP29bwSrTfJUTp7aJE_l5GX8zb7X9_DfqGXg3Q7Q0eixD9oZGx-4mje1qDdC5ZaLueQWEPbceezjP_2_7bA</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Robinson, W R</creator><creator>Utz, R L</creator><creator>Keyes, K M</creator><creator>Martin, C L</creator><creator>Yang, Y</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X</title><author>Robinson, W R ; Utz, R L ; Keyes, K M ; Martin, C L ; Yang, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-51d8b9fc1ab6633a0b29edc93ded731ff69d080e5b82e493a41d3896b30ce2433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>631/443/7</topic><topic>692/699/2743/393</topic><topic>692/700/478/174</topic><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Age factors in disease</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Baby boomers</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Effect</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Generation X</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Surveys</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity, Abdominal - etiology</topic><topic>Obesity, Abdominal - prevention & control</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Growth</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>World War II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robinson, W R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utz, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robinson, W R</au><au>Utz, R L</au><au>Keyes, K M</au><au>Martin, C L</au><au>Yang, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle><stitle>Int J Obes</stitle><addtitle>Int J Obes (Lond)</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1134</epage><pages>1129-1134</pages><issn>0307-0565</issn><eissn>1476-5497</eissn><coden>IJOBDP</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:
Abdominal obesity predicts a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Over the past several decades, prevalence of abdominal obesity has increased markedly in industrialized countries like the United States No previous analyses, however, have evaluated whether there are birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity. Estimating cohort effects is necessary to forecast future health trends and understand the past population-level trends.
METHODS:
This analysis evaluated whether there were birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity for the Silent Generation (born 1925–1945), children of the Great Depression; Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964); or Generation X (born 1965–1980). Cohort effects for prevalence of abdominal obesity were estimated using the median polish method with data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1988 and 2008. Respondents were aged 20–74 years.
RESULTS:
After taking into account age effects and ubiquitous secular changes, the Silent Generation and Generation X had higher cohort-specific prevalence of abdominal obesity than the Baby Boomers. Effects were more pronounced in women than men.
CONCLUSIONS:
This work presents a novel finding: evidence that the birth cohorts of the post-World War II Baby Boom appeared to have uniquely low cohort effects on abdominal obesity. The growing prosperity of the post-World War II US may have exposed the baby-boom generation to lower levels of psychosocial and socioeconomic stress than the previous or subsequent generations. By identifying factors associated with the Baby Boomers’ low cohort-specific sensitivity to the obesogenic environment, the obesity prevention community can identify early-life factors that can protect future generations from excess weight gain.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23229734</pmid><doi>10.1038/ijo.2012.198</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-0565 |
ispartof | International Journal of Obesity, 2013-08, Vol.37 (8), p.1129-1134 |
issn | 0307-0565 1476-5497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3604045 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 20th century 631/443/7 692/699/2743/393 692/700/478/174 Abdomen Adult Age Age Distribution Age factors in disease Aged Baby boomers Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control Chronic illnesses Cohort analysis Cohort Effect Demographic aspects Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control Disease Epidemiology Female Gender differences Generation X Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Humans Internal Medicine Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metabolic Diseases Middle Aged Miscellaneous Nutrition Nutrition Surveys Obesity Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology Obesity, Abdominal - etiology Obesity, Abdominal - prevention & control original-article Population Population Growth Prevalence Prevention Public Health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Risk Factors Socioeconomic Factors Socioeconomics Sociology Time Factors Trends United States - epidemiology War Womens health World War II |
title | Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Birth%20cohort%20effects%20on%20abdominal%20obesity%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20the%20Silent%20Generation,%20Baby%20Boomers%20and%20Generation%20X&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Obesity&rft.au=Robinson,%20W%20R&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1134&rft.pages=1129-1134&rft.issn=0307-0565&rft.eissn=1476-5497&rft.coden=IJOBDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ijo.2012.198&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA341935568%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417956480&rft_id=info:pmid/23229734&rft_galeid=A341935568&rfr_iscdi=true |