Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure?
Replacement of gastrostomy tube in patients under-going percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally considered as a safe and simple procedure. However, it could be associated with serious complications, such as gastrocutaneous tract disruption and intraperitoneal tube placement, which may...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy 2013-01, Vol.5 (1), p.14-18 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Lohsiriwat, Varut |
description | Replacement of gastrostomy tube in patients under-going percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally considered as a safe and simple procedure. However, it could be associated with serious complications, such as gastrocutaneous tract disruption and intraperitoneal tube placement, which may lead to chemical peritonitis and even death. When PEG tube needs a replacement (e.g., occlusion or breakage of the tube), clinicians must realize that the gastrocutaneous tract of PEG is more friable than that of surgical gastrostomy because there is no suture fixation between gastric wall and abdominal wall in PEG. In general, the tract of PEG begins to mature in 1-2 wk after placement and it is well formed in 4-6 wk. However, this process could take a longer period of time in some patients. Accordingly, this article describes three major principles of a safe PEG tube replacement: (1) good control of the replacement tube along the well-formed gastrocutaneous tract; (2) minimal insertion force during the replacement, and, most importantly; and (3) reliable methods for the confirmation of intragastric tube insertion. In addition, the management of patients with suspected intraperitoneal tube placement (e.g., patients having abdominal pain or signs of peritonitis immediately after PEG tube replacement or shortly after tube feeding was resumed) is discussed. If prompt investigation confirms the intraperitoneal tube placement, surgical intervention is usually required. This article also highlights the fact that each institute should have an optimal protocol for PEG tube replacement to prevent, or to minimize, such serious complications. Meanwhile, clinicians should be aware of these potential complications, particularly if there are any difficulties during the gastrostomy tube replacement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.14 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3547115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>1003030070</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1273662115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-905836396e08e402c6e7d5fca4b8b71cbb7dae96317a9a96285471e156a644723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1LxDAQxYMoKurRqxS8eOmaNF-tB0UWdQVBD3oOaTpbI23TTdoV_3uz7LqsmUMS5vGbxxuEzgmesIzT6--vGiZLPrFkQtgeOiYFy1NOCry_8z5CZyF84XgYk5jIQ3SUUUrjtzhGszfwZhx0B24MCXSVC8b11iS1DoN3YXDtTzKMJSQe-kYbaKEbbu6TYNu-gaT3zkA1erg7RQdz3QQ429wn6OPx4X06S19en56n9y-poYwPaYF5TgUtBOAcGM6MAFnxudGszEtJTFnKSkMhKJG60IXIcs4kAcKFFtF-Rk_Q7Zrbj2ULlYl2vG5U722r_Y9y2qr_nc5-qtotFV2BCI-Aqw3Au8UIYVCtDQaaZp2BIpmkQmRrabqWmphE8DDfjiFYrRagVgtQS64sUYRF_cWut636L-4ouNwAP11XL2xX7xAxjYUlpr8Ooo9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273662115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure?</title><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lohsiriwat, Varut</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohsiriwat, Varut</creatorcontrib><description>Replacement of gastrostomy tube in patients under-going percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally considered as a safe and simple procedure. However, it could be associated with serious complications, such as gastrocutaneous tract disruption and intraperitoneal tube placement, which may lead to chemical peritonitis and even death. When PEG tube needs a replacement (e.g., occlusion or breakage of the tube), clinicians must realize that the gastrocutaneous tract of PEG is more friable than that of surgical gastrostomy because there is no suture fixation between gastric wall and abdominal wall in PEG. In general, the tract of PEG begins to mature in 1-2 wk after placement and it is well formed in 4-6 wk. However, this process could take a longer period of time in some patients. Accordingly, this article describes three major principles of a safe PEG tube replacement: (1) good control of the replacement tube along the well-formed gastrocutaneous tract; (2) minimal insertion force during the replacement, and, most importantly; and (3) reliable methods for the confirmation of intragastric tube insertion. In addition, the management of patients with suspected intraperitoneal tube placement (e.g., patients having abdominal pain or signs of peritonitis immediately after PEG tube replacement or shortly after tube feeding was resumed) is discussed. If prompt investigation confirms the intraperitoneal tube placement, surgical intervention is usually required. This article also highlights the fact that each institute should have an optimal protocol for PEG tube replacement to prevent, or to minimize, such serious complications. Meanwhile, clinicians should be aware of these potential complications, particularly if there are any difficulties during the gastrostomy tube replacement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1948-5190</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-5190</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.14</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23330049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited</publisher><subject>Complication ; endoscopic ; exchange ; gastrostomy ; Management ; Minireviews ; Percutaneous ; Peritonitis ; Prevention ; reinsertion ; replacement ; tube</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2013-01, Vol.5 (1), p.14-18</ispartof><rights>2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-905836396e08e402c6e7d5fca4b8b71cbb7dae96317a9a96285471e156a644723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-905836396e08e402c6e7d5fca4b8b71cbb7dae96317a9a96285471e156a644723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71419X/71419X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547115/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547115/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23330049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohsiriwat, Varut</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure?</title><title>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</addtitle><description>Replacement of gastrostomy tube in patients under-going percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally considered as a safe and simple procedure. However, it could be associated with serious complications, such as gastrocutaneous tract disruption and intraperitoneal tube placement, which may lead to chemical peritonitis and even death. When PEG tube needs a replacement (e.g., occlusion or breakage of the tube), clinicians must realize that the gastrocutaneous tract of PEG is more friable than that of surgical gastrostomy because there is no suture fixation between gastric wall and abdominal wall in PEG. In general, the tract of PEG begins to mature in 1-2 wk after placement and it is well formed in 4-6 wk. However, this process could take a longer period of time in some patients. Accordingly, this article describes three major principles of a safe PEG tube replacement: (1) good control of the replacement tube along the well-formed gastrocutaneous tract; (2) minimal insertion force during the replacement, and, most importantly; and (3) reliable methods for the confirmation of intragastric tube insertion. In addition, the management of patients with suspected intraperitoneal tube placement (e.g., patients having abdominal pain or signs of peritonitis immediately after PEG tube replacement or shortly after tube feeding was resumed) is discussed. If prompt investigation confirms the intraperitoneal tube placement, surgical intervention is usually required. This article also highlights the fact that each institute should have an optimal protocol for PEG tube replacement to prevent, or to minimize, such serious complications. Meanwhile, clinicians should be aware of these potential complications, particularly if there are any difficulties during the gastrostomy tube replacement.</description><subject>Complication</subject><subject>endoscopic</subject><subject>exchange</subject><subject>gastrostomy</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Minireviews</subject><subject>Percutaneous</subject><subject>Peritonitis</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>reinsertion</subject><subject>replacement</subject><subject>tube</subject><issn>1948-5190</issn><issn>1948-5190</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1LxDAQxYMoKurRqxS8eOmaNF-tB0UWdQVBD3oOaTpbI23TTdoV_3uz7LqsmUMS5vGbxxuEzgmesIzT6--vGiZLPrFkQtgeOiYFy1NOCry_8z5CZyF84XgYk5jIQ3SUUUrjtzhGszfwZhx0B24MCXSVC8b11iS1DoN3YXDtTzKMJSQe-kYbaKEbbu6TYNu-gaT3zkA1erg7RQdz3QQ429wn6OPx4X06S19en56n9y-poYwPaYF5TgUtBOAcGM6MAFnxudGszEtJTFnKSkMhKJG60IXIcs4kAcKFFtF-Rk_Q7Zrbj2ULlYl2vG5U722r_Y9y2qr_nc5-qtotFV2BCI-Aqw3Au8UIYVCtDQaaZp2BIpmkQmRrabqWmphE8DDfjiFYrRagVgtQS64sUYRF_cWut636L-4ouNwAP11XL2xX7xAxjYUlpr8Ooo9Q</recordid><startdate>20130116</startdate><enddate>20130116</enddate><creator>Lohsiriwat, Varut</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130116</creationdate><title>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure?</title><author>Lohsiriwat, Varut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-905836396e08e402c6e7d5fca4b8b71cbb7dae96317a9a96285471e156a644723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Complication</topic><topic>endoscopic</topic><topic>exchange</topic><topic>gastrostomy</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Minireviews</topic><topic>Percutaneous</topic><topic>Peritonitis</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>reinsertion</topic><topic>replacement</topic><topic>tube</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohsiriwat, Varut</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohsiriwat, Varut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure?</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</addtitle><date>2013-01-16</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>14-18</pages><issn>1948-5190</issn><eissn>1948-5190</eissn><abstract>Replacement of gastrostomy tube in patients under-going percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally considered as a safe and simple procedure. However, it could be associated with serious complications, such as gastrocutaneous tract disruption and intraperitoneal tube placement, which may lead to chemical peritonitis and even death. When PEG tube needs a replacement (e.g., occlusion or breakage of the tube), clinicians must realize that the gastrocutaneous tract of PEG is more friable than that of surgical gastrostomy because there is no suture fixation between gastric wall and abdominal wall in PEG. In general, the tract of PEG begins to mature in 1-2 wk after placement and it is well formed in 4-6 wk. However, this process could take a longer period of time in some patients. Accordingly, this article describes three major principles of a safe PEG tube replacement: (1) good control of the replacement tube along the well-formed gastrocutaneous tract; (2) minimal insertion force during the replacement, and, most importantly; and (3) reliable methods for the confirmation of intragastric tube insertion. In addition, the management of patients with suspected intraperitoneal tube placement (e.g., patients having abdominal pain or signs of peritonitis immediately after PEG tube replacement or shortly after tube feeding was resumed) is discussed. If prompt investigation confirms the intraperitoneal tube placement, surgical intervention is usually required. This article also highlights the fact that each institute should have an optimal protocol for PEG tube replacement to prevent, or to minimize, such serious complications. Meanwhile, clinicians should be aware of these potential complications, particularly if there are any difficulties during the gastrostomy tube replacement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited</pub><pmid>23330049</pmid><doi>10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.14</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1948-5190 |
ispartof | World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2013-01, Vol.5 (1), p.14-18 |
issn | 1948-5190 1948-5190 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3547115 |
source | Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Complication endoscopic exchange gastrostomy Management Minireviews Percutaneous Peritonitis Prevention reinsertion replacement tube |
title | Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A09%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20endoscopic%20gastrostomy%20tube%20replacement:A%20simple%20procedure?&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Lohsiriwat,%20Varut&rft.date=2013-01-16&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=14-18&rft.issn=1948-5190&rft.eissn=1948-5190&rft_id=info:doi/10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.14&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1273662115%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273662115&rft_id=info:pmid/23330049&rft_cqvip_id=1003030070&rfr_iscdi=true |