Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU

Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy. In a single...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2012-06, Vol.16 (3), p.R103-R103, Article R103
Hauptverfasser: Noppens, Ruediger R, Geimer, Stephanie, Eisel, Nicole, David, Matthias, Piepho, Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page R103
container_issue 3
container_start_page R103
container_title Critical care (London, England)
container_volume 16
creator Noppens, Ruediger R
Geimer, Stephanie
Eisel, Nicole
David, Matthias
Piepho, Tim
description Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy. In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®). A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&L grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.0001). Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/cc11384
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3580658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534348785</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534348785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ustu1DAUtRCItgPiD5AlFnRBit9xukAaRQUqtWJDJXaW49zMGCVxiJOR-gX8DR_Bl-F5UHUkkBd-3HPOPfdeI_SKkgtKtXrvHKVciyfolAqlMkWKb0_TmSuRacnlCTqL8TshNNeKP0cnjKlCEpKfop9XfR2m0bo12Bb7fporO_nQ4zn6foWnNeAyu12Wv3_hja8h4NaO9_0qRBcGwGHcIW6tS8wQ10fRS2zxMIY4gJv8Bt5hF7rBjnZ7wXGa6_uUb8e_Lu9eoGeNbSO8POwLdPfx6mv5Obv58um6XN5kldD5lImaES1t1eiCUEaJ47woWCWodrVjUNGCKlIDAcZ1ngshlZQgcsXy2vGKM75AH_a6w1x1UDvoU_GtGUbfJesmWG-OI71fm1XYGC41UVIngcu9QOXDfwSOI6lqcxhPIp8fso_hxwxxMp2PDtrW9hDmaKiUlDBO1Nbomz10ZVswvm92U9rCzVJywVM70mQX6OIfqLRq6LwLPTQ-vR8R3u4JLk0mjtA8OKfEbL_SI6-vH3fqAff37_A_iQrGPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551023062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Noppens, Ruediger R ; Geimer, Stephanie ; Eisel, Nicole ; David, Matthias ; Piepho, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Noppens, Ruediger R ; Geimer, Stephanie ; Eisel, Nicole ; David, Matthias ; Piepho, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy. In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®). A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&amp;L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) (P &lt; 0.0001). Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc11384</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22695007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colposcopes ; Comparative analysis ; Endoscopes ; Female ; Gastroscopes ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - standards ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Intubation, Intratracheal - standards ; Laryngoscopes - standards ; Laryngoscopes - utilization ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Trachea</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2012-06, Vol.16 (3), p.R103-R103, Article R103</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2012 Noppens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Noppens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580658/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580658/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22695007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noppens, Ruediger R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geimer, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisel, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepho, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy. In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®). A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&amp;L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) (P &lt; 0.0001). Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colposcopes</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Endoscopes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroscopes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - standards</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - standards</subject><subject>Laryngoscopes - standards</subject><subject>Laryngoscopes - utilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Trachea</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ustu1DAUtRCItgPiD5AlFnRBit9xukAaRQUqtWJDJXaW49zMGCVxiJOR-gX8DR_Bl-F5UHUkkBd-3HPOPfdeI_SKkgtKtXrvHKVciyfolAqlMkWKb0_TmSuRacnlCTqL8TshNNeKP0cnjKlCEpKfop9XfR2m0bo12Bb7fporO_nQ4zn6foWnNeAyu12Wv3_hja8h4NaO9_0qRBcGwGHcIW6tS8wQ10fRS2zxMIY4gJv8Bt5hF7rBjnZ7wXGa6_uUb8e_Lu9eoGeNbSO8POwLdPfx6mv5Obv58um6XN5kldD5lImaES1t1eiCUEaJ47woWCWodrVjUNGCKlIDAcZ1ngshlZQgcsXy2vGKM75AH_a6w1x1UDvoU_GtGUbfJesmWG-OI71fm1XYGC41UVIngcu9QOXDfwSOI6lqcxhPIp8fso_hxwxxMp2PDtrW9hDmaKiUlDBO1Nbomz10ZVswvm92U9rCzVJywVM70mQX6OIfqLRq6LwLPTQ-vR8R3u4JLk0mjtA8OKfEbL_SI6-vH3fqAff37_A_iQrGPQ</recordid><startdate>20120613</startdate><enddate>20120613</enddate><creator>Noppens, Ruediger R</creator><creator>Geimer, Stephanie</creator><creator>Eisel, Nicole</creator><creator>David, Matthias</creator><creator>Piepho, Tim</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120613</creationdate><title>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</title><author>Noppens, Ruediger R ; Geimer, Stephanie ; Eisel, Nicole ; David, Matthias ; Piepho, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colposcopes</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Endoscopes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroscopes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - standards</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - standards</topic><topic>Laryngoscopes - standards</topic><topic>Laryngoscopes - utilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Trachea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noppens, Ruediger R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geimer, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisel, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepho, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noppens, Ruediger R</au><au>Geimer, Stephanie</au><au>Eisel, Nicole</au><au>David, Matthias</au><au>Piepho, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2012-06-13</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>R103</spage><epage>R103</epage><pages>R103-R103</pages><artnum>R103</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy. In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®). A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&amp;L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) (P &lt; 0.0001). Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>22695007</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc11384</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-8535
ispartof Critical care (London, England), 2012-06, Vol.16 (3), p.R103-R103, Article R103
issn 1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3580658
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colposcopes
Comparative analysis
Endoscopes
Female
Gastroscopes
Humans
Intensive Care Units - standards
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Intubation, Intratracheal - standards
Laryngoscopes - standards
Laryngoscopes - utilization
Male
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Trachea
title Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A39%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endotracheal%20intubation%20using%20the%20C-MAC%C2%AE%20video%20laryngoscope%20or%20the%20Macintosh%20laryngoscope:%20a%20prospective,%20comparative%20study%20in%20the%20ICU&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Noppens,%20Ruediger%20R&rft.date=2012-06-13&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=R103&rft.epage=R103&rft.pages=R103-R103&rft.artnum=R103&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc11384&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534348785%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551023062&rft_id=info:pmid/22695007&rft_galeid=A534348785&rfr_iscdi=true