Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.182-196 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 196 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 182 |
| container_title | Ecology and evolution |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Lowry, Edward Rollinson, Emily J. Laybourn, Adam J. Scott, Tracy E. Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E. Gray, Sarah M. Mickley, James Gurevitch, Jessica |
| description | Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
We employ the techniques of systematic reviewing and field synopses, widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to describe and categorize a substantial portion of the literature on biological invasions, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. Among other findings, we report that studies of terrestrial plant invasions dominate the literature, and we identify important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.431 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3568853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289628311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-7bfc18f739cf409f8bb3a0138d654819a3e51966620affa96285e39f3c4aa83a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrFTEQx4MottSCn0ACXjx0a5LZzWY9CPp42kKhl3rwFGazkzZl3-aZ7L7yvr27tNYqiLnMwPz4kZk_Y6-lOJVCqPfkCE5LkM_YoRJlVdR1ZZ4_6Q_Ycc63Yn5aqFLUL9mBglKUGvQh-_45xD5eB4c9D8MOc4hD_sCR-0B9x_N-iNsc8snc5ZE2OAbHE-0C3Z1wHDre4YgtZuLR8_GGeB9GSjhOiV6xFx77TMcP9Yh9-7K-Wp0VF5dfz1efLgpXQS2LuvVOGl9D43wpGm_aFlBIMJ2uSiMbBKpko7VWAr3HRitTETQeXIloAOGIfbz3bqd2Q52jYUzY220KG0x7GzHYPydDuLHXcWeh0sZUMAvePQhS_DFRHu0mZEd9jwPFKVtZS1VpgMb8H1WmNqYGWKxv_0Jv45SG-RJWKbOsAVL-FroUc07kH_8thV3StUu6dk53Rt883fMR_JXlDBT3wF3oaf9PkV2v1rAIfwLHG61J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289628311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lowry, Edward ; Rollinson, Emily J. ; Laybourn, Adam J. ; Scott, Tracy E. ; Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E. ; Gray, Sarah M. ; Mickley, James ; Gurevitch, Jessica</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowry, Edward ; Rollinson, Emily J. ; Laybourn, Adam J. ; Scott, Tracy E. ; Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E. ; Gray, Sarah M. ; Mickley, James ; Gurevitch, Jessica</creatorcontrib><description>Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
We employ the techniques of systematic reviewing and field synopses, widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to describe and categorize a substantial portion of the literature on biological invasions, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. Among other findings, we report that studies of terrestrial plant invasions dominate the literature, and we identify important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.431</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23404636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>19th century ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biological invasions ; Charles Elton ; disturbance ; Ecosystems ; EICA ; enemy escape ; Environmental conditions ; Human influences ; Hybridization ; Hypotheses ; Introduced species ; invasion hypothesis ; Invasions ; Literature reviews ; Mapping ; Nonnative species ; Observational studies ; Reviewing ; Reviews ; Species richness ; Success ; Systematic review ; Terrestrial environments ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.182-196</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-7bfc18f739cf409f8bb3a0138d654819a3e51966620affa96285e39f3c4aa83a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-7bfc18f739cf409f8bb3a0138d654819a3e51966620affa96285e39f3c4aa83a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568853/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568853/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11542,27903,27904,45553,45554,46031,46455,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23404636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowry, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rollinson, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laybourn, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Tracy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mickley, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurevitch, Jessica</creatorcontrib><title>Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
We employ the techniques of systematic reviewing and field synopses, widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to describe and categorize a substantial portion of the literature on biological invasions, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. Among other findings, we report that studies of terrestrial plant invasions dominate the literature, and we identify important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>Charles Elton</subject><subject>disturbance</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>EICA</subject><subject>enemy escape</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>invasion hypothesis</subject><subject>Invasions</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Reviewing</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrFTEQx4MottSCn0ACXjx0a5LZzWY9CPp42kKhl3rwFGazkzZl3-aZ7L7yvr27tNYqiLnMwPz4kZk_Y6-lOJVCqPfkCE5LkM_YoRJlVdR1ZZ4_6Q_Ycc63Yn5aqFLUL9mBglKUGvQh-_45xD5eB4c9D8MOc4hD_sCR-0B9x_N-iNsc8snc5ZE2OAbHE-0C3Z1wHDre4YgtZuLR8_GGeB9GSjhOiV6xFx77TMcP9Yh9-7K-Wp0VF5dfz1efLgpXQS2LuvVOGl9D43wpGm_aFlBIMJ2uSiMbBKpko7VWAr3HRitTETQeXIloAOGIfbz3bqd2Q52jYUzY220KG0x7GzHYPydDuLHXcWeh0sZUMAvePQhS_DFRHu0mZEd9jwPFKVtZS1VpgMb8H1WmNqYGWKxv_0Jv45SG-RJWKbOsAVL-FroUc07kH_8thV3StUu6dk53Rt883fMR_JXlDBT3wF3oaf9PkV2v1rAIfwLHG61J</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Lowry, Edward</creator><creator>Rollinson, Emily J.</creator><creator>Laybourn, Adam J.</creator><creator>Scott, Tracy E.</creator><creator>Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E.</creator><creator>Gray, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Mickley, James</creator><creator>Gurevitch, Jessica</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature</title><author>Lowry, Edward ; Rollinson, Emily J. ; Laybourn, Adam J. ; Scott, Tracy E. ; Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E. ; Gray, Sarah M. ; Mickley, James ; Gurevitch, Jessica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-7bfc18f739cf409f8bb3a0138d654819a3e51966620affa96285e39f3c4aa83a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>Charles Elton</topic><topic>disturbance</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>EICA</topic><topic>enemy escape</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>invasion hypothesis</topic><topic>Invasions</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Reviewing</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowry, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rollinson, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laybourn, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Tracy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mickley, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurevitch, Jessica</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowry, Edward</au><au>Rollinson, Emily J.</au><au>Laybourn, Adam J.</au><au>Scott, Tracy E.</au><au>Aiello‐Lammens, Matthew E.</au><au>Gray, Sarah M.</au><au>Mickley, James</au><au>Gurevitch, Jessica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>182-196</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
We employ the techniques of systematic reviewing and field synopses, widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to describe and categorize a substantial portion of the literature on biological invasions, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well‐studied areas and important gaps. Among other findings, we report that studies of terrestrial plant invasions dominate the literature, and we identify important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>23404636</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.431</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
| ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.182-196 |
| issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3568853 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | 19th century Anthropogenic factors Biological invasions Charles Elton disturbance Ecosystems EICA enemy escape Environmental conditions Human influences Hybridization Hypotheses Introduced species invasion hypothesis Invasions Literature reviews Mapping Nonnative species Observational studies Reviewing Reviews Species richness Success Systematic review Terrestrial environments Websites |
| title | Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20invasions:%20a%20field%20synopsis,%20systematic%20review,%20and%20database%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Lowry,%20Edward&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=182-196&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2289628311%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289628311&rft_id=info:pmid/23404636&rfr_iscdi=true |