Comparison of latency and rate coding for the direction of whisker deflection in the subcortical somatosensory pathway
The response of many neurons in the whisker somatosensory system depends on the direction in which a whisker is deflected. Although it is known that the spike count conveys information about this parameter, it is not known how important spike timing might be. The aim of this study was to compare neu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2012-10, Vol.108 (7), p.1810-1821 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1821 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1810 |
container_title | Journal of neurophysiology |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Storchi, Riccardo Bale, Michael R Biella, Gabriele E M Petersen, Rasmus S |
description | The response of many neurons in the whisker somatosensory system depends on the direction in which a whisker is deflected. Although it is known that the spike count conveys information about this parameter, it is not known how important spike timing might be. The aim of this study was to compare neural codes based on spike count and first-spike latency, respectively. We extracellularly recorded single units from either the rat trigeminal ganglion (primary sensory afferents) or ventroposteromedial (VPM) thalamic nucleus in response to deflection in different directions and quantified alternative neural codes using mutual information. We found that neurons were diverse: some (58% in ganglion, 32% in VPM) conveyed information only by spike count; others conveyed additional information by latency. An issue with latency coding is that latency is measured with respect to the time of stimulus onset, a quantity known to the experimenter but not directly to the subject's brain. We found a potential solution using the integrated population activity as an internal timing signal: in this way, 91% of the first-spike latency information could be recovered. Finally, we asked how well direction could be decoded. For large populations, spike count and latency codes performed similarly; for small ones, decoding was more accurate using the latency code. Our findings indicate that whisker deflection direction is more efficiently encoded by spike timing than by spike count. Spike timing decreases the population size necessary for reliable information transmission and may thereby bring significant advantages in both wiring and metabolic efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/jn.00921.2011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3545005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1082238786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-428d170851b053be89c64e5de41b86c8628b1e8826c42aabbbb3d8c8f7a01a8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1PwzAMxSMEgjE4ckU5culw0qbNLkho4ktC4gLnKE1dltEmI8mY9t9T2EDgi5_sn54tPULOGEwYE_xy4SYAU84mHBjbI6NhxjMmpnKfjAAGnUNVHZHjGBcAUAngh-SIc8lEAXxEPma-X-pgo3fUt7TTCZ3ZUO0aGgZNjW-se6WtDzTNkTY2oEl2C6_nNr5hoA223W5q3TcWV7XxIVmjOxp9r5OP6KIPG7rUab7WmxNy0Oou4umuj8nL7c3z7D57fLp7mF0_ZqYQecoKLhtWgRSsBpHXKKemLFA0WLBalkaWXNYMpeSlKbjW9VB5I41sKw1MS5OPydXWd7mqe2wMuhR0p5bB9jpslNdW_d84O1ev_kPlohAw3ByTi51B8O8rjEn1NhrsOu3Qr6JiIDnPZSXLAc22qAk-xoDt7xkG6isrtXDqOyv1ldXAn__97Zf-CSf_BEagkvc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1082238786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of latency and rate coding for the direction of whisker deflection in the subcortical somatosensory pathway</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Storchi, Riccardo ; Bale, Michael R ; Biella, Gabriele E M ; Petersen, Rasmus S</creator><creatorcontrib>Storchi, Riccardo ; Bale, Michael R ; Biella, Gabriele E M ; Petersen, Rasmus S</creatorcontrib><description>The response of many neurons in the whisker somatosensory system depends on the direction in which a whisker is deflected. Although it is known that the spike count conveys information about this parameter, it is not known how important spike timing might be. The aim of this study was to compare neural codes based on spike count and first-spike latency, respectively. We extracellularly recorded single units from either the rat trigeminal ganglion (primary sensory afferents) or ventroposteromedial (VPM) thalamic nucleus in response to deflection in different directions and quantified alternative neural codes using mutual information. We found that neurons were diverse: some (58% in ganglion, 32% in VPM) conveyed information only by spike count; others conveyed additional information by latency. An issue with latency coding is that latency is measured with respect to the time of stimulus onset, a quantity known to the experimenter but not directly to the subject's brain. We found a potential solution using the integrated population activity as an internal timing signal: in this way, 91% of the first-spike latency information could be recovered. Finally, we asked how well direction could be decoded. For large populations, spike count and latency codes performed similarly; for small ones, decoding was more accurate using the latency code. Our findings indicate that whisker deflection direction is more efficiently encoded by spike timing than by spike count. Spike timing decreases the population size necessary for reliable information transmission and may thereby bring significant advantages in both wiring and metabolic efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00921.2011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22815402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Afferent Pathways - physiology ; Animals ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Neurons - physiology ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Reaction Time ; Trigeminal Ganglion - physiology ; Ventral Thalamic Nuclei - physiology ; Vibrissae - innervation</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2012-10, Vol.108 (7), p.1810-1821</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 the American Physiological Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-428d170851b053be89c64e5de41b86c8628b1e8826c42aabbbb3d8c8f7a01a8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-428d170851b053be89c64e5de41b86c8628b1e8826c42aabbbb3d8c8f7a01a8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3026,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815402$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Storchi, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biella, Gabriele E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Rasmus S</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of latency and rate coding for the direction of whisker deflection in the subcortical somatosensory pathway</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>The response of many neurons in the whisker somatosensory system depends on the direction in which a whisker is deflected. Although it is known that the spike count conveys information about this parameter, it is not known how important spike timing might be. The aim of this study was to compare neural codes based on spike count and first-spike latency, respectively. We extracellularly recorded single units from either the rat trigeminal ganglion (primary sensory afferents) or ventroposteromedial (VPM) thalamic nucleus in response to deflection in different directions and quantified alternative neural codes using mutual information. We found that neurons were diverse: some (58% in ganglion, 32% in VPM) conveyed information only by spike count; others conveyed additional information by latency. An issue with latency coding is that latency is measured with respect to the time of stimulus onset, a quantity known to the experimenter but not directly to the subject's brain. We found a potential solution using the integrated population activity as an internal timing signal: in this way, 91% of the first-spike latency information could be recovered. Finally, we asked how well direction could be decoded. For large populations, spike count and latency codes performed similarly; for small ones, decoding was more accurate using the latency code. Our findings indicate that whisker deflection direction is more efficiently encoded by spike timing than by spike count. Spike timing decreases the population size necessary for reliable information transmission and may thereby bring significant advantages in both wiring and metabolic efficiency.</description><subject>Afferent Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Trigeminal Ganglion - physiology</subject><subject>Ventral Thalamic Nuclei - physiology</subject><subject>Vibrissae - innervation</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1PwzAMxSMEgjE4ckU5culw0qbNLkho4ktC4gLnKE1dltEmI8mY9t9T2EDgi5_sn54tPULOGEwYE_xy4SYAU84mHBjbI6NhxjMmpnKfjAAGnUNVHZHjGBcAUAngh-SIc8lEAXxEPma-X-pgo3fUt7TTCZ3ZUO0aGgZNjW-se6WtDzTNkTY2oEl2C6_nNr5hoA223W5q3TcWV7XxIVmjOxp9r5OP6KIPG7rUab7WmxNy0Oou4umuj8nL7c3z7D57fLp7mF0_ZqYQecoKLhtWgRSsBpHXKKemLFA0WLBalkaWXNYMpeSlKbjW9VB5I41sKw1MS5OPydXWd7mqe2wMuhR0p5bB9jpslNdW_d84O1ev_kPlohAw3ByTi51B8O8rjEn1NhrsOu3Qr6JiIDnPZSXLAc22qAk-xoDt7xkG6isrtXDqOyv1ldXAn__97Zf-CSf_BEagkvc</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Storchi, Riccardo</creator><creator>Bale, Michael R</creator><creator>Biella, Gabriele E M</creator><creator>Petersen, Rasmus S</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Comparison of latency and rate coding for the direction of whisker deflection in the subcortical somatosensory pathway</title><author>Storchi, Riccardo ; Bale, Michael R ; Biella, Gabriele E M ; Petersen, Rasmus S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-428d170851b053be89c64e5de41b86c8628b1e8826c42aabbbb3d8c8f7a01a8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Afferent Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Trigeminal Ganglion - physiology</topic><topic>Ventral Thalamic Nuclei - physiology</topic><topic>Vibrissae - innervation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Storchi, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biella, Gabriele E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Rasmus S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Storchi, Riccardo</au><au>Bale, Michael R</au><au>Biella, Gabriele E M</au><au>Petersen, Rasmus S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of latency and rate coding for the direction of whisker deflection in the subcortical somatosensory pathway</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1810</spage><epage>1821</epage><pages>1810-1821</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>The response of many neurons in the whisker somatosensory system depends on the direction in which a whisker is deflected. Although it is known that the spike count conveys information about this parameter, it is not known how important spike timing might be. The aim of this study was to compare neural codes based on spike count and first-spike latency, respectively. We extracellularly recorded single units from either the rat trigeminal ganglion (primary sensory afferents) or ventroposteromedial (VPM) thalamic nucleus in response to deflection in different directions and quantified alternative neural codes using mutual information. We found that neurons were diverse: some (58% in ganglion, 32% in VPM) conveyed information only by spike count; others conveyed additional information by latency. An issue with latency coding is that latency is measured with respect to the time of stimulus onset, a quantity known to the experimenter but not directly to the subject's brain. We found a potential solution using the integrated population activity as an internal timing signal: in this way, 91% of the first-spike latency information could be recovered. Finally, we asked how well direction could be decoded. For large populations, spike count and latency codes performed similarly; for small ones, decoding was more accurate using the latency code. Our findings indicate that whisker deflection direction is more efficiently encoded by spike timing than by spike count. Spike timing decreases the population size necessary for reliable information transmission and may thereby bring significant advantages in both wiring and metabolic efficiency.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>22815402</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00921.2011</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3077 |
ispartof | Journal of neurophysiology, 2012-10, Vol.108 (7), p.1810-1821 |
issn | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3545005 |
source | MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Afferent Pathways - physiology Animals Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory Neurons - physiology Rats Rats, Wistar Reaction Time Trigeminal Ganglion - physiology Ventral Thalamic Nuclei - physiology Vibrissae - innervation |
title | Comparison of latency and rate coding for the direction of whisker deflection in the subcortical somatosensory pathway |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20latency%20and%20rate%20coding%20for%20the%20direction%20of%20whisker%20deflection%20in%20the%20subcortical%20somatosensory%20pathway&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Storchi,%20Riccardo&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1810&rft.epage=1821&rft.pages=1810-1821&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00921.2011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1082238786%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1082238786&rft_id=info:pmid/22815402&rfr_iscdi=true |