Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound
ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)‐based microarrays for pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 2858 pregnancies with abnormal ultrasounds and normal kary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prenatal diagnosis 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.986-995 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 995 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 986 |
container_title | Prenatal diagnosis |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Shaffer, Lisa G. Rosenfeld, Jill A. Dabell, Mindy P. Coppinger, Justine Bandholz, Anne M. Ellison, Jay W. Ravnan, J. Britt Torchia, Beth S. Ballif, Blake C. Fisher, Allan J. |
description | ABSTRACT
Objective
The aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)‐based microarrays for pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 2858 pregnancies with abnormal ultrasounds and normal karyotypes (when performed) tested in our laboratory using CGH microarrays targeted to known chromosomal syndromes with later versions providing backbone coverage of the entire genome. Abnormalities were stratified according to organ system involvement. Detection rates for clinically significant findings among these categories were calculated.
Results
Clinically significant genomic alterations were identified in cases with a single ultrasound anomaly (n = 99/1773, 5.6%), anomalies in two or more organ systems (n = 77/808, 9.5%), isolated growth abnormalities (n = 2/76, 2.6%), and soft markers (n = 2/77, 2.6%). The following anomalies in isolation or with additional anomalies had particularly high detection rates: holoprosencephaly (n = 9/85, 10.6%), posterior fossa defects (n = 21/144, 14.6%), skeletal anomalies (n = 15/140, 10.7%), ventricular septal defect (n = 14/132, 10.6%), hypoplastic left heart (n = 11/68, 16.2%), and cleft lip/palate (n = 14/136, 10.3%).
Conclusions
Microarray analysis identified clinically significant genomic alterations in 6.5% of cases with one or more abnormal ultrasound findings; the majority were below the resolution of karyotyping. Larger data sets such as this allow for sub‐stratification by specific anomalies to determine risks for genomic alterations detectable by microarray analysis. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pd.3943 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3509216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1082236630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-a714b2abd6e8703e2d15a799e7a0b95718f92f2c5992923b127f94225686a2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU-P0zAQxS0EYsuC-AbIN5BWWfynieMLEtpdClK1sFIljtYkmRSDYxc7AXLlk-PSUsGBk-3xb94bzSPkKWeXnDHxctddSr2U98iCM60KJoS8TxaM57usS35GHqX0OYO10OohOROiXiql6gX5eY0jtqMNnkYYMdHQ09ZZb1twbqbJbr3t88OPdIs-DLal4EbMbG5JtJlpLsUAMcJMwYObk020D5GmHbb71lwNAzibtbvfXtjt2yY3Rkhh8t1j8qAHl_DJ8Twnmzc3m6u3xfr96t3V63XRlkzLAhRfNgKarsJaMYmi4yUorVEBa3SpeN1r0Yu21FpoIRsuVK-XQpRVXYEAeU5eHWR3UzNg16LPAzizi3aAOJsA1vz74-0nsw3fjMz2gldZ4MVRIIavE6bRDDa16Bx4DFMynNV57VUlWUafH9C8mpQi9icbzsw-MLPrzD6wTD77e6oT9yehDFwcgO_W4fw_HfPh-ihXHGibRvxxoiF-MZWSqjQfb1dmtdbqrrq7NRv5Cw-1sP4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1082236630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Shaffer, Lisa G. ; Rosenfeld, Jill A. ; Dabell, Mindy P. ; Coppinger, Justine ; Bandholz, Anne M. ; Ellison, Jay W. ; Ravnan, J. Britt ; Torchia, Beth S. ; Ballif, Blake C. ; Fisher, Allan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Lisa G. ; Rosenfeld, Jill A. ; Dabell, Mindy P. ; Coppinger, Justine ; Bandholz, Anne M. ; Ellison, Jay W. ; Ravnan, J. Britt ; Torchia, Beth S. ; Ballif, Blake C. ; Fisher, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objective
The aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)‐based microarrays for pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 2858 pregnancies with abnormal ultrasounds and normal karyotypes (when performed) tested in our laboratory using CGH microarrays targeted to known chromosomal syndromes with later versions providing backbone coverage of the entire genome. Abnormalities were stratified according to organ system involvement. Detection rates for clinically significant findings among these categories were calculated.
Results
Clinically significant genomic alterations were identified in cases with a single ultrasound anomaly (n = 99/1773, 5.6%), anomalies in two or more organ systems (n = 77/808, 9.5%), isolated growth abnormalities (n = 2/76, 2.6%), and soft markers (n = 2/77, 2.6%). The following anomalies in isolation or with additional anomalies had particularly high detection rates: holoprosencephaly (n = 9/85, 10.6%), posterior fossa defects (n = 21/144, 14.6%), skeletal anomalies (n = 15/140, 10.7%), ventricular septal defect (n = 14/132, 10.6%), hypoplastic left heart (n = 11/68, 16.2%), and cleft lip/palate (n = 14/136, 10.3%).
Conclusions
Microarray analysis identified clinically significant genomic alterations in 6.5% of cases with one or more abnormal ultrasound findings; the majority were below the resolution of karyotyping. Larger data sets such as this allow for sub‐stratification by specific anomalies to determine risks for genomic alterations detectable by microarray analysis. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.3943</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22847778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>abnormal ultrasound ; Adult ; Array CGH < PRENATAL CYTOGENETICS ; Bone and Bones - abnormalities ; Brain - abnormalities ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; Congenital Abnormalities - diagnostic imaging ; Congenital Abnormalities - genetics ; congenital anomalies ; Female ; Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Defects, Congenital - genetics ; Holoprosencephaly - diagnostic imaging ; Holoprosencephaly - genetics ; Humans ; Karyotyping ; microarray ; Microarray Analysis - methods ; Mutation - genetics ; Original ; Pregnancy ; prenatal ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; soft markers ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.986-995</ispartof><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-a714b2abd6e8703e2d15a799e7a0b95718f92f2c5992923b127f94225686a2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-a714b2abd6e8703e2d15a799e7a0b95718f92f2c5992923b127f94225686a2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.3943$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.3943$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22847778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Lisa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Jill A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabell, Mindy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppinger, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandholz, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Jay W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravnan, J. Britt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torchia, Beth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballif, Blake C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objective
The aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)‐based microarrays for pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 2858 pregnancies with abnormal ultrasounds and normal karyotypes (when performed) tested in our laboratory using CGH microarrays targeted to known chromosomal syndromes with later versions providing backbone coverage of the entire genome. Abnormalities were stratified according to organ system involvement. Detection rates for clinically significant findings among these categories were calculated.
Results
Clinically significant genomic alterations were identified in cases with a single ultrasound anomaly (n = 99/1773, 5.6%), anomalies in two or more organ systems (n = 77/808, 9.5%), isolated growth abnormalities (n = 2/76, 2.6%), and soft markers (n = 2/77, 2.6%). The following anomalies in isolation or with additional anomalies had particularly high detection rates: holoprosencephaly (n = 9/85, 10.6%), posterior fossa defects (n = 21/144, 14.6%), skeletal anomalies (n = 15/140, 10.7%), ventricular septal defect (n = 14/132, 10.6%), hypoplastic left heart (n = 11/68, 16.2%), and cleft lip/palate (n = 14/136, 10.3%).
Conclusions
Microarray analysis identified clinically significant genomic alterations in 6.5% of cases with one or more abnormal ultrasound findings; the majority were below the resolution of karyotyping. Larger data sets such as this allow for sub‐stratification by specific anomalies to determine risks for genomic alterations detectable by microarray analysis. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>abnormal ultrasound</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Array CGH < PRENATAL CYTOGENETICS</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - abnormalities</subject><subject>Brain - abnormalities</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Comparative Genomic Hybridization</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - genetics</subject><subject>congenital anomalies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - genetics</subject><subject>Holoprosencephaly - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Holoprosencephaly - genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Karyotyping</subject><subject>microarray</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>prenatal</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>soft markers</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU-P0zAQxS0EYsuC-AbIN5BWWfynieMLEtpdClK1sFIljtYkmRSDYxc7AXLlk-PSUsGBk-3xb94bzSPkKWeXnDHxctddSr2U98iCM60KJoS8TxaM57usS35GHqX0OYO10OohOROiXiql6gX5eY0jtqMNnkYYMdHQ09ZZb1twbqbJbr3t88OPdIs-DLal4EbMbG5JtJlpLsUAMcJMwYObk020D5GmHbb71lwNAzibtbvfXtjt2yY3Rkhh8t1j8qAHl_DJ8Twnmzc3m6u3xfr96t3V63XRlkzLAhRfNgKarsJaMYmi4yUorVEBa3SpeN1r0Yu21FpoIRsuVK-XQpRVXYEAeU5eHWR3UzNg16LPAzizi3aAOJsA1vz74-0nsw3fjMz2gldZ4MVRIIavE6bRDDa16Bx4DFMynNV57VUlWUafH9C8mpQi9icbzsw-MLPrzD6wTD77e6oT9yehDFwcgO_W4fw_HfPh-ihXHGibRvxxoiF-MZWSqjQfb1dmtdbqrrq7NRv5Cw-1sP4</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Shaffer, Lisa G.</creator><creator>Rosenfeld, Jill A.</creator><creator>Dabell, Mindy P.</creator><creator>Coppinger, Justine</creator><creator>Bandholz, Anne M.</creator><creator>Ellison, Jay W.</creator><creator>Ravnan, J. Britt</creator><creator>Torchia, Beth S.</creator><creator>Ballif, Blake C.</creator><creator>Fisher, Allan J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound</title><author>Shaffer, Lisa G. ; Rosenfeld, Jill A. ; Dabell, Mindy P. ; Coppinger, Justine ; Bandholz, Anne M. ; Ellison, Jay W. ; Ravnan, J. Britt ; Torchia, Beth S. ; Ballif, Blake C. ; Fisher, Allan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-a714b2abd6e8703e2d15a799e7a0b95718f92f2c5992923b127f94225686a2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>abnormal ultrasound</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Array CGH < PRENATAL CYTOGENETICS</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - abnormalities</topic><topic>Brain - abnormalities</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Comparative Genomic Hybridization</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - genetics</topic><topic>congenital anomalies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - genetics</topic><topic>Holoprosencephaly - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Holoprosencephaly - genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Karyotyping</topic><topic>microarray</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>prenatal</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>soft markers</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Lisa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Jill A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabell, Mindy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppinger, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandholz, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Jay W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravnan, J. Britt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torchia, Beth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballif, Blake C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaffer, Lisa G.</au><au>Rosenfeld, Jill A.</au><au>Dabell, Mindy P.</au><au>Coppinger, Justine</au><au>Bandholz, Anne M.</au><au>Ellison, Jay W.</au><au>Ravnan, J. Britt</au><au>Torchia, Beth S.</au><au>Ballif, Blake C.</au><au>Fisher, Allan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>986</spage><epage>995</epage><pages>986-995</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objective
The aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)‐based microarrays for pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 2858 pregnancies with abnormal ultrasounds and normal karyotypes (when performed) tested in our laboratory using CGH microarrays targeted to known chromosomal syndromes with later versions providing backbone coverage of the entire genome. Abnormalities were stratified according to organ system involvement. Detection rates for clinically significant findings among these categories were calculated.
Results
Clinically significant genomic alterations were identified in cases with a single ultrasound anomaly (n = 99/1773, 5.6%), anomalies in two or more organ systems (n = 77/808, 9.5%), isolated growth abnormalities (n = 2/76, 2.6%), and soft markers (n = 2/77, 2.6%). The following anomalies in isolation or with additional anomalies had particularly high detection rates: holoprosencephaly (n = 9/85, 10.6%), posterior fossa defects (n = 21/144, 14.6%), skeletal anomalies (n = 15/140, 10.7%), ventricular septal defect (n = 14/132, 10.6%), hypoplastic left heart (n = 11/68, 16.2%), and cleft lip/palate (n = 14/136, 10.3%).
Conclusions
Microarray analysis identified clinically significant genomic alterations in 6.5% of cases with one or more abnormal ultrasound findings; the majority were below the resolution of karyotyping. Larger data sets such as this allow for sub‐stratification by specific anomalies to determine risks for genomic alterations detectable by microarray analysis. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22847778</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.3943</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-3851 |
ispartof | Prenatal diagnosis, 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.986-995 |
issn | 0197-3851 1097-0223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3509216 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | abnormal ultrasound Adult Array CGH < PRENATAL CYTOGENETICS Bone and Bones - abnormalities Brain - abnormalities Chromosome Aberrations Comparative Genomic Hybridization Congenital Abnormalities - diagnostic imaging Congenital Abnormalities - genetics congenital anomalies Female Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging Heart Defects, Congenital - genetics Holoprosencephaly - diagnostic imaging Holoprosencephaly - genetics Humans Karyotyping microarray Microarray Analysis - methods Mutation - genetics Original Pregnancy prenatal Prenatal Diagnosis - methods Retrospective Studies soft markers Ultrasonography, Prenatal |
title | Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A23%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20rates%20of%20clinically%20significant%20genomic%20alterations%20by%20microarray%20analysis%20for%20specific%20anomalies%20detected%20by%20ultrasound&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Shaffer,%20Lisa%20G.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=986&rft.epage=995&rft.pages=986-995&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.3943&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1082236630%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1082236630&rft_id=info:pmid/22847778&rfr_iscdi=true |