Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation

The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2006-09, Vol.174 (2), p.376-385
Hauptverfasser: DARLING, Warren G, WOLF, Steven L, BUTLER, Andrew J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 385
container_issue 2
container_start_page 376
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 174
creator DARLING, Warren G
WOLF, Steven L
BUTLER, Andrew J
description The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level using linear and non-linear multiple regression analysis. Eight healthy adult subjects received single pulse TMS over the left motor cortex at a point where minimal stimulation intensity was required to produce MEPs in extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Voluntary activation of the muscle was controlled by visual display of a target force (indicated by a stable line on an oscilloscope) and the isometric force produced as the subject attempted to extend the fingers (indicated by a line on the oscilloscope representing the finger extension force) while subjects were instructed to: exert zero extension force (0%) and produce forces equal to 5 and 10% of maximum voluntary finger extension under separate conditions. Relative variability (coefficient of variation) of single MEPs at a constant stimulus intensity and of pre-stimulus muscle EMG was lower during maintained 5 and 10% contractions than at 0% contraction levels. Therefore, maintaining a stable low intensity contraction helps stabilize cortical and spinal excitability. Multiple regression analyses showed that a linear dependence of single MEPs on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level produced similar fits to those for a non-linear dependence on stimulus intensity and a linear dependence on pre-stimulus EMG. Thus, a simple linear method can be used to assess dependence of single MEP amplitudes on both stimulus intensity (to characterize slope of the recruitment curve) and low intensity background muscle activation level.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3582032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1124344871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f8cce640c5900e02dd7f5e90a2f67a0201501a12e71aa174e6065f475b6767f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCLCR6C8z4M7kgoYovqRKXwtXyOk7rksSL7ay0_77e7opCL1xsj-eZVzPzEvIK4R0C6PcZgDFsAFQDQrVN94SsUHDWIIJ6SlYAKBrRYndCTnO-3Ydcw3NygkpxpVu9Ijc_bQp2HcZQdjQOdIolJrqJxc8l2DFTv42_fE_XO1qSnbOrR_2nk72efQmO5hKmZbQlxJn2fuPnPtP6nJbsRk-tK2F7n3xBng1Vz7883mfkx-dPVxdfm8vvX75dfLxsnJRYmm5onfNKgJMdgAfW93qQvgPLBqUtMEAJaJF5jdaiFl6BkoPQcq200gM_Ix8OuptlPfne1TmSHc0mhcmmnYk2mH8zc7gx13FruGwZcFYFzo8CKf5efC5mCtn5cbSzj0s2qq0LZZ36L4gdl0wIUcE3j8DbuKS5bsEwlCigdl8hPEAuxZyTH_60jGD2bpuD26a6bfZum67WvP571oeKo70VeHsEbHZ2HKp5LuQHrkWuVSf5HRRltDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215140475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>DARLING, Warren G ; WOLF, Steven L ; BUTLER, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>DARLING, Warren G ; WOLF, Steven L ; BUTLER, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level using linear and non-linear multiple regression analysis. Eight healthy adult subjects received single pulse TMS over the left motor cortex at a point where minimal stimulation intensity was required to produce MEPs in extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Voluntary activation of the muscle was controlled by visual display of a target force (indicated by a stable line on an oscilloscope) and the isometric force produced as the subject attempted to extend the fingers (indicated by a line on the oscilloscope representing the finger extension force) while subjects were instructed to: exert zero extension force (0%) and produce forces equal to 5 and 10% of maximum voluntary finger extension under separate conditions. Relative variability (coefficient of variation) of single MEPs at a constant stimulus intensity and of pre-stimulus muscle EMG was lower during maintained 5 and 10% contractions than at 0% contraction levels. Therefore, maintaining a stable low intensity contraction helps stabilize cortical and spinal excitability. Multiple regression analyses showed that a linear dependence of single MEPs on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level produced similar fits to those for a non-linear dependence on stimulus intensity and a linear dependence on pre-stimulus EMG. Thus, a simple linear method can be used to assess dependence of single MEP amplitudes on both stimulus intensity (to characterize slope of the recruitment curve) and low intensity background muscle activation level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16636787</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electromyography - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Fingers - innervation ; Fingers - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pyramidal Tracts - physiology ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2006-09, Vol.174 (2), p.376-385</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f8cce640c5900e02dd7f5e90a2f67a0201501a12e71aa174e6065f475b6767f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f8cce640c5900e02dd7f5e90a2f67a0201501a12e71aa174e6065f475b6767f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18137695$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16636787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DARLING, Warren G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLF, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level using linear and non-linear multiple regression analysis. Eight healthy adult subjects received single pulse TMS over the left motor cortex at a point where minimal stimulation intensity was required to produce MEPs in extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Voluntary activation of the muscle was controlled by visual display of a target force (indicated by a stable line on an oscilloscope) and the isometric force produced as the subject attempted to extend the fingers (indicated by a line on the oscilloscope representing the finger extension force) while subjects were instructed to: exert zero extension force (0%) and produce forces equal to 5 and 10% of maximum voluntary finger extension under separate conditions. Relative variability (coefficient of variation) of single MEPs at a constant stimulus intensity and of pre-stimulus muscle EMG was lower during maintained 5 and 10% contractions than at 0% contraction levels. Therefore, maintaining a stable low intensity contraction helps stabilize cortical and spinal excitability. Multiple regression analyses showed that a linear dependence of single MEPs on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level produced similar fits to those for a non-linear dependence on stimulus intensity and a linear dependence on pre-stimulus EMG. Thus, a simple linear method can be used to assess dependence of single MEP amplitudes on both stimulus intensity (to characterize slope of the recruitment curve) and low intensity background muscle activation level.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Fingers - innervation</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pyramidal Tracts - physiology</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCLCR6C8z4M7kgoYovqRKXwtXyOk7rksSL7ay0_77e7opCL1xsj-eZVzPzEvIK4R0C6PcZgDFsAFQDQrVN94SsUHDWIIJ6SlYAKBrRYndCTnO-3Ydcw3NygkpxpVu9Ijc_bQp2HcZQdjQOdIolJrqJxc8l2DFTv42_fE_XO1qSnbOrR_2nk72efQmO5hKmZbQlxJn2fuPnPtP6nJbsRk-tK2F7n3xBng1Vz7883mfkx-dPVxdfm8vvX75dfLxsnJRYmm5onfNKgJMdgAfW93qQvgPLBqUtMEAJaJF5jdaiFl6BkoPQcq200gM_Ix8OuptlPfne1TmSHc0mhcmmnYk2mH8zc7gx13FruGwZcFYFzo8CKf5efC5mCtn5cbSzj0s2qq0LZZ36L4gdl0wIUcE3j8DbuKS5bsEwlCigdl8hPEAuxZyTH_60jGD2bpuD26a6bfZum67WvP571oeKo70VeHsEbHZ2HKp5LuQHrkWuVSf5HRRltDM</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>DARLING, Warren G</creator><creator>WOLF, Steven L</creator><creator>BUTLER, Andrew J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation</title><author>DARLING, Warren G ; WOLF, Steven L ; BUTLER, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-9f8cce640c5900e02dd7f5e90a2f67a0201501a12e71aa174e6065f475b6767f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Fingers - innervation</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pyramidal Tracts - physiology</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DARLING, Warren G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLF, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DARLING, Warren G</au><au>WOLF, Steven L</au><au>BUTLER, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>376-385</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level using linear and non-linear multiple regression analysis. Eight healthy adult subjects received single pulse TMS over the left motor cortex at a point where minimal stimulation intensity was required to produce MEPs in extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Voluntary activation of the muscle was controlled by visual display of a target force (indicated by a stable line on an oscilloscope) and the isometric force produced as the subject attempted to extend the fingers (indicated by a line on the oscilloscope representing the finger extension force) while subjects were instructed to: exert zero extension force (0%) and produce forces equal to 5 and 10% of maximum voluntary finger extension under separate conditions. Relative variability (coefficient of variation) of single MEPs at a constant stimulus intensity and of pre-stimulus muscle EMG was lower during maintained 5 and 10% contractions than at 0% contraction levels. Therefore, maintaining a stable low intensity contraction helps stabilize cortical and spinal excitability. Multiple regression analyses showed that a linear dependence of single MEPs on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level produced similar fits to those for a non-linear dependence on stimulus intensity and a linear dependence on pre-stimulus EMG. Thus, a simple linear method can be used to assess dependence of single MEP amplitudes on both stimulus intensity (to characterize slope of the recruitment curve) and low intensity background muscle activation level.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16636787</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 2006-09, Vol.174 (2), p.376-385
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3582032
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Electromyography - methods
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Fingers - innervation
Fingers - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Medicine
Middle Aged
Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration
Motor Cortex - physiology
Movement - physiology
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - innervation
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Pyramidal Tracts - physiology
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A47%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20of%20motor%20potentials%20evoked%20by%20transcranial%20magnetic%20stimulation%20depends%20on%20muscle%20activation&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=DARLING,%20Warren%20G&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=376-385&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1124344871%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215140475&rft_id=info:pmid/16636787&rfr_iscdi=true