General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
Objectives To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes.Design Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2012-11, Vol.345 (7884), p.14-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7884 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | BMJ (Online) |
container_volume | 345 |
creator | Krogsbøll, Lasse T Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl Larsen, Christian Grønhøj Gøtzsche, Peter C |
description | Objectives To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes.Design Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the results with random effects meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible.Data sources Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EPOC register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies, citation tracking (Web of Knowledge), and contacts with trialists.Selection criteria Randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adult populations unselected for disease or risk factors. Health checks defined as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. We did not include geriatric trials.Data extraction Two observers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary.Results We identified 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182 880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (11 940 deaths), and they gave a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17), and eight on cancer mortality (3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. We did not find beneficial effects of general health checks on morbidity, hospitalisation, disability, worry, additional physician visits, or absence from work, but not all trials reported on these outcomes. One trial found that health checks led to a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group and an increased number of people with self reported chronic conditions, and one trial found an increased prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Two out of four trials found an increased use of antihypertensives. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self reported health, which could be due to bias.Conclusions General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor fo |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.e7191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3502745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41724341</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41724341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-be842925810bc665fd4ef0081f26e9b28f5aadba02f6d218113c08b09ecbfb7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAcxCMEoqvSAx8AZAmQ4JBiO_EjHJDQipZHVTgAV8t2_ul6m8TFdgp74qvjJWXLQ-rJsubn0YynKO4TfEhIxZ-bYX0IgjTkVrEggvGSyKq6XSxww5pSkkruFQcxrjHGtBKy4exusUcrwhvJ5aL4cQwjBN2jFeg-rZBdgT2PyI1It1OfIup8QAHaybrxDA0-GNe6tEF6bLe3pPvtrQt-QK2LoCO8QEtvV0GPgOImJhh0cjZbXDr4Nj-DpEs96n4TXbxX3Ol0H-Hg6twvPh-9_rR8U558OH67fHVSGiZ4Kg3ImjaUSYKN5Zx1bQ0dxpJ0lENjqOyY1q3RmHa8pUTmn7FYGtyANZ0RbbVfvJx9LyYzQGthTLm1ughu0GGjvHbqb2V0K3XmL1XFMBU1ywZPrwyC_zpBTGpw0ULf56J-iooQyRvCKa0z-ugfdO2nkAtnqslWhImK3kjRmnBSCS4y9WymbPAxBuh2kQlW2_1V3l_92j-zD__suCN_r52BBzOwjsmHnV4TkVPXW4Ny1l3e7ftO1-Fc5SiCqdMvS4WXH49O6_dcvcv845nfZrgp15Nr7Lrkf9xP7OTd8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1945315732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Krogsbøll, Lasse T ; Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl ; Larsen, Christian Grønhøj ; Gøtzsche, Peter C</creator><creatorcontrib>Krogsbøll, Lasse T ; Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl ; Larsen, Christian Grønhøj ; Gøtzsche, Peter C</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes.Design Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the results with random effects meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible.Data sources Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EPOC register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies, citation tracking (Web of Knowledge), and contacts with trialists.Selection criteria Randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adult populations unselected for disease or risk factors. Health checks defined as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. We did not include geriatric trials.Data extraction Two observers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary.Results We identified 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182 880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (11 940 deaths), and they gave a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17), and eight on cancer mortality (3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. We did not find beneficial effects of general health checks on morbidity, hospitalisation, disability, worry, additional physician visits, or absence from work, but not all trials reported on these outcomes. One trial found that health checks led to a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group and an increased number of people with self reported chronic conditions, and one trial found an increased prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Two out of four trials found an increased use of antihypertensives. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self reported health, which could be due to bias.Conclusions General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor for cardiovascular or cancer causes, although they increased the number of new diagnoses. Important harmful outcomes were often not studied or reported.Systematic review registration Cochrane Library, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009009.</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23169868</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antihypertensives ; Cancer ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; Death ; Diagnosis ; Disease ; Disease prevention ; Disease risk ; Diseases ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Evidence-based medicine ; Genetic screening ; Health outcomes ; Heart ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Internet ; Intervention ; Lipid Disorders ; Medical screening ; Mens health ; Meta-analysis ; Metabolic Disorders ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Older people ; Physical examinations ; Predisposing factors ; Primary care ; Primary Prevention ; Reviews ; Risk factors ; Screening (Epidemiology) ; Screening (Oncology) ; Screening (Public Health) ; Sensitivity analysis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2012-11, Vol.345 (7884), p.14-14</ispartof><rights>Krogsbøll et al 2012</rights><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2012</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Nov 24, 2012</rights><rights>2012 Krogsbøll et al 2012 Krogsbøll et al This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Krogsbøll et al 2012 2012 Krogsbøll et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e7191.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e7191.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,776,780,799,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,30976,55321,57992,58225,77569,77600,77628,77654</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23169868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krogsbøll, Lasse T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Christian Grønhøj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gøtzsche, Peter C</creatorcontrib><title>General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objectives To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes.Design Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the results with random effects meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible.Data sources Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EPOC register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies, citation tracking (Web of Knowledge), and contacts with trialists.Selection criteria Randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adult populations unselected for disease or risk factors. Health checks defined as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. We did not include geriatric trials.Data extraction Two observers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary.Results We identified 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182 880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (11 940 deaths), and they gave a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17), and eight on cancer mortality (3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. We did not find beneficial effects of general health checks on morbidity, hospitalisation, disability, worry, additional physician visits, or absence from work, but not all trials reported on these outcomes. One trial found that health checks led to a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group and an increased number of people with self reported chronic conditions, and one trial found an increased prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Two out of four trials found an increased use of antihypertensives. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self reported health, which could be due to bias.Conclusions General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor for cardiovascular or cancer causes, although they increased the number of new diagnoses. Important harmful outcomes were often not studied or reported.Systematic review registration Cochrane Library, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009009.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Disease risk</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lipid Disorders</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metabolic Disorders</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physical examinations</subject><subject>Predisposing factors</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Prevention</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Screening (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Screening (Oncology)</subject><subject>Screening (Public Health)</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAcxCMEoqvSAx8AZAmQ4JBiO_EjHJDQipZHVTgAV8t2_ul6m8TFdgp74qvjJWXLQ-rJsubn0YynKO4TfEhIxZ-bYX0IgjTkVrEggvGSyKq6XSxww5pSkkruFQcxrjHGtBKy4exusUcrwhvJ5aL4cQwjBN2jFeg-rZBdgT2PyI1It1OfIup8QAHaybrxDA0-GNe6tEF6bLe3pPvtrQt-QK2LoCO8QEtvV0GPgOImJhh0cjZbXDr4Nj-DpEs96n4TXbxX3Ol0H-Hg6twvPh-9_rR8U558OH67fHVSGiZ4Kg3ImjaUSYKN5Zx1bQ0dxpJ0lENjqOyY1q3RmHa8pUTmn7FYGtyANZ0RbbVfvJx9LyYzQGthTLm1ughu0GGjvHbqb2V0K3XmL1XFMBU1ywZPrwyC_zpBTGpw0ULf56J-iooQyRvCKa0z-ugfdO2nkAtnqslWhImK3kjRmnBSCS4y9WymbPAxBuh2kQlW2_1V3l_92j-zD__suCN_r52BBzOwjsmHnV4TkVPXW4Ny1l3e7ftO1-Fc5SiCqdMvS4WXH49O6_dcvcv845nfZrgp15Nr7Lrkf9xP7OTd8w</recordid><startdate>20121120</startdate><enddate>20121120</enddate><creator>Krogsbøll, Lasse T</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl</creator><creator>Larsen, Christian Grønhøj</creator><creator>Gøtzsche, Peter C</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121120</creationdate><title>General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Krogsbøll, Lasse T ; Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl ; Larsen, Christian Grønhøj ; Gøtzsche, Peter C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-be842925810bc665fd4ef0081f26e9b28f5aadba02f6d218113c08b09ecbfb7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Disease risk</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lipid Disorders</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metabolic Disorders</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physical examinations</topic><topic>Predisposing factors</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Prevention</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Screening (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Screening (Oncology)</topic><topic>Screening (Public Health)</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krogsbøll, Lasse T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Christian Grønhøj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gøtzsche, Peter C</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krogsbøll, Lasse T</au><au>Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl</au><au>Larsen, Christian Grønhøj</au><au>Gøtzsche, Peter C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><stitle>BMJ</stitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2012-11-20</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>345</volume><issue>7884</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>14-14</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Objectives To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes.Design Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the results with random effects meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible.Data sources Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EPOC register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies, citation tracking (Web of Knowledge), and contacts with trialists.Selection criteria Randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adult populations unselected for disease or risk factors. Health checks defined as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. We did not include geriatric trials.Data extraction Two observers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary.Results We identified 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182 880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (11 940 deaths), and they gave a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17), and eight on cancer mortality (3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. We did not find beneficial effects of general health checks on morbidity, hospitalisation, disability, worry, additional physician visits, or absence from work, but not all trials reported on these outcomes. One trial found that health checks led to a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group and an increased number of people with self reported chronic conditions, and one trial found an increased prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Two out of four trials found an increased use of antihypertensives. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self reported health, which could be due to bias.Conclusions General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor for cardiovascular or cancer causes, although they increased the number of new diagnoses. Important harmful outcomes were often not studied or reported.Systematic review registration Cochrane Library, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009009.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>23169868</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.e7191</doi><tpages>1</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2012-11, Vol.345 (7884), p.14-14 |
issn | 0959-8138 1756-1833 0959-8146 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3502745 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Adult Antihypertensives Cancer Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases Clinical trials Collaboration Death Diagnosis Disease Disease prevention Disease risk Diseases Epidemiologic Studies Evidence-based medicine Genetic screening Health outcomes Heart Humans Hypertension Internet Intervention Lipid Disorders Medical screening Mens health Meta-analysis Metabolic Disorders Morbidity Mortality Older people Physical examinations Predisposing factors Primary care Primary Prevention Reviews Risk factors Screening (Epidemiology) Screening (Oncology) Screening (Public Health) Sensitivity analysis Systematic review |
title | General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T21%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=General%20health%20checks%20in%20adults%20for%20reducing%20morbidity%20and%20mortality%20from%20disease:%20Cochrane%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Krogsb%C3%B8ll,%20Lasse%20T&rft.date=2012-11-20&rft.volume=345&rft.issue=7884&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=14-14&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.e7191&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41724341%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1945315732&rft_id=info:pmid/23169868&rft_jstor_id=41724341&rfr_iscdi=true |