The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of R-Endo® and K3® rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with manual instrumentation with H-files, with use of a solvent, for removal of gutta-percha during retreatment. Forty five freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth, each with one roo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-05, Vol.17 (3), p.e506-e511 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e511 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e506 |
| container_title | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Akpınar, Kerem-Engin Altunbaş, Demet Kuştarcı, Alper |
| description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of R-Endo® and K3® rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with manual instrumentation with H-files, with use of a solvent, for removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.
Forty five freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K-files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH 26® sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: Group 1 (H-files), Group 2 (R-Endo®), and Group 3 (K3®). The specimens were rendered transparent for the evaluation of the area of remaining gutta-percha/sealer in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Statistical analysis as performed by using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p=0.05).
All retreatment techniques used in this study left some filling material inside the root canal. Images in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions showed no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05).
Under the experimental conditions, the remaining filling material after retreatment was similar for each group. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4317/medoral.17582 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3476094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1011175431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-7964cc5338089295ce42a8e052ffdd7ab6fee5a96bddefbd46a951b6b5a430e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1PJCEQxYlx49d69Go4eukRGhqai4kxrpqY3cvsmdB04WC6mxFozfz3yzqj0VNVwq8eVe8hdEbJgjMqL0foQzTDgsqmrffQERWqrYTiYv9Lf4iOU3omhEkqxQE6rGvKmazVEdLLFWBwzltjNzg4nN8CjiGbuMG__dJjP6Uc5xGmnLCZenxfOT9AwrlgMIZXwE9zzqZaQ7Qrg10MY5kPGVszmSH9RD9cKXC6qyfo76_b5c199fjn7uHm-rGyrJW5kkpwaxvGWtKqWjUWeG1aIE3tXN9L0wkH0Bglur4H1_VcGNXQTnSN4YyAYCfoaqu7nrtiiS37Flf0OvqxnKKD8fr7y-RX-im8asalIIoXgYudQAwvM6SsR58sDIOZIMxJU0Jp8bh4XtBqi9oYUorgPr-hRP8PRe9C0e-hFP78626f9EcK7B9OJYws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011175431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin ; Altunbaş, Demet ; Kuştarcı, Alper</creator><creatorcontrib>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin ; Altunbaş, Demet ; Kuştarcı, Alper</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of R-Endo® and K3® rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with manual instrumentation with H-files, with use of a solvent, for removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.
Forty five freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K-files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH 26® sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: Group 1 (H-files), Group 2 (R-Endo®), and Group 3 (K3®). The specimens were rendered transparent for the evaluation of the area of remaining gutta-percha/sealer in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Statistical analysis as performed by using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p=0.05).
All retreatment techniques used in this study left some filling material inside the root canal. Images in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions showed no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05).
Under the experimental conditions, the remaining filling material after retreatment was similar for each group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1698-4447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17582</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22143729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity ; Dentistry ; Endodontics ; Gutta-Percha ; Humans ; Nickel ; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-05, Vol.17 (3), p.e506-e511</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-7964cc5338089295ce42a8e052ffdd7ab6fee5a96bddefbd46a951b6b5a430e63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476094/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476094/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altunbaş, Demet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuştarcı, Alper</creatorcontrib><title>The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals</title><title>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</title><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of R-Endo® and K3® rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with manual instrumentation with H-files, with use of a solvent, for removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.
Forty five freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K-files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH 26® sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: Group 1 (H-files), Group 2 (R-Endo®), and Group 3 (K3®). The specimens were rendered transparent for the evaluation of the area of remaining gutta-percha/sealer in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Statistical analysis as performed by using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p=0.05).
All retreatment techniques used in this study left some filling material inside the root canal. Images in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions showed no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05).
Under the experimental conditions, the remaining filling material after retreatment was similar for each group.</description><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><issn>1698-6946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1PJCEQxYlx49d69Go4eukRGhqai4kxrpqY3cvsmdB04WC6mxFozfz3yzqj0VNVwq8eVe8hdEbJgjMqL0foQzTDgsqmrffQERWqrYTiYv9Lf4iOU3omhEkqxQE6rGvKmazVEdLLFWBwzltjNzg4nN8CjiGbuMG__dJjP6Uc5xGmnLCZenxfOT9AwrlgMIZXwE9zzqZaQ7Qrg10MY5kPGVszmSH9RD9cKXC6qyfo76_b5c199fjn7uHm-rGyrJW5kkpwaxvGWtKqWjUWeG1aIE3tXN9L0wkH0Bglur4H1_VcGNXQTnSN4YyAYCfoaqu7nrtiiS37Flf0OvqxnKKD8fr7y-RX-im8asalIIoXgYudQAwvM6SsR58sDIOZIMxJU0Jp8bh4XtBqi9oYUorgPr-hRP8PRe9C0e-hFP78626f9EcK7B9OJYws</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin</creator><creator>Altunbaş, Demet</creator><creator>Kuştarcı, Alper</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals</title><author>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin ; Altunbaş, Demet ; Kuştarcı, Alper</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-7964cc5338089295ce42a8e052ffdd7ab6fee5a96bddefbd46a951b6b5a430e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altunbaş, Demet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuştarcı, Alper</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akpınar, Kerem-Engin</au><au>Altunbaş, Demet</au><au>Kuştarcı, Alper</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals</atitle><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e506</spage><epage>e511</epage><pages>e506-e511</pages><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><eissn>1698-6946</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of R-Endo® and K3® rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with manual instrumentation with H-files, with use of a solvent, for removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.
Forty five freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth, each with one root canal, were instrumented with K-files and filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH 26® sealer. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 15 specimens each. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: Group 1 (H-files), Group 2 (R-Endo®), and Group 3 (K3®). The specimens were rendered transparent for the evaluation of the area of remaining gutta-percha/sealer in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Statistical analysis as performed by using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p=0.05).
All retreatment techniques used in this study left some filling material inside the root canal. Images in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions showed no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05).
Under the experimental conditions, the remaining filling material after retreatment was similar for each group.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>22143729</pmid><doi>10.4317/medoral.17582</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1698-6946 |
| ispartof | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-05, Vol.17 (3), p.e506-e511 |
| issn | 1698-6946 1698-4447 1698-6946 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3476094 |
| source | MEDLINE; NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Dental Pulp Cavity Dentistry Endodontics Gutta-Percha Humans Nickel Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation Titanium |
| title | The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20efficacy%20of%20two%20rotary%20NiTi%20instruments%20and%20H-files%20to%20remove%20gutta-percha%20from%20root%20canals&rft.jtitle=Medicina%20oral,%20patolog%C3%ADa%20oral%20y%20cirug%C3%ADa%20bucal&rft.au=Akp%C4%B1nar,%20Kerem-Engin&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e506&rft.epage=e511&rft.pages=e506-e511&rft.issn=1698-6946&rft.eissn=1698-6946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/medoral.17582&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1011175431%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011175431&rft_id=info:pmid/22143729&rfr_iscdi=true |