Competition Drives Clumpy Species Coexistence in Estuarine Phytoplankton
Understanding the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity is a fundamental problem in ecology. Competition is thought to reduce diversity, but hundreds of microbial aquatic primary producers species coexist and compete for a few essential resources (e.g., nutrients and light). Here, we show that resou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1037-1037, Article 1037 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1037 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1037 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Segura, A. M. Kruk, C. Calliari, D. García-Rodriguez, F. Conde, D. Widdicombe, C. E. Fort, H. |
description | Understanding the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity is a fundamental problem in ecology. Competition is thought to reduce diversity, but hundreds of microbial aquatic primary producers species coexist and compete for a few essential resources (e.g., nutrients and light). Here, we show that resource competition is a plausible mechanism for explaining clumpy distribution on individual species volume (a proxy for the niche) of estuarine phytoplankton communities ranging from North America to South America and Europe, supporting the Emergent Neutrality hypothesis. Furthermore, such a clumpy distribution was also observed throughout the Holocene in diatoms from a sediment core. A Lotka-Volterra competition model predicted position in the niche axis and functional affiliation of dominant species within and among clumps. Results support the coexistence of functionally equivalent species in ecosystems and indicate that resource competition may be a key process to shape the size structure of estuarine phytoplankton, which in turn drives ecosystem functioning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/srep01037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3539148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1273352190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f59635cc690ec2bd48f90d785b4f91445cb36e2fe056ccb7b0f0e043f53773d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkVFLHDEQx0NRVNQHv0BZ6IstnCaZZHfzIpTTVkGwUH0Ou7lZjd1NtklWvG_fyOlx1XmZGebHf2b4E3LE6AmjUJ_GgCPNVfWJ7HEq5IwD51sb9S45jPGR5pBcCaZ2yC4HoIzJeo9czv0wYrLJelecB_uEsZj30zAui98jGvvSeny2MaEzWFhXXMQ0NcE6LH49LJMf-8b9Sd4dkO2u6SMevuZ9cvfj4nZ-Obu--Xk1_349MwLqNOukKkEaUyqKhrcLUXeKLqpatqJTTAhpWiiRd0hlaUxbtbSjSAV0EqoKFgD75GylO07tgAuDLoWm12OwQxOW2jdW_z9x9kHf-ycNEvKCOgscvwoE_3fCmPRgo8E-_4F-iprxCkBypmhGv7xDH_0UXH5Ps1pVAspSsUx9XVEm-Jjd6NbHMKpfLNJrizL7efP6NflmSAa-rYCYR-4ew8bKD2r_AHZlmyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1897436691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition Drives Clumpy Species Coexistence in Estuarine Phytoplankton</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Segura, A. M. ; Kruk, C. ; Calliari, D. ; García-Rodriguez, F. ; Conde, D. ; Widdicombe, C. E. ; Fort, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Segura, A. M. ; Kruk, C. ; Calliari, D. ; García-Rodriguez, F. ; Conde, D. ; Widdicombe, C. E. ; Fort, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity is a fundamental problem in ecology. Competition is thought to reduce diversity, but hundreds of microbial aquatic primary producers species coexist and compete for a few essential resources (e.g., nutrients and light). Here, we show that resource competition is a plausible mechanism for explaining clumpy distribution on individual species volume (a proxy for the niche) of estuarine phytoplankton communities ranging from North America to South America and Europe, supporting the Emergent Neutrality hypothesis. Furthermore, such a clumpy distribution was also observed throughout the Holocene in diatoms from a sediment core. A Lotka-Volterra competition model predicted position in the niche axis and functional affiliation of dominant species within and among clumps. Results support the coexistence of functionally equivalent species in ecosystems and indicate that resource competition may be a key process to shape the size structure of estuarine phytoplankton, which in turn drives ecosystem functioning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep01037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23301158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/670 ; 631/158/853 ; 631/326/2565 ; 631/326/2565/855 ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Coexistence ; Competition ; Diatoms ; Dominant species ; Ecological function ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Estuaries ; Holocene ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Models, Biological ; multidisciplinary ; Niches ; Nutrients ; Phytoplankton ; Phytoplankton - physiology ; Plankton ; Science</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1037-1037, Article 1037</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f59635cc690ec2bd48f90d785b4f91445cb36e2fe056ccb7b0f0e043f53773d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f59635cc690ec2bd48f90d785b4f91445cb36e2fe056ccb7b0f0e043f53773d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539148/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539148/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Segura, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruk, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calliari, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Rodriguez, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widdicombe, C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fort, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Competition Drives Clumpy Species Coexistence in Estuarine Phytoplankton</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Understanding the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity is a fundamental problem in ecology. Competition is thought to reduce diversity, but hundreds of microbial aquatic primary producers species coexist and compete for a few essential resources (e.g., nutrients and light). Here, we show that resource competition is a plausible mechanism for explaining clumpy distribution on individual species volume (a proxy for the niche) of estuarine phytoplankton communities ranging from North America to South America and Europe, supporting the Emergent Neutrality hypothesis. Furthermore, such a clumpy distribution was also observed throughout the Holocene in diatoms from a sediment core. A Lotka-Volterra competition model predicted position in the niche axis and functional affiliation of dominant species within and among clumps. Results support the coexistence of functionally equivalent species in ecosystems and indicate that resource competition may be a key process to shape the size structure of estuarine phytoplankton, which in turn drives ecosystem functioning.</description><subject>631/158/670</subject><subject>631/158/853</subject><subject>631/326/2565</subject><subject>631/326/2565/855</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Holocene</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Phytoplankton - physiology</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Science</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkVFLHDEQx0NRVNQHv0BZ6IstnCaZZHfzIpTTVkGwUH0Ou7lZjd1NtklWvG_fyOlx1XmZGebHf2b4E3LE6AmjUJ_GgCPNVfWJ7HEq5IwD51sb9S45jPGR5pBcCaZ2yC4HoIzJeo9czv0wYrLJelecB_uEsZj30zAui98jGvvSeny2MaEzWFhXXMQ0NcE6LH49LJMf-8b9Sd4dkO2u6SMevuZ9cvfj4nZ-Obu--Xk1_349MwLqNOukKkEaUyqKhrcLUXeKLqpatqJTTAhpWiiRd0hlaUxbtbSjSAV0EqoKFgD75GylO07tgAuDLoWm12OwQxOW2jdW_z9x9kHf-ycNEvKCOgscvwoE_3fCmPRgo8E-_4F-iprxCkBypmhGv7xDH_0UXH5Ps1pVAspSsUx9XVEm-Jjd6NbHMKpfLNJrizL7efP6NflmSAa-rYCYR-4ew8bKD2r_AHZlmyU</recordid><startdate>20130108</startdate><enddate>20130108</enddate><creator>Segura, A. M.</creator><creator>Kruk, C.</creator><creator>Calliari, D.</creator><creator>García-Rodriguez, F.</creator><creator>Conde, D.</creator><creator>Widdicombe, C. E.</creator><creator>Fort, H.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130108</creationdate><title>Competition Drives Clumpy Species Coexistence in Estuarine Phytoplankton</title><author>Segura, A. M. ; Kruk, C. ; Calliari, D. ; García-Rodriguez, F. ; Conde, D. ; Widdicombe, C. E. ; Fort, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f59635cc690ec2bd48f90d785b4f91445cb36e2fe056ccb7b0f0e043f53773d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>631/158/670</topic><topic>631/158/853</topic><topic>631/326/2565</topic><topic>631/326/2565/855</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Holocene</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Phytoplankton - physiology</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Segura, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruk, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calliari, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Rodriguez, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widdicombe, C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fort, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Segura, A. M.</au><au>Kruk, C.</au><au>Calliari, D.</au><au>García-Rodriguez, F.</au><au>Conde, D.</au><au>Widdicombe, C. E.</au><au>Fort, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition Drives Clumpy Species Coexistence in Estuarine Phytoplankton</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2013-01-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1037</spage><epage>1037</epage><pages>1037-1037</pages><artnum>1037</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Understanding the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity is a fundamental problem in ecology. Competition is thought to reduce diversity, but hundreds of microbial aquatic primary producers species coexist and compete for a few essential resources (e.g., nutrients and light). Here, we show that resource competition is a plausible mechanism for explaining clumpy distribution on individual species volume (a proxy for the niche) of estuarine phytoplankton communities ranging from North America to South America and Europe, supporting the Emergent Neutrality hypothesis. Furthermore, such a clumpy distribution was also observed throughout the Holocene in diatoms from a sediment core. A Lotka-Volterra competition model predicted position in the niche axis and functional affiliation of dominant species within and among clumps. Results support the coexistence of functionally equivalent species in ecosystems and indicate that resource competition may be a key process to shape the size structure of estuarine phytoplankton, which in turn drives ecosystem functioning.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23301158</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep01037</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1037-1037, Article 1037 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3539148 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 631/158/670 631/158/853 631/326/2565 631/326/2565/855 Biodiversity Biomass Coexistence Competition Diatoms Dominant species Ecological function Ecology Ecosystem Estuaries Holocene Humanities and Social Sciences Models, Biological multidisciplinary Niches Nutrients Phytoplankton Phytoplankton - physiology Plankton Science |
title | Competition Drives Clumpy Species Coexistence in Estuarine Phytoplankton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T15%3A49%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%20Drives%20Clumpy%20Species%20Coexistence%20in%20Estuarine%20Phytoplankton&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Segura,%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2013-01-08&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1037&rft.epage=1037&rft.pages=1037-1037&rft.artnum=1037&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep01037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1273352190%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1897436691&rft_id=info:pmid/23301158&rfr_iscdi=true |