Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey
Aims There have been significant changes in the management of out of hours services in ophthalmology recently. The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and economic measures have anecdotally reduced the availability of staff and facilities outside normal working hours, and there have been various...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2013-03, Vol.27 (3), p.363-366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 366 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Eye (London) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | O'Colmain, U Wright, M Bennett, H MacEwen, C J |
description | Aims
There have been significant changes in the management of out of hours services in ophthalmology recently. The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and economic measures have anecdotally reduced the availability of staff and facilities outside normal working hours, and there have been various responses to the provision of emergency surgical care. There are disparate attitudes to the optimum management of the emergency surgical case. We sought to establish a nationwide picture of the management of out of hours surgery.
Methods
A questionnaire was distributed to every consultant ophthalmologist working in the NHS and registered with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (
n
=947). Information was requested regarding departmental and personal policies, local facilities, and personal beliefs regarding emergency surgery.
Results
A total of 440 (46.5%) questionnaires were returned from 155 units; 18.7% of the units had no out of hours services or no operating facilities. Sixty-three percent of units reported a local policy regarding a time after which patients should not be taken to theatre. For 57%, this time began between 2100 hours and midnight. The most common reasons for not operating after a certain time were ‘belief that delay does not significantly affect the outcome’ (41.6%), ‘delayed access to theatre due to competition with other surgical specialities’ (40%), and ‘no specialist ophthalmic-theatre nursing input’ (32.7%).
Conclusion
We report the first nationwide study on out of hours ophthalmological surgical working practices. This demonstrates variation in work patterns. It is significant to patients and ophthalmologists that there should be units in United Kingdom without full local facilities and staff. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/eye.2012.280 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3597882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1317407798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-c91db907f917c4050d3989385b261976b2e3662c7ad3b80c55f55a7e9846b58e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1LwzAYxoMobk5vnqXgxYOd-WiaxIMgwy8c7OLAW0jbdO3ompm0g_73ZnSOKZ5eeJ8fz_vxAHCJ4BhBwu90p8cYIjzGHB6BIYpYHNKIRsdgCAWFIcb4cwDOnFtC6EUGT8EAE8JghMQQ0FnbBCYPCtNaF5h10RSqWpVp4Fq70La7D1Qwfw9q1ZSmVtW2vdHdOTjJVeX0xa6OwPz56WPyGk5nL2-Tx2mYRpA1YSpQlgjIcoGY71CYEcEF4TTBMRIsTrAmcYxTpjKScJhSmlOqmBY8ihPKNRmBh9533SYrnaW6bqyq5NqWK2U7aVQpfyt1WciF2UhCBeMce4ObnYE1X612jVyVLtVVpWptWicRQcyvygT36PUfdOl_4m_uKUg5FpGnbnsqtcY5q_P9MgjKbR7S5yG3eUifh8evDg_Ywz8BeCDsAeel2n_8YOp_ht8_b5Oo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317058294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>O'Colmain, U ; Wright, M ; Bennett, H ; MacEwen, C J</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Colmain, U ; Wright, M ; Bennett, H ; MacEwen, C J</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
There have been significant changes in the management of out of hours services in ophthalmology recently. The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and economic measures have anecdotally reduced the availability of staff and facilities outside normal working hours, and there have been various responses to the provision of emergency surgical care. There are disparate attitudes to the optimum management of the emergency surgical case. We sought to establish a nationwide picture of the management of out of hours surgery.
Methods
A questionnaire was distributed to every consultant ophthalmologist working in the NHS and registered with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (
n
=947). Information was requested regarding departmental and personal policies, local facilities, and personal beliefs regarding emergency surgery.
Results
A total of 440 (46.5%) questionnaires were returned from 155 units; 18.7% of the units had no out of hours services or no operating facilities. Sixty-three percent of units reported a local policy regarding a time after which patients should not be taken to theatre. For 57%, this time began between 2100 hours and midnight. The most common reasons for not operating after a certain time were ‘belief that delay does not significantly affect the outcome’ (41.6%), ‘delayed access to theatre due to competition with other surgical specialities’ (40%), and ‘no specialist ophthalmic-theatre nursing input’ (32.7%).
Conclusion
We report the first nationwide study on out of hours ophthalmological surgical working practices. This demonstrates variation in work patterns. It is significant to patients and ophthalmologists that there should be units in United Kingdom without full local facilities and staff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23370419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject><![CDATA[692/700/1538 ; 692/700/565/545 ; After-Hours Care - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical Study ; Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data ; European Union ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Ophthalmology ; Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data ; State Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom ; Work Schedule Tolerance]]></subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2013-03, Vol.27 (3), p.363-366</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2013 Royal College of Ophthalmologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-c91db907f917c4050d3989385b261976b2e3662c7ad3b80c55f55a7e9846b58e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597882/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3597882/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23370419$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Colmain, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacEwen, C J</creatorcontrib><title>Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Aims
There have been significant changes in the management of out of hours services in ophthalmology recently. The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and economic measures have anecdotally reduced the availability of staff and facilities outside normal working hours, and there have been various responses to the provision of emergency surgical care. There are disparate attitudes to the optimum management of the emergency surgical case. We sought to establish a nationwide picture of the management of out of hours surgery.
Methods
A questionnaire was distributed to every consultant ophthalmologist working in the NHS and registered with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (
n
=947). Information was requested regarding departmental and personal policies, local facilities, and personal beliefs regarding emergency surgery.
Results
A total of 440 (46.5%) questionnaires were returned from 155 units; 18.7% of the units had no out of hours services or no operating facilities. Sixty-three percent of units reported a local policy regarding a time after which patients should not be taken to theatre. For 57%, this time began between 2100 hours and midnight. The most common reasons for not operating after a certain time were ‘belief that delay does not significantly affect the outcome’ (41.6%), ‘delayed access to theatre due to competition with other surgical specialities’ (40%), and ‘no specialist ophthalmic-theatre nursing input’ (32.7%).
Conclusion
We report the first nationwide study on out of hours ophthalmological surgical working practices. This demonstrates variation in work patterns. It is significant to patients and ophthalmologists that there should be units in United Kingdom without full local facilities and staff.</description><subject>692/700/1538</subject><subject>692/700/565/545</subject><subject>After-Hours Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Work Schedule Tolerance</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1LwzAYxoMobk5vnqXgxYOd-WiaxIMgwy8c7OLAW0jbdO3ompm0g_73ZnSOKZ5eeJ8fz_vxAHCJ4BhBwu90p8cYIjzGHB6BIYpYHNKIRsdgCAWFIcb4cwDOnFtC6EUGT8EAE8JghMQQ0FnbBCYPCtNaF5h10RSqWpVp4Fq70La7D1Qwfw9q1ZSmVtW2vdHdOTjJVeX0xa6OwPz56WPyGk5nL2-Tx2mYRpA1YSpQlgjIcoGY71CYEcEF4TTBMRIsTrAmcYxTpjKScJhSmlOqmBY8ihPKNRmBh9533SYrnaW6bqyq5NqWK2U7aVQpfyt1WciF2UhCBeMce4ObnYE1X612jVyVLtVVpWptWicRQcyvygT36PUfdOl_4m_uKUg5FpGnbnsqtcY5q_P9MgjKbR7S5yG3eUifh8evDg_Ywz8BeCDsAeel2n_8YOp_ht8_b5Oo</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>O'Colmain, U</creator><creator>Wright, M</creator><creator>Bennett, H</creator><creator>MacEwen, C J</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey</title><author>O'Colmain, U ; Wright, M ; Bennett, H ; MacEwen, C J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-c91db907f917c4050d3989385b261976b2e3662c7ad3b80c55f55a7e9846b58e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>692/700/1538</topic><topic>692/700/565/545</topic><topic>After-Hours Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Work Schedule Tolerance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Colmain, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacEwen, C J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Colmain, U</au><au>Wright, M</au><au>Bennett, H</au><au>MacEwen, C J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>363-366</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><abstract>Aims
There have been significant changes in the management of out of hours services in ophthalmology recently. The European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and economic measures have anecdotally reduced the availability of staff and facilities outside normal working hours, and there have been various responses to the provision of emergency surgical care. There are disparate attitudes to the optimum management of the emergency surgical case. We sought to establish a nationwide picture of the management of out of hours surgery.
Methods
A questionnaire was distributed to every consultant ophthalmologist working in the NHS and registered with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (
n
=947). Information was requested regarding departmental and personal policies, local facilities, and personal beliefs regarding emergency surgery.
Results
A total of 440 (46.5%) questionnaires were returned from 155 units; 18.7% of the units had no out of hours services or no operating facilities. Sixty-three percent of units reported a local policy regarding a time after which patients should not be taken to theatre. For 57%, this time began between 2100 hours and midnight. The most common reasons for not operating after a certain time were ‘belief that delay does not significantly affect the outcome’ (41.6%), ‘delayed access to theatre due to competition with other surgical specialities’ (40%), and ‘no specialist ophthalmic-theatre nursing input’ (32.7%).
Conclusion
We report the first nationwide study on out of hours ophthalmological surgical working practices. This demonstrates variation in work patterns. It is significant to patients and ophthalmologists that there should be units in United Kingdom without full local facilities and staff.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23370419</pmid><doi>10.1038/eye.2012.280</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
ispartof | Eye (London), 2013-03, Vol.27 (3), p.363-366 |
issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3597882 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 692/700/1538 692/700/565/545 After-Hours Care - statistics & numerical data Clinical Study Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data European Union Health Services Research Humans Laboratory Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data Ophthalmology Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data State Medicine Surgery Surgical Oncology Surveys and Questionnaires United Kingdom Work Schedule Tolerance |
title | Out of hours ophthalmic surgery: a UK national survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T06%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Out%20of%20hours%20ophthalmic%20surgery:%20a%20UK%20national%20survey&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=O'Colmain,%20U&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=363-366&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/eye.2012.280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1317407798%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317058294&rft_id=info:pmid/23370419&rfr_iscdi=true |