Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU
Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy. In a single...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2012-06, Vol.16 (3), p.R103-R103, Article R103 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | R103 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | R103 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Noppens, Ruediger R Geimer, Stephanie Eisel, Nicole David, Matthias Piepho, Tim |
description | Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy.
In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®).
A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&L grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.0001).
Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/cc11384 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3580658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534348785</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534348785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ustu1DAUtRCItgPiD5AlFnRBit9xukAaRQUqtWJDJXaW49zMGCVxiJOR-gX8DR_Bl-F5UHUkkBd-3HPOPfdeI_SKkgtKtXrvHKVciyfolAqlMkWKb0_TmSuRacnlCTqL8TshNNeKP0cnjKlCEpKfop9XfR2m0bo12Bb7fporO_nQ4zn6foWnNeAyu12Wv3_hja8h4NaO9_0qRBcGwGHcIW6tS8wQ10fRS2zxMIY4gJv8Bt5hF7rBjnZ7wXGa6_uUb8e_Lu9eoGeNbSO8POwLdPfx6mv5Obv58um6XN5kldD5lImaES1t1eiCUEaJ47woWCWodrVjUNGCKlIDAcZ1ngshlZQgcsXy2vGKM75AH_a6w1x1UDvoU_GtGUbfJesmWG-OI71fm1XYGC41UVIngcu9QOXDfwSOI6lqcxhPIp8fso_hxwxxMp2PDtrW9hDmaKiUlDBO1Nbomz10ZVswvm92U9rCzVJywVM70mQX6OIfqLRq6LwLPTQ-vR8R3u4JLk0mjtA8OKfEbL_SI6-vH3fqAff37_A_iQrGPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551023062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Noppens, Ruediger R ; Geimer, Stephanie ; Eisel, Nicole ; David, Matthias ; Piepho, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Noppens, Ruediger R ; Geimer, Stephanie ; Eisel, Nicole ; David, Matthias ; Piepho, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy.
In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®).
A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&L grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.0001).
Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc11384</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22695007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colposcopes ; Comparative analysis ; Endoscopes ; Female ; Gastroscopes ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - standards ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Intubation, Intratracheal - standards ; Laryngoscopes - standards ; Laryngoscopes - utilization ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Trachea</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2012-06, Vol.16 (3), p.R103-R103, Article R103</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2012 Noppens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Noppens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580658/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580658/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22695007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noppens, Ruediger R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geimer, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisel, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepho, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy.
In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®).
A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&L grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.0001).
Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colposcopes</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Endoscopes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroscopes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - standards</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - standards</subject><subject>Laryngoscopes - standards</subject><subject>Laryngoscopes - utilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Trachea</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ustu1DAUtRCItgPiD5AlFnRBit9xukAaRQUqtWJDJXaW49zMGCVxiJOR-gX8DR_Bl-F5UHUkkBd-3HPOPfdeI_SKkgtKtXrvHKVciyfolAqlMkWKb0_TmSuRacnlCTqL8TshNNeKP0cnjKlCEpKfop9XfR2m0bo12Bb7fporO_nQ4zn6foWnNeAyu12Wv3_hja8h4NaO9_0qRBcGwGHcIW6tS8wQ10fRS2zxMIY4gJv8Bt5hF7rBjnZ7wXGa6_uUb8e_Lu9eoGeNbSO8POwLdPfx6mv5Obv58um6XN5kldD5lImaES1t1eiCUEaJ47woWCWodrVjUNGCKlIDAcZ1ngshlZQgcsXy2vGKM75AH_a6w1x1UDvoU_GtGUbfJesmWG-OI71fm1XYGC41UVIngcu9QOXDfwSOI6lqcxhPIp8fso_hxwxxMp2PDtrW9hDmaKiUlDBO1Nbomz10ZVswvm92U9rCzVJywVM70mQX6OIfqLRq6LwLPTQ-vR8R3u4JLk0mjtA8OKfEbL_SI6-vH3fqAff37_A_iQrGPQ</recordid><startdate>20120613</startdate><enddate>20120613</enddate><creator>Noppens, Ruediger R</creator><creator>Geimer, Stephanie</creator><creator>Eisel, Nicole</creator><creator>David, Matthias</creator><creator>Piepho, Tim</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120613</creationdate><title>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</title><author>Noppens, Ruediger R ; Geimer, Stephanie ; Eisel, Nicole ; David, Matthias ; Piepho, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b487t-4d2085abf8901210c33992b418cdc2eb19160de0e23877445655e47627dc3b323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colposcopes</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Endoscopes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroscopes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - standards</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - standards</topic><topic>Laryngoscopes - standards</topic><topic>Laryngoscopes - utilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Trachea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noppens, Ruediger R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geimer, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisel, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepho, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noppens, Ruediger R</au><au>Geimer, Stephanie</au><au>Eisel, Nicole</au><au>David, Matthias</au><au>Piepho, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2012-06-13</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>R103</spage><epage>R103</epage><pages>R103-R103</pages><artnum>R103</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a challenging procedure and is frequently associated with life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope on laryngeal view and intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy.
In a single-center, prospective, comparative before-after study in an anesthetist-lead surgical ICU of a tertiary university hospital, predictors of potentially difficult tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, success rate and glottic view were evaluated during a 2-year study period (first year, Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML); second year, C-MAC®).
A total of 274 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation were included; 113 intubations using ML and 117 intubations using the C-MAC® were assessed. In patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation, the C-MAC® resulted in more successful intubations on first attempt compared with ML (34/43, 79% vs. 21/38, 55%; P = 0.03). The visualization of the glottis with ML using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grading was more frequently rated as difficult (20%, C&L grade 3 and 4) compared with the C-MAC® (7%, C&L grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.0001).
Use of the C-MAC® video laryngoscope improved laryngeal imaging and improved the intubating success rate on the first attempt in patients with predictors for difficult intubation in the ICU setting. Video laryngoscopy seems to be a useful tool in the ICU where potentially difficult endotracheal intubations regularly occur.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>22695007</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc11384</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2012-06, Vol.16 (3), p.R103-R103, Article R103 |
issn | 1364-8535 1466-609X 1364-8535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3580658 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Colposcopes Comparative analysis Endoscopes Female Gastroscopes Humans Intensive Care Units - standards Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation Intubation, Intratracheal - methods Intubation, Intratracheal - standards Laryngoscopes - standards Laryngoscopes - utilization Male Medical research Medicine, Experimental Middle Aged Prospective Studies Trachea |
title | Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A39%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endotracheal%20intubation%20using%20the%20C-MAC%C2%AE%20video%20laryngoscope%20or%20the%20Macintosh%20laryngoscope:%20a%20prospective,%20comparative%20study%20in%20the%20ICU&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Noppens,%20Ruediger%20R&rft.date=2012-06-13&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=R103&rft.epage=R103&rft.pages=R103-R103&rft.artnum=R103&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc11384&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534348785%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551023062&rft_id=info:pmid/22695007&rft_galeid=A534348785&rfr_iscdi=true |