International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)

Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-ite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2012-01, Vol.82 (1), p.250-255
Hauptverfasser: Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H, Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D, Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B, McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D, Toita, Takafumi, M.D, Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D, Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S, Long, Harry, M.D, Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D, Marth, Christian, M.D, Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D, Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D, Small, William, M.D, Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 255
container_issue 1
container_start_page 250
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 82
creator Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H
Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D
Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B
McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D
Toita, Takafumi, M.D
Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D
Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S
Long, Harry, M.D
Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D
Marth, Christian, M.D
Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D
Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D
Small, William, M.D
Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H
description Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3489266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S036030161003453X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S036030161003453X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl1rFDEUDaLYtfoPRAIi6MOs-ZpkxgehLrouFCxUoW8hzdzZzTidDEl2Yf69mW6t1RfJQ8jNueeee89F6CUlS0qofN8tXRf89bhk5Da0JJw8QgtaqbrgZXn1GC0Il6TgGXyCnsXYEUIoVeIpOmGUVpxV1QLZzZAgDCY5P5gefwrG7qa0g2DGCV_kV3IW8IVJMyp-wGf4ch8OMGHf4gzD62kA63u_dRavzGAh4FvGbfD7Eb9drzbrd8_Rk9b0EV7c3afox5fP31dfi_Nv683q7LywUtBUqBpoIxuqCFNNLSVhXClZqcowCZIDqVk-lSqpZMZa0VBBaq6MKqE0ohX8FH088o776xtoLAwpmF6Pwd2YMGlvnP77Z3A7vfUHzUVVMykzwesjgY_J6WhdAruzfsgtJs0YKctalBkljigbfIwB2vsKlOjZGt3pozV6tmaOZmty2quH6u6TfnuRAW_uACZa07chj9PFP7i5OhcP2oQ8y4ODMCuFPPrGhVlo493_lPxLYHs3uFzzJ0wQO7_PC9FHTXVkmujLeY3mLaKE8Nz_Ff8FLpHCug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H ; Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D ; Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B ; McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D ; Toita, Takafumi, M.D ; Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D ; Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S ; Long, Harry, M.D ; Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D ; Marth, Christian, M.D ; Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D ; Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D ; Small, William, M.D ; Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H ; Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D ; Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B ; McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D ; Toita, Takafumi, M.D ; Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D ; Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S ; Long, Harry, M.D ; Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D ; Marth, Christian, M.D ; Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D ; Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D ; Small, William, M.D ; Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21183288</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; BRACHYTHERAPY ; Brachytherapy - adverse effects ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Brachytherapy - utilization ; Cervical cancer ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; COOPERATIVES ; DOSE EQUIVALENTS ; Dose Fractionation ; DOSE RATES ; Europe ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; FRACTIONATION ; Gynecology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Care Surveys ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Internationality ; JAPAN ; MANAGEMENT ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Staging ; NEOPLASMS ; New Zealand ; North America ; PATIENTS ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Radiation dose ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; REPUBLIC OF KOREA ; Societies, Medical ; STANDARDIZATION ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2012-01, Vol.82 (1), p.250-255</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036030161003453X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25594344$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21183288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22055945$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Harry, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marth, Christian, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, William, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><title>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BRACHYTHERAPY</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - utilization</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>COOPERATIVES</subject><subject>DOSE EQUIVALENTS</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>DOSE RATES</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>FRACTIONATION</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>JAPAN</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Radiation dose</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>REPUBLIC OF KOREA</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>STANDARDIZATION</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl1rFDEUDaLYtfoPRAIi6MOs-ZpkxgehLrouFCxUoW8hzdzZzTidDEl2Yf69mW6t1RfJQ8jNueeee89F6CUlS0qofN8tXRf89bhk5Da0JJw8QgtaqbrgZXn1GC0Il6TgGXyCnsXYEUIoVeIpOmGUVpxV1QLZzZAgDCY5P5gefwrG7qa0g2DGCV_kV3IW8IVJMyp-wGf4ch8OMGHf4gzD62kA63u_dRavzGAh4FvGbfD7Eb9drzbrd8_Rk9b0EV7c3afox5fP31dfi_Nv683q7LywUtBUqBpoIxuqCFNNLSVhXClZqcowCZIDqVk-lSqpZMZa0VBBaq6MKqE0ohX8FH088o776xtoLAwpmF6Pwd2YMGlvnP77Z3A7vfUHzUVVMykzwesjgY_J6WhdAruzfsgtJs0YKctalBkljigbfIwB2vsKlOjZGt3pozV6tmaOZmty2quH6u6TfnuRAW_uACZa07chj9PFP7i5OhcP2oQ8y4ODMCuFPPrGhVlo493_lPxLYHs3uFzzJ0wQO7_PC9FHTXVkmujLeY3mLaKE8Nz_Ff8FLpHCug</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</creator><creator>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</creator><creator>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</creator><creator>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</creator><creator>Long, Harry, M.D</creator><creator>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</creator><creator>Marth, Christian, M.D</creator><creator>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</creator><creator>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</creator><creator>Small, William, M.D</creator><creator>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</title><author>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H ; Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D ; Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B ; McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D ; Toita, Takafumi, M.D ; Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D ; Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S ; Long, Harry, M.D ; Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D ; Marth, Christian, M.D ; Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D ; Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D ; Small, William, M.D ; Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BRACHYTHERAPY</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - utilization</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>COOPERATIVES</topic><topic>DOSE EQUIVALENTS</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>DOSE RATES</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>FRACTIONATION</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>JAPAN</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Radiation dose</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>REPUBLIC OF KOREA</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>STANDARDIZATION</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Harry, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marth, Christian, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, William, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</au><au>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</au><au>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</au><au>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</au><au>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</au><au>Long, Harry, M.D</au><au>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</au><au>Marth, Christian, M.D</au><au>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</au><au>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</au><au>Small, William, M.D</au><au>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>250-255</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21183288</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2012-01, Vol.82 (1), p.250-255
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3489266
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Australia
Biological and medical sciences
BRACHYTHERAPY
Brachytherapy - adverse effects
Brachytherapy - methods
Brachytherapy - utilization
Cervical cancer
CLINICAL TRIALS
COOPERATIVES
DOSE EQUIVALENTS
Dose Fractionation
DOSE RATES
Europe
Female
Female genital diseases
FRACTIONATION
Gynecology
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health Care Surveys
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Internationality
JAPAN
MANAGEMENT
Medical sciences
Neoplasm Staging
NEOPLASMS
New Zealand
North America
PATIENTS
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Radiation dose
RADIATION DOSES
Radiology
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Societies, Medical
STANDARDIZATION
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy
title International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Brachytherapy%20Practice%20Patterns:%20A%20Survey%20of%20the%20Gynecologic%20Cancer%20Intergroup%20(GCIG)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Viswanathan,%20Akila%20N.,%20M.D.,%20M.P.H&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=250-255&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3E1_s2_0_S036030161003453X%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21183288&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S036030161003453X&rfr_iscdi=true