The bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa is not killed if it fails to infect: implications for coevolution
Strong selection on parasites, as well as on hosts, is crucial for fueling coevolutionary dynamics. Selection will be especially strong if parasites that encounter resistant hosts are destroyed and diluted from the local environment. We tested whether spores of the bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2013-02, Vol.3 (2), p.197-203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 203 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | King, Kayla C. Auld, Stuart K. J. R. Wilson, Philip J. James, Janna Little, Tom J. |
description | Strong selection on parasites, as well as on hosts, is crucial for fueling coevolutionary dynamics. Selection will be especially strong if parasites that encounter resistant hosts are destroyed and diluted from the local environment. We tested whether spores of the bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa were passed through the gut (the route of infection) of their host, Daphnia magna, and whether passaged spores remained viable for a “second chance” at infecting a new host. In particular, we tested if this viability (estimated via infectivity) depended on host genotype, whether or not the genotype was susceptible, and on initial parasite dose. Our results show that Pasteuria spores generally remain viable after passage through both susceptible and resistant Daphnia. Furthermore, these spores remained infectious even after being frozen for several weeks. If parasites can get a second chance at infecting hosts in the wild, selection for infection success in the first instance will be reduced. This could also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts and slow the coevolutionary process.
In coevolutionary interactions, selection on parasites will be strong if parasites are destroyed and diluted from the environment by resistant individuals. We show that a bacterial parasite of Daphnia remains viable after passage through some host genotypes, even after several weeks in an extreme environment. Parasite survival through host guts may reduce selection for successful infection in the first instance and may also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.438 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3586630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290206668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3998-d17f7286300785580f679427c4da7a41b8f1505183d7981c24b3fd1a064fe78b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1LHjEQx0NpqWKFfgIJeOllbd6T9SDIw9MXENqDPYdsNtFodrNNsorfvnnwBdtL5zLDzI__DMkfgI8YnWCEyGdnHT1hVL0B-wQx3knJ1dtX9R44LOUGtRCIMCTfgz1CmZAKiX0QLq8dHIytLgcT4WKyKaE6-NOU6tbWg9lMqRgYCpxThbchRjfC4GGo0JsQC6wJhtk7W09hmJYYrKkhzQX6lKFN7i7Fddf4AN55E4s7fMoH4NeX7eXmW3fx4-v3zflFt9C-V92IpZdECYqQVJwr5IXsGZGWjUYahgflMUccKzrKXmFL2ED9iA0SzDupBnoAzh51l3WY3GjdXLOJeslhMvlBJxP035M5XOurdKcpV6KtbQKfngRy-r26UvUUinUxmtmltWgsMeGC9Yr-H6WYC4qxZA09_ge9SWue20toQnpEkBBCNero9fEvVz9_WAO6R-A-RPfwMsdI77ygd17QzQt6u9nSlukfRSalFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290206668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa is not killed if it fails to infect: implications for coevolution</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>King, Kayla C. ; Auld, Stuart K. J. R. ; Wilson, Philip J. ; James, Janna ; Little, Tom J.</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Kayla C. ; Auld, Stuart K. J. R. ; Wilson, Philip J. ; James, Janna ; Little, Tom J.</creatorcontrib><description>Strong selection on parasites, as well as on hosts, is crucial for fueling coevolutionary dynamics. Selection will be especially strong if parasites that encounter resistant hosts are destroyed and diluted from the local environment. We tested whether spores of the bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa were passed through the gut (the route of infection) of their host, Daphnia magna, and whether passaged spores remained viable for a “second chance” at infecting a new host. In particular, we tested if this viability (estimated via infectivity) depended on host genotype, whether or not the genotype was susceptible, and on initial parasite dose. Our results show that Pasteuria spores generally remain viable after passage through both susceptible and resistant Daphnia. Furthermore, these spores remained infectious even after being frozen for several weeks. If parasites can get a second chance at infecting hosts in the wild, selection for infection success in the first instance will be reduced. This could also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts and slow the coevolutionary process.
In coevolutionary interactions, selection on parasites will be strong if parasites are destroyed and diluted from the environment by resistant individuals. We show that a bacterial parasite of Daphnia remains viable after passage through some host genotypes, even after several weeks in an extreme environment. Parasite survival through host guts may reduce selection for successful infection in the first instance and may also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.438</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23467806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Cloning ; Coevolution ; Daphnia ; Daphnia magna ; dilution effect ; Esophagus ; Experiments ; Genotype & phenotype ; Genotypes ; host–parasite coevolution ; Infections ; Infectivity ; Mollusks ; Original Research ; Parasites ; Pasteuria ; Pasteuria ramosa ; Population ; Spores ; Viability ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2013-02, Vol.3 (2), p.197-203</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586630/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586630/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23467806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Kayla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auld, Stuart K. J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Janna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, Tom J.</creatorcontrib><title>The bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa is not killed if it fails to infect: implications for coevolution</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Strong selection on parasites, as well as on hosts, is crucial for fueling coevolutionary dynamics. Selection will be especially strong if parasites that encounter resistant hosts are destroyed and diluted from the local environment. We tested whether spores of the bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa were passed through the gut (the route of infection) of their host, Daphnia magna, and whether passaged spores remained viable for a “second chance” at infecting a new host. In particular, we tested if this viability (estimated via infectivity) depended on host genotype, whether or not the genotype was susceptible, and on initial parasite dose. Our results show that Pasteuria spores generally remain viable after passage through both susceptible and resistant Daphnia. Furthermore, these spores remained infectious even after being frozen for several weeks. If parasites can get a second chance at infecting hosts in the wild, selection for infection success in the first instance will be reduced. This could also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts and slow the coevolutionary process.
In coevolutionary interactions, selection on parasites will be strong if parasites are destroyed and diluted from the environment by resistant individuals. We show that a bacterial parasite of Daphnia remains viable after passage through some host genotypes, even after several weeks in an extreme environment. Parasite survival through host guts may reduce selection for successful infection in the first instance and may also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Coevolution</subject><subject>Daphnia</subject><subject>Daphnia magna</subject><subject>dilution effect</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>host–parasite coevolution</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectivity</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Pasteuria</subject><subject>Pasteuria ramosa</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Spores</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1LHjEQx0NpqWKFfgIJeOllbd6T9SDIw9MXENqDPYdsNtFodrNNsorfvnnwBdtL5zLDzI__DMkfgI8YnWCEyGdnHT1hVL0B-wQx3knJ1dtX9R44LOUGtRCIMCTfgz1CmZAKiX0QLq8dHIytLgcT4WKyKaE6-NOU6tbWg9lMqRgYCpxThbchRjfC4GGo0JsQC6wJhtk7W09hmJYYrKkhzQX6lKFN7i7Fddf4AN55E4s7fMoH4NeX7eXmW3fx4-v3zflFt9C-V92IpZdECYqQVJwr5IXsGZGWjUYahgflMUccKzrKXmFL2ED9iA0SzDupBnoAzh51l3WY3GjdXLOJeslhMvlBJxP035M5XOurdKcpV6KtbQKfngRy-r26UvUUinUxmtmltWgsMeGC9Yr-H6WYC4qxZA09_ge9SWue20toQnpEkBBCNero9fEvVz9_WAO6R-A-RPfwMsdI77ygd17QzQt6u9nSlukfRSalFQ</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>King, Kayla C.</creator><creator>Auld, Stuart K. J. R.</creator><creator>Wilson, Philip J.</creator><creator>James, Janna</creator><creator>Little, Tom J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>The bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa is not killed if it fails to infect: implications for coevolution</title><author>King, Kayla C. ; Auld, Stuart K. J. R. ; Wilson, Philip J. ; James, Janna ; Little, Tom J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3998-d17f7286300785580f679427c4da7a41b8f1505183d7981c24b3fd1a064fe78b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Coevolution</topic><topic>Daphnia</topic><topic>Daphnia magna</topic><topic>dilution effect</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>host–parasite coevolution</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectivity</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Pasteuria</topic><topic>Pasteuria ramosa</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Spores</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Kayla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auld, Stuart K. J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Janna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, Tom J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Kayla C.</au><au>Auld, Stuart K. J. R.</au><au>Wilson, Philip J.</au><au>James, Janna</au><au>Little, Tom J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa is not killed if it fails to infect: implications for coevolution</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>197-203</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Strong selection on parasites, as well as on hosts, is crucial for fueling coevolutionary dynamics. Selection will be especially strong if parasites that encounter resistant hosts are destroyed and diluted from the local environment. We tested whether spores of the bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa were passed through the gut (the route of infection) of their host, Daphnia magna, and whether passaged spores remained viable for a “second chance” at infecting a new host. In particular, we tested if this viability (estimated via infectivity) depended on host genotype, whether or not the genotype was susceptible, and on initial parasite dose. Our results show that Pasteuria spores generally remain viable after passage through both susceptible and resistant Daphnia. Furthermore, these spores remained infectious even after being frozen for several weeks. If parasites can get a second chance at infecting hosts in the wild, selection for infection success in the first instance will be reduced. This could also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts and slow the coevolutionary process.
In coevolutionary interactions, selection on parasites will be strong if parasites are destroyed and diluted from the environment by resistant individuals. We show that a bacterial parasite of Daphnia remains viable after passage through some host genotypes, even after several weeks in an extreme environment. Parasite survival through host guts may reduce selection for successful infection in the first instance and may also weaken reciprocal selection on hosts.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>23467806</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.438</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2013-02, Vol.3 (2), p.197-203 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3586630 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central |
subjects | Bacteria Cloning Coevolution Daphnia Daphnia magna dilution effect Esophagus Experiments Genotype & phenotype Genotypes host–parasite coevolution Infections Infectivity Mollusks Original Research Parasites Pasteuria Pasteuria ramosa Population Spores Viability Yeast |
title | The bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa is not killed if it fails to infect: implications for coevolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20bacterial%20parasite%20Pasteuria%20ramosa%20is%20not%20killed%20if%20it%20fails%20to%20infect:%20implications%20for%20coevolution&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=King,%20Kayla%20C.&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=197-203&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290206668%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290206668&rft_id=info:pmid/23467806&rfr_iscdi=true |