Can Radiographic Morphometric Parameters for the Hip Be Assessed on MRI?
Background Although morphometric hip parameters measured on radiographs are valuable tools guiding diagnosis and therapy in patients with hip disorders, some clinicians use MRI for such measurements, although it is unclear whether the parameters assessed on MRI differ from those assessed on radiogra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013-03, Vol.471 (3), p.989-999 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 999 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 989 |
container_title | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
container_volume | 471 |
creator | Stelzeneder, David Hingsammer, Andreas Bixby, Sarah D. Kim, Young-Jo |
description | Background
Although morphometric hip parameters measured on radiographs are valuable tools guiding diagnosis and therapy in patients with hip disorders, some clinicians use MRI for such measurements, although it is unclear whether the parameters assessed on MRI differ from those assessed on radiographs.
Questions/purposes
We asked whether the lateral center-edge angle (LCE), Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and anterior center-edge angle (ACE) are similar on MRI and radiography.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the imaging data of 103 hips from 103 patients: 46 with femoroacetabular impingement and 57 with hip dysplasia. We manually measured the LCE, Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and ACE from radiographs and MRI in all 103 hips. Four straight coronal (Ant-10 mm, Ant-5 mm, Center, and Post-5 mm), three straight sagittal (S-Med-5 mm, S-Center, S-Lat-5 mm), and three 25º oblique sagittal (OS-Med-5 mm, OS-Center, OS-Lat-5 mm) reformats were reconstructed from a three-dimensional isotropic morphologic MRI sequence. MRI measurements were compared against the gold standard radiographic measurements.
Results
We found good agreement for the LCE angle, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index between radiographic and coronal slice MRI measurements. The mean differences between radiographic and MRI measurements were 5º or less or 5% or less (for the extrusion index) in all coronal MRI slices. However, the differences between ACE angles on sagittal MRI slices and radiographs ranged from 5° to 28º.
Conclusions
LCE, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index can be measured on MRI with comparable results to radiography. The ACE angle on radiographs cannot be estimated reliably from MRI.
Clinical Relevance
MRI provides similar morphometric measurements as radiography for most hip parameters, except for the ACE angle. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11999-012-2654-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3563814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2882760961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bdd0c1e8b072e6649700f4b51767d6e08327ab11288614dcd8e3ac643553fb7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UN9LwzAQDqK4Of0DfJGAz9Vc0qbpizKHusGGMhR8C2mTbh1bU5NO8L83Y3PMB-Hg7rjvx_EhdAnkBghJbz1AlmURARpRnsQRO0JdSKiIABg9Rl1CSBZlFD466Mz7RVhZnNBT1KEs8EHwLhoOVI2nSld25lQzrwo8sa6Z25VpXVhelVNhNM7j0jrczg0eVg1-MLjvvQmlsa3xZDq6P0cnpVp6c7HrPfT-9Pg2GEbjl-fRoD-OCsbTNsq1JgUYkZOUGs7jLCWkjPMEUp5qbohgNFU5ABWCQ6wLLQxTBY9ZkrAyTzXrobutbrPOV0YXpm6dWsrGVSvlvqVVlfx7qau5nNkvyRLOBMRB4Hon4Ozn2vhWLuza1eFnGVxZJmLOs4CCLapw1ntnyr0DELkJX27DlyF8uQlfssC5Onxtz_hNOwDoFuDDqZ4Zd2D9r-oPqOCOnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283984669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Radiographic Morphometric Parameters for the Hip Be Assessed on MRI?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stelzeneder, David ; Hingsammer, Andreas ; Bixby, Sarah D. ; Kim, Young-Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Stelzeneder, David ; Hingsammer, Andreas ; Bixby, Sarah D. ; Kim, Young-Jo</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Although morphometric hip parameters measured on radiographs are valuable tools guiding diagnosis and therapy in patients with hip disorders, some clinicians use MRI for such measurements, although it is unclear whether the parameters assessed on MRI differ from those assessed on radiographs.
Questions/purposes
We asked whether the lateral center-edge angle (LCE), Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and anterior center-edge angle (ACE) are similar on MRI and radiography.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the imaging data of 103 hips from 103 patients: 46 with femoroacetabular impingement and 57 with hip dysplasia. We manually measured the LCE, Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and ACE from radiographs and MRI in all 103 hips. Four straight coronal (Ant-10 mm, Ant-5 mm, Center, and Post-5 mm), three straight sagittal (S-Med-5 mm, S-Center, S-Lat-5 mm), and three 25º oblique sagittal (OS-Med-5 mm, OS-Center, OS-Lat-5 mm) reformats were reconstructed from a three-dimensional isotropic morphologic MRI sequence. MRI measurements were compared against the gold standard radiographic measurements.
Results
We found good agreement for the LCE angle, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index between radiographic and coronal slice MRI measurements. The mean differences between radiographic and MRI measurements were 5º or less or 5% or less (for the extrusion index) in all coronal MRI slices. However, the differences between ACE angles on sagittal MRI slices and radiographs ranged from 5° to 28º.
Conclusions
LCE, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index can be measured on MRI with comparable results to radiography. The ACE angle on radiographs cannot be estimated reliably from MRI.
Clinical Relevance
MRI provides similar morphometric measurements as radiography for most hip parameters, except for the ACE angle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2654-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23100186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Clinical Research ; Conservative Orthopedics ; Female ; Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnosis ; Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging ; Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology ; Hip ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnosis ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - pathology ; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Joint - pathology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013-03, Vol.471 (3), p.989-999</ispartof><rights>The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012</rights><rights>The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bdd0c1e8b072e6649700f4b51767d6e08327ab11288614dcd8e3ac643553fb7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bdd0c1e8b072e6649700f4b51767d6e08327ab11288614dcd8e3ac643553fb7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563814/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563814/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23100186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stelzeneder, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingsammer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bixby, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jo</creatorcontrib><title>Can Radiographic Morphometric Parameters for the Hip Be Assessed on MRI?</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Background
Although morphometric hip parameters measured on radiographs are valuable tools guiding diagnosis and therapy in patients with hip disorders, some clinicians use MRI for such measurements, although it is unclear whether the parameters assessed on MRI differ from those assessed on radiographs.
Questions/purposes
We asked whether the lateral center-edge angle (LCE), Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and anterior center-edge angle (ACE) are similar on MRI and radiography.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the imaging data of 103 hips from 103 patients: 46 with femoroacetabular impingement and 57 with hip dysplasia. We manually measured the LCE, Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and ACE from radiographs and MRI in all 103 hips. Four straight coronal (Ant-10 mm, Ant-5 mm, Center, and Post-5 mm), three straight sagittal (S-Med-5 mm, S-Center, S-Lat-5 mm), and three 25º oblique sagittal (OS-Med-5 mm, OS-Center, OS-Lat-5 mm) reformats were reconstructed from a three-dimensional isotropic morphologic MRI sequence. MRI measurements were compared against the gold standard radiographic measurements.
Results
We found good agreement for the LCE angle, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index between radiographic and coronal slice MRI measurements. The mean differences between radiographic and MRI measurements were 5º or less or 5% or less (for the extrusion index) in all coronal MRI slices. However, the differences between ACE angles on sagittal MRI slices and radiographs ranged from 5° to 28º.
Conclusions
LCE, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index can be measured on MRI with comparable results to radiography. The ACE angle on radiographs cannot be estimated reliably from MRI.
Clinical Relevance
MRI provides similar morphometric measurements as radiography for most hip parameters, except for the ACE angle.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Conservative Orthopedics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnosis</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - pathology</subject><subject>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UN9LwzAQDqK4Of0DfJGAz9Vc0qbpizKHusGGMhR8C2mTbh1bU5NO8L83Y3PMB-Hg7rjvx_EhdAnkBghJbz1AlmURARpRnsQRO0JdSKiIABg9Rl1CSBZlFD466Mz7RVhZnNBT1KEs8EHwLhoOVI2nSld25lQzrwo8sa6Z25VpXVhelVNhNM7j0jrczg0eVg1-MLjvvQmlsa3xZDq6P0cnpVp6c7HrPfT-9Pg2GEbjl-fRoD-OCsbTNsq1JgUYkZOUGs7jLCWkjPMEUp5qbohgNFU5ABWCQ6wLLQxTBY9ZkrAyTzXrobutbrPOV0YXpm6dWsrGVSvlvqVVlfx7qau5nNkvyRLOBMRB4Hon4Ozn2vhWLuza1eFnGVxZJmLOs4CCLapw1ntnyr0DELkJX27DlyF8uQlfssC5Onxtz_hNOwDoFuDDqZ4Zd2D9r-oPqOCOnA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Stelzeneder, David</creator><creator>Hingsammer, Andreas</creator><creator>Bixby, Sarah D.</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Jo</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Can Radiographic Morphometric Parameters for the Hip Be Assessed on MRI?</title><author>Stelzeneder, David ; Hingsammer, Andreas ; Bixby, Sarah D. ; Kim, Young-Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bdd0c1e8b072e6649700f4b51767d6e08327ab11288614dcd8e3ac643553fb7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Conservative Orthopedics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnosis</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - pathology</topic><topic>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stelzeneder, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingsammer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bixby, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stelzeneder, David</au><au>Hingsammer, Andreas</au><au>Bixby, Sarah D.</au><au>Kim, Young-Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Radiographic Morphometric Parameters for the Hip Be Assessed on MRI?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><stitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</stitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>471</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>989</spage><epage>999</epage><pages>989-999</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><abstract>Background
Although morphometric hip parameters measured on radiographs are valuable tools guiding diagnosis and therapy in patients with hip disorders, some clinicians use MRI for such measurements, although it is unclear whether the parameters assessed on MRI differ from those assessed on radiographs.
Questions/purposes
We asked whether the lateral center-edge angle (LCE), Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and anterior center-edge angle (ACE) are similar on MRI and radiography.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the imaging data of 103 hips from 103 patients: 46 with femoroacetabular impingement and 57 with hip dysplasia. We manually measured the LCE, Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and ACE from radiographs and MRI in all 103 hips. Four straight coronal (Ant-10 mm, Ant-5 mm, Center, and Post-5 mm), three straight sagittal (S-Med-5 mm, S-Center, S-Lat-5 mm), and three 25º oblique sagittal (OS-Med-5 mm, OS-Center, OS-Lat-5 mm) reformats were reconstructed from a three-dimensional isotropic morphologic MRI sequence. MRI measurements were compared against the gold standard radiographic measurements.
Results
We found good agreement for the LCE angle, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index between radiographic and coronal slice MRI measurements. The mean differences between radiographic and MRI measurements were 5º or less or 5% or less (for the extrusion index) in all coronal MRI slices. However, the differences between ACE angles on sagittal MRI slices and radiographs ranged from 5° to 28º.
Conclusions
LCE, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index can be measured on MRI with comparable results to radiography. The ACE angle on radiographs cannot be estimated reliably from MRI.
Clinical Relevance
MRI provides similar morphometric measurements as radiography for most hip parameters, except for the ACE angle.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23100186</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11999-012-2654-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-921X |
ispartof | Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013-03, Vol.471 (3), p.989-999 |
issn | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3563814 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Clinical Research Conservative Orthopedics Female Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnosis Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology Hip Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnosis Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging Hip Dislocation, Congenital - pathology Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging Hip Joint - pathology Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopedics Predictive Value of Tests Radiography Retrospective Studies Sports Medicine Surgery Surgical Orthopedics Young Adult |
title | Can Radiographic Morphometric Parameters for the Hip Be Assessed on MRI? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T23%3A01%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Radiographic%20Morphometric%20Parameters%20for%20the%20Hip%20Be%20Assessed%20on%20MRI?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Stelzeneder,%20David&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=471&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=989&rft.epage=999&rft.pages=989-999&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11999-012-2654-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2882760961%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283984669&rft_id=info:pmid/23100186&rfr_iscdi=true |