Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

Purpose We evaluated radiologic and clinical outcomes to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A total of 40 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF for multilevel CSM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1551-1557
Hauptverfasser: Song, Kyung-Jin, Lee, Kwang-Bok, Song, Ji-Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1557
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1551
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 21
creator Song, Kyung-Jin
Lee, Kwang-Bok
Song, Ji-Hoon
description Purpose We evaluated radiologic and clinical outcomes to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A total of 40 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF for multilevel CSM were divided into two groups. Group A ( n  = 25) underwent ACDF and group B ( n  = 15) ACCF. Clinical outcomes (JOA and VAS scores), perioperative parameters (length of hospital stay, blood loss, operation time), radiological parameters (fusion rate, segmental height, cervical lordosis), and complications were compared. Results Both group A and group B demonstrated significant increases in JOA scores and significant decreases in VAS. Patients who underwent ACDF experienced significantly shorter hospital stays ( p  = 0.031), less blood loss ( p  = 0.001), and shorter operation times ( p  = 0.024). Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative cervical lordosis and achieved satisfactory fusion rates (88.0 and 93.3 %, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications among the groups. Conclusions Both ACDF and ACCF provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates for multilevel CSM. However, multilevel ACDF is associated with better radiologic parameters, shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, and shorter operative times.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-012-2296-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3535261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1093452311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cfccb0b48feaefc941d69bfca67a845e98c1cc4b6c8527ca029331c4ee044c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAURiMEotPCA7BBltiwMfgvmZgFEqpaQKrEBtaWc2O3rpw42PG0eSceEo9SRgMIiVUW37nH8fVXVS8oeUMJ2b5NhNRtgwllmDHZ4PtH1YYKzjCRnD2uNkQKgpstlSfVaUq3hNBakuZpdcJYzZpGyk3148JaBxoWFCwasp-dNzvjkR5nE12ICEzcFcCj3iUwMIdhKWGPbE4ujGhnYsoJQYjT36Et80fOgypNYewXH2YHaFiMD5Oeb5Z3SKPBjW7IA6rxYnQsAu_DHc4TSnPul2fVE6t9Ms8fvmfVt8uLr-ef8NWXj5_PP1xhqAmfcQ0WoCOdaK3RxoIUtG9kZ0E3W92K2sgWKIDoGmhrtgVNmOScgjCGCAGMn1XvV--Uu8H0YMY5aq-m6AYdFxW0U78no7tR12GneM3LYmkRvH4QxPA9mzSrYb897_VoQk6KlgcSNeP0f1BejJRKWdBXf6C3IcexbGKluGjkXkhXCmJIKRp7-G9K1L42aq2NKrVR-9qo-zLz8vjCh4lfPSkAW4FUovHaxOOj_2X9CRDk1GE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032634691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Song, Kyung-Jin ; Lee, Kwang-Bok ; Song, Ji-Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Kyung-Jin ; Lee, Kwang-Bok ; Song, Ji-Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose We evaluated radiologic and clinical outcomes to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A total of 40 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF for multilevel CSM were divided into two groups. Group A ( n  = 25) underwent ACDF and group B ( n  = 15) ACCF. Clinical outcomes (JOA and VAS scores), perioperative parameters (length of hospital stay, blood loss, operation time), radiological parameters (fusion rate, segmental height, cervical lordosis), and complications were compared. Results Both group A and group B demonstrated significant increases in JOA scores and significant decreases in VAS. Patients who underwent ACDF experienced significantly shorter hospital stays ( p  = 0.031), less blood loss ( p  = 0.001), and shorter operation times ( p  = 0.024). Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative cervical lordosis and achieved satisfactory fusion rates (88.0 and 93.3 %, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications among the groups. Conclusions Both ACDF and ACCF provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates for multilevel CSM. However, multilevel ACDF is associated with better radiologic parameters, shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, and shorter operative times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2296-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22526699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Blood ; Bone surgery ; Central nervous system diseases ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Diskectomy - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Radiography ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Spine ; Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging ; Spondylosis - surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1551-1557</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cfccb0b48feaefc941d69bfca67a845e98c1cc4b6c8527ca029331c4ee044c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cfccb0b48feaefc941d69bfca67a845e98c1cc4b6c8527ca029331c4ee044c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535261/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535261/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22526699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Kyung-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kwang-Bok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Ji-Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose We evaluated radiologic and clinical outcomes to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A total of 40 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF for multilevel CSM were divided into two groups. Group A ( n  = 25) underwent ACDF and group B ( n  = 15) ACCF. Clinical outcomes (JOA and VAS scores), perioperative parameters (length of hospital stay, blood loss, operation time), radiological parameters (fusion rate, segmental height, cervical lordosis), and complications were compared. Results Both group A and group B demonstrated significant increases in JOA scores and significant decreases in VAS. Patients who underwent ACDF experienced significantly shorter hospital stays ( p  = 0.031), less blood loss ( p  = 0.001), and shorter operation times ( p  = 0.024). Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative cervical lordosis and achieved satisfactory fusion rates (88.0 and 93.3 %, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications among the groups. Conclusions Both ACDF and ACCF provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates for multilevel CSM. However, multilevel ACDF is associated with better radiologic parameters, shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, and shorter operative times.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Central nervous system diseases</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Diskectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spondylosis - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAURiMEotPCA7BBltiwMfgvmZgFEqpaQKrEBtaWc2O3rpw42PG0eSceEo9SRgMIiVUW37nH8fVXVS8oeUMJ2b5NhNRtgwllmDHZ4PtH1YYKzjCRnD2uNkQKgpstlSfVaUq3hNBakuZpdcJYzZpGyk3148JaBxoWFCwasp-dNzvjkR5nE12ICEzcFcCj3iUwMIdhKWGPbE4ujGhnYsoJQYjT36Et80fOgypNYewXH2YHaFiMD5Oeb5Z3SKPBjW7IA6rxYnQsAu_DHc4TSnPul2fVE6t9Ms8fvmfVt8uLr-ef8NWXj5_PP1xhqAmfcQ0WoCOdaK3RxoIUtG9kZ0E3W92K2sgWKIDoGmhrtgVNmOScgjCGCAGMn1XvV--Uu8H0YMY5aq-m6AYdFxW0U78no7tR12GneM3LYmkRvH4QxPA9mzSrYb897_VoQk6KlgcSNeP0f1BejJRKWdBXf6C3IcexbGKluGjkXkhXCmJIKRp7-G9K1L42aq2NKrVR-9qo-zLz8vjCh4lfPSkAW4FUovHaxOOj_2X9CRDk1GE</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Song, Kyung-Jin</creator><creator>Lee, Kwang-Bok</creator><creator>Song, Ji-Hoon</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study</title><author>Song, Kyung-Jin ; Lee, Kwang-Bok ; Song, Ji-Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cfccb0b48feaefc941d69bfca67a845e98c1cc4b6c8527ca029331c4ee044c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Central nervous system diseases</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Diskectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spondylosis - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Kyung-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kwang-Bok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Ji-Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Kyung-Jin</au><au>Lee, Kwang-Bok</au><au>Song, Ji-Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1551</spage><epage>1557</epage><pages>1551-1557</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose We evaluated radiologic and clinical outcomes to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A total of 40 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF for multilevel CSM were divided into two groups. Group A ( n  = 25) underwent ACDF and group B ( n  = 15) ACCF. Clinical outcomes (JOA and VAS scores), perioperative parameters (length of hospital stay, blood loss, operation time), radiological parameters (fusion rate, segmental height, cervical lordosis), and complications were compared. Results Both group A and group B demonstrated significant increases in JOA scores and significant decreases in VAS. Patients who underwent ACDF experienced significantly shorter hospital stays ( p  = 0.031), less blood loss ( p  = 0.001), and shorter operation times ( p  = 0.024). Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative cervical lordosis and achieved satisfactory fusion rates (88.0 and 93.3 %, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications among the groups. Conclusions Both ACDF and ACCF provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates for multilevel CSM. However, multilevel ACDF is associated with better radiologic parameters, shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, and shorter operative times.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22526699</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-012-2296-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1551-1557
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3535261
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Blood
Bone surgery
Central nervous system diseases
Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Diskectomy - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neurosurgery
Original
Original Article
Radiography
Spinal cord
Spinal Fusion - methods
Spine
Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging
Spondylosis - surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T17%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20multilevel%20anterior%20cervical%20discectomy%20and%20fusion%20versus%20corpectomy%20and%20fusion%20for%20multilevel%20cervical%20spondylotic%20myelopathy:%20a%20minimum%205-year%20follow-up%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Song,%20Kyung-Jin&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1551&rft.epage=1557&rft.pages=1551-1557&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-012-2296-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1093452311%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032634691&rft_id=info:pmid/22526699&rfr_iscdi=true