Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells is Not Associated with Improved Central Venous Oxygen Saturation or Organ Function in Patients with Septic Shock
Abstract Background The exact role of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion in the setting of early resuscitation in septic shock is unknown. Study Objective To evaluate whether PRBC transfusion is associated with improved central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) or organ function in patients wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of emergency medicine 2012-10, Vol.43 (4), p.593-598 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 598 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 593 |
container_title | The Journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Fuller, Brian M., MD Gajera, Mithil, MD Schorr, Christa, RN Gerber, David, DO Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD Parrillo, Joseph, MD Zanotti, Sergio, MD |
description | Abstract Background The exact role of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion in the setting of early resuscitation in septic shock is unknown. Study Objective To evaluate whether PRBC transfusion is associated with improved central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) or organ function in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock receiving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Methods Retrospective cohort study (n = 93) of patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with EGDT. Results Thirty-four of 93 patients received at least one PRBC transfusion. The ScvO2 goal > 70% was achieved in 71.9% of the PRBC group and 66.1% of the no-PRBC group ( p = 0.30). There was no difference in the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within the first 24 h in the PRBC group vs. the no-PRBC group (8.6–8.3 vs. 5.8–5.6, p = 0.85), time to achievement of central venous pressure > 8 mm Hg (732 min vs. 465 min, p = 0.14), or the use of norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure > 65 mm Hg (81.3% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.77). Conclusions In this study, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved cellular oxygenation, as demonstrated by a lack of improved achievement of ScvO2 > 70%. Also, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved organ function or improved achievement of the other goals of EGDT. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of transfusion of PRBC within the context of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3500776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0736467912001278</els_id><sourcerecordid>1095455510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-d6a557564025fcd106fb35483df0760927598f1dbd7e62f9125068bf3ba273663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAUjBCIbgu_UPnIJemzEzvJpaKsKFSq2IotXC3HcXadzdpbO1nYL-HKt_BlOE1bARcOlqX3ZubZMy-KTjEkGDA7a5NWbZXbqjohgEkCOIG0eBbNSEpJTIGUz6MZ5CmLM5aXR9Gx9y0AzqHAL6MjQrKMhvos-nHrhPHN4LU1yDboRsiNqtHncN511tZorrrOI-3RJ9ujC--t1KIP3W-6X6Or7c7ZvRpRpneiQ1-VsYNHi--HlTJoKfrBif5e2qGFWwmDLgcj7yva_Pp5E5qB6Se1pdr1WqLl2srNq-hFIzqvXj_cJ9GXy_e384_x9eLD1fziOpaUsD6umaA0pywDQhtZY2BNldKsSOsGcgYlyWlZNLiu6lwx0pSYUGBF1aSVIMEclp5E55PubqiCmXL6B985vRXuwK3Q_O-O0Wu-snueUoA8HwXePAg4ezco3_Ot9jKYJowKVnAMJc0opRgClE1Q6az3TjVPYzDwMVXe8sdU-ZgqB8xDqoF4-ucjn2iPMQbA2wmgglV7rRz3MhgrVa2dkj2vrf7_jPN_JGSnjZai26iD8q0dnAlBcMx94PDluFvjamES1orkRfobZbbPEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1095455510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells is Not Associated with Improved Central Venous Oxygen Saturation or Organ Function in Patients with Septic Shock</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Fuller, Brian M., MD ; Gajera, Mithil, MD ; Schorr, Christa, RN ; Gerber, David, DO ; Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD ; Parrillo, Joseph, MD ; Zanotti, Sergio, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Brian M., MD ; Gajera, Mithil, MD ; Schorr, Christa, RN ; Gerber, David, DO ; Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD ; Parrillo, Joseph, MD ; Zanotti, Sergio, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The exact role of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion in the setting of early resuscitation in septic shock is unknown. Study Objective To evaluate whether PRBC transfusion is associated with improved central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) or organ function in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock receiving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Methods Retrospective cohort study (n = 93) of patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with EGDT. Results Thirty-four of 93 patients received at least one PRBC transfusion. The ScvO2 goal > 70% was achieved in 71.9% of the PRBC group and 66.1% of the no-PRBC group ( p = 0.30). There was no difference in the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within the first 24 h in the PRBC group vs. the no-PRBC group (8.6–8.3 vs. 5.8–5.6, p = 0.85), time to achievement of central venous pressure > 8 mm Hg (732 min vs. 465 min, p = 0.14), or the use of norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure > 65 mm Hg (81.3% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.77). Conclusions In this study, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved cellular oxygenation, as demonstrated by a lack of improved achievement of ScvO2 > 70%. Also, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved organ function or improved achievement of the other goals of EGDT. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of transfusion of PRBC within the context of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22445679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arterial Pressure ; Central Venous Pressure ; early goal-directed therapy ; Emergency ; Erythrocyte Transfusion ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Norepinephrine - therapeutic use ; Organ Dysfunction Scores ; Oxygen - blood ; packed red blood cells ; Retrospective Studies ; sepsis ; septic shock ; Shock, Septic - blood ; Shock, Septic - physiopathology ; Shock, Septic - therapy ; Time Factors ; transfusion ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2012-10, Vol.43 (4), p.593-598</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-d6a557564025fcd106fb35483df0760927598f1dbd7e62f9125068bf3ba273663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-d6a557564025fcd106fb35483df0760927598f1dbd7e62f9125068bf3ba273663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Brian M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajera, Mithil, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schorr, Christa, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, David, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrillo, Joseph, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, Sergio, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells is Not Associated with Improved Central Venous Oxygen Saturation or Organ Function in Patients with Septic Shock</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The exact role of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion in the setting of early resuscitation in septic shock is unknown. Study Objective To evaluate whether PRBC transfusion is associated with improved central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) or organ function in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock receiving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Methods Retrospective cohort study (n = 93) of patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with EGDT. Results Thirty-four of 93 patients received at least one PRBC transfusion. The ScvO2 goal > 70% was achieved in 71.9% of the PRBC group and 66.1% of the no-PRBC group ( p = 0.30). There was no difference in the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within the first 24 h in the PRBC group vs. the no-PRBC group (8.6–8.3 vs. 5.8–5.6, p = 0.85), time to achievement of central venous pressure > 8 mm Hg (732 min vs. 465 min, p = 0.14), or the use of norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure > 65 mm Hg (81.3% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.77). Conclusions In this study, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved cellular oxygenation, as demonstrated by a lack of improved achievement of ScvO2 > 70%. Also, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved organ function or improved achievement of the other goals of EGDT. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of transfusion of PRBC within the context of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock.</description><subject>Arterial Pressure</subject><subject>Central Venous Pressure</subject><subject>early goal-directed therapy</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Norepinephrine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Organ Dysfunction Scores</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>packed red blood cells</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>sepsis</subject><subject>septic shock</subject><subject>Shock, Septic - blood</subject><subject>Shock, Septic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shock, Septic - therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>transfusion</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAUjBCIbgu_UPnIJemzEzvJpaKsKFSq2IotXC3HcXadzdpbO1nYL-HKt_BlOE1bARcOlqX3ZubZMy-KTjEkGDA7a5NWbZXbqjohgEkCOIG0eBbNSEpJTIGUz6MZ5CmLM5aXR9Gx9y0AzqHAL6MjQrKMhvos-nHrhPHN4LU1yDboRsiNqtHncN511tZorrrOI-3RJ9ujC--t1KIP3W-6X6Or7c7ZvRpRpneiQ1-VsYNHi--HlTJoKfrBif5e2qGFWwmDLgcj7yva_Pp5E5qB6Se1pdr1WqLl2srNq-hFIzqvXj_cJ9GXy_e384_x9eLD1fziOpaUsD6umaA0pywDQhtZY2BNldKsSOsGcgYlyWlZNLiu6lwx0pSYUGBF1aSVIMEclp5E55PubqiCmXL6B985vRXuwK3Q_O-O0Wu-snueUoA8HwXePAg4ezco3_Ot9jKYJowKVnAMJc0opRgClE1Q6az3TjVPYzDwMVXe8sdU-ZgqB8xDqoF4-ucjn2iPMQbA2wmgglV7rRz3MhgrVa2dkj2vrf7_jPN_JGSnjZai26iD8q0dnAlBcMx94PDluFvjamES1orkRfobZbbPEg</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Fuller, Brian M., MD</creator><creator>Gajera, Mithil, MD</creator><creator>Schorr, Christa, RN</creator><creator>Gerber, David, DO</creator><creator>Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD</creator><creator>Parrillo, Joseph, MD</creator><creator>Zanotti, Sergio, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells is Not Associated with Improved Central Venous Oxygen Saturation or Organ Function in Patients with Septic Shock</title><author>Fuller, Brian M., MD ; Gajera, Mithil, MD ; Schorr, Christa, RN ; Gerber, David, DO ; Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD ; Parrillo, Joseph, MD ; Zanotti, Sergio, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-d6a557564025fcd106fb35483df0760927598f1dbd7e62f9125068bf3ba273663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arterial Pressure</topic><topic>Central Venous Pressure</topic><topic>early goal-directed therapy</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Norepinephrine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Organ Dysfunction Scores</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>packed red blood cells</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>sepsis</topic><topic>septic shock</topic><topic>Shock, Septic - blood</topic><topic>Shock, Septic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shock, Septic - therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>transfusion</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Brian M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajera, Mithil, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schorr, Christa, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, David, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrillo, Joseph, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, Sergio, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuller, Brian M., MD</au><au>Gajera, Mithil, MD</au><au>Schorr, Christa, RN</au><au>Gerber, David, DO</au><au>Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD</au><au>Parrillo, Joseph, MD</au><au>Zanotti, Sergio, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells is Not Associated with Improved Central Venous Oxygen Saturation or Organ Function in Patients with Septic Shock</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>593-598</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The exact role of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion in the setting of early resuscitation in septic shock is unknown. Study Objective To evaluate whether PRBC transfusion is associated with improved central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) or organ function in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock receiving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Methods Retrospective cohort study (n = 93) of patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with EGDT. Results Thirty-four of 93 patients received at least one PRBC transfusion. The ScvO2 goal > 70% was achieved in 71.9% of the PRBC group and 66.1% of the no-PRBC group ( p = 0.30). There was no difference in the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within the first 24 h in the PRBC group vs. the no-PRBC group (8.6–8.3 vs. 5.8–5.6, p = 0.85), time to achievement of central venous pressure > 8 mm Hg (732 min vs. 465 min, p = 0.14), or the use of norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure > 65 mm Hg (81.3% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.77). Conclusions In this study, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved cellular oxygenation, as demonstrated by a lack of improved achievement of ScvO2 > 70%. Also, the transfusion of PRBC was not associated with improved organ function or improved achievement of the other goals of EGDT. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of transfusion of PRBC within the context of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22445679</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.038</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-4679 |
ispartof | The Journal of emergency medicine, 2012-10, Vol.43 (4), p.593-598 |
issn | 0736-4679 2352-5029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3500776 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Arterial Pressure Central Venous Pressure early goal-directed therapy Emergency Erythrocyte Transfusion Female Humans Male Middle Aged Norepinephrine - therapeutic use Organ Dysfunction Scores Oxygen - blood packed red blood cells Retrospective Studies sepsis septic shock Shock, Septic - blood Shock, Septic - physiopathology Shock, Septic - therapy Time Factors transfusion Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use |
title | Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells is Not Associated with Improved Central Venous Oxygen Saturation or Organ Function in Patients with Septic Shock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transfusion%20of%20Packed%20Red%20Blood%20Cells%20is%20Not%20Associated%20with%20Improved%20Central%20Venous%20Oxygen%20Saturation%20or%20Organ%20Function%20in%C2%A0Patients%20with%20Septic%20Shock&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Fuller,%20Brian%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=593-598&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1095455510%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1095455510&rft_id=info:pmid/22445679&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0736467912001278&rfr_iscdi=true |