3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects

Introduction and hypothesis This study assesses relative contributions of "midline defects" (widening of the vagina) and "paravaginal defects" (separation of the lateral vagina from the pelvic sidewall). Methods Ten women with anterior predominant prolapse and ten with normal sup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2012-03, Vol.23 (3), p.285-293
Hauptverfasser: Larson, Kindra A., Luo, Jiajia, Guire, Kenneth E., Chen, Luyun, Ashton-Miller, James A., DeLancey, John O. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 293
container_issue 3
container_start_page 285
container_title International Urogynecology Journal
container_volume 23
creator Larson, Kindra A.
Luo, Jiajia
Guire, Kenneth E.
Chen, Luyun
Ashton-Miller, James A.
DeLancey, John O. L.
description Introduction and hypothesis This study assesses relative contributions of "midline defects" (widening of the vagina) and "paravaginal defects" (separation of the lateral vagina from the pelvic sidewall). Methods Ten women with anterior predominant prolapse and ten with normal support underwent pelvic MR imaging. 3-D models of the anterior vaginal wall (AVW) were generated to determine locations of the lateral AVW margin, vaginal width, and apical position. Results The lateral AVW margin was farther from its normal position in cases than controls throughout most of the vaginal length, most pronounced midvagina (effect sizes, 2.2–2.8). Vaginal widths differed in the midvagina with an effect size of 1.0. Strong correlations between apical and paravaginal support were evident in mid- and upper vagina ( r  = 0.77–0.93). Conclusions Changes in lateral AVW location were considerably greater than changes in vaginal width in cases vs controls, both in number of sites affected and effect sizes. These "paravaginal defects" are highly correlated with apical descent.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00192-011-1586-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3593601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2589098381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-65c4c9ab34d3e1dc7d28042857bb96fb748b2089922b5f4fb7b377ff386d26143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCLC5cGjr-E8e5IKFSKFKlXuBsOY6zuMraiyeput8eh5QClThZmveb55l5hLxi8I4BNGcIwFpeAWMVq7Wq7p6QDZNCVAK4eEo20IqmElLxI3KMeAMAEmp4To44B6UF5xuyEx-pjXY8YECaBuoOOCXnR490xhC3dGe30U_B0ewxRRudp6HUFskielyh0I8h-lO6t9neLqodT4tvT-0-ODvS3g_eTfiCPBvsiP7l_XtCvn26-Hp-WV1df_5y_uGqclLpqVK1k661nZC98Kx3Tc81SK7rputaNXSN1B0H3bacd_UgS6ETTTMMQqueq3KBE_J-9d3P3c73zscp29Hscxk9H0yywfyrxPDdbNOtEXUrFLBi8PbeIKcfs8fJ7AKWs4w2-jSjKT83imulCvnmEXmT5lz2_wWBaCUsEFshlxNi9sPDKAzMEqVZozQlSrNEae5Kz-u_d3jo-J1dAfgKYJHi1uc_P__f9SdqiquR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922039406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Larson, Kindra A. ; Luo, Jiajia ; Guire, Kenneth E. ; Chen, Luyun ; Ashton-Miller, James A. ; DeLancey, John O. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kindra A. ; Luo, Jiajia ; Guire, Kenneth E. ; Chen, Luyun ; Ashton-Miller, James A. ; DeLancey, John O. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis This study assesses relative contributions of "midline defects" (widening of the vagina) and "paravaginal defects" (separation of the lateral vagina from the pelvic sidewall). Methods Ten women with anterior predominant prolapse and ten with normal support underwent pelvic MR imaging. 3-D models of the anterior vaginal wall (AVW) were generated to determine locations of the lateral AVW margin, vaginal width, and apical position. Results The lateral AVW margin was farther from its normal position in cases than controls throughout most of the vaginal length, most pronounced midvagina (effect sizes, 2.2–2.8). Vaginal widths differed in the midvagina with an effect size of 1.0. Strong correlations between apical and paravaginal support were evident in mid- and upper vagina ( r  = 0.77–0.93). Conclusions Changes in lateral AVW location were considerably greater than changes in vaginal width in cases vs controls, both in number of sites affected and effect sizes. These "paravaginal defects" are highly correlated with apical descent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1586-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22068322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Cystocele - pathology ; Female ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Urology ; Vagina - pathology</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2012-03, Vol.23 (3), p.285-293</ispartof><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2011</rights><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-65c4c9ab34d3e1dc7d28042857bb96fb748b2089922b5f4fb7b377ff386d26143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-65c4c9ab34d3e1dc7d28042857bb96fb748b2089922b5f4fb7b377ff386d26143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-011-1586-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-011-1586-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22068322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kindra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jiajia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guire, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Luyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton-Miller, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLancey, John O. L.</creatorcontrib><title>3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis This study assesses relative contributions of "midline defects" (widening of the vagina) and "paravaginal defects" (separation of the lateral vagina from the pelvic sidewall). Methods Ten women with anterior predominant prolapse and ten with normal support underwent pelvic MR imaging. 3-D models of the anterior vaginal wall (AVW) were generated to determine locations of the lateral AVW margin, vaginal width, and apical position. Results The lateral AVW margin was farther from its normal position in cases than controls throughout most of the vaginal length, most pronounced midvagina (effect sizes, 2.2–2.8). Vaginal widths differed in the midvagina with an effect size of 1.0. Strong correlations between apical and paravaginal support were evident in mid- and upper vagina ( r  = 0.77–0.93). Conclusions Changes in lateral AVW location were considerably greater than changes in vaginal width in cases vs controls, both in number of sites affected and effect sizes. These "paravaginal defects" are highly correlated with apical descent.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cystocele - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Vagina - pathology</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCLC5cGjr-E8e5IKFSKFKlXuBsOY6zuMraiyeput8eh5QClThZmveb55l5hLxi8I4BNGcIwFpeAWMVq7Wq7p6QDZNCVAK4eEo20IqmElLxI3KMeAMAEmp4To44B6UF5xuyEx-pjXY8YECaBuoOOCXnR490xhC3dGe30U_B0ewxRRudp6HUFskielyh0I8h-lO6t9neLqodT4tvT-0-ODvS3g_eTfiCPBvsiP7l_XtCvn26-Hp-WV1df_5y_uGqclLpqVK1k661nZC98Kx3Tc81SK7rputaNXSN1B0H3bacd_UgS6ETTTMMQqueq3KBE_J-9d3P3c73zscp29Hscxk9H0yywfyrxPDdbNOtEXUrFLBi8PbeIKcfs8fJ7AKWs4w2-jSjKT83imulCvnmEXmT5lz2_wWBaCUsEFshlxNi9sPDKAzMEqVZozQlSrNEae5Kz-u_d3jo-J1dAfgKYJHi1uc_P__f9SdqiquR</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Larson, Kindra A.</creator><creator>Luo, Jiajia</creator><creator>Guire, Kenneth E.</creator><creator>Chen, Luyun</creator><creator>Ashton-Miller, James A.</creator><creator>DeLancey, John O. L.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects</title><author>Larson, Kindra A. ; Luo, Jiajia ; Guire, Kenneth E. ; Chen, Luyun ; Ashton-Miller, James A. ; DeLancey, John O. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-65c4c9ab34d3e1dc7d28042857bb96fb748b2089922b5f4fb7b377ff386d26143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cystocele - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Vagina - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kindra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jiajia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guire, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Luyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton-Miller, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLancey, John O. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Larson, Kindra A.</au><au>Luo, Jiajia</au><au>Guire, Kenneth E.</au><au>Chen, Luyun</au><au>Ashton-Miller, James A.</au><au>DeLancey, John O. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>285-293</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis This study assesses relative contributions of "midline defects" (widening of the vagina) and "paravaginal defects" (separation of the lateral vagina from the pelvic sidewall). Methods Ten women with anterior predominant prolapse and ten with normal support underwent pelvic MR imaging. 3-D models of the anterior vaginal wall (AVW) were generated to determine locations of the lateral AVW margin, vaginal width, and apical position. Results The lateral AVW margin was farther from its normal position in cases than controls throughout most of the vaginal length, most pronounced midvagina (effect sizes, 2.2–2.8). Vaginal widths differed in the midvagina with an effect size of 1.0. Strong correlations between apical and paravaginal support were evident in mid- and upper vagina ( r  = 0.77–0.93). Conclusions Changes in lateral AVW location were considerably greater than changes in vaginal width in cases vs controls, both in number of sites affected and effect sizes. These "paravaginal defects" are highly correlated with apical descent.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22068322</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-011-1586-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-3462
ispartof International Urogynecology Journal, 2012-03, Vol.23 (3), p.285-293
issn 0937-3462
1433-3023
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3593601
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Case-Control Studies
Cystocele - pathology
Female
Gynecology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Article
Urology
Vagina - pathology
title 3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D%20analysis%20of%20cystoceles%20using%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20assessing%20midline,%20paravaginal,%20and%20apical%20defects&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Larson,%20Kindra%20A.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=285-293&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-011-1586-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2589098381%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922039406&rft_id=info:pmid/22068322&rfr_iscdi=true