International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)
Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-ite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2012-01, Vol.82 (1), p.250-255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 250 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D Toita, Takafumi, M.D Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S Long, Harry, M.D Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D Marth, Christian, M.D Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D Small, William, M.D Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H |
description | Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3489266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S036030161003453X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S036030161003453X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl1rFDEUDaLYtfoPRAIi6MOs-ZpkxgehLrouFCxUoW8hzdzZzTidDEl2Yf69mW6t1RfJQ8jNueeee89F6CUlS0qofN8tXRf89bhk5Da0JJw8QgtaqbrgZXn1GC0Il6TgGXyCnsXYEUIoVeIpOmGUVpxV1QLZzZAgDCY5P5gefwrG7qa0g2DGCV_kV3IW8IVJMyp-wGf4ch8OMGHf4gzD62kA63u_dRavzGAh4FvGbfD7Eb9drzbrd8_Rk9b0EV7c3afox5fP31dfi_Nv683q7LywUtBUqBpoIxuqCFNNLSVhXClZqcowCZIDqVk-lSqpZMZa0VBBaq6MKqE0ohX8FH088o776xtoLAwpmF6Pwd2YMGlvnP77Z3A7vfUHzUVVMykzwesjgY_J6WhdAruzfsgtJs0YKctalBkljigbfIwB2vsKlOjZGt3pozV6tmaOZmty2quH6u6TfnuRAW_uACZa07chj9PFP7i5OhcP2oQ8y4ODMCuFPPrGhVlo493_lPxLYHs3uFzzJ0wQO7_PC9FHTXVkmujLeY3mLaKE8Nz_Ff8FLpHCug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H ; Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D ; Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B ; McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D ; Toita, Takafumi, M.D ; Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D ; Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S ; Long, Harry, M.D ; Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D ; Marth, Christian, M.D ; Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D ; Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D ; Small, William, M.D ; Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H ; Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D ; Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B ; McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D ; Toita, Takafumi, M.D ; Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D ; Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S ; Long, Harry, M.D ; Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D ; Marth, Christian, M.D ; Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D ; Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D ; Small, William, M.D ; Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21183288</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; BRACHYTHERAPY ; Brachytherapy - adverse effects ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Brachytherapy - utilization ; Cervical cancer ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; COOPERATIVES ; DOSE EQUIVALENTS ; Dose Fractionation ; DOSE RATES ; Europe ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; FRACTIONATION ; Gynecology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Care Surveys ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Internationality ; JAPAN ; MANAGEMENT ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Staging ; NEOPLASMS ; New Zealand ; North America ; PATIENTS ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Radiation dose ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; REPUBLIC OF KOREA ; Societies, Medical ; STANDARDIZATION ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2012-01, Vol.82 (1), p.250-255</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036030161003453X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25594344$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21183288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22055945$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Harry, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marth, Christian, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, William, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><title>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BRACHYTHERAPY</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - utilization</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>COOPERATIVES</subject><subject>DOSE EQUIVALENTS</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>DOSE RATES</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>FRACTIONATION</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>JAPAN</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Radiation dose</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>REPUBLIC OF KOREA</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>STANDARDIZATION</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl1rFDEUDaLYtfoPRAIi6MOs-ZpkxgehLrouFCxUoW8hzdzZzTidDEl2Yf69mW6t1RfJQ8jNueeee89F6CUlS0qofN8tXRf89bhk5Da0JJw8QgtaqbrgZXn1GC0Il6TgGXyCnsXYEUIoVeIpOmGUVpxV1QLZzZAgDCY5P5gefwrG7qa0g2DGCV_kV3IW8IVJMyp-wGf4ch8OMGHf4gzD62kA63u_dRavzGAh4FvGbfD7Eb9drzbrd8_Rk9b0EV7c3afox5fP31dfi_Nv683q7LywUtBUqBpoIxuqCFNNLSVhXClZqcowCZIDqVk-lSqpZMZa0VBBaq6MKqE0ohX8FH088o776xtoLAwpmF6Pwd2YMGlvnP77Z3A7vfUHzUVVMykzwesjgY_J6WhdAruzfsgtJs0YKctalBkljigbfIwB2vsKlOjZGt3pozV6tmaOZmty2quH6u6TfnuRAW_uACZa07chj9PFP7i5OhcP2oQ8y4ODMCuFPPrGhVlo493_lPxLYHs3uFzzJ0wQO7_PC9FHTXVkmujLeY3mLaKE8Nz_Ff8FLpHCug</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</creator><creator>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</creator><creator>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</creator><creator>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</creator><creator>Long, Harry, M.D</creator><creator>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</creator><creator>Marth, Christian, M.D</creator><creator>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</creator><creator>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</creator><creator>Small, William, M.D</creator><creator>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</title><author>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H ; Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D ; Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B ; McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D ; Toita, Takafumi, M.D ; Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D ; Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S ; Long, Harry, M.D ; Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D ; Marth, Christian, M.D ; Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D ; Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D ; Small, William, M.D ; Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-79e1d6d17027d966023776878a26e63e092929875162acc4d140937a75e5a4f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BRACHYTHERAPY</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - utilization</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>COOPERATIVES</topic><topic>DOSE EQUIVALENTS</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>DOSE RATES</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>FRACTIONATION</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>JAPAN</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Radiation dose</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>REPUBLIC OF KOREA</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>STANDARDIZATION</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Harry, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marth, Christian, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, William, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Viswanathan, Akila N., M.D., M.P.H</au><au>Creutzberg, Carien L., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Craighead, Peter, M.B., Ch.B</au><au>McCormack, Mary, FRCR Ph.D</au><au>Toita, Takafumi, M.D</au><au>Narayan, Kailash, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Reed, Nicholas, M.B.B.S</au><au>Long, Harry, M.D</au><au>Kim, Hak-Jae, M.D</au><au>Marth, Christian, M.D</au><au>Lindegaard, Jacob C., M.D</au><au>Cerrotta, Annmarie, M.D</au><au>Small, William, M.D</au><au>Trimble, Edward, M.D., M.P.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>250-255</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) ( p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21183288</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2012-01, Vol.82 (1), p.250-255 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3489266 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Australia Biological and medical sciences BRACHYTHERAPY Brachytherapy - adverse effects Brachytherapy - methods Brachytherapy - utilization Cervical cancer CLINICAL TRIALS COOPERATIVES DOSE EQUIVALENTS Dose Fractionation DOSE RATES Europe Female Female genital diseases FRACTIONATION Gynecology Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Health Care Surveys Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Internationality JAPAN MANAGEMENT Medical sciences Neoplasm Staging NEOPLASMS New Zealand North America PATIENTS Practice Patterns, Physicians Radiation dose RADIATION DOSES Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE REPUBLIC OF KOREA Societies, Medical STANDARDIZATION Tumors Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy |
title | International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Brachytherapy%20Practice%20Patterns:%20A%20Survey%20of%20the%20Gynecologic%20Cancer%20Intergroup%20(GCIG)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Viswanathan,%20Akila%20N.,%20M.D.,%20M.P.H&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=250-255&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3E1_s2_0_S036030161003453X%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21183288&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S036030161003453X&rfr_iscdi=true |